TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Buttimer: Oireachtas hearings on abortion were ‘not window dressing’

Buttimer said that the subject was dealt with sensitively, and that the hearings showed the Oireachtas “at its best”.

Image: Screengrab

DEPUTY JERRY BUTTIMER, head of the Joint Committee on Health and Children, said today that this week’s hearings on abortion legislation were not ‘window dressing’.

Speaking to Morning Ireland this morning, he paid tribute to the members of the committee and Oireachtas, Sinn Féin’s Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin and Billy Kelleher and Independent deputy Seamus Heaney, saying the two political parties had “cast aside their political differences for this week”.

He said that the hearings “showed the Oireachtas at its best”. The purpose of the meetings was to gather information to be of assistance to ministers and the Government, and the next step is to write a report on the hearings.

The committee is to meet about that report and discuss the process. The report will be a summation of information gathered, and will also take account of written submissions received, as well as a request from a group of obstetricians, said Deputy Buttimer. They won’t be making recommendations on the legislation, but outlining what they heard during the hearing.

Saying that many people were afraid there would be “window dressing” at the committee hearings, Deputy Buttimer said that it was “anything but that”. He added that the middle ground has been widened in respect to the fact the issue can now be dealt with “with complexity and sensitivity”.

Deputy Buttimer added that there is “a huge body of people who have a genuine concern” that there will be “floodgates” opened as a result of this legislation, but he “certainly would not want that to happen”.

Read:  10 interesting moments from day three of the Oireachtas hearings on abortion>

Read next:

Comments (7 Comments)

  • In fairness to the committee they did an excellent job over the past 3 days. I believe the debate has set the tone for a mature, reasonable discourse over the weeks ahead, especially after the proposed legislative wording has been published.

    Reply
  • Committee did a great job. Sadly the minister responsible for introducing the legislation is James Reilly and his record on consultation, listening, taking advice etc is somewhat less than confidence inspiring.

    Reply
  • It is less than window dressing, it is a case of the emperors new clothes. A lot spent and nothing to show but as you were gentlemen.

    Reply
  • We should not lose sight of the elephant in the room, Article 40.3.3 of the Constitution, which places very tight restriction on what may be legislated for. Very little practical benefit will ensue, the Roman Catholic Church was given a platform to repeat direction to the Dail and we remain with the life threatening consequences of the Eight Amendment, which enshrined Roman Catholic Church dogma into the Constitution. It is hardly even a very modest start. We should not exaggerate or over estimate the significance of the hearings or the benefits to result.

    Some speakers were good but within the tight limits of what can be done.

    Reply
  • They have made up their minds it is window dressing labour and fine Gael etc are doomed they are hood winking us. Bye bye enda and eamonn with their nonsense . They haven’t brought in any laws that make sense yet they just wa nt to bring in money. Regulations you need not laws that can be picked on and exploited for money etc on this

    Reply
  • Savita could easily have been transported to the UK for an abortion. That didn’t happen, why?

    I believe her sad death was all built up to propagandise to force abortion on the Irish people against our will as is now happening.

    This is therefore the final end of democracy in Ireland.

    Reply
  • socmot 11/01/13 #

    “Independent deputy Seamus Heaney” – we have a Nobel winner in the Dáil? :-)

    Reply

Add New Comment