TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Column: Riots show the worst in us, but also the best

As English cities struggle to recover from several nights of rioting, London councillor Mike Harris looks at the aftermath.

Mike Harris

After several nights of rioting, local councillor Mike Harris writes about the effect of the disturbances in his area of Lewisham, south London.

IT’S HIGHLY UNUSUAL to have widespread violence across a city, where the authorities have absolutely no idea of the root cause.

There’s no one to negotiate with, no community group to speak to, no leaders, no ideals to challenge: it’s just sporadic mob violence. My constituents have been shocked by its spread and unpredictability. St Stephen’s church just off the High Street has boarded up its windows, as have local pubs. On Tuesday our local branch of Barclays had a sign that ominously proclaimed: “This branch is closed until further notice”. Twitter has become a dangerous tool: provocateurs are using it to spread rumours that the far-right National Front is going to march upon Lewisham to “reclaim the streets”. On Tuesday night panicked tweets exclaimed: “200 national front marching to Lewisham”. It wasn’t true. But in a highly diverse area where over 100 languages are spoken, rumours are enough to cause fear.

If you plot where the violence has happened in London against deprivation there’s a clear relationship: the violence mostly happened in poorer areas. There’s also a historic link between austerity and social unrest, according to a discussion document just published by the The Centre for Economic Policy Research. Yet, no one thinks the individuals who caused the violence were anything other than opportunists – some career criminals, others who saw a chance to loot.

The first before the courts included an organic chef, an opera house steward and a university student. There’s no political sentiment being expressed by the looters except for the downright stupid – such as the “I want my taxes back” looter in Clapham Junction which went viral.

‘People wanted to stand up’

This civil disorder has brought out the worst elements from our community. It’s thought that some gang members were behind the most extreme violence. But it has also brought out the best in Lewisham. People have genuinely wanted to stand up for their community. On Tuesday morning, unprompted, around 15 local people came down to the town centre on their way to work to help with the clean-up. Fantastic images of Londoners coming out onto the streets to clean up the mess have been seen across the globe. One American tweeted in response: “English people, WE’LL stop thinking you’re all quaint and proper as soon as YOU stop immediately cleaning up after your own riots.”

My constituents have inundated me asking me how they can help. This Saturday, local people will be gathering in the town centre for a ‘carrot mob’: armed only with shopping bags, we’re going to go and do our weekly shopping at the local market and at shops damaged by Monday’s violence. It’s a great way of putting money back into the pockets of those affected. It’s also a show of solidarity.

London is a chaotic place. It’s survived terrorism, the Blitz, the Great Fire, civil war and revolts. Asymmetric violence for no cause has visibly shaken us – and we have to deal with complex issues that have created this situation including the culture of greed. The collapse of trust in our major institutions isn’t helping. In amongst much confusion, one thing is clear, the decent majority have to take an interest in their communities. And politicians have to be visible on the streets and listening.

Mike Harris is a Labour councillor for Lewisham Central, where looting took place on Monday evening.

Read next:

Comments (6 Comments)

  • I hope the politicians clean up the bigger mess, which is a deeply unequal society.
    I watched the Commons debate on this subject. What was very notable was how reluctant Labour politicians were about even so much as tentatively hinting that there was any connection between social inequality and the violence that occurred.
    Almost everyone’s afraid of saying anything that could in any way be perceived as sounding soft on crime. When Caroline Lucas of the Green party raised the question of inequality, she was immediately dismissed. Cameron said inequality was a problem in Britain, but the looting had nothing to do with inequality. There were predictable cheers to that put-down. (Cameron’s assertion that inequality is a problem is progress, when you consider Thatcher’s last performance in the Commons mocked the notion of there being a problem with a gap existing between rich and poor.)
    Most Labour questions dealt with cuts to the police force. Many pointed out the difference between Boris
    Johnson’s position (no cuts) and Cameron’s (cuts). This is an important issue, but not as important as inequality. Most of the MPs in affected constituencies invited Cameron to pay a visit (a reasonable request). Many criticized the police inaction on the first day (a reasonable criticism).
    Miliband did quote Cameron’s surprisingly Un-Tory phrase ‘to explain is not to excuse’ but on the whole, also dodged in-depth discussion of underlying problems and focused primarily on the here and now. The key social problems Cameron seemed concerned with were poor parenting and lack of discipline in schools. (Real problems to be sure, but surely social inequality isn’t unconnected to them.)
    The short question-and-answer setup did make it difficult for nuanced points to be made, and Cameron, as prime minister would always have the upper hand. There was also a need for at least the appearance of solidarity across the benches in such a troubled time. Still, overall, it was a disappointing debate.
    Of course the looters were not protesting about inequality. They wanted free stuff. Of course, the debate took place in a climate of justifiable public anger. Of course, the looters should be given stiff punishments (hopefully with some restorative justice.) Of course most poor people don’t riot.
    However, as the authors of The Spirit Level can testify, more unequal societies have far higher levels of crime and violence than more equal societies. This fact should be taken into account by politicians. Policies to address inequality, taken now, will reduce the risk of future riots.

    Reply
  • Not sure smallpox is the right term to use there Anthony, I live in London and multiculturalism is not the problem. It is the me, myself and I attitude instilled in SOME of the youth today. It is not all of their fault. Material wealth and gain is like a new religion. You are constantly reminded by adverts everywhere you look that you do not have the latest fashion, technology. It is sad, but some especially the very poor are fed up of being pushed down further and MAYBE their idea of happiness is accquiring the latest nike shoes. The riots were fun to some because they have not been brought up with any fear of reprisals for their bad behaviour, but whose fault is this? The parents or the governments in power over the last twenty years? I think personally both.
    I came from a poor background but we never resorted to violence or theft. It is the ever widening divide between rich and poor, the haves and the have nots. The evil soulless tax avoiding greedy banks and corporations and the government, that even after all this shocking disgusting behaviour which I would never condone, still do not get the reason why it may have happened.
    Part of me is worried about the future as we never seem to learn. These people involved do deserve to face the consequences of their actions and they do need a lesson in morality and how to not want want want. It is a shallow disposable society and I feel sick to look at the complete waste of money spent on designer goods, tellies etc. At the risk of sounding like a hippy, all we need is love, good friends, be able to pay the bills and feed ourselves and a few treats now and again. Life is about more than material gain young people!

    Reply
  • Far too much being made of this now.

    People are motivated by marketing to desire material goods and some are dishonest.
    Some people – regardless of their demographics or age – will engage in public disorder.

    This is a given, which is why even without all the hardened criminals we need a police force.
    There is a subset of people who engage in public disorder who are dishonest and will go looting.

    But at least one set of tweets from a young girl suggested that this was more like an exciting evening out for some people.

    Similarities between the Brighton riots haven’t been made because possible people forget, and because there are no defined sub-groups here having pitched battles, but the similarities are there.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mods_and_Rockers

    It seems to be partly based on greed and partly based on risk taking to gain political, social or sexual advantage in a local group.

    (not mainstream or community positioning, mroe peer group positioning)

    It would be interesting from a sociological viewpoint to map any spike in pregnancies in nine months time.
    But of course the fuddy-duddies won’t be interested – we’re not driven by socio-biological drives at all.
    We’re not animals but rational beings!

    Yeah. RIght.

    Reply
  • Notice how he says 100 languages are spoken across Lewisham and theres’s me thinking English was the spoken language in London.Thats why London is a divided tribally organised series of rich and poor ghettos. PC and Multiculturalism are the small pox of the 20th and 21st century the sooner we find a cure for them the sooner you will have an integrated united community.

    Reply
  • “The worst in us” I didn’t realize that they took place in Ireland.

    Reply

Add New Comment