A MAJOR REVIEW of assaults on prison staff has found that the assaults cost the state around €26 million between 2008 and 2015.

The State Claims Agency (SCA) review was initiated in 2015 after a number of violent physical assaults on Irish Prison Service (IPS) staff by prisoners.

It found that 3% of prison staff (93 people) were directly assaulted by prisoners in 2015, which was broadly in line with an annual average of 95 assaults per year in the five-year period from 2011 to 2015.

The review found that there is some evidence to suggest that the number of direct assaults may be increasing but this evidence is not conclusive.

It also stated that given there were 17,206 committals to prison in 2015, the ratio of these assaults to the number of prisoners in the system is low.

The review, which looked at a range of operational, staff, prisoner and governance factors, found that assaults are carried out by a relatively small number of prisoners with an established pattern of challenging behaviours and/or mental health problems.

Key Recommendations

The aim was to review the incidents of assaults on prison staff by prisoners, to determine the root cause, to comment on the potential for future reoccurrence and to make recommendations for improvement.

Pat Kirwan, Deputy Director of the State Claims Agency and lead on the Review Group, said,

“This review involved detailed interviews and surveys of staff, governors and management, benchmarking against other European Prison Agencies and extensive research and data analysis.”

The SCA made the following recommendations:

• Operational Duties – Conflict Management: The IPS should refocus its emphasis on the management of prisoner behaviours using conflict resolution techniques to deescalate situations that could lead to physical violence through further training and selection of staff.
• Operational Duties – Escorts: The IPS should review the use of escorts and explore opportunities to reduce the frequency of prisoners leaving prisons for court appearances and hospital visits – through greater use of video links with courts and improved on-site medical facilities within prisons.
• Deterrent and Protective Equipment and Clothing: The current practice of prison staff not carrying batons as standard should continue. However, the review did make recommendations that batons should be carried as standard outside prisons while on escort. In addition, it was recommended that the IPS explore the use of pepper spray to be used in a controlled manner for certain specific situations. The Review Group also does not recommend the routine wearing of body armour on the landing or within the perimeter of the prison but that it should be available for other activities subject to a needs analysis.
• Prisoner Risk Assessment: The IPS should improve and standardise the approach of prisoner risk assessment to ensure that all personal information and security information gathered in respect of prisoners is available when making critical operations decisions.
• Prisoner health and wellbeing: As far as possible, extend existing arrangements to take prisoners with serious mental health issues out of the prison system for care in more appropriate locations.
• Deterrent Measures: The IPS needs to develop a more transparent and graded deterrent and disciplinarily procedure (based on severity of breach) to act as a deterrent against assaults on operational staff.

Ciarán Breen, Director of the State Claims Agency, said, “The State Claims Agency has an important role in assessing risks to people who work for the State and identifying areas where changes can be made to improve their safety.

“This review is a crucial step in reducing assaults on prison staff and in reducing the significant costs to the taxpayer of these assaults.”

Read: Convicted drug dealer denies calling prison officer “a dog”>

Making a difference

A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can make sure we can keep reliable, meaningful news open to everyone regardless of their ability to pay.

Support us Learn More