TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

‘Birth tourism’ heightens tensions between China and Hong Kong

Half of the babies born in Hong Kong last year have parents from the mainland.

Image: HKGolden.com

ANTI-CHINA SENTIMENT has risen in Hong Kong over the past few months as the phenomenon of ‘birth tourism’ becomes more apparent and the semi-autonomous state asserts its own identity.

In Hong Kong last year, nearly 33,500 children were born to parents who live on the mainland of China. Many come to give birth to escape China’s one-child policy or to benefit from superior health services.

Locals have started to complain about the influx of so-called birth tourists to the territory. Those babies born in Hong Kong have the right to live and work there.

The issue came to a head last week when an advertisement appeared in a local newspaper depicting a giant locust overlooking Hong Kong’s skyline.

According to BBC News, a group of locals raised money to fund the advert in the Apple Daily. It called for the government to change the rules so the children (who have been given the derogatory name of “double negatives” because they are born to two mainland parents) don’t get automatic rights.

Authorities in the south Chinese province of Guangdong have warned parents that travelling to Hong Kong will not protect them from fines or punishment for breaking the one-child law. China’s strict family planning rules limit urban couples to one child and rural couples to two.

The anti-China sentiment has reared its head in other ways as well. A recent viral video clip shows local commuters getting angry at a Chinese tourist for spilling noodles onto the floor of a subway train.

They tells her, “Hey! This is Hong Kong!”, highlighting the strained tensions between the islanders and mainlanders.



YouTube Credit: kbdrose1

Other issues that Hong Kongers take issue with include Chinese tourist shoppers who buy everything from luxury apartments to baby formula.

It has been 15 years since the former British colony was handed back to China. Beijing now fear that if Hong Kong’s vibrant culture continues to grow and develop, residents may seek a faster pace of democratisation and reform.

-Additional reporting by AP

Read next:

Comments (15 Comments)

  • On a more serious note, if there are no children born into a State then the funding lifecycle provisions for it’s older citizens can’t be catered for. It is the taxes, spending etc from
    these children that fund the pensions of the generation that precedes them and so on.

    Reply
  • Didn’t understand a word of that video.

    Reply
  • You want kids? Then u support them, it’s was ure choice to have them. The states should not support any child, thats the parents job not the tax payer, unpopular view I know, harsh? Maybe, but honest. Money does not grow on trees

    Reply
    • The difficulty with that view is where do you draw the line in terms of taking responsibility for ones actions/lifestyle choices? For example, should the state leave smokers, alcoholics, drug addicts etc. to fend for themselves when their health deteriorates? Perhaps or perhaps not. But surely in the long run the state benefits from investing in a child’s future.

      Reply
    • Once it goes into the exchequer it’s not your money anymore. Get a grip we live in welfare state. Those the way it goes. Stop paying child benefit and you’ve thousand of people in absolute poverty. See how long you like that. You ever been to the third world. Well I’m
      Sure yea have seen it on the telly.

      Reply
    • The problem with this view is that it would create a poverty trap for thousands of families. Any idea what would happen next? The crime rate would soar as these families try and find other ways of generating an income. Want an example? Take a holiday in the pavellas of Brazil or the slums of Johannesburg. While the welfare system may seem inequitable to those who fund it, I’m afraid it is a necessary evil.

      Reply
  • In Ireland, rather than limit the number of children a couple can have, how about limiting the number of child benefit payments per family?
    For example, if the limit was 3 payments per family, if the couple have a fourth child, then you have (3xChild Benefit)/4 for each child and so on.

    Reply
  • Maybe u’d prefer ur taxes to go to the sterilisation of women instead!!! Or free “snip” for men- that’d certainly stop the need for all the money going into children having a quality of life!!!

    Reply
  • The problem Hong Kong is having should be familiar to us all.

    The Irish do-gooders who tried to save everyone in the world by supporting every pregnant (and intentioned) person who came to Ireland.

    With a well-researched hard-luck story, a sad face and the plea for ‘a better life’ they have created the same problem here.

    Birth tourists taking advantage of everything from our naiveity to legal loopholes to overly generous social support.

    I’m sure they couldn’t believe their luck.

    Reply
  • The first can should be a can’t.
    CORRECTION

    Reply

Add New Comment