TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

British bank accepts $340 million fine over Iran transactions

The bank had denied accusations that it systematically hid $250 billion worth of Iranian client transactions.

Image: Kin Cheung/AP/Press Association Images

STANDARD CHARTERED HAS agreed to settle US allegations that it helped Iranian clients dodge sanctions, accepting a fine of $340 million from New York’s banking watchdog.

The bank had denied accusations that it systematically hid $250 billion worth of Iranian client transactions that were carried out over 10 years.

Under the terms of the deal, Standard Chartered agreed to its transactions being monitored for two years and to appoint auditors to investigate compliance with US sanctions.

The deal does not cover separate probes by federal US regulators, including the Treasury Department.

Although the cash settlement may appear to be a steep, it is far from the worst-case scenario for the bank.

Banking licence

New York state’s Department of Financial Services had questioned whether Standard Chartered should be allowed to keep its banking license, raising the spectre of being cut out of a major market.

And the bank should have deep enough pockets to cover the fine, without operations being dented. In the first half of this year Standard Chartered reported profits of $3.95 billion.

The greater price may be reputational damage. The London-headquartered bank is a household name in many emerging markets, particularly in Asia.

Since the allegations became public just over a week ago the firm’s shares have lost around 15 per cent of their value.

The allegations thrust Standard Chartered to the center of a major geopolitical dispute.

In the last decade the United States and allies have ramped up sanctions against Iranian banks, institutions and individuals, accusing them of helping the government seek a nuclear weapon, repress rights and fund terrorism.

US authorities accused Standard Chartered of throwing the doors of the financial system wide open to “terrorists, weapons dealers, drug kingpins and corrupt regimes.”

- © AFP, 2012

Read: British bank Standard Chartered rejects US claims of laundering Iran’s money>

Read next:

Comments (15 Comments)

  • Losing its banking license would not raise the spectre of it being locked out of a major market: less than 5% of its profits come from the US and Europe combined. Losing its license would stop it from passing dollar funds through the US system which originated in mostly emerging markets in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Sth America.

    Reply
  • Hope there’s a few quid left for the Pool….

    Reply
  • Wonder what will they do with $340million fine? Pocket for themselves? It’s a crazy world.

    Reply
  • Nice of them to “accept” the fine. So wait , 340 million fine Covering 10 years of corrupt behaviour , that’s 34 million a year , and the annual profit was over 3 billion just for the past ONE YEAR , is it just me or is the whole world of banking just totally gone mad.

    Reply
  • YNWA

    Reply
  • US SANCTIONS ? Who on this earth gives them the right to sanction another nation ? Is it a one way ticket with sanctions ? We can sanction you but we are free to do what we want when we want and how we want…a truly tyrannical state if there ever was one. What a disgrace !!

    Reply
    • Ridiculous comment. Sanctions can easily be placed on the US by another state. Any nation can simply block all trade with the US, thereby reducing the opportunities for growth for US firms an thus their economy.

      Europe, Russia or China could do it tomorrow if they really wanted to. The main issue is that the US, unlike many countries, could be largely self-sufficient which makes sanctions on the US difficult to impose with any effect. The main area you could sanction the US is through oil for example, but nobody with oil has any real reason to block a valuable customer.

      Reply
    • Blocking trade ? Their are basically punishing anyone that does business with any company that is from Iran if it was that easy why is no one else doing it ? and America is far from self sufficient , they are being propped up by the sale of Oil in the dollars…makes you wonder , Saddam wanted to move away from the dollar , country destroyed and he was executed, same in Libya , Gaddafi wanted to move away from the dollar, country bombed and he also was excecuted, now Iran want to do the same and hell we all know what is next, removal of the government and bomb the country back to the stone age. Gotta keep selling that Oil in dollars no matter how many deaths are caused or no matter how many countries are destroyed.

      Reply
    • I see you didn’t actually read what I said, or you didn’t pay attention to it. I suspect you saw that I said oil and used it to rant away. So I’ll break it down for you.

      - The US is a mineral-rich country which can provide many of its industries with resources.
      - Due to this the only raw resource that can be blocked from the US is oil.
      - No country with oil bar Iran wants to block sales of oil to such a big country.

      So what would sanctions do to the US? You haven’t actually addressed anything I said, just ranted about the US being a big bad wolf…

      While you do that, the above points are basically the reason why nobody will place sanctions on the US or on Russia and China for that matter. Waste of time and effort.

      Reply
    • i was watching a programme on tg4 last night called fiorsceal which showed how the USA and Italy dumped there toxic waste on the east coast of Africa , what a two faced country not even taking the weapons of mass destruction
      into account

      Reply
  • Hanging the Bankers may NOT be a bad idea… will make the current
    bankers think twice before doing it again… and they no doubt will.
    History has shown they have always gotten away with it.

    Reply
  • Repress rights they say ? Drones now flying over civilian areas in the states, NDAA signed into law…..keep an eye on the “i can no wrong US ” because they turning the very thing they are supposed to be against “TYRANNY”

    Reply
  • what a joke of a fine. this would not cover there teams wages for 12 months. why do bankers always get away with
    everything corrupt that they do

    Reply

Add New Comment