TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Taliban claims film revenge attack on base in south Afghanistan

Two US Marines were killed in the attack on Camp Bastion in Helmand Province, where Prince Harry is based.

File photo of Prince Harry examining an Apache helicopter with a member of his squadron at Camp Bastion
File photo of Prince Harry examining an Apache helicopter with a member of his squadron at Camp Bastion
Image: AP Photo/John Stillwell/pool file

THE TALIBAN HAS claimed responsibility for an attack against a sprawling British base in southern Afghanistan that killed two U.S. Marines and wounded several other troops, saying it was to avenge an anti-Islamic film which insulted the Prophet Muhammad and also because Britain’s Prince Harry is serving there.

The US-led NATO coalition said in a statement that the overnight attack focused on Camp Bastion, a huge British base adjacent to Camp Leatherneck which houses U.S. Marine operations in southern Helmand province.

“We attacked that base because Prince Harry was also on it and so they can know our anger” Taliban spokesman Qari Youssef Ahmadi said. He added, “thousands more suicide attackers are ready to give up their lives for the sake of the Prophet.”

Prince Harry, third in line to the British throne, is based at Camp Bastion.

A spokesperson for Britain’s Ministry of Defense told The Associated Press that he was unharmed in the attack, which according to Britain’s Press Association took place two kilometers from the section of the complex where the prince was located.

Captain Harry Wales, as the prince is known in the military, is serving a four-month combat deployment as a gunner on an Apache helicopter. Harry, who turns 28 on Saturday, is expected to start flying Apache missions this week. This is his second tour in Afghanistan.

In its statement, the International Security Assistance Force, NATO’s Afghan mission, said that insurgents attacked “with both small arms fire and indirect fire killing two ISAF service members and causing damage to buildings and aircraft on the flight line. Currently, ISAF forces are in the process of assessing the extent of the damage”. Indirect fire usually refers to mortars or rockets.

No details were provided on the dead and wounded, but U.S. officials said in Washington that two Marines were killed in the attack.

Lt. Col. Stewart Upton, a spokesman at Camp Leatherneck, and Daoud Ahmadi, a spokesman for Helmand’s governor, said 16 Taliban fighters were also killed.

It was unclear what the insurgents hoped to accomplish in attacking Camp Bastion, one of the largest and most heavily defended military facilities in Afghanistan.

Bastion is located in a remote desert area northwest of Lashkar Gah, the capital of Helmand. It is the hub for all British operations in Helmand and along with Leatherneck houses thousands of combat troops and Marines, including Danish and Estonian forces.

Afghanistan’s southern region has been a hotbed of the insurgency and attacks against foreign forces occur daily, although the Taliban have largely been routed in its capital and larger towns. Helmand remains an active battlefield between insurgents and NATO forces and for years has been the site of some of the war’s bloodiest engagements.

There were few protests against the film in Afghanistan on Friday and Saturday. The largest involved a few hundred people in the eastern city of Jalalabad.

The Afghan government has indefinitely blocked YouTube to prevent Afghans from viewing a video clip of the film that was posted on the internet site, said Khair Mohammad Faizi, a spokesman for communication ministry. He said it will remain blocked until the video is taken down.

Other Google services, including gmail, were also blocked in Afghanistan on Friday and Saturday. Faizi did not comment on this.

Read next:

Comments (30 Comments)

  • The film was so badly made it is impossible to find words to describe it, let alone take offense to it , yet this childish piece of trash has incited a horrible backlash of violence in which people were killed.
    The religion of peace once again living up to its name. Even the “moderate” Muslims who condemned the killings and mayhem caused by their brethren had a “but” in their criticizem as if there could be some kind of justification for the violence.
    Not one of them unconditionally criticized the mob actions.

    Reply
    • Agreed.
      Absolutely pathetic. It would be far more productive for the so called majority of moderate muslims to hold massive peacful protests condemning the violence.

      If they are a majority they should make clear that this behaviour is unacceptable in their society. Whether or not a silly film has been made. Its madness and counter productive.

      Reply
    • This is why the rte and British/Irish film producers have not yet produced shown an Imam Ted series

      Reply
    • Joe, you could say the same thing about 19th century Punch cartoons depicting the monkey-Irish…but they were just the tip of a vicious racist iceberg…and so is this video…and that racist preumption is throughout our anglophile culture, so prevalent it is generally subconscious.

      Reply
  • The war in Afghanistan was raging long before NATO entered the country and it will continue to do so long after. Afghanistan is a nation that shouldn’t exist, it is too fractured and divided by tribalism to ever hope for a centralised government with full control.

    NATO wants to stay until Afghanistan can stand on their own two feet, that is a long time away.

    Reply
    • Jason, reread yourself. And note the contradictions.
      I was out there in the ’70s…it was a peaceful country, with fine, hospitable and generous people. Western interference had destroyed it and produced the mess. And western ignorance and bigotry sustains it.

      Reply
    • Dublin was a fine, generous and hospitable city at the time when paramilitaries were making life hell in the north of the island. Just because you had what you believe to be a positive experience does not mean that the country was pleasant to live in by any means. So unless you visited every single little town and village I’d be more inclined to dismiss your point unless you can provide any evidence to say otherwise.

      Last I checked, during the 70s the world wasn’t aspiring to be more like Afghanistan. I’m sure, If you visited the country then as you claimed, you’d be aware that the country was suffering from severe economic woes and political instability. Sounds like not much has changed. Oh and let’s for forget the oppressive communist regime or the Taliban who ousted them.

      I’m not even getting into the bloody coups, revolutions or tribal warfare yet.

      Reply
    • Nicely dodged, Jason.
      I was refering to your ‘..Afghanistan is a nation that shouldn’t exist…’…

      You’ve obviously never been there. But tell us..where do you derive your authority for such dictatorial pronouncements?

      The Tea Party?

      Reply
  • mike 15/09/12 #

    I watched the film this morning. it is a bad attempt at comedy rather than an attack on the Muslim faith. The Life of Brian was just as bad from a devout Catholics point of view. But no one was killed over it.
    It’s hard to believe that in protest of being described as a religion with no respect for human life and the rights of others, you would murder random strangers just because they are American. The movie might be more accurate than I thought.

    Reply
  • That ‘religion’ is one of the greatest threats to freedom of thought, any doctrine that orders its followers to actively kill those who disbelieve should be resisted at all costs. It is not possible to reason with the unreasonable. Christianity might be bad but a religion founded by a desert dwelling, psychopathic nomad with a penchant for butchery & paedophilia… And they’re outraged by how a YouTube clip depicts their prophet!!!?

    Reply
  • Ye know it’s often been noted that Islam is the youngest of the major religions on the planet and boy do they act like young children , spoiled children infact who will lash out at anyone who disagrees with their warped ideology . Grow up Islam and be the peaceful faith you proclaim to be. Why not just turn the other cheek instead of always being the aggressor?

    Reply
    • Barry..when the crusading west stops its remote-drone suspect-fatwa maybe the high-moral tone will be called for…

      Kettles and pots?

      The video is just the trigger..the gun is long overloaded.

      Reply
    • Mjhint 15/09/12 #

      Damien while I agree with your view of how the west treats those in the muslim world its hard to take these people serious. Anything to kill or start a riot. These people are not condemned enough. Its hard to see islam taking over the world. Anyone from this faith that cant get up & condemn these groups are as bad. In the west now at least there is a very strong voice against christian fundamentalists.

      Reply
    • ‘Anything to kill or start riot.’

      Not so long since I was hearing such ignorant comments about the NE of Ireland. Have you been to the region(Afghanistan)?
      I have.
      And if you do a little research you’ll find considerable input from Christian and Judaic bible fundamental literalists driving this expanding western crusade…and you’ll find the Wahhabi Sunni sectarian Islam of the Saudi(exemplary democracy, Mjint?)royals driving that dimension…not without the help of the CIA and associates.

      Reply
  • Right so they admit that he was a target for their attack! Soz Harry but time to put your pride aside and come home cos your just putting your fellow soldiers lives at further risk!

    Reply
    • Kim 15/09/12 #

      The Taliban will use any excuse they can find to justify their killings.
      While I agree that Harry needs to leave now as he’s maybe doing more harm than good unfortunately.
      If he wishes to serve out there could they and the bloody media SHUT UP!!!! an stop plastering his name and photo’s in every edition of news paper or news broadcast they can.
      Advertising him being there is just asking for an attack.
      They don’t advertise each and every other soldier out there……unless they’ve been killed that is.
      Sorry just cause he’s the title of “prince” or third in line to a throne does not make him more special than any other man or woman out there serving their country.
      Please don’t take this as a statement against Harry it’s not I quite like Harry he’s a loveable rouge sometimes, it’s the bloody media that boil my blood.
      Ok I’m putting away my soapbox now

      Reply
    • Come home, oh yes I forgot he was from Wicklow………

      Reply
    • Kim..advertising his presence is not the invite..the invasion, after 30 years of promoting al CIAda in the region, and the ongoing crusader fatwa by remote drone assassination of suspects, is the invitation to natural resistence.
      Its been running since the Brutish empire opened hostilities in the 19th century. Prince Charming is just the fairy tale decoy-duck they feed the programmed public.
      Its a bit like all the outrage for the ‘free speech’ to ridicule Islam …while the latest flash of just one more royal tit raises the same outrage when its blowback time.
      Stop swallowing the tabloids.

      Reply
    • Damian, you neglect to mention the Russian empire in “The Great Game” when the British went in to afghanistan in the 19th century. Once again we have a few individuals on the journal giving this one sided history of the world.

      Reply
    • Was just about to say this – definitely. It is bringing unwelcome attention.

      Reply
    • Declan…I also don’t mention the British empire protecting its jewel of India, the Irish famines, European financial and banking neo-colonial replacement of the Spanish empire in Latin America, the pending implosion of the Ottoman empire…how many sides do you expect in a brief comment?
      And why don’y you enlighten us as to what exactly your point is?
      Find fault with what I’ve written if I am factually wrong..no problem…but you imply(unless I misread)that I misrepresent the facts in Afghanistan(a country I spent some time travelling in before the Russian invasion).
      Are you saying Britain had some sort of legal right to interfere in the region?Perhaps you can clarify.

      Reply
  • Further atrocious acts committed by despicable psychopaths in the name of religion…

    Like the abuse in the Catholic church, it is the facilitation by the majority that allows the evils of the minority to continue unchecked.

    Reply
  • Serious respect for that young man, he could choose to chill out at home and enjoy all the trappings that come with Royal life. Instead he will be performing duties as rear gunner in an apache flying over a warzone for his country. It takes balls to do what hes doing and knowing that if he is shot down the fate that awaits him is horrendous. Respect

    Reply
  • Playboy Prince Harry loves ‘playing’ War.

    Reply
  • We have been chasing the Muj up, down, left and right for 10+ years now. Their advantage is the ability to hide within the populace, to strike and disappear. This Harry fella is a high value target for the Talibs yes? Use him as you would use a goat as bait to lure the wolf in close… then feed ‘em lead.

    Reply
  • I want to see proof they claimed it before I believe anything

    Reply
  • Love the picture. Harry showing his mate the new York photos.

    Reply
  • I love prince Harriet

    Reply

Add New Comment