TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Minister: Some politicians fear ‘transfer of power’ created by social media

Ciarán Cannon believes that social media does not need to be subjected to any more regulation than is already in place and has hit out at some who do not understand or fear sites like Facebook and Twitter.

Ciarán Cannon speaking at the Fine Gael Ard Fheis last year.
Ciarán Cannon speaking at the Fine Gael Ard Fheis last year.
Image: Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland

A JUNIOR MINISTER says that there should be no additional regulation of social media despite recent controversies and claims that some politicians fear the ‘transfer of power’ being created by new technology.

Fine Gael TD, Ciarán Cannon, who is the Minister of State for Training and Skills says that social media sites like Facebook and Twitter are merely new methods of communications and should be subject to “no more or no less regulation than our existing methods”.

Writing for TheJournal.ie today Cannon says that existing laws and regulation are enough to deal with instances of bullying, abuse and defamatory statements aimed at politicians or anyone using social media.

He writes: “As politicians we have to be open to fair criticism. We are also mature enough to discern the difference between someone who wishes to express a passionately held opinion and someone who is just spewing spiteful bile.

“If we are subjected to unwarranted abuse on our own social media accounts we do have fairly simple options open to us to immediately end that abuse, the “unfriend” and “block” buttons.

“These options are no different to binning hate mail or hanging up on abusive callers, something right minded politicians have been doing for decades.”

Cannon was responding to suggestions that social media could be subjected to further regulation in Ireland following a number of recent controversies including the death of two sisters in Donegal following the alleged bullying of one on the website Ask.fm.

While the death of junior minister Shane McEntee in December led to his brother hitting out at “faceless cowards” who made comments about the Minister of State on the internet which he said affected his brother before his death.

Losing control

Cannon writes that the death of his party colleague had forced all politicians to reflect on their careers and because of this the issue of social media had come up in recent weeks.

He says that there is a lack of understanding among some and writes that there needs to be efforts made to make people aware of the protection afforded to them from online abuse through existing laws and regulations.

However he also says that in some cases the fear of social media arises from “transfer of communicative power from the few to the many” because of the advent of social media sites.

“There are some in the political sphere, both practitioners and media commentators, who are distinctly uncomfortable with this recent transfer of power,” he writes.

“They are losing control of the “message” and feel challenged, now that the power to communicate with many is no longer the preserve of the few.

“Some calls for regulation of social media are well intentioned. My fear is that those who would like to regain control of public discourse could exploit the genuinely held concerns of others to do exactly that.”

Cannon added that all politicians who “value genuine freedom of expression” should resist calls for regulation of social media and should instead engage with it to communicate directly with the people who elected them.

The Oireachtas Committee on Communications is to hold a special meeting about social media and internet bullying later this month to examine whether there is a need for new laws or regulation of internet comments.

Read more: Politicians should engage in social media, not regulate it

Read: Fitzgerald concerned about difficult of regulating cyberbullying sites

Read next:

Comments (37 Comments)

  • I would tend to agree with Ciarán Cannon. The existing laws on libel cover internet communications no other regulation is necessary. There are those who think that they can write anything they wish, under the supposed cloak of anonymity , without fear of any consequences.

    Reply
  • They are essentially afraid of public opinion so want to clamp down?You have every right to express yourself anonomously or otherwise,isnt this a democratic society?Social Media is the new peoples court and they cant spin it to suit them,thats the issue.

    Reply
  • KEVIN.N 09/01/13 #

    “fear the transfer of power”…..WTF? Are we ruled by a monarchy or by the voice of the people? No one answer that question.

    Reply
    • Well spotted, Kevin. What power?

      Reply
    • Spinning power.

      Reply
    • The power of how opinions are widely disseminated. Before the internet people got their information from newspapers, magazines, televisions. Bar extensive documentaries, investigative pieces, etc., criticism was generally delivered in snippets and given the journalistic standard of giving the other side the right of reply the criticism could be “managed” by releasing some made up bollocks that the media would be obliged to include in some form. The internet has taken a lot of this power (hence, transfer of power) by making many opinions and criticisms widely accessible to the general public. Regulation of the internet would be a step back and would give politicians greater control over the “message” once again, diluting the quality of information available and restricting the public’s access to the truth.

      Reply
  • very sensible article, better than the stupid knee jerk reaction from other politicians blaming everything on internet and people who comment. I was disgusted with Brutons comments over the christmas where he was trying to shift the blame on to everyone else apart from themselves.
    For too long the powers that be have been able to censor what is put out on our media

    Reply
    • Very well put Frank, 100% agree with you.
      We are not fools so stop trying to treat us like naughty schoolkids.
      These people are elected to represent us and not lord it over us.
      A oerson that has been elected can very easily be un-elected as well and the sooner they realise that and get on with the job they were hired to do the better.
      There are no ivory towers in life.

      Reply
    • Here here!

      Reply
  • I think social media is great and allows everyone to have a say. Certainly better than hoping you might eventually get a letter printed in the print media which seems to be the reserve of the chosen few.

    Reply
  • Are we finally hear some truth from a Government politician?
    However in place of Ciarán Cannon’s ‘fear of transfer of power’ I would say it’s a fear of accountability, they are worried about.

    Reply
  • Joseph 09/01/13 #

    Surely the fundamental issue should be accountability – politicians should be inconvertibly accountable.
    Should it be possible to gain such positions of power under false pretences and dubious or no qualifications, take such large salaries plus expenses, and then wiggle and scoot out from under their mandate and responsibilities?

    Reply
  • These failed school teachers are ‘afraid of new technology’ and yet they’re responsible for dealing with billions of euros and running a country?!

    Christ Almighty, we need experienced professionals running this country. Not this shower of (can’t say what I want on this new fangled technology machine or I’ll soon be up in court for online bullying)

    Reply
  • Additional regulations for social media isn’t necessary. However, the fear that some politicians hold against social media (a new form of communication) is an example of what is wrong with the political machine in Ireland.

    Our poiticians lack experince, expertise and understanding.

    Generally, our politician bring no practiced skills to the table other than being teacher. Yes, being a teacher is a respectable profession. However, the expertise that is required to run a business, manage people or run a country is not assumed while a teacher is studying. Therefore, all our elected officials are learning while on the job. This is not acceptable. Would we go to a doctor for surgery if s\he were learning on the job? I think not! As a result, we have political system, when in fear or backed into a corner make loathsome decisions which the people of Ireland must suffer the results.

    We need to stop voting for teachers and demand that the best persons are elected into office with related skills and experience. The value that would be brought to the table will save us millions.

    Reply
  • Be afraid Mr Politician, be very afraid.
    You’ve been getting away with it for too long.

    Reply
  • Bobby 09/01/13 #

    We were once suppressed with only the opinion of Denis o Brien media style with government influence all over it, now we have twitter and Facebook and we hear real facts and honest opinions not just what they want us to hear and they don’t like it ! We seen Constantine G, economist got 2 mins thanks to pat Kenny but we can follow him on twitter and get all the facts on a daily basis!

    It scares the politicians because they don’t have a clue what they are at.never have and more informed we are the more we see that! Resign school teachers !

    Reply
  • Politicians are alarmed because social media breach the wall of complacency and privilege in which they exist. The contempt displayed by the public is not due to a hatred of politics but a show of rage at having been fooled once again. Politicians should be relieved that the public have this outlet as a substitute for taking to the streets. http://www.ottosbunker.com

    Reply
  • Are not the Civil Service and special advisers supposed to compensate politicians for their lack of experience. Only around a third are teachers. Where do you get experience at running countries?

    Reply
    • Brian

      You must never have read the Civil Service Code of Standards and Behaviour, basically the employment contract all civil servants must sign up to. Part 2 states
      “In the performance of their duties civil servants must:
      (a) Maintain high standards in service delivery
      by:
      • conscientiously, honestly and impartially serving the Government of the day, the other institutions of State and the public;
      • always acting within the law and
      • performing their duties with efficiency, diligence and courtesy.”

      Therefore Civil Servants must Serve the needs of the Government 1st, serve of institutions of the state 2nd, then serve the public 3rd, and then act within the law.

      So basically Civil Servants must do what the Government tells them to do, even if doing so does not comply with the law.

      Reply
  • I wonder does this mean that we who comment here will be hauled over the coals by those who feel ‘defamed’… It’s not 1984 but its beginning to read like it is.

    Reply
  • What the people think will be ignored anyway and treated as waffle and we will be told ‘lies is the only way to get into government it’s not about us it’s about them

    Reply
  • There are a few ways of looking at this .
    People are very annoyed at being treated like rabble and like we are an annoyance. How dare we question the polititions and attempt to hold them to their word.
    Bear in mind we were **** on from a height and had it royally rubbed in by the last crowd of yahoo’s.
    Now we have the power of social media to voice our discomfort and get a message directly to the people that have put themselves forward as representitives.
    Years ago we had to wait until the chosen few called to your door to have your say but now the power of social media gives us that voice.
    If I call a politition a liar then it’s because that person has lied… That’s fairly simple,and if I call that same person decietful then that is because that person has/is decieving.
    I don’t hide behind a false identity and I am man enough to say the same thing to a person’s face.
    I have no fear in holding my hand up making an apology (be it online or face to face) when I am in the wrong.
    People that put themselves forward to represent us as a nation make promises and vows in order to get into office.
    If they go back on the promises with no proper explaination and just treat the electorate like “naughty children” then they can expect serious backlash from the majority.
    We are not ignorant,stupid rabble and we know damm well we are in trouble and that we are paying for the pure greed of others but there are ways of communicating and carrying on when dealing with people.

    Reply
    • You highlighted something there which the article reference the government in “Power” . The population voted them into office

      Reply
    • Ryan'O 09/01/13 #

      Under false pretences! Telling lies like a child to get a job is a stackable offence in any other industry but these so called leaders have no accountability and think its ok! Gilmore” well….isnt that what one does in an election”. The electorate are fed up of spin, lies and deceit.

      Reply
  • Why is it that, and I’m genuinely curious, if i say something about a politician online I can get in trouble..

    Yet if i walk up to him and say it straight to his face it’s shrugged off and nothing happens?

    Reply
    • Where does it say in the article ‘you get in trouble’? He said that if someone says something nasty just block them , the same as hanging up the phone on an abusive caller.
      In fairness to him, it would be very easy for him to start calling for crazy legislation. That would make some circles happy.
      Does everything coming out of a politicians mouth automatically have to be bad ?

      Reply
    • Bobby 09/01/13 #

      No not automatically but it is bad all the comments from leading politicians are bad, I listen to economists and the politicians are talking all bad believe me they have no clue so wen you are in a job and you are doing that job all wrong , we can’t fire you for a few years , expect criticism! Fact of life

      Reply
    • Hence the power. You say something to his or her face to face that’s as far as it goes. Say it on an online media it never goes away. And that’s the ethos politicians work from…….people will forget….and they do, not all but most.

      Reply
    • Until there is immediate accountability five years later about what happened to this country and more importantly it’s citizens, politicians no longer represent their electorate and yet nobody seems to be getting their proverbial knickers in a twist because of disgraceful failing of all our learned over paid PUBLIC REPRESENTITIVES.

      Reply
  • Ummmm… Are the same individuals bitching for more regulation for social media sites…. The same individuals getting iPads paid for by the public?

    Instead of handing out iPad willy-nilly to politicians, who spend little time in the Dail as it is, should be required to take a number of courses in technology. They would range in topics from Basic Computer Fundamentals to Using Technology for Business Effectiveness (paid for by the politician). This would definitely bring value to Dail which we as the people would benefit.

    Reply
  • Faust 13/01/13 #

    Political “grooming” we may call the pre-election promises of those who is campaigning today for more regulation in media.
    With the same success we should demand censorship for politicians. “Students brand government ‘liars’ over tuition fee promises. A STUDENTS’ UNION has accused government TDs of lying in pre-election promises not to increase tuition fees for third-level colleges.”http://www.thejournal.ie/students-brand-government-liars-over-tuition-fee-promises-268414-Nov2011/. Eamon Gilmore and Ruairí Quinn both signed a pledge not to increase student fees.
    Current education minister Ruairí Quinn and Labour leader Eamon Gilmore both publicly signed a pledge to “oppose and campaign against” any form of fee increases. Fine Gael’s election manifesto also contained a vow “not [to] increase the student registration fee further”.
    http://www.finegael2011.com/pdf/Fine%20Gael%20Manifesto%20low-res.pdf
    We are witnessing very dangerous POLITICAL TREND here, when a political party having obtained power is trying to “cement” its rule into concrete. Similar developments and appeals for more control and censorship were made by Propaganda Minister Goebels. Blue shirt/brown shirts ?

    Reply

Add New Comment