Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Defamation

Sinn Féin politician ordered to pay almost £50k over defamatory tweet

In his ruling today, Justice Stephens described Phil Flanagan’s tweet as “a most serious libel and is grossly defamatory”.

BELFAST’S HIGH COURT has awarded £48,750 in damages to former Ulster Unionist leader Tom Elliott over a defamatory tweet posted by Sinn Féin MLA Phil Flanagan.

The tweet was posted after Elliott appeared on a BBC radio programme in May 2014. Though the tweet was removed from Twitter within an hour of being posted, it was still accessible online on other websites.

In his ruling today, Justice Stephens described Flanagan’s tweet as “a most serious libel and is grossly defamatory”.

It was an outrageous libel in relation to an individual of considerable standing attacking his integrity at a most fundamental level.

He said it affected a core aspect of Elliott’s life with implications as to his trustworthiness in public life and as a representative for all the members of the constituency which he had represented and which he was seeking to represent in the future.

He said the comments merited £75,000 in damages, but reduced the figure by 35% to reflect steps, like an apology, taken by Flanagan.

The judge also put a stay on the payout until the Sinn Féin MLA resolves a legal action with insurers over their refusal to indemnify him.

Read: Six family members kicked off bus lose defamation claim>

Read: Denis O’Brien has asked another website to remove an article>

Your Voice
Readers Comments
102
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.