TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 15 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Doctors in Northern Ireland go on strike

The British government is raising the retirement age from 60 to 68.

Many doctors in the UK go on a 24 hour strike today.
Many doctors in the UK go on a 24 hour strike today.
Image: Dave Higgens/PA Wire/Press Association Images

THOUSANDS OF DOCTORS in Northern Ireland are beginning strike action today as part of a UK wide day of protest over pensions.

The British Government wants doctors to contribute more to their pensions, as it says the public are currently funding 80 per cent of the final pay pots.  But the British Medical Association (BMA) claims this is unfair, as they already pay a higher proportion of their salaries into pensions than others in the public sector.

“We negotiated a deal in 2008 that was supposed to last a lifetime,” Peter Maguire, a consultant anaesthetist at Daisy Hill hospital in Newry told TheJournal.ie.

Now we’re being asked to work longer, pay more and get less when we finally retire. It’s a triple whammy.

Under plans drawn up by the British government, doctors could be paying 12.5 per cent of their salaries into pension funds by 2015 compared to 1.5 per cent among many civil servants, reports The Guardian.

It is also planning to raise the retirement age from 60 to 68.

However, doctors say this is unfair.

“It’s your life in our hands and it gets much harder to work as you get older,” adds Maguire.

Not all doctors are taking part in the protests. Only one third of GPs and hospital doctors in the UK are members of the BMA.

Nine members of the British parliament in Westminister are also doctors.

Among them is Conservative Sarah Wallston, who disagrees with the srike action.

Writing in the Daily Express, she says: “it is plain wrong for doctors, who receive among the most generous pensions in the public sector, to put self-interest before vocation.” She continued:

How will those in the minority who decide to put pensions before patients look them in the eye when they resume normal duties?

Read: Another pension scheme may bite the dust. Why is it happening? >

Read next:

Comments (7 Comments)

  • I am one of the doctors taking part in the action in Scotland. There is a lot more to the story than us being greedy as we have been accused. nWe agreed a new pension only 4 years ago and there is a £2bn excess in the pot. Our concern is the link to state retirement age. Making medical staff work to 68 is unwise. I personally wouldn’t want a 68 surgeon operating me. I accept I have to pay increased contribution of 14.5%, not 12.5 as quoted in the article. But Westminster civil servants should have to have theirs’ similarly increased. We only took this action due to the government not engaging in negotiation and just foisting change on us. This has already happened as increased contributions came in April. Not all doctors took part, and it was a withdrawal of routine non urgent services. I still did urgent work today but left the non urgent paperwork. We work extremely hard and are well paid but we need to have some say about retirement. As the government raises the age of retirement, ours will rise too. Potentially as someone approaching 40, I may end up working into my 70′s. As a dementia specialist this is a worry. I may be more impaired than those being referred to me! nDoctors are not greedy. We want fair remuneration and working conditions. And no action was taken that put any patient at risk today. n

    Reply
  • What!?! A SF governed country is not a utopia?!

    But that’s what people keep insisting it would be if they were elected here?!

    Say it ain’t so!

    Reply
  • Poppy 21/06/12 #

    68 too old a retirement age !!

    Reply
  • mel 21/06/12 #

    The biggest pension ponzi scheme is the public service one,total assets 5billion total liabilities 120billion,and the same laws that apply to the private pension schemes regarding proportion of assets to liabilities do not apply here because if they did this great ponzi scheme would crumble
    Note , that a typical pension of 30thousand a year would need a fund of 600,000e
    Most private sector workers could only dream of this pension pot
    These pensions are paid from current spending because they are not properly funded ,do the next time you hear a public servant complain about the pay cuts tell them they are lucky knowing they will have a comfortable retirement with a heavily subsidised pension

    Reply
    • your misguided general statement offends me. the front line members of the public service will have more than earned their pensions when they retire and some may live a long and happy life, if they are lucky. i could be wrong but as i see it the problems with op comments are ceo’s of public, tds and ministers goverment advisors etc getting pensions after a few years “work” and their replacements on the same terms and conditions thus creating the largest liabilities.

      Reply

Add New Comment