TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

Data Protection Commissioner investigating secondary schools’ security flaw

The data watchdog has asked the manufacturer of potentially vulnerable software to provide a full list of affected schools.

Data Protection Commissioner Billy Hawkes and his deputy Gary Davis: the DPC is now investigating a security vulnerability with software used by hundreds of Irish schools.
Data Protection Commissioner Billy Hawkes and his deputy Gary Davis: the DPC is now investigating a security vulnerability with software used by hundreds of Irish schools.
Image: Sam Boal/Photocall Ireland

IRELAND’S DATA SECURITY WATCHDOG has contacted the manufacturer of a popular school management software product, asking for a list of the schools which run the software.

The contact comes after it was revealed that the ePortal software, manufactured by Serco, was vulnerable to exploitation because of the existence of a username-and-password combination which would allow access to almost every Irish machine running the software.

TheJournal.ie revealed on Saturday that the ‘master key’ credentials, which were discovered last week, by a pupil in one school running the software, could allow anyone to access sensitive personal data – possibly including medical records – of thousands of Irish second-level pupils.

The issue is made particularly sensitive by the fact that many schools running the software have their systems set up so that they can be accessed remotely, from any internet-connected device.

While this makes it more convenient for teachers to log in and update pupils’ records from home, it also means that school’s records are vulnerable to access by anyone who has the ‘master key’ combination of username and passwords.

The Department of Education has contacted school patrons asking them to advise their schools about the issue, but the Data Protection Commissioner is now also taking action to resolve the problem.

Deputy data protection commissioner Gary Davis said last night the issue was “of huge interest of us” and that the office had been in contact with Serco seeking documentation about the product and the nature of the vulnerability.

“We’re asking them for a copy of their client list, and then what we’ll probably do is approach the schools directly,” he said.

Thousands of pupils may be affected

While Davis said the fact that the ePortal software runs on servers physically housed within each school, the DPC was also keen to ensure that no similar difficulties arose with rival products where pupils’ data is stored ‘in the cloud’ – and therefore accessible to any internet user with the right password.

Davis said such products “give rise to some concerns” about potential a similar vulnerability, if it existed, could leave pupils’ data open to access from inappropriate parties.

There are 722 second-level schools in the country, with a combined student body of 323,000 pupils. While each school is responsible for choosing and maintaining its own data products, it is thought that several hundred schools use the ePortal offering – suggesting that data of tens of thousands of pupils could be at risk.

Though a minority of those schools have set up their systems to be accessible through the internet, most schools would make the system available to any computers on the network within their buildings, so the records would still be vulnerable to use by anyone within the school.

Fianna Fáíl last night asked education minister Ruairí Quinn to clarify the details of the threat, after the Department of Education wrote to schools to warn them of teh problem.

“Parents across the country will be extremely worried to learn that the private and personal information of their children may have been accessed by unauthorised individuals,” the party’s education spokesman Charlie McConalogue said.

“It is incumbent on Minister Quinn to explain how exactly this happened and what is being done now to rectify the situation.”

Read: Irish pupils’ records at risk in major data protection threat

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (18 Comments)

  • If it’s a major security flaw isn’t there some sort of need for urgency?

    Not so much the dawdling, “We’re waiting for a client list” or “Oh yeah, we could approach the schools directly.” more a getting on it with sort of approach? JFDI as we used to say.

    I mean if I was a bad person I could have downloaded the databases and sold them to the boiler room boys by now.

    Reply
    • it’s probably been done already :0(

      Was flagging this computer flaw , before it had been resolved, a good thing ?

      Reply
    • The original article mentioned that details on the master passwords were circulating online. Sheer curiosity had me take a look. It took two Google searches to locate the master username+password on a discussion forum (for administrators of the Servo software ironically). The details of the flaw had already gone public.

      If the flaw wasn’t flagged, the chances are no steps would be taken to fix the problem. As it stands, there seems to not be a rush by either the vendor to issue a fix, or schools to simply disable remote access until the fix is installed.

      Reply
    • @David Vaughan are you 100% sure? I’ve searched and cant see it online. can you pm me on twitter with the link to the username and password as I’ve a school setup online with eportal.

      Reply
    • @Paddy, Paddy, afraid I’m one of those people that don’t use Twitter. I’m also being a little careful here, since your Twitter account hasn’t actually tweeted yet. Therefore, I’ve no way to know who you are. Your following/followers also don’t help me decide!!

      However, I will just say that with a little research on the maker and name of the affected application, you will find an open list, run by Computer Education Society of Ireland, which will reveal a discussion about the security concerns in question. The discussion began on this list at the end of September, which reveals it was indeed in the public domain before the news broke on this issue.

      Mods, if you feel I’ve revealed too much, kill this comment please.

      Reply
    • Damocles 23/10/12 #

      David you wouldn’t have looked if not for the article, which I believe is Joan’s point.

      Should they perhaps have informed the necessary authorities and allowed them to finish taking steps before publishing the article?

      That seems to be the question.

      Reply
    • @Damocles. You are correct in that I wouldn’t have gone looking except out of sheer curiosity. But a simple search on Google found the discussion and the details.

      Now, its well known that security by obscurity is a flawed idea. After all, if its not secure, then you’re only waiting for someone to discover the weakness. And the chances are you’ll never know it’s been discovered until you’re bitten in the ass.

      The security flaw in question was being discussed in an open, publicly accessible Google group as far back as end of September. Three weeks ago.

      Its plenty of time for the software vendor to publish an advisory, and for affected schools to disable remote access, until a fix is issued. Or at least the boundaries and scope of the flaw are documented and known so schools can make informed decisions as to how serious this problem is.

      Nothing seems to have happened. Until The Journal published their story. And folks started asking questions.

      So, should the article have been published? In my opinion, yes. Until it was, the flaw was known about, but not being fixed. Now its in process of being fixed.

      Reply
    • Cheers david, all fixed. For the record serco were callings schools last week and the security flaw wasn’t as bad as it sounds. It didn’t give you the initial login details for the software its self. so it wasn’t a case if you knew of a school which had eportal online you couldn’t just login

      Reply
    • Damocles 23/10/12 #

      I see your point, David, but I see Joan’s point as well.

      Might there have been a percentage in alerting the schools, who were possibly quite busy at the start of the school year and weren’t reading the google groups on a bit of software they thought was fine, directly rather than publishing straight off.

      Isn’t “Journal averts security risk” a better headline than “Journal tells everyone in Ireland, no matter how dodgy, how to get to children’s personal information” (On a Saturday morning, when the schools are all shut and the school staff are nowhere near their servers and probably arent surfing the web.)?

      I’m not saying it was irresponsible journalism, but that it might be seen as such.

      Reply
    • @paddy. Glad to have been of some help. Good to know the flaw isn’t as bad as it seems, and that a fix is in progress.

      As for it being irresponsible to publish the article on a Saturday, fair point. Schools were shut and could do little. But that’s where you hit the downside of the free press. The scoop, and all the plaudits (and any profits), that go with it, only go to the publisher that breaks the story first.

      Could the story have been delayed until schools could do something about it, possibly it could.

      The tricky bit in being responsible is balancing your story being published against the damage publishing the story might do. That’s in the realm of the Editor in charge I guess.

      Overall, since it has now come to light that remedial action was being taken last week, was The Journal right, responsible and wise to publish? We’ll all have our opinions, mine is that they probably were right to post the story.

      If nothing else, it has helped get the flaw fixed, and drawn schools attention to the data on their pupils they are trusted with guarding.

      Reply
    • The issue that David described is different from the one schools were advised to fix last week as described in this article. Serco released an advisory today relating to the SQL issue that David read about on CESI-list and that Paddy described.

      Reply
  • Rule number 1 always change the master/default username and password then change them every 60 days, good advice for your wireless networks, routers, computers, Facebook, twitter accounts, takes an hour out of your life once every couple of months

    Reply
    • The problem Niall is that this seems to be a hard coded master password.

      You have to wonder if normal admins were even aware of it, let alone how to change it.

      Reply
    • True David but a flaw like this to be easily found by a kid no less maybe the adage is true that when a team of 40′year olds takes weeks to secure something it only takes a teen hours to break, I have a 7 year old nephew who’s recovering data on phones etc I want him to start getting involved in codeacademy or into a coder dojo .

      Reply
  • The schools themselves should know whether they are using this software and whether their files can be accessed from the internet. If this is the case, a letter should be sent to parents explaining the situation and how they intend rectifing it.
    As it is every parent in the country who has a child or children in secondry school is worried about whether their childs records can be accessed by inappropriate people.

    Reply
  • tom 23/10/12 #

    it doesn’t take much to disconnect the server from the network failing that press the off button and if that’s to difficult pull the plug… no much point leaving the information to be accessed or corrupted while a private company figures out it’s liability before it takes action.

    Reply
  • In fairness SERCO sets default passwords its up to the school the change them.

    Reply

Add New Comment