TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Saturday 18 May, 2013

Information Commissioner welcomes Freedom of Information reform

However Emily O’Reilly said “the devil will be in the detail” when the new legislation is published.

Information Commissioner Emily O'Reilly
Information Commissioner Emily O'Reilly
Image: Graham Hughes/Photocall Ireland

INFORMATION COMMISSIONER EMILY O’Reilly has welcomed the government’s plans to extend the scope of the Freedom of Information act.

Speaking on RTE’s Morning Ireland O’Reilly said the devil would be in the detail and “until we see the legislation we won’t know just how deep the penetration goes into accountability and transparency”.

The government has proposed to extend the act to include the Gardaí, NAMA and several other public bodies that were not previously covered.

Yesterday Brendan Howlin said the new laws may also see bodies which get public support – like banks – subject to information requests.

O’Reilly said she hoped the hostility towards the act in the past would not continue and that the “genuine enthusiasm” shown by the government would trickle down to the decision makers.

As part of the reform, the cost of appeals will also be reduced with the price for an appeal to the Office of the Information Commissioner dropping from €150 to €50.

“I think that is very important because that did serve as a significant barrier towards people appealing their initial rejection for records,” she said.

Read: Banks could be subject to Freedom of Information requests under new regime

Read next:

Comments (3 Comments)

  • Watch the “commercial confidentiality” clause being used to conceal information.

    A few years back an attempt was made to rezone land near my house. when I made a FoI request for details of the talks between the speculators and the planners, I was refused on the grounds of commercial confidentiality and I could not afford to appeal to the Information Commissioner. Staff and elected councillors – you could not slide a paper between them!

    And the land: sheep grazing peacefully on it today

    Reply
    • I TOTALLY agree. Anyone doing business with the state – ie you and me, should be happy to forgo “confidentiality” in exchange for a reliable paymaster. While individual people are entitled to privacy, the concept of “commercial sensitivity” has no place in public private business deals. The “public” part of such deals will always be us, and we will always have the right to follow the progress of our money.

      Reply
  • I would like to know when the onus for openness and transparency will be taken off ordinary people, who must supply both money, time, passion and focussed attention to obtain information, and placed back onto the shoulders of public agencies, who should, as a matter of course, publish everything that doesn’t violate the privacy of individuals.

    The need to deal with FOI requests and Dail questions would be hugely reduced with proper public reporting procedures.

    Reply

Add New Comment