Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

European Commissioner for Competition Joaquin Almunia addresses the media, at the European Commission headquarters in Brussels, Wednesday, April 13, 2011. AP Photo/Yves Logghe
LIVE BLOG

EU fines Unilever, P&G for price fixing

Giant multinational companies Unliever and Procter & Gamble have been fined millions by the European Union for price-fixing laundry detergent in eight countries.

EUROPEAN UNION REGULATORS have fined consumer products companies Procter & Gamble and Unilever a total of €315.2 million for fixing prices of powdered laundry detergent together with Henkel in eight EU countries.

Germany’s Henkel AG escaped a fine because it blew the whistle on the cartel.

US-based Procter & Gamble Company has to pay €211.2 million, while British-Dutch company Unilever NV was fined €104 million. Both companies had their fines reduced because they agreed to settle the case with the Commission and cooperated with the investigation.

The three companies are the leading producers for washing powder in Europe, the Commission said. Unilever makes laundry detergents including OMO and Radiant; Procter & Gamble produces Ariel and Tide; while Henkel owns the Persil brand. In the UK and Ireland, Persil is sold by Unilever.

The cartel was started when the companies were in joint talks on how to cut down on packaging, said the EU’s Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia.

“They used this environmental initiative to agree on market share and to agree on not reducing the prices even if the packages were smaller,” Almunia said.

The cartel lasted from January 2002 until March 2005 and covered Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain and the Netherlands, the Commission said.

Unilever said the fine falls below provisions already made in the company’s 2010 results. “Unilever believes it is in the best interests of the company for Unilever and the Commission to have reached this settlement,” it said in a statement.

Procter & Gamble said the fine was not a surprise and it had already put away money for it in recent earnings reports. “It’s our policy to comply with the letter and spirit of all laws everywhere we do business,” spokesman Paul Fox said in Cincinnati. “We’ve already taken the appropriate internal action and strengthened our global compliance program.”

Henkel said it discovered the cartel in 2008 during an internal audit and immediately notified the authorities.

The detergent case is the third cartel case the Commission decided to settle this year. A settlement leads to lower fines, but it also cuts down on the time and money the EU has to spend on an investigation.

Almunia said companies should expect the Commission to pursue a relentless fight against cartels, “which extract higher prices from consumers than if companies compete fairly and on the merits.”

– AP