TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 16 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

European Space Agency sets sights on Jupiter

New mission will focus on the gas giant’s three large icy moons.

Image: http://www.thejournal.ie/high-tech-project-aims-to-mine-asteroids-in-space-427351-Apr2012/

THE EUROPEAN SPACE Agency has announced plans to launch a new mission – to Jupiter’s moons.

The ESA says that the Jupiter Icy moons Explorer (or JUICE) is the first large-scale mission selected by the body as part of its 2015-2015 Cosmic Vision programme.

Jupiter is the largest planet in our solar system. Four large moons orbit the gas giant, as do with a number of smaller moons.  Those large moons were discovered by the astronomer Galileo.

The explorer will be launched in 2022 from the European spaceport on Kourou in French Guiana and should arrive at Jupiter eight years later. It will spend about three years making observations of the three icy moons – Europa, Ganymede and Callisto.

The craft will visit Callisto and will identify possible sites for the in situ exploration or Europa.

The ESA says that JUICE will also observe the gas planet’s atmosphere and magnetosphere and the interaction of the moons with Jupiter.

The ESA’s director of science and robotic exploration says that the mission will provide better insight into how giant gas planets and their orbiting worlds form, as well as information on their potential for hosting life.

“Jupiter is the archetype for the giant planets of the Solar System and for many giant planets being found around other stars,” Prof Alvaro Giménez Cañete said.

Last year, NASA launched its Juno spacecraft to map Jupiter’s gravity field, magnetic field and atmospheric structure.

Ever seen a ‘super moon’? Well, you can this weekend… >

High-tech project aims to mine asteroids in space >

Read next:

Comments (15 Comments)

  • I wonder will HAL be supervising this trip

    Reply
  • I wonder are there any jobs on Jupiter, the say there is great skiing on Europa and the atmosphere is good.

    Reply
  • I want to go

    Reply
  • Waste of money. NASA has already done that years ago !

    Reply
    • NASA has been responsible for a number of missions to Jupiter, so I’m sure even they will agree there is more they can learn.

      Reply
    • NASA budget is minuscule compared to the military budget and the world gains a lot more from our understanding of the universe in which we live than from wars.

      Reply
    • When has Science ever been a waste of money?

      Reply
    • Depends on who is doing the science and for what purposes, scientists are human beings not angels remember, there has been plenty of money wasted on bad science, however on the whole, publicly funded research with good institutional governance and transparency is money well spent. I would also say money on the arts and humanities is also money well spent.

      Reply
    • Not necessarily. For example, the US military is responsible for pretty much all of the early development in the computer industry, and if it wasn’t for them we would probably be a good few years behind where we are now.

      Reply
    • Because governments pump money into warfare technology, doesn’t justify military spend. Had they pumped similar amounts into socially beneficial public science rather than weapons guidance systems, we’d be a lot better off in many respects.

      Reply
    • I wasn’t justifying military spending. I was pointing to an example that in my opinion shows that there is no such thing as “bad” science. Scientific research leads to knowledge. It is then up to us how we use that knowledge.

      Reply
    • So you believe the development of nuclear or biological weapons or Nazi science is all good. Anyway I’m done here, seeing as you don’t believe it exists perhaps you ought to take this up with Ben Goldacre, who writes extensively about bad science.

      Reply
    • I don’t believe the development of nuclear or biological weapons is bad. Like my example of the US military and the computer industry. I do however believe that the way in which they are used is bad. I’m sure the development of nuclear and biological weapons has led to breakthroughs in other areas of science.

      And I think that Nazi science is completely different, because in my opinion that was mostly pushed by cruelty and some other sick reasons, not by a need for knowledge. There were lots of their experiments which were pointless or conclusions they reached which could have been achieved without hurting people. However, I don’t know much about the experiments, but I’d say some results could have benefited future research into other areas. And no, I am not condoning Nazi science at all by the way.

      Reply
    • Exploring our solar system is never a waste of money. In fact , I believe that we should focus most of our money on outer space . We would learn a lot more about world we live in .

      Reply

Add New Comment