TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

Fiery exchanges in last Dáil debates before Fiscal Compact referendum

One TD is ordered to leave the chamber as Eamon Gilmore and Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin exchange fire during Leaders’ Questions.

THERE WERE FIERY exchanges in Dáil Éireann this morning – with one TD being ordered to leave the chamber – during the final session of Leaders’ Questions ahead of next week’s referendum on the Fiscal Compact.

Fianna Fáíl’s Billy Kelleher was booted from the chamber by Ceann Comhairle Seán Barrett, while Eamon Gilmore exchanged hostilities with Sinn Féín’s Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin over the latter party’s record in supporting fiscal measures.

Ó Caoláin had asked Gilmore to ask what the government proposed to do if the Fiscal Compact was adopted before “the fears of so many citizens prove well-founded,” though he did not elaborate on what those fears would be.

“Let us recognise that this carefully crafted German-engineered text has only one gear,” Ó Caoláin said.

There is no reverse, the steering is locked, it can’t turn right, it can’t turn left. We’re heading straight into whatever lies ahead.

Gilmore responded by summarising his arguments in favour of a Yes vote in next week’s referendum – underlining its role in the government’s plan for responding to the financial crisis – though Ó Caoláin was unhappy with the Tánaiste’s response.

‘But a listening ear’

Referring to last night’s European Council meeting, Ó Caoláin asked: “Was it the case – as often times appears – that we were but a listening ear as others put forward their respective positions?”

A furious Gilmore said Sinn Féin were wrong to suggest the Irish government was in “listening mode”, saying Ireland’s calls for a growth agenda had been one of the reasons last night’s meeting was convened in the first place.

Amid interruptions, the Tánaiste said it was “typical of Sinn Féin” to complain that he had not answered a question, and then interrupting him when he tried to respond – recalling speeches made by Ó Caoláin and Pearse Doherty in favour of introducing the bank guarantee in 2008.

“Sinn Féin is wrong. It’s wrong in several respects… Sinn Féin was wrong about the bank bailout, and Sinn Féín is wrong about the stability treaty.”

Gilmore went on to reveal that the Irish government had specifically proposed the use of project bonds to pay for economic stimulus measures, as well as increased capital funding from the European Investment Bank and the redeployment of unused structural funding.

All Sinn Féin can do is talk down what is happening, and talk down this country, and I’m sick and tired of Sinn Féin taking every opportunity to talk down this country, and talk down the opportunities that should be there for employers.

Ejection

Earlier, Fianna Fáil’s Billy Kelleher was ejected from the chamber after refusing to keep the peace while Gilmore responded to questions from his party’s stand-in leader Barry Cowen.

Cowen had said the government’s intention to employ people from the live register when rolling out the installation of water meters did not appear to be reflected on the ground, reporting that jobless people were currently unable to enrol in any appropriate training courses in advance of installations beginning.

Gilmore said the programme of introducing water charges was still only in its embryonic stages, before referencing NAMA’s €2 billion investment into the construction sector which hopes to create as many as 35,000 jobs.

This prompted fury from Kelleher, who complained to the government benches that ministers were now hailing NAMA’s ability to stimulate the economy, having opposed its existence for two years before coming to power.

“You’ve a brass neck, Deputy,” retorted public expenditure minister Brendan Howlin,” as Barrett ejected him from the chamber. “We’re not putting up with this roaring and shouting every morning here,” Barrett insisted.

Thomas Pringle from the technical group raised concerns that HSE cutbacks meant Dublin hospitals specialising in vital treatments were refusing to treat some patients in urgent need of care.

“It appears hospitals are not being paid by the HSE for these treatments, because they are not from the area,” Pringle said, saying he was aware of individual cases where people from his native Donegal were being refused treatment in Dublin.

Gilmore asked Pringle to provide details of the cases so that they could be referred directly to the Minister for Health.

Read: Taoiseach says fiscal compact WON’T be changed after meeting of EU leaders

More: Referendum Commission tells An Post: stop adding No leaflets to booklet

Read next:

Comments (44 Comments)

  • It was on sky news that France/Spain and basically everyone bar Germany yet again want the banks in Spain and where ever else will need it to get recapitalized done so from the European central bank.

    This should have great retrospective action for our bank debt or it would be double standards.

    Germany of course want the countries the banks are in to make the bank debts sovereign like we did, meaning the debt will be guaranteed keeping their banks safe from their gambling debts.. Germany would be the biggest loser if we let the banks fail so they are forcing member states to swap out risky bank debt for safe sovereign debt, through Austerity.

    You have to hand it to them. Its very clever.

    Reply
    • Fagan's 24/05/12 #

      European PMI (Manufacturing index) hit a 36 month low yesterday. It’s either stimulate massively the Eurozone, via increased liquidity to banks and investment (via quantitative easing) and debt write down, or else the Euro will be implementing a very severe and continent wide prog. of cuts in a Eurozone in a deep recession. Killing export markets in stronger countries like Holland, etc, and driving troubled economies in to a deeper hole.

      Look at Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize winning economist’s take on the treaty and how it ignores all economic precedent.
      http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/16/opinion/krugman-europes-economic-suicide.html?_r=1&hp

      Reply
    • That’s it. Unfortunately for the German government, it’s not going to plan..

      Reply
    • Reply
    • Hit the nail on the head Shayno!! Germans enforcing private German banking and pension fund debt onto the citizens of Europe to ensure they get their money and don’t lose
      Yes, the Germans are giving us the money to essentially pay them back, but in doing so, they are nationalising the debt which almost guarantees they get the money back- very clever indeed ! Shame on the other governments like our own for allowing this!

      Reply
    • Gary, it’s interesting that you reference Canada’s fiscal correction of the 90′s.
      If you believe that the idiots in the Dail are capable of such a correction you are deluded. This is why their advocacy of this treaty is a fallacy.
      Canada corrected it’s finances by reducing spending more rapidly than it reduced taxation.
      FG/Labours approach is to increase taxation more rapidly than it increases spending. Ignoring the fact that you cannot tax an economy out of recession.
      Lucinda Cretin pointed out earlier this week that Irelands projected deficit for next year is €15 billion and the same for the following year.
      FG/Labour have shown, just as they are incapable of fighting for Ireland’s interests in Brussels, they don’t do fiscal corrections.
      Just as they’re 1982 correction failed, now they’re attempt last December is a rerun without the tax on childrens shoes.
      FG/Labour will not face down the unions in the same way as Kenny will not debate the merits of this treaty on live tv.

      Reply
    • Sean you’re wrong. In the last budget, cuts in expenditure outweighted tax increases by 2:1. FG’s election manifesto stated they wanted 3:1 cuts to taxation, while Labour said they wanted 1:1. No party has advocated more taxation over more cuts. Also there was a report in Tuesday’s Irish Times that said Ireland has the second lowest tax take per GDP of all EU states. So statistically we’re still a very low tax economy.

      Reply
    • Damianm 24/05/12 #

      Ladies & Gents a YES Vote is our political establishment getting a free line of credit to continue financing their Gold Plated Pay, Perks, Pension, unvouched expenses and off course allow them to finance those very important special advisors that the salary caps had to be broken for,….. Anyone who votes YES to continue with this madness whilst we saddle debts of private banks onto future generations with the blessing of our political establishment as long as they can keep their Gold Plated Pay, Perks, Pension, unvouched expenses… If you Vote YES. SHAME ON YOU !!!

      Reply
    • Ignoreland, Canada’s fiscal correction (1992-1997)
      Tax revenues relative to GDP went from 44.2% to 44.5%.
      Government spending relative to GDP 53% to 44%.

      Reply
    • Apologies. Source: Economist Intelligence Unit.

      Reply
    • You forget to add that’s why we must vote NO.

      Reply
    • Exactly. This is also why Germany is against Eurobonds, as it would average out risk, lowering most countries’ but pushing Germany’s upwards. Merkel wouldn’t be adverse to a bit of European domination, but that was only ever a smokescreen and side effect. The real aim of all of the manoeuvring was to simultaneously cover Germany’s exposed arse while hiding the fact it was in danger of being kicked in the first place.

      Reply
    • censored 24/05/12 #

      So Gary, you now support the point that austerity requires an external “miracle” to be successful?

      Good man, I knew you’d see reason in the end.

      Reply
    • Please note, the EMS, or “the bailout fund” will exist mainly for this. To guarantee that all European banks will now and forever be fully underwritten and fully guaranteed by the blood, sweat and tears of the people of Europe.

      With the twin treaties (which may yet prove to be illegal) of the Fiscal Compact and the EMS treaty, Europe is on course to adopt Ireland’s temporary, emergency bank guarantee policy as its own permanent “normal” plan.

      Good bye, forever, to moral hazard to banks. Hello, forever, to debt peonage for the poor duped peoples of Europe.

      Reply
    • Ireland’s tax revenue compared to GDP is second lowest in euro zone
      http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2012/0522/1224316503183.html

      Reply
    • Gary, as Europe is the highest tax & spend region on the planet, this doesn’t offer much insight.
      The idea of using austerity to induce economic growth is termed ‘expansionary fiscal consolidation’.
      These consolidations are characterised by pronounced cuts in public spending, reductions in taxation or implict/ explicit promises of reduced taxation, Market liberalisation and regulatory reform. In addition, successful consolidations have been supported by monetary policy. Irelands consolidation (1987), Denmark (1982), Sweden (90′s), Canada, Turkey (2001) were accompanied by currency devaluations. An option not now available.
      Reducing the tax burden is more important than the relative rate. Sweden continues to place a relatively high tax burden. However, it has continued to reduce taxation and spending since the 90′s with a continued expansionary effect.
      The extent of Irelands debt (both public & total) considerably greater than any of these cases. Prof Niall Ferguson has pointed out that no nation in 200 years have sustained this level of debt without either restructuring or devaluation neither option will be made available unless we reject this treaty.

      Reply
  • wow a fiery debate in dail enda must be hiding somewhere with the fear he might have to debate issues or address questions. Wat stage are we at in the great 5 point plan

    Reply
  • Not supporting Sinn Fein in the slightest here, or anyone else for that matter.
    But Eamon Gilmore saying he’s sick of sinn fein talking things down is a bit rich.
    Prior to being elected the labour partys soul mission was to talk things down and and stand in the way of every move, Joan Burton couldn’t be got off the Tv and now she’s vanished like Lord Lucan. Spend more more more is what the labour party wanted in 2007.
    Amazing how they forget there past but are quick to point out others.
    Think they’ll be sharing the same faith as the green party for wanting to play ball with the big boys!
    At least the greens done some of what they said they’d do although i wish they didnt!

    Reply
    • If we are talking about the real Joan Burton, she is still in everyone’s face and ears. A little quieter in the later half of this campaign, but indeed she is still about and was on the radio this morning but not about the treaty (at least what I heard anyway).

      Reply
  • Gilmore said it was their calls for growth that caused the meeting to be summoned? What a load of horse manure, if Sarkozy was still president of France there would have not been one word about growth, this guy is an embarrassment and only getting worse by the day!

    Reply
    • agree. can never believe a word he says again after getting caught out when he said what he says in public isn’t what he believes personally. I switch channels or stations the second he opens his gob.

      Reply
  • What a turncoat Gilmore is, I feel dirty having given him a vote. He canvassed aggressively in my area and had a lot of sound answers to how he would stand of the people of Ireland. He’s a bare faced liar who is singing a different tune having secured his seat and cushy salary/pension.

    I will be sure to remind everyone i know, how he sold us all a bunch of lies the next time he or anyone from his party comes looking for support.

    Hopefully Labour will suffer the same fate as the Progressive Democrats.

    Reply
    • Fagan's 24/05/12 #

      Labour went native a long, long time ago. Need to have people that do not have the in built relations and loyalty to status quo, fresh blood is required in FG/Lab. Enda has been there since 70′s, he is so damaged from it now, that he could not know right from wrong anymore.

      Reply
  • It’s a Comedy show in there an absolute comedy show.

    Reply
  • We are in the middle of World War 3,only this time its an economic war & the Germans are winning,why is everyone so stupid in our Parliament to see this?
    We loan money to pay back bad debts to Germany & Britain -amongst others,we become increasingly impoverished,while they get more powerful- am i missing something?
    Their investment banks should be taking the fall,not the Irish taxpayer!

    Reply
    • Fagan's 24/05/12 #

      When you have bought the leaders at the top, you no longer need to obey the rules of business and capitalism, get too slow in the market place, make a major mistake, then is should be Goodbye. In the EU nowadays , there can be no accountability by failed business or politicians. Make the small business and man on the road pay.

      Vote Yes – Fuc8 You.
      Vote No – Fuc8 You.

      The EU may dither on its approach but it is very clear in its approach to the vast majority of people in it.

      The EU is playing a dangerous game here, it is sentencing 5-6 countries to severe long term decline. Countries like France and Holland are also going to have sub-par growth for a decade as well, maybe longer. The people of Ireland, unfortunately will take any level of beating, but there are many that will not,watch their country and their own futures go down the drain to protect Merkel’s party in German politics.

      Reply
    • “We are in the middle of World War 3,only this time its an economic war & the Germans are winning,why is everyone so stupid in our Parliament to see this”
      Good holy s**h is this the level of political debate in this country?

      Reply
  • Gilmore really does have a short memory… Frankfurts way or Labours way etc etc…
    And in relation to SF supporting the bank bailout, i don’t know if Gilmore is just an idiot with selective memory, or if he has fully forgotten that Yes, SF initially supported the Bank guarantee when it was initially proposed in the Dail… as the guarantee was initially only supposed to guarantee the deposits in the bank up to 100k.
    When FF added the bond holders etc, SF refused to support it. How Gilmore can apparently have fogotten this very important detail during leaders questions today raises a very very important point.
    Does Eamonn Gilmore really have a memory loss issue, in which case he should not be doing the job…
    or is it simply a case that he will attack anyone who raises any valid points/concerns over the upcoming treaty with deliberately misleading re-directs, in order to avoid answering direct questions.

    Either way, Gilmore is showing his ineptitude for the job he is being paid almost 500k a year to do.

    Reply
  • It’s very simple and every one in the eu knows it Spanish banks are on there way out ,, Greeks banks are finished there is Hugh amount of euros leaving Greek banks every day and the same will happen to Spanish bank it’s only time

    Reply
  • Funny such a ‘minority’ party raising such anger from Gilmore

    Reply
    • Fagan's 24/05/12 #

      Gilmore knows that the treaty is hatstand economics. European manufacturing hitting a 3 yr low and here is the continent looking at having every country in the EU implement a prog. of cuts that would be quiet difficult for a strong productive country to achieve in time frame.

      It’s bat doo crazy economics and the markets will never allow it to be implemented.

      Reply
  • It’s a comedy show in there

    Reply
  • What a fool Gilmore is turning out to be. His outburst at Sinn Fein in the Dail today sounds like an echo of what Cowan said to Labour whilst in Opposition, when Joan Burton said the country was “banjaxed” Why does he keep giving hostages to fortune? Can he really be so wholly?

    Reply
  • It is disingenuous for FF and the rest of the political elite to keep blaiming that the (as yet non-existent) ESM fund will provide cheap credit to the Irish state. In fact, the EU revised a statement which offered transparency on the cost of aid to one which offers no transparency.
    “(1) The cost. The old version of the Treaty made the pricing transparent. Programme countries would pay a margin on the cost of funds, and that margin was 2% for funding up to three years and 3% for longer-term funding. So if the ESM borrowed funds at say 2%, then Ireland would be charged 5% for 3-year plus funding which is our likely requirement. However the new version of the Treaty doesn’t provide an upfront pricing menu at all; it merely says “1. When granting stability support, the ESM shall aim to fully cover its financing and operating costs and shall include an appropriate margin. 2. For all financial assistance instruments, pricing shall be detailed in a pricing guideline, which shall be adopted by the Board of Governors. 3. The pricing policy may be reviewed by the Board of Governors.”

    In recent days, there has been commentary from economists and others supporting a “yes” vote in the forthcoming referendum on 31st May, and a perception has emerged that the ESM would provide funds at cost. That is not correct, at least based on the wording of the current Treaty.”
    Namawinelake
    The governments line that this treaty offers stability and certainty are simply untrue and cannot be validated.

    Reply
  • censored 24/05/12 #

    Gilmore accuses SF of “talking the country down”, while he and Kenny prepare to deliver a lethal injection to the Irish economy.

    Reply
  • Unvouched for expenses…Unf**#ingbelievable!!

    Reply
  • Sarah 24/05/12 #

    “You cant please all of the people all of the time” Lincoln. Our government might want to say these words to the Germans in their inept negotiations.

    Reply

Add New Comment