TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Fine Gael TDs to run marathon for Yes vote in referendum

Fine Gael Deputies Liam Twomey and Damien English will run to raise money for Barnardos, and encourage people to vote Yes in the Children’s Referendum.

Damien English, one of the two TDs running the Dublin Marathon
Damien English, one of the two TDs running the Dublin Marathon
Image: James Horan/Photocall Ireland

TWO FINE GAEL deputies will run the Dublin Marathon later this month with two aims: to raise money for Barnardos, and encourage people to vote Yes in the upcoming Children’s Referendum.

Fine Gael Deputies Liam Twomey and Damien English were presented with two t-shirts today by Barnardos to wear when they run the marathon later this month.

Both TDs said they have decided to use the marathon as an opportunity to raise money for independent children’s charity Barnardos, but they will also be using the opportunity to encourage people to vote Yes in the Children’s Referendum on 10 November.

Deputy English said:

It’s vital that everyone gets out to vote on Saturday November 10th to help support families and protect vulnerable children. We’re using the marathon to raise awareness about the importance of the Referendum. Following the long tradition of using the marathon to raise funds for charities it’s also a great opportunity for us to raise money for Barnardos and the work they do.

Deputy Twomey added that it was a great chance “to remind people to get out to cast their vote and play their part in helping to protect vulnerable children”.

Barnardos is one of a number of organisations that provide services to children, and that are strongly advocating a Yes vote in the Referendum.

Read: Referendum Commission asks broadcasters to give more time to bulletins>

Read next:

Comments (26 Comments)

  • Irish politicians tended to run a mile from any issue to do with child welfare and child abuse – evidence how long the the cruel exploitation of children in the Industrial Schools was allowed to continue. These two guys are going to run a marathon!

    The referendum isn’t about children’s rights – it’ll allow some people to adopt some children if passed.

    Reply
  • Well done to them.
    And, everyone else that runs the marathon for charity.

    Reply
  • Is this referendum not a definite Yes, I haven’t seen a No poster or even heard of a No group opposing it. I think allot of these children’s charities and children’s groups are throwing money away by printing posters and placing adverts in TV for what I can see is going to be a landslide Yes.

    Reply
  • andrew 16/10/12 #

    bizzarre to have to run a marathon to get a referendum through. its like some bad reality tv stunt. evenif you agreed that they should do something like this shouldnt it have something to do with children?

    what next? climbing mt everest to raise awareness of the need to address EU fishing quotas?

    Reply
  • phil 16/10/12 #

    Is there seriously people giving these two hassle for raising money for children ?

    Reply
  • mart_n 16/10/12 #

    Personally I’d prefer if this lot refrained from publicly supporting either side in the referendum. I plan to vote yes, but the more they push for a Yes vote; the more people will see voting No as a protest against government.

    Reply
    • Micheal 16/10/12 #

      The people shouldn’t be voting if they’re voting on the people who wrote the referendum. What are you expecting them to do? Come out and say “listen lads, we know we wrote up the referendum like, but because we’re afraid of ye saying no we’re gonna say vote no, that way ye might vote yes”????
      I said it yesterday – google is your friend, there are copies of the text in every post office, no doubt the referendum commission will send the text to every home, flat, apartment in the country. It’s up to you to find out what this is all about, the material is widely available, and don’t, for goodness sake, be an ignorant lout and vote no because the people who wrote the thing are, shock of all shocks, advocating a yes vote.
      There is so much at stake here, out of respect for the children of tomorrow find out what it is you’re voting on.

      Reply
    • Michael
      I agree . People should read the actual text of the referendum, then they should read the text that is being removed from the Constitution and decide which form will better protect children , given that the state has failed to do so in the past on way too many occasions. I myself have not made up my mind yet and look forward to more proper discussions.

      Reply
  • Not too sure about mixing politics with sport and charity a

    Reply
  • What the hell are the TDs on about. Surely people are not going to vote NO. Why should they when its childrens rights we are voting for. It appears those TDs are riding on the back of the childrens referendum to secure their own votes.

    Reply
    • John, you need to read some of the other comments threads on the Children’s Referendum. They are full of people who are saying that they are considering voting NO simply because the government is advocating a YES.

      Reply
    • If a person chooses to vote ( Which I would encourage everyone to go out and do) ,Then there are two ways to vote .
      Yes or No. Of course people have the right to choose to vote which ever way they want , for what ever reason they want. However I do not think there is anyone out there who would vote a certain way just to be ‘spiteful’ .It is as you say , child protection which we are discussing .This is why I would encourage every one to read up and discuss the details of the referendum as much as possible before polling day .

      Reply
  • If they didnt betray the trust of the people with false election promises they wouldnt have to resort to running marathons to get a referendum through…
    ps Is our minister for health running?

    Reply
  • Now try it, you just try to run all that is proposed here without reference to the special case of the Traveller families, you can’t , not even with a solid YES vote on Saturday November 10th – and this is why this referendum is a complete and total Confidence Trick because no legislation that will work , without provision for the Traveller families can actually work, and such provision can’t work either as everybody must be equal under law.
    So if Frances Fitzgerald gets her Yes Vote she still cannot legislate as laid out for the purposes of this referendum with no mention of the Travellers anywhere, but even if she now produced legislation to make them exceptions to the rule it can’t be done anyway as we all have to be treated the same under law.
    Any or all legal eagles here must by now realise that it is all a Sham and a Confidence Trick of being asked to vote for something that can’t be done without that Traveller exception , that can’t be done either!
    Come on the Travellng People your existence has not now only shattered the Government but all Irish political parties in Dail Eireann as well and exposed them all as Fakers and Charlatans.
    Thanks for your help, Lads:-)

    Reply
  • Save the Children, Vote NO. |

    Vote NO for Democracy and Freedom and to save the children from the State.
    The Irish Government , with the support of all the Irish political parties including all the opposition , are running a national referendum in Ireland on Saturday next November 10th to give the State more control over the children of Ireland in opposition to existing parental rights, even though the Irish Constitution already protects children , where the State has always dismally failed to do so.
    Those of us concerned citizens opposing this are being overwhelmed by mass organisation, mass media and postering across Ireland right now by ALL the Irish political parties with all the politicians ganging up on the people, we feel that this is the final solution by the State and the politicians to all dissenting voices in Ireland.
    Thus we the people , with no organisation, no political party left, are fighting to the finish for Democracy and Freedom of Choice to be maintained in a Free Ireland, and that our children be saved from State despotism and Dictatorship.
    Save the Children, Vote NO.

    Reply
  • Yes, Jim you are quite correct.

    Reply
  • Barry 16/10/12 #

    Its great to see anyone take part in a marathon or for that matter any event to raise money for charitys,

    First marathon I did was in Cork and I ran it for the Irish Cancer Society, although I am running Dublin in two weeks I’m not doing it for charity but I have a plan of doing a 100km run next summer in aid of charity. Going to go for a more local based charity this time though

    Reply
  • Say what you will I will vote No simply because if you want children peapleshould be able to afford them instead of having them mostly for claiming benefits like an awful lot do.I am a parent and had my kids years ago because I WANTED them.And I was paid properly then.

    Reply
    • Becoming a parent can be an incredibly rewarding but also incredibly difficult thing. Having an unwanted child for the child benefit would be a helluva lot of work.

      But that said, I’m assuming you were at the March for Choice a couple weeks ago? If you honestly believe all children should be wanted?

      Reply
    • @ Caroline. Read the text of the proposed change below. There is no mention of social welfare or child benefit in it.

      PROPOSED NEW ARTICLE 42A

      1 The State recognises and affirms the natural and imprescriptible rights of all children and shall, as far as practicable, by its laws protect and vindicate those rights.

      2 1° In exceptional cases, where the parents, regardless of their marital status, fail in their duty towards their children to such extent that the safety or welfare of any of their children is likely to be prejudicially affected, the State as guardian of the common good shall, by proportionate means as provided by law, endeavour to supply the place of the parents, but always with due regard for the natural and imprescriptible rights of the child.

      2° Provision shall be made by law for the adoption of any child where the parents have failed for such a period of time as may be prescribed by law in their duty towards the child and where the best interests of the child so require.

      3 Provision shall be made by law for the voluntary placement for adoption and the adoption of any child.

      4 1° Provision shall be made by law that in the resolution of all proceedings -

      i brought by the State, as guardian of the common good, for the purpose of preventing the safety and welfare of any child from being prejudicially affected, or ii concerning the adoption, guardianship or custody of, or access to, any child, the best interests of the child shall be the paramount consideration.

      2° Provision shall be made by law for securing, as far as practicable, that in all proceedings referred to in subsection 1° of this section in respect of any child who is capable of forming his or her own views, the views of the child shall be ascertained and given due weight having regard to the age and maturity of the child.

      Reply

Add New Comment