Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Gardaí on the streets around the Aviva Stadium. Sam Boal via RollingNews.ie
Extra time

FAI leaves gardaí €360,000 out of pocket over failure to pay for policing major matches

The FAI said it had no comment to make.

THE FAI HAS left the Gardai almost €360,000 out of pocket over its failure last year to pay any money for policing operations around major international soccer matches in Dublin.

A spokesman for the Gardai today confirmed that “total fees outstanding to An Garda Síochána from the FAI for policing events is €357,244.95”.

He stated: “An Garda Síochána are continuing to pursue the recovery of the outstanding sum.”

In a recent written Dáil reply, the Minister for Justice, Charlie Flanagan confirmed that in the year to December 12th last, the FAI made ‘zero’ payments to the Gardai for non-public service duties.

The Garda spokesman confirmed on Friday that no payment has been received from the FAI since December 12th.

He stated: “This outstanding debt has had no impact on the Garda budget.”

The bulk of the monies would concern policing international matches at the Aviva stadium and last year, the senior Republic of Ireland team played four Euro 2020 qualifiers at the stadium.

The matches were against Georgia on March 26th, Gibraltar on June 10th, Switzerland on September 5th and Denmark on November 18th.

In addition, the Republic also played friendly matches at the Aviva against Bulgaria in September and New Zealand in November.

In contrast to the ‘nil’ payments from the FAI, Minister Flanagan stated that in the year to December 12th last, the GAA had made payments totalling €947,939 to the Gardai for non-public service duties while the FAI’s co-owners of the Aviva, the IRFU had made payments totalling €247,627 to the Gardai last year.

In his written Dáil reply to Deputy Tommy Broughan, Minister Flanagan stated that the cost to the event holder is determined by the number of Gardaí deployed and the hours they are deployed for.

He stated: “An Garda Síochána issues invoices to all relevant event holders.”

He added: “It is not always possible to define the demarcation line between public and non-public duty and it is not always feasible for An Garda Síochána to recover the total policing cost of any particular event as the over-riding concern of An Garda Síochána is public safety.

On the failure by the FAI to pay over the outstanding monies, the Garda spokesman stated: “The reasons for the non-payment of money owed to An Garda Siochana is a matter for the body that has not paid the money to comment on. No further information is available.”

He stated: “We don’t comment on the specifics of on-going correspondence with third parties.”

Asked why the FAI failed to make any payment last year or does it intend to pay the money owed to the Gardai, a spokesman for the FAI would only say: “We have no comment.”

The failure by the FAI to make any policing payments last year is the latest illustration of the perilous financial state at the organisation that threatens jobs of people working there.

The association has current liabilities of €62 million and made a loss of €8.9 million in 2018. They believe that 2019 will also be loss making perhaps up to €4m.

If the FAI was to enter liquidation with the scale of liabilities involved, there would be little prospect of the Gardai securing the monies owed.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
66
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel