TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

Gilligan and Zappone vow to continue with Supreme Court appeal

The Supreme Court denies the lesbian couple permission to add a claim of unconstitutionality to their long-running appeals.

Katherine Zappone (left) and Ann-Louise Gilligan have vowed to continue their Supreme Court appeal against Ireland's recognition of same-sex marriages, despite Friday's defeat in the Supreme Court.
Katherine Zappone (left) and Ann-Louise Gilligan have vowed to continue their Supreme Court appeal against Ireland's recognition of same-sex marriages, despite Friday's defeat in the Supreme Court.
Image: Graham Hughes/Photocall Ireland

A LESBIAN COUPLE have asserted that they will continue with their Supreme Court appeal against the constitutionality of Ireland’s marriage laws, after the court denied them the opportunity to add another argument to that appeal.

Senator Katherine Zappone and Ann Louise Gilligan married in Canada in 2003 and had sought to have that marriage recognised in Ireland. They launched a legal appeal when the State and the Revenue Commissioners failed to do so, and when the State denied them leave to marry here.

Their original High Court action in 2006 was unsuccessful, when the court interpreted the Constitution as limiting ‘marriage’ to a partnership between a man and a woman. They have since appealed that decision to the Supreme Court.

On Friday the couple had asked the Supreme Court to allow them to amend their grounds for appealing that decision, to include an appeal that Section 2.2 of the Civil Registration Act 2004 was unconstitutional.

That section specifically says there “an impediment to marriage” if both parties are of the same sex.

The Supreme Court denied their motion to appeal, saying that while the 2004 Act had been noted in the original 2006 High Court decision, a full constitutional challenge had not been mounted in that court.

This morning a statement from the couple said they were “deeply disappointed, though equally respectful of” the court’s decision, but said they wanted to state clearly “that we will continue with our court case”.

The couple are now to begin immediate consultation with their legal team to “determine the best route for a successful outcome”, and say they are undeterred in that regard.

“We believe that the constitutional issue of the human right to marry the partner of one’s choice is of the utmost public interest,” they said.

While the Civil Partnership Act passed last year grants certain privileges to same-sex couples, they do not enjoy the same status as ‘married’ couples, which in Ireland is a status only presently afforded to heterosexual couples.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (22 Comments)

  • I wish them every success. Poll after poll have shown that the majority of Irish people support same sex marriage. This is a human rights issue. Denying one group the right to marry based on their sexual orientation, something which they had no control over, is bizarre and irrational. The argument that heterosexual marriages will suffer if gay marriages are allowed has no foundation. It really is quite simple. If you don’t agree with same sex marriages, just don’t marry someone of the same sex. Allow others do as they wish.

    Reply
  • I have followed this couples fight for there basic human rights. There courage and determination have been an inspirational. Why are there laws in the way of love?

    Reply
  • I lived in Ireland with a partner from Vancouver who while here felt she had fallen asleep and woke up in a conservative catholic controlled statelet with a political establishment feverishly trying to defend our outdated laws and constitution against the influences of more liberal European ideology. We made a few shapes to get the EUmoney but we’ve a bit more to go.

    Reply
  • What consenting adults choose to do among themselves is their business. The fact that many people still believe the creator of the universe has a specific interest in the sexual affairs of humans as opposed to opossums and springboks is a contributing factor if not the only factor involved in this. Stop the lunacy give people their human rights and lets debate about something worthy of debate.

    Reply
  • Okay so the High Court are applying their interpretation of Marriage in a constitutional context. This is similar to how the wife of a deceased judge argued that the provision in the constitution did not allow for the deduction of PRSI. The court of course did not agree, if they had maybe we would have seen constitutional change on judicial pay before now. So the Oireachtas need to address this. We dont need a referendum on the matter, we simply need a new piece of legislation giving definition to marriage in the constitutional context. No where does the blue book say marriage is between man and woman, its an old concept based on judicial precedent.

    The government can easily step in here and stop wasting court time, money and effort. Lets spend money on more important things, like mortgage defaulters and the homeless.

    Reply
  • Having met them and hearing their story its heartbreaking they cant get married and fair play to them for pushing this (expensive) case this far!

    Reply
  • The issue of children’s welfare is one of those that often gets brought up in the discussions of marriage equality. Whether you like it or not, children *are* being raised by same-sex couples. But with the inequality enshrined in the Civil Partnership Act, those children DO NOT have their rights or best interests realised. They can be taken away from a loving parent if their biological parent dies, and the extended family decide they know what’s best for the child. A loving non-biological parent cannot sign a consent form for their child’s participation in school, nor can they sign essential medical consent forms in an emergency. There are many, many families in Ireland headed by same-sex couples, and their children are legally discriminated against by Civil Partnership legislation.
    So, if you really care about the welfare of children, you would support full marriage equality for same sex couples.

    Reply
  • Marriage is a societal concept primarily conceived to enable a contractual element to the transfer of money or property where less definite legal contract would not stand up. The attachment of religious concepts of retribution and damnation to this contract was to instill fear and the opprobrium of society to further stitch it up. In most early societies a woman or two was thrown in for luck.
    Where’s the need for the remnants of that crap today?

    Reply
  • Cyril, you say give everyone their rights. What about the right of children to be raised in a heterosexual family? Our is it just their though luck? Don’t believe the media that everybody in Ireland is pro same sex marriage. That is how it is portrayed.

    Reply
    • or my right to be raised by two parents? how dare i not be taken away from my dad after my mother died, clearly i would have had a much better life…just look at.children who were raised in institutiinal homes.instead of by unwed mothers *cough*

      kids should be raised by loving and capable parent(s) and if single people can legally adopt what difference.does partners adopting their spouses child make apart from clearing up legal and tax grey areas that are created by not being afforded a legally recognosed relationship with their parents. its like not having ur relationship with ur father not recognised because he wasnt married to ur mother (legitimacy did create a few legal questions in my own case, nothing as serious though as same sex, non biological parents have with their own children thank god!)

      anyway these woman dont even have children!

      Reply
    • silly phone didnt keep my paragraphs!

      Reply
    • The only harm that comes to children raised by gay parents is the bullying they receive from bigots like you. Study after study has shown conclusively that they grow up happy and healthy and no they dont turn gay. They go to college, get jobs have relationships and do everything normal healthy adults do. You see thats the thing with religion they try to introduce paranoia into everything they oppose like for example consenting adults having sex outside marriage is psychologically harmful. No it is not. The average person has around 7 small time sexual relations before meeting the right person, They say that if society loses religion they will turn evil. No they dont societies without religion that have a genuine atheistic philosophy are the most peaceful and advanced societies on earth eg Nordic nations. The same with gay marriage. Because there is a word that religions and the sheep that follow them dont like and thats called evidence. http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07161/793042-51.stm

      Reply
    • Please, correct me if I have misinterpreted your statement, but are you trying to assert that heterosexual parents = better? Because that’s one heck of a hasty generalisation..

      There are plenty of terrible parents out there who are heterosexual, whereas we have no real data on whether homosexual couples are any better or worse, they have not been given a chance. Seeing as they are people – just the same as their heterosexual counterparts – they have most likely the same chance of being as good or bad as anyone else. It is no more than assumption to state any different.

      If anything – the only thing truly standing in their way is the homophobia instilled in children by their parents or society and how this may play out in the schoolyard – but that is not the fault of the homosexual couple, nor is it an indication of their capabilities to provide a loving home for a child.

      These arguments are the last fallacious refuges of homophobia and the sooner people realise that they are based on flawed logic the better.

      Reply
    • bpdeasy,

      Not everyone will be pro same sex marriages, be it Ireland or anywhere else, thats life. You seem to idolize certain religious teachings. While we’re on the issue of both parents, thats another dated concept in our constitution. The family is recognized by the union of marriage. This leads to discrimination against same sex couples and also single parents. Unless you’re married you are not a legal family. This is wrong. Families come in all shapes and sizes.

      Ireland has moved on I hope, and we need to embrace change.

      What we have learned throughout history is that discrimination is never a good thing. The sooner we embrace difference we will all get along a lot better. Being different is not harmful.

      Reply
    • @bpdeasy
      What right of children to be raised by heterosexual guardians? I take it that’s what you mean. The most well adapted, open minded, functional children are being reared by homosexual guardians worldwide. It is only in societies like here that a narrow minded attitude prevails upon these kids to make them feel different and, in some awful cases, outcasts whereby their lives are made difficult. The only situation where you can argue that children are better off being raised by heterosexual guardians is in societies that discriminate and who’s wrong there?

      Reply
  • Marriage is between a man and a woman. Anything else is a legal agreement and shouldn’t be called marriage. This attitude of live and let live is a mistake. It’s I do the he’ll what I want and you do the he’ll what you want and we’ll all be happy. But all of our actions have an effect on society.

    Reply
    • How exactly would marriage equality effect society??

      Reply
    • You once accused me of wishing to be a dictator who would drive your beliefs off a cliff. Who is the dictator now? The biggest threat to religious freedom is and always was religion itself and it is also the biggest threat to human progresses. The voices in the heads of the few who believe they can communicate with their space daddy should be the ones who are ridiculed and not be appointed legislators.

      Reply
    • All opinions are to be respected. Some really go to the wire!

      Reply
    • I meant progress please excuse the typo.

      Reply
    • You show me where it says marriage is between a man and woman, in Bunreacht na hEireann. You fail to recognize that your idea of society does not fit all. We have marriage in the west, we also have polygamy. I suppose you do not recognize this either?

      Marriage is a legal agreement, whether it be a man and woman or otherwise. You are not separating the civil law from canon law. The laws of the church have no legal effect in this state.

      You can apply the churches definition of marriage if you wish, but until you realize the laws of this land are at the will of the people, and not the church your idea of society is flawed.

      By the way, show me that marriage is not a man mad concept. I believe it dates back to biblical times, however that document again was witnessed and written by the hand of man.

      Reply
    • Tommy C 29/09/12 #

      bp is on a pro choice story telling us how Irish women are going to be forced to have abortions by the UK and India!

      Reply

Add New Comment