TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 16 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

Newborn blood samples due for destruction ‘could save lives’

The Irish Heart Foundation is calling for people to ask for the cards, which contain genetic data from children born between 1984 and 2002, to be returned to them.

THE IRISH HEART Foundation is calling on the HSE not to destroy newborn screening card blood samples, saying they could save the lives of family members of 1,000 young victims of Sudden Cardiac Death.

Its Stop the Destruction campaign is urging members of the public to return the cards containing heel prick test samples taken from children between 1984 and 2002, as the cards represent a unique bio bank of genetic data from a generation of young people.

Genetic data

The IHF It believes that the blood samples contain invaluable genetic information that could be used to identify people at risk of Sudden Cardiac Death.

IHF medical director and consultant cardiologist, Dr Angie Brown said that unless the destruction of the cards is halted – at least until the public is properly informed – they could lose “the only chance left to obtain a genetic diagnosis for the extended family members of over 1,000 babies, children and young adults who were victims of Sudden Cardiac Death in the 18-year period up to 2002″.

This would mean that cardiac conditions that could be fatal without treatment would go undetected.

The decision to destroy the cards came after it emerged that samples taken before 1 July 2011 are being retained without consent and are in breach of national and EU data protection legislation.

A policy review carried out by a group including HSE and Department of Health experts recommended that samples more than 10 years old be destroyed unless their owners or guardians request their return. The HSE deadline for this request is March 31, Easter Sunday. After this, all other samples will be incinerated.

Sally Hegarty, whose 16 year old son Rory died in 2009 apparently due to SADS – sudden arrhythmic death syndrome, an inherited genetic condition which does not show up on post mortem – spoke of her fears for her other two children, Sadhbh and Neil.

I have been assured my children are low risk. But this is poor comfort to me – I don’t want any risk. The newborn screening card holds the only DNA I have of Rory and I hope in the future that through genetic testing, experts will be able to isolate the faulty gene and my children can be tested to prove they have not inherited this gene.

The IHF is urging the public to request that their bloodspot cards or those of their children, where possible, be returned to them. They can apply on www.newbornscreening.ie.

It is also asking for consideration to be given to legislation that would provide an ‘opt out’ system, where cards are preserved until destruction is requested. It says the cards could be used in those cases in which there is no other surviving blood or tissue sample to identify genetic abnormalities in the case of SADS.

Information on storing returned cards is available from the Irish Heart Foundation on their National Helpline Locall 1890 432 787, Mon to Fri, 10am to 5pm or by visiting www.irishheart.ie.

The HSE said that the cards are due to be destroyed to meet Data Protection regulations, and that it has invited a range of health organisations to submit details of how they would store the cards or use them for research.

Read: Defibrillators in GP surgeries could save hundreds of lives>

Read next:

Comments (12 Comments)

  • To destroy such valuable information is unethical. The HSE should just refuse to destroy it.

    Reply
    • tom 13/03/13 #

      Personal information collected for a purpose with consent can’t be used for other purposes without consent. That would be both unethical and illegal.
      Data protection is for our protection.
      While I can see why they would like to have this personal information for research they would be illegally obtaining personal information without consent. Otherwise we would have every organisation both good and bad seeking to manipulate data protection laws.

      Reply
    • You have a point Tom, but the value of these blood samples to research that could benefit us all is immense, and there are ways that they could be retained without breach of data protection.

      For one, surely they could be anonymised, so that the sex, date of birth and so on was retained, but the name not. They would not be destroyed, but would also not be identifiable.

      I have contacted the HSE and requested that the samples taken from my children are retained. They have not exactly made it easy to do this – the form is, well, quite a tricky one to complete, and I think there are an awful lot of people who would like to have their children’s (or their own) sample retained but either don’t know this is happening, don’t know what it means or are daunted by the procedure of ensuring retention.

      I think there needs to be a pause for thought and an information campaign to explain to people what this means. It could also be made easier to request retention. I don’t see why an online form could not be used for a start, with some kind of verification. If you can pay tax online I don’t see why you cannot request something like this online.

      Reply
  • Go to the HSE new born screening blood spot and read the directives there it gives details there on what’s tested, parental consent and disposal of tests.

    Reply
  • OU812 13/03/13 #

    Government needs to intervene here.

    Even from security point of view, a DNA record of everyone born in the country & it’s gonna be torched?

    Reply
  • I think it’s clear that the request is to have the samples to parents, not to create a police based genetic database. I’m sure that parents subject to a tragic loss of a child would submit samples for scientific research in order to help others not go through the same trauma.

    Reply
  • Im glad these are being destroyed before a DNA database can be established, a scary police state that would be

    Reply
    • I think we can rest safe in the knowledge that Ireland could never set up, manage and use such a database effectively. They can’t even keep the register of electors up to date. The amount of people on it that are dead quite some time is shocking, and it is possibly the most basic database the State is in charge of.

      Reply
  • Sorry but without the permission to retain that genetic data, those samples should be destroyed.
    It is a massive breach of data protection policy. A tempting database of information that the likes of Shatter would be tempted to use.
    I can appreciate where the IHF is coming from, but if people want to help out with research, they will opt in to it, not have samples of their blood used without consent.

    Reply
    • Paddy
      Your correct that’s why there is an eu directive in place. Also there is no concrete evidence that these blood screening tests will actually hold the answers they just hope they might. Parents also have the right to opt out of the test so it’s a minefield.

      Reply
    • Paddy, the point of the article is that the samples are going to be destroyed this year because it is in breech of data protection. Because the genetic information contained in the samples could be valuable they are urging people to give their consent so that their own sample is not disposed of.

      Reply
  • But what about pre-1984 which, as I understand, have already been destroyed without any bally-hoo. The newer cards are only being kept until the child reaches 11 years. A storm in a tea-cup in my opinion.

    Reply

Add New Comment