TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

International mission rescues 44 sexually exploited children

Operation Sunflower saw 245 people arrested.

Image: Old Teddy Photo via Shutterstock

AN INTERNATIONAL OPERATION targeting the sexual exploitation of children has identified 123 at-risk minors and arrested 245 suspects.

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) special agents identified 123 victims during the mission which hoped to rescue the children and target the individuals who own, trade and produce images of child pornography.

Of the children identified, 44 were rescued directly from their abusers. Another 79 were identified as either being exploited by others outside the home or are now adults who were victimised as children.

The majority of children live in the US and are female. Five were under the age of three, nine were between four and six years old, 21 were aged seven, eight or nine, while 11 were pre-teens. There were 38 identified in the 13 to 15 age bracket, while 15 were either 16- or 17-years-old.

Between 1 November and 7 December, 245 suspects were arrested. Of these, 23 were detained in six different countries, though the ICE declined to specify which ones.

Operation Sunflower was named to remember the agency’s first successful rescue under the Victim Identification Programme.

The Sunflower case began in November 2011 when Danish law enforcement officials shared their discovery of material and posts on a chat board indicating that a 16-year-old boy was planning to rape an 11-year-old girl. The suspect was soliciting advice on a pedophile board and posting images of the girl. One image held a clue that proved to be invaluable to investigators: a yellow road sign visible from the window of a moving vehicle. The road sign depicted a sunflower graphic that was unique to the State of Kansas.

For days, HSI special agents drove in pairs along Kansas highways, seeking a comparison between the images in the photos and the actual locations. Just 13 days after receiving the material, and by combining sophisticated photo forensics with traditional law enforcement methods, special agents located the residence in a small Kansas town. These efforts made it possible for law enforcement to intervene and rescue the girl before she was further victimised.

The agency is now asking for the public’s help to identify a man and a woman who appear in a number of widely-distributed child pornography images. The photos, which were taken 11 years ago, depict a male and female adult molesting a girl who looks to be about 13 years old.

-Additional reporting by AFP

Delhi gang-rape suspects to be charged in court

Read next:

Comments (23 Comments)

  • This is such a sad story and makes for horrible reading. God knows how many other children out there have not been identified. I just pray that these children go on to lead a good life.

    Reply
  • No one deserves to be the victim of such abuse. The perpetrators deserve nothing short of a slow and agonising death…..I’d go with impalement Vlad style….

    Reply
  • This type of case proves that Internet regulation is a good thing, the likes of these evil filth would never have been tracked down if they had recourse to their privacy rights. I for one am for far more stringent measures , if your not doing anything wrong you have nothing to worry about. Bring it on.

    Reply
    • The internet should be shut down and started from scratch

      Reply
    • tom 03/01/13 #

      Idiots the internet isn’t the problem if anything it makes it easier to track down and identify those who carry out these crimes.

      Reply
    • I’m with Tom. Internet isn’t the (or part of the) problem. I don’t think there are more sexual crimes now, it’s just we have more and more information (in part, thanks to the Internet).

      Reply
    • ” if your not doing anything wrong you have nothing to worry about” Ah yes, those immortal words issued by just about every dictatorship and repressive regime since the beginning of time. If you really want to be devoid of your privacy rights why not move to China or North Korea? It should be right up your street.

      Why impinge on the rights of the majority because of the wrongdoings of the minority? If you are so concerned about material detailing child abuse why not go into the Library in the ILAC center and shut it down? It contains the book 120 days of Sodom written by the Marquis de Sade and parts of it depicts child abuse. So lets shut down the library and trawl through every book and person going in and out of other libraries. Lets pat down all customers coming out of all libraries, I’m sure they won’t mind. I mean if they have done nothing wrong then they have nothing to worry about.

      Reply
  • tom 03/01/13 #

    Very encouraging reading about the sunflower case and the work put in by officials.

    Reply
  • The skin crawls. how do we deal with these people?

    Reply
  • JakkiB 03/01/13 #

    I find that those that call for the internet to be shut down or controlled are those that know nothing about it

    Reply
  • Who are they exactly Brian ? I see one comment ( which I don’t agree with btw) saying it should be shut down and started again. I called for tighter regulation which makes perfect sense.

    Reply
    • “They ” Barry is anyone who would happily give up their privacy and freedoms to Governments and regulation just because of the wrongdoings of a small few. It starts slowly but soon gathers momentum until pretty soon you end up with a situation whereby it is the regulators that tell you what you can and can’t access. Think about the censorship of books in Ireland where Catcher in the Rye was banned as was Borstal Boy. Do we want the Government to start banning websites and making ISP’s enforce that ban because they are already doing that with Eircom and the Pirate Bay.

      A basic article http://falkvinge.net/2012/07/19/debunking-the-dangerous-nothing-to-hide-nothing-to-fear/ sets out some of the arguments against the “nothing to hide”refrain. To put it another way, why do people have curtains on their windows, why do police need a warrant to search your home , why can’t the postman open your letters? It is because we all have a basic right to privacy and the right to make our own choices as to what information we want to access and what we want to keep private.

      Ireland is one of only about 20-25 countries in the world that is classed as having full legislation to deal with child pornography including CGI child porn. We don’t need any more legislation in this are bar one point which I’m still not too sure about. It is other countries that need to get up to speed and legislate more not us. In Russia for example it is legal to possess child pornography!

      Reply
    • Do like Norway, when someone wants to access a website with child pornography they aren’t stopped, instead a warning page pops up and warns them that their computer is trying access illegal material and gives them the option to leave the page or to call a phone number (police HQ in Norway) and leave their details along with certain information unique to the warning that popped up on their screen, this would allow them access the website but the authorities would have their personal information etc. this way technically there is no censorship as you will be allowed access the illegal material but you must inform the police of your intention to view child pornography

      Originally the internet service providers would not agree to this in Norway but successive opinion polls in many on the national newspapers showed a 90+% approval rating of this method monitaring child pornography websites being accessed on the internet by people using internet connections in Norway.

      Reply
    • Well that would solve a big chunk of it too! We need to start a campaign to bring this in here!!

      Reply
    • Steve 04/01/13 #

      I don’t understand why a Norwegian with a penchant for child porn would choose either option when he could easily log on anonymously using any number of ip-obscuring methods

      Reply
    • js1711 04/01/13 #

      @my_opinion. The Norwegians should hang their heads in shame if that’s what they do. How ridiculously accepting are they. Give us your details so we know you’re doing it and forget about the children. If they can create pop ups for these sites, they can shut them down and investigate the fates of the unfortunate children. I’m thoroughly disgusted.

      Reply
    • js1711 04/01/13 #

      @my_opinion. The Norwegians should hang their heads in shame if that’s what they do. How ridiculously accepting are they. Give us your details so we know you’re doing it and forget about the children. If they can create pop ups for these sites, they can shut them down and investigate the fates of the unfortunate children. I’m thoroughly disgusted.

      Reply
    • My_Opinion, I don’t think they are actually allowed to access the site as such. They are allowed to appeal in the case where the site might have been blocked in error by the filtering software. Section 204 and 204a of the Penal Code covers this are and that is what pops up on the screen. It would be handy though if every sex offender who had a problem with this would pop down to the local cop shop and make a complaint.

      Reply
  • To brian ward they locked the Marquis de Sade in the nut house and let him rot if you believe any form of media has the right to promote this sick revolting material then you should be locked up. Hang anybody who abuses a child in this way. As you clearly are so concerned about the freedom of expression in my opinon any book or any media that supports this should be burned/destroyed

    Reply
    • John I dare say that there were sex offenders in the stone age as well so going back to that time would not solve anything. At no time did I say that any form of media has the right to promote child pornography nor does any individual however burning down a library for the sake of one book is completely illogical. While you might think that taking up your pitchfork and burning torch and leading the mob in a good old book burning is a civilized way of dealing with the problem, I would prefer to take the book out of circulation, arrest the author and anyone who read the book.

      Every form of new media poses a problem to society as someone will always find a way of using it for improper purposes. Should we ban all cameras just because they can be used to take pornographic photographs or should we concentrate on the photographer. No matter what systems are put in place sex offenders will find a way around them and regularly exchange ways of doing this via chat-rooms, social media and email. Should we ban email?

      It is virtually impossible to track down sex offenders without using a targeted approach. That is why law enforcement agencies use things like Google’s Bedspread Detector, monitor chat-room’s, trace IP address’s and the COPINE project. We use technology to fight the online threat as opposed to just pulling the plug. Pedophilia is not a technological problem it is a human one so putting a pedophile in a cave isn’t going to change them one bit.

      If you want to go back to the stone age then off with you but keep an eye on your next door neighbor, you never know what they are painting on their wall!

      Reply
  • Are these on eBay

    Reply
  • There is no irony in my comment stating a fact better to be back in the stone age than allow this vile abuse to continue

    Reply

Add New Comment