TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Report into prisoner death finds multiple mistakes were made

Shane Rogers took his own life in a cell at Cloverhill courthouse, despite being on suicide watch.

Cloverhill
Cloverhill
Image: Eamonn Farrell/Photocall Ireland

A REPORT INTO the death of a prisoner in a Dublin courthouse has found multiple failings and mistakes by authorities.

Judge Michael Reilly, the Inspector of Prisons, found in his report that there had been  inadequate record keeping and a failure by parts of the prison system to communicate with each other. He also noted failure to adhere to stated work practices and the absence of governance to ensure compliance with work procedures.

Shane Rogers, who had been charged with murder, was on suicide watch when he was found unconscious in a holding cell at Cloverhill courthouse in west Dublin on 20 December 2011. He was pronounced dead at a hospital a short time later. The report notes that he had taken his own life.

The report found that a number of problems arose once Rogers was transferred to the courthouse from Cloverhill prison for a hearing.

Despite instructions that Rogers was to be checked every 15 minutes, the report found Rogers was not checked from 12.03pm until 12.58pm, which he was found unconscious by officers and an alarm was raised.

In a chronology of events, the report notes that Rogers had told his solicitor that he was going to kill himself on 12 December. He had also asked his solicitor to make his will.

The report notes that his mother and his solicitor had both telephoned the prison the week before Rogers died to express fears that he was suicidal.

Despite being classified as a vulnerable prisoner who needed protection while in Cloverhill Prison, staff at the courthouse told Justice Reilly that they only had basic details about Rogers and that they knew nothing about his vulnerability.

However the judge emphasises that even if courthouse staff had known of Rogers’ vulnerability, the tragedy would not necessarily have been averted.

A Chaplain was asked to call Rogers’ family at 2.30pm on 20 December, 27 minutes after he had been pronounced dead. However the report notes that the family already knew because a newspaper had contacted them.

Justice Reilly says in the report that changes need to be made to ensure such a case never happens again. He notes:

This Report does not set out to scapegoat prison officers who, because of systemic failures and a lack of oversight by superiors, did not adhere to the highest standards.
This Report should be used to address such failures, to provide appropriate oversight and to act as a warning to public servants at all grades that they must be careful and scrupulous when attending to their public duties in order that the general public can have complete confidence in the system that operates in our prisons.

The report noted that medical staff and prison officers at Cloverhill Prison acted properly and responsibly while Rogers was in their care during his detention.

The report by the Inspector of Prisons was separate to a Garda investigation and the Coroner’s inquest.

Minister for Justice Alan Shatter said he has has been assured by the director general of the Irish Prison Service that action has already been taken by prison management in relation to a number of issues. In a statement, he said:

I fully expect the recommendations contained in the Report to be acted upon and all necessary steps taken to ensure the deficiencies identified by the Inspector are addressed and that such a tragic occurrence can be avoided in the future.

Shatter asked Justice Reilly to carry out an independent investigation on 22 December 2011, two days after the death of Shane Rogers.

32-year-old Rogers had been charged with the murder of GAA player James Hughes in Dundalk in Louth in December 2011. He had also been accused of shooting a taxi driver and a female companion of James Hughes.

Read: The full report of the Inspector of Prisons here >

Previously: GAA player’s murder accused found dead >

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (15 Comments)

  • If you really want to kill yourself you will regardless if your in jail or not

    Reply
  • Fools 24/01/13 #

    Some justice for the people he murderd.

    Reply
    • @ Fools: The article stayed that he was charged with murder, not convicted of it. Rather a blinkered comprehension of the word “justice” in your last comment. And I wholly agree with those who point out that once the State assumes responsibility for the care/detention of a person, they are responsible for that person’s safety.

      Reply
    • John F 25/01/13 #

      @Dermot. Are you serious? He shot the guy in cold blood and in view of his ex girlfriend who sustained injury? Unfortunately the victims family will never get justice in this instance!

      Reply
  • Red Ed 24/01/13 #

    He killed himself

    Reply
  • @John: Irrespective of the media reports, eye witness accounts, etc, “justice” is the trying and convicting/acquitting of the accused. A normal, human response (given the overwhelming presence of incriminating evidence, eye witness accounts, etc) is to call this guy’s death “justice”. I’m simply highlighting the misuse of the word. Innocent until proven guilty, and all that. Similar to a thread I commented on where people were calling for the execution of the Indian gang rapists, I got lambasted with red thumbs for simply stating the flawed principle of calling for a punishment that, in other circumstances, could result in the wrongful death of potentially innocent people. Justice is not some bloke expiring on the floor of a courthouse cell, and in that respect I wholeheartedly agree with you that the family will never get justice. But my initial comment here was in objection to people considering this guy’s suicide as karmic account-settling.

    Reply
  • your rights are taken away as a free person, but not as a human being. he still deserved care despite the crime.

    Reply
    • Who watches out for those who are suicidal but not in custody? It is not fair to say that the prison service are responsible for him killing himself.

      Reply
    • Of course it’s fair to say they are responsible! He was on suicide watch, they didn’t watch him. They didn’t follow their own protocols. The mission statement of the Irish prison service is “Providing safe and secure custody, dignity of care and rehabilitation to prisoners for safer communities”. They were found to be in dereliction of the duty they declared for themselves. The fact our government doesn’t regard suicide as a priority is another issue altogether.

      Reply
  • If they are going to lock you up , and if you are known to be suicidal , they have a duty of care towards you.

    Reply
    • Shocking negligence by the screws in question. This suicide check of every 15 minutes is in reality never adhered to, and as happened in this case. How did a man on suicide watch get access to ligature to hang himself?

      Reply
  • So who is going to be held accountable for this avoidable death? Are assurances by the director general of the Irish Prison Service enough?

    Reply

Add New Comment