TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 5 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Iran prepares for ‘war games’ as sanctions take effect

Three-day drill starts days after EU and US imposed new sanctions.

Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at a  Rio+20 event last month.
Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at a Rio+20 event last month.
Image: Victor R. Caivano/AP/Press Association Images

IRAN SAID TODAY that it was readying ballistic missile war games simulating a counter-attack against US or Israeli targets in the region in the event of air strikes on its nuclear facilities.

The three-day drill in Iran’s central desert region was starting days after the European Union and the United States imposed severe new sanctions, and on the eve of another round of negotiations with world powers seeking to curb Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.

“All units and missile bases have commenced their preparation and movement to the designated areas,” the Revolutionary Guards, Iran’s powerful elite military force conducting the exercise, said in a statement published by the official IRNA news agency.

It said the “tens of different missiles” to be used included the Shahab-3, a ballistic missile with a range of 2,000 km capable of hitting Israel.

The other ballistic missiles it said would be used – the Fateh, Tondar, Zelzal, Khalij Fars and Qiam – have lesser ranges of 200 to 750 km.

The exercise, dubbed Great Prophet 7, was to target a “replica air base” in the Kavir Desert, the statement said.

Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the head of the Guards’ aerospace division handling missile operations, announced the war games Sunday by saying they showed Iran “will decisively respond to any trouble” caused by “adventurous nations”.

He intimated the mock air base was modelled after US military bases in neighbouring Afghanistan, Bahrain, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Iran has previously warned it would target those US bases if Israel or the United States made good on threats to attack it.

IRNA quoted Hajizadeh as saying: “If they (the Israelis) make a move, they will give us a pretext to obliterate them from the face of the Earth.”

He asserted that Israel needed US help for any military action against Iran, adding: “Since the US bases are within the range of our missiles and weapons, they (the Americans) definitely will not be pressured to go along with this regime (Israel).”

Exercises

The manoeuvres will take place during negotiations in Istanbul on Tuesday between representatives from Iran and from the P5+1 group comprising the five permanent UN Security Council members, the United States, Britain, France, China and Russia, plus Germany.

The talks have faltered through three rounds held this year, with it becoming clear that a vast distance divided the two sides. As a result, they have now been downgraded from a political director level to that of experts.

Iran chafes under the West’s “carrot and stick” approach aimed at rolling back its nuclear programme through bargaining in the negotiations, and through the harder tactics of sanctions and the US threat of military action if all else fails.

Tehran has defiantly forged on with its atomic activities, particularly its highly sensitive uranium enrichment programme, while repeatedly denying Western suspicions that it is seeking a nuclear weapon “break-out” capability.

A sanction regime imposed by the UN Security Council and extended through punishing additional Western sanctions was reinforced last week.

The United States on Thursday bolstered restrictions on foreign companies doing business with Iran’s central bank, unless their nations were granted exemptions on the basis of reduced Iranian oil imports.

And the European Union on Sunday enacted a bloc-wide embargo on Iranian crude that also blocked EU companies from providing insurance for tankers carrying Iranian oil anywhere in the world – a move affecting 90 per cent of that market.

Iran disputes data from the International Energy Agency that suggest the Western sanctions have already cut its vital oil exports by around 40 percent.

- (c) AFP, 2012

Read next:

Comments (25 Comments)

  • Every nation has the right to prepare against any military invasion. I’m conflicted on this. On one side, Iran is controlled by bunch of lunatics, who are not being transparent with respect to it’s nuclear program. On the other side, you have Israel – also controlled by lunatics, which is even less transparent about it’s nuclear program, finger-waving at Iran.

    Even if both sides did possess nuclear weapons (and by all intelligence reports, Israel is the only one to possess them) – I highly doubt either would be stupid enough to actually use them.. Israel however (with or without US support) would certainly launch an air-based attack on Iranian facilities, starting another war in the region.

    To rectify the Iranian problem – we need the following to happen. Israel needs to shut up and relax with the sabre-rattling, the US and the EU need to continue sanctions until Iran opens it’s nuclear program up for unconditional inspection.

    Reply
  • Sanctions. The PR word for strangle a country

    Reply
  • Economic sanctions have long been recognised as an act of war. We’re never taught in school that Pearl Harbour was the direct result of US imposed sanctions prohibiting Japan from importing oil in WW2. Now they’re stopping Iran from exporting it’s oil with
    equally dire economic consequences as oil is its main export. The west is running out of money and war is a lucrative business for oligarchies and the military industrial complex. These money junkie sociopaths want to send gullible children and young adults to fight brutal wars in the name of profit. Makes me sick to the stomach.

    Reply
  • The Israelis don’t allow weapon inspectors in either so why are they not sanctioned? Oh ya, I forgot, they run America.

    Reply
    • MnB 02/07/12 #

      ‘They run America,’ nnQuality stuff

      Reply
    • This is all about western hegemonic control. Would the US or Britain allow other countries inspect their military sites?.., don’t think so. Turkey, friend of the USA , had plans to double its armed forces which already number at a staggering 500000. Anybody concerned about that? Don’t get me wrong .. I’m for western hegemonic control.. Just call it what it is.

      Reply
  • Jaysus

    Reply
  • The first paragraph from the Wiki page for the Iranian Nuclear Programme:
    “The nuclear program of Iran was launched in the 1950s with the help of the United States as part of the Atoms for Peace program.[1] The participation of the United States and Western European governments in Iran’s nuclear program continued until the 1979 Iranian Revolution that toppled the Shah of Iran.[2]”
    So basically as long as Iran puts a pro-US dictator in power it can have as many nukes as it likes. Gotta love Wikipedia for telling it as it is.

    Reply
    • mattoid 02/07/12 #

      The Atoms for Peace programme was all about sharing nuclear technology and expertise for the development of nuclear power plants, something the US and the UN still have no problem with Iran pursuing, so I’m not sure exactly what point you’re trying to make…

      Reply
    • Daniel R 02/07/12 #

      It was a cover- as Leonard Weiss scholar at Stanford University’s Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC) said recently: It is legitimate to ask whether Atoms for Peace accelerated proliferation by helping some nations achieve more advanced arsenals than would have otherwise been the case. The jury has been in for some time on this question, and the answer is yes’

      Reply
    • mattoid 02/07/12 #

      You forgot this part of the wiki page:n’In November 2011, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Board of Governors rebuked Iran following an IAEA report detailing how Iran had undertaken research and experiments geared to developing a nuclear weapons capability.[7] For the first time, the IAEA report outlines, in depth, the country’s detonator development, the multiple-point initiation of high explosives, and experiments involving nuclear payload integration into a missile delivery vehicle.’

      Reply
    • Daniel R 02/07/12 #

      I never doubted Iran’s development of nucear weapons, but how many times has the IAEA critisized the US, the country with the biggest supply of nukes, dealer of nukes to countries like Israel and the only country to have ever used one? None. As Paul Carr osted earlier wouldn’t you want nuclear weapons in this scenario?: http://socioecohistory.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/us_military_bases_surrounding_iran.jpg

      Reply
  • mel 02/07/12 #

    Where is the evidence that Iran is building a bomb sounds like the evidence we had on Iraq

    Reply
  • USA is the true international rogue state. Under Obama, it has bombed 6 countries in violation of international law. Their drones have killed at least 800 civilians in Pakistan alone. Their drone campaign continues there despite a resolution passed by the Pakistani democratically elected parliament in April calling on its cessation.

    Iran seeks only the peaceful use of nuclear energy, something it is entitled to as a signatory of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Israel has nukes and it is not a signatory to the above mentioned treaty.

    The USA has a ring of military bases in 4 countries surrounding Iran. Its 4th fleet is based in Bahrain and, yet, its government feels insecure enough to threaten military intervention if it doesn’t get its way in negotiations. And we’re supposed to conclude that this says more about Iran than the USA?

    Reply
  • In 2010, Californian farmers earned USD1bn on the sale of Pistachio nuts. California are the world’s second largest producer of Pistachios, second only to Iran. So as the price of Pistachios increases over the coming months and years, we should be aware that this is just one of the products financing the economic war with Iran.

    Reply

Add New Comment