TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 17 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Irish people still believe overseas aid is important

A new poll has shown that the majority of people believe Ireland should be proud of its reputation as an international donor.

Image: Photocall Ireland/DFA

ALTHOUGH A TOUGH economic climate continues to worry the people of Ireland, the vast majority of the population believe the State should continue to invest in overseas aid.

A new Ipsos/MRBI poll commissioned by Dóchas found that 88 per cent of the public think that Ireland should be proud of its reputation as an international aid donor.

A similar number (85 per cent) rated overseas aid as either ‘important’ or ‘very important’.

However, the research also highlighted that members of the public are increasingly unsure about what kind of difference such investment can make to the lives of those who they wish to help.

Good news from Africa not reaching the public

Less than half of those surveyed believe Africa is better off now than two decades ago. “In fact there is increasing evidence of progress in the continent’s sub-Saharan region where much of Ireland’s public and private aid is spent,” said Dóchas in a statement.

”The poll shows that…people’s perceptions of what aid can do, and what aid is actually achieving, have not caught up with realities on the ground,” added Dóchas chairperson Jim Clarken.

“There are good stories coming from the countries that Ireland provides government aid to. In Mozambique, for example, seven million children are now in school compared to 400,000 twenty years ago. In Uganda, HIV infection rates have been reversed, and there are now more democracies across the region than ever before,” said Hans Zomer, director of Dóchas.

Although most people get their information about Africa from news sources and television, most of what is covered deals with crises, explains Matthias Fiedler of the Irish Development Education Association (IDEA).

“Images of hunger, violence and poverty dominate the news, but the good news stories -of economic growth, creativity, improving education and innovation – are not coming through,” he said.

Ireland has pledged to spend about 0.7 per cent of its national income on overseas aid before 2015. That equates to 70 cents out of every €100. At the moment, the budget is less than that and stands at €639 million, a fall of more than 30 per cent since 2008.

“Irish Aid has been recognised time after time, by independent international observers, as one of the best aid programmes in the world,” said Junior Minister Joe Costello today. “Irish Aid is the Irish people’s aid programme and I am glad that the public takes pride in our role in supporting the world’s poorest communities to tackle hunger and poverty.”

A conference entitled C Cubed focusing on how NGOs can creatively communicate complex ideas about the effectiveness of international aid to the public is being held today.

Commenting ahead of that conference, Costello urged not-for-profits to move away from negative imaging and messaging which portrays peoplein the developing world as passive victims.

Too often the messages and images portrayed in fundraising and communications focus on the negative and the simple. We must communicate the more complex picture of international development and portray people in developing countries as active citizens rather than just victims; as agents in their own political and economic change. It is not only the right thing to do: international research has shown it is what the public wants to see and read.

Read: Ireland to pledge €500,000 in response to Syria crisis>

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (7 Comments)

  • The finding that the majority of people are in favour of Irish Aid is contradictory to the finding that the majority or people do not know or do not feel that aid does any good.
    The finding does not therefore support the giving of aid at least in its present form because of the lack of credibility in its usefulness.
    The lack of transparency, accountability or measurable results reinforces the view that there is no consideration of value for money.
    The findings will only add to demands for spin and “good news stories” which do nothing to tell the truth of the huge waste of money that most aid offers.

    Reply
  • Since we are financially fecked and are getting funds from the EU/IMF/UK etc, should we not be giving away money (unless we are seeing some kind of return on it?) when we are borrowing money.

    Reply
  • Well that is GREAT news from the government.
    However, from my vast experience here in Africa this money donated usually is minuscule by the time it filters its way through these big NGO’s & local officials. From initial transport, lovely offices, big 4x4 vehicles to lavish housing…

    I’ve seen it for my own eyes & it makes me physically sick.
    Why is this money not properly ever followed up with what are honourable expenses etc?

    This is what makes it difficult for small NGO’s who actually pay for expenses out of their own pockets, don’t charge administration fees, who don’t take salaries, who ensure any donated monies go exactly to the designated place to have the ability to attain donations due to the negligence of other large bodies.

    Valerie Mc Nulty
    Founder & Volunteering,
    Born to Learn, Tanzania.

    Reply
    • Agree with your comments on unacceptable costs of the big NGOs and Government aid people but depending on semi-volunteers as you suggest is hardly the way to go.
      Few people can afford to work in aid without salaries, transport or housing and those that do usually are either well-off, Religious (with their own agendas) or very young and with little life experience or know-how.
      Overseas aid needs to be able to recruit and attract those with the right skills as well as the motivation which you demonstrate.
      Too many well meaning people end up working in aid who have not the experience and skills for such a difficult role while on the other hand too many of those you describe dominate the profession.
      We need a lot more accountability both for the financial and results achieved. Until we get more quality, professionalism, conditionality and payment by results into aid -we will continue to question the point of it all.

      Reply
  • I can understand people being dubious about where the money as going as we have had stories in recent years about money going to warlords. I don’t know if any have been proven as true but they does stick in peoples’ minds.

    Our own Bob Geldof was (wrongly) accused of helping out private armies in Ethiopia with Live Aid money. We need to hear more about how aid is benefitting Africa, to balance out the negative stories.

    The article says “seven million children are now in school compared to 400,000 twenty years ago.” That’s absolutely amazing, great work. I for one would love to hear more positive news stories from Africa.

    Reply
  • Trade not aid. Handouts are not sustainable . Creates a culture of dependence

    Reply
  • ***they do**

    Reply

Add New Comment