TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 14 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Over 3,000 episodes of physical restraint in mental health centres in 2011

A new report said there has been a year-on-year increase in the use of physical restraint.

Image: Hands image via Shutterstock

A NEW REPORT on mental health centres in Ireland has revealed that a total of 3,056 episodes of physical restraint were reported in 2011. The report by the Mental Health Commission said this figure represents an increase of 71 compared to the number recorded in 2010,

Overall use of restrictive practices in 2011 were down by almost 12 per cent on the previous year and the the use of seclusion and mechanical means of bodily restraint has also steadily declined since 2008.

However the report said there has been a year-on-year increase in the use of physical restraint.

Seclusion accounted for 35.5 per cent of all restrictive interventions reported to the Commission in 2011 with 1,683 episodes reported. Less than half, 47.1 per cent, of approved centres (32/68) indicated that they used seclusion in 2011 and the remainder (36) reported that they did not use seclusion at all.

Dublin North Central and Dublin North West had the highest rate of seclusion followed closely by Waterford/Wexford.

For the fourth year, St Joseph’s Intellectual Disability Services at St Ita’s Hospital in North Dublin recorded the highest number of episodes of seclusion. They reported 369 episodes of seclusion in 2011, a notable decrease on use reported in 2010 when there were 711 episodes of seclusion in this approved centre.

Two dedicated child and adolescent approved centres, the Adolescent In-patient Unit, St Vincent’s Hospital and the Child & Adolescent Mental Health In-patient Unit, Merlin Park University Hospital, reported that they used seclusion in 2011.

As in previous years, the percentage of males secluded were greater than that of females at over 60 per cent.

seclusion gender

The majority 51.6 per cent of seclusion episodes lasted for four hours or less and three-quarters (75.2 per cent) lasted for eight hours or less. In 16 per cent of episodes, seclusion lasted between eight and 24 hours and in a further 6.9 per cent of episodes it lasted between 24 and 72 hours.

Only three approved centres reported using mechanical restraint while over three quarters recorded episodes of physical restraint.

St Joseph’s Intellectual Disability Services in St Ita’s Hospital recorded the highest number of physical restraint episodes of all approved centres in 2011. This intervention was used 366 times in 2011, which was considerably less than their use of physical restraint in 2010 when they reported 616 episodes.

All dedicated child and adolescent approved centres (5) reported using physical restraint, usage was up from 100 episodes in 2010 to 214 episodes in 2011.

In 2011, 90.5 per cent of physical restraint episodes lasted for 15 minutes or less and 7.9 per cent of episodes lasted for between 16 and 30 minutes. Fifty one episodes (1.7 per cent) lasted for more than 30 minutes, of which ten (0.3 per cent) lasted for more than one hour. In 2010, four episodes lasted for longer than one hour.

physical restraint

Commenting on the publication of the report today, John Saunders, Chairman of the Mental Health Commission said it is the watchdog’s view that “the use of seclusion and restraint are not standard interventions but emergency measures which should be used in rare and exceptional circumstances and only in the best interests of the patient when the patient poses an immediate threat of serious harm to self or others”.

“Our aim is to encourage approved centres to focus on preventative measures that eliminate or minimise the use of restrictive interventions,” he said. “To that end the Commission has during 2012 completed a consultation exercise on a seclusion and physical restraint reduction strategy,” he added.

The strategy is expected to be published during 2013 and it will be implemented nationwide.

Read: INTO calls for all teachers to be given mental health training>

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (20 Comments)

  • Patients may present what is seen as a danger to self or others, due to staff shortages,
    We must be mindful to provide adequate staffing, if we wish to provide holistic care, and always remember that their is a duty of care to staff as well as patients

    Reply
    • Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. Mentally disabled people dragged away and shut into a room by themselves, frightened and confused, for “up to four hours”? What the hell is this country becoming?
      We’re returning to the land of the Magdalen Laundries.

      Reply
    • @sinabhfuil.. you dont have a clue what you are talking about.. you haven’t seen the behaviour of some people with severe mental health problems..

      Reply
    • Of course I have seen the behaviour of people with mental disability (which is the subject of this article, not mental health ‘problems’). And I know that physical restraint and solitary confinement do not help people to become calm and happy, especially people who can’t understand well what’s going on.
      This is a disgrace.

      Reply
    • Sina, your solution when an individual patient presents a direct risk to other patients and staff???

      Reply
    • Those cases are extremely rare, Shay, and – like most human anger – can 99% of the time be short-circuited by intelligent foresight.

      Reply
    • And incidentally, surely it’s good practice to look at the clinical practice in other countries known for their excellent care of the mentally disabled. We don’t have to go through the painful process of evolution by ourselves in Ireland every time.
      I assume, by the way, that all the red thumbs are from people who enjoy having the chance to physically restrain people less powerful than themselves?

      Reply
    • Sina, that’s the reason this area of care should not be left short staff, it is labour intensive, as in identifying problems before they arise,
      The duty of care to staff cannot be ignored, everyone has right to work in a safe environment , the 1 percent you speak of have to be cared for too

      I don’t work this area, but did volunteer work as a teenager, and admire greatly all staff providing care in this unique area

      Reply
    • An incidentally , money can improve environment , extra specialities can improve communication,
      Sending people over seas is useful only if resources are provided when they return

      Reply
    • You’re right, Shay, there should be enough staff, and they should be properly trained people suited to the work, with good pay and conditions so they’re not crazy with stress.

      Reply
  • I wonder, does the increase have a direct correlation to to the decrease in frontline staff? as a complete outsider to the system, this would be one of the first things that would spring to my mind.

    Reply
    • No question – of course it does. And staff are stressed; and it’s quite possible that people are increaingly going into this work because “it’s a job”, not because of love and dedication.

      Reply
  • I have worked in other places that deal in the same business and have seen clients been given prn (drugs to make them relax) cause they were getting abit excitable. If the increase in restraint means a decrease in giving drugs i dont see it as a bad thing over all. However several people i worked with would act up just to be restraint to seek some body contact, something the care business has to remain mindful of

    Reply
  • Orla B 15/03/13 #

    Duty of care to staff applies to any job surely

    Reply
  • Orla B 16/03/13 #

    Practically every job has its risks whether your a farmer, a van driver, a nurse, an office worker or mental health worker. Inadequate training, understaffing and day to day pressures to meet deadlines etc increase the risks in any job. Why do civil servant staff somehow think they have more to put up with than the rest of us

    Reply
  • Orla B 16/03/13 #

    I agree it’s a demanding job just sick of civil and /or public servants moaning !

    Reply

Add New Comment