TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 16 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

My favourite speech: Micheál Martin

Continuing a summer series on TheJournal.ie of public figures’ favourite speeches, Micheál Martin picks a famous address by John F Kennedy.

Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin
Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin
Image: Niall Carson/PA Archive/Press Association Images

THE AUTHOR AND former presidential speechwriter Peggy Noonan once said: “A speech is poetry: cadence, rhythm, imagery, sweep!  A speech reminds us that words, like children, have the power to make dance the dullest beanbag of a heart.”

One can not underestimate the power of a good speech or the effectiveness of a speech’s key line.

With that in mind, over the course of the summer TheJournal.ie is asking some of the most prominent figures in Irish society from politicians to sports stars to nominate their favourite speech of all time and tell us why they like it so much.

Today: Fianna Fáil leader and former minister Micheál Martin. He writes:

My favourite speech is President John F Kennedy’s address at Rice University Texas in September 1962.

At a time of great turmoil and self doubt in the USA, President Kennedy sets out a bold and stirring challenge to the country. He acknowledges the seemingly insurmountable technological and financial challenges, but appeals to a deeper, more emotional place – setting this scientific challenge in the context of the American people’s self image, appealing to their resilience andtheir ability to choose their future place in the world.

Apart from the obvious resonance in the speech for people at this time ofeconomic crisis and doubt, when I listen to the speech I still admire the scaleof what Kennedy was proposing for his country and the sense of self belief andcommon endeavour he successfully inspired.

KN-C23643

President John F Kennedy outlined a vision to see the United States reach the moon by the end of the decade. His hope would be realised in July 1969 when Neil Armstrong set foot on the moon. (Wikimedia Commons/JFK Library)

Watch the speech in full:


YouTube:

The full text of the speech:

President Pitzer, Mr. Vice President, Governor, Congressman Thomas, Senator Wiley, and Congressman Miller, Mr. Webb, Mr. Bell, scientists, distinguished guests, and ladies and gentlemen:

I appreciate your president having made me an honorary visiting professor, and I will assure you that my first lecture will be very brief.
I am delighted to be here, and I’m particularly delighted to be here on this occasion.

We meet at a college noted for knowledge, in a city noted for progress, in a State noted for strength, and we stand in need of all three, for we meet in an hour of change and challenge, in a decade of hope and fear, in an age of both knowledge and ignorance. The greater our knowledge increases, the greater our ignorance unfolds.

Despite the striking fact that most of the scientists that the world has ever known are alive and working today, despite the fact that this Nation¹s own scientific manpower is doubling every 12 years in a rate of growth more than three times that of our population as a whole, despite that, the vast stretches of the unknown and the unanswered and the unfinished still far outstrip our collective comprehension.

No man can fully grasp how far and how fast we have come, but condense, if you will, the 50,000 years of man¹s recorded history in a time span of but a half-century. Stated in these terms, we know very little about the first 40 years, except at the end of them advanced man had learned to use the skins of animals to cover them. Then about 10 years ago, under this standard, man emerged from his caves to construct other kinds of shelter. Only five years ago man learned to write and use a cart with wheels. Christianity began less than two years ago. The printing press came this year, and then less than two months ago, during this whole 50-year span of human history, the steam engine provided a new source of power.

Newton explored the meaning of gravity. Last month electric lights and telephones and automobiles and airplanes became available. Only last week did we develop penicillin and television and nuclear power, and now if America’s new spacecraft succeeds in reaching Venus, we will have literally reached the stars before midnight tonight.

This is a breathtaking pace, and such a pace cannot help but create new ills as it dispels old, new ignorance, new problems, new dangers. Surely the opening vistas of space promise high costs and hardships, as well as high reward.

So it is not surprising that some would have us stay where we are a little longer to rest, to wait. But this city of Houston, this State of Texas, this country of the United States was not built by those who waited and rested and wished to look behind them. This country was conquered by those who moved forward–and so will space.

William Bradford, speaking in 1630 of the founding of the Plymouth Bay Colony, said that all great and honorable actions are accompanied with great difficulties, and both must be enterprised and overcome with answerable courage.

If this capsule history of our progress teaches us anything, it is that man, in his quest for knowledge and progress, is determined and cannot be deterred. The exploration of space will go ahead, whether we join in it or not, and it is one of the great adventures of all time, and no nation which expects to be the leader of other nations can expect to stay behind in the race for space.

Those who came before us made certain that this country rode the first waves of the industrial revolutions, the first waves of modern invention, and the first wave of nuclear power, and this generation does not intend to founder in the backwash of the coming age of space. We mean to be a part of it–we mean to lead it. For the eyes of the world now look into space, to the moon and to the planets beyond, and we have vowed that we shall not see it governed by a hostile flag of conquest, but by a banner of freedom and peace. We have vowed that we shall not see space filled with weapons of mass destruction, but with instruments of knowledge and understanding.

Yet the vows of this Nation can only be fulfilled if we in this Nation are first, and, therefore, we intend to be first. In short, our leadership in science and in industry, our hopes for peace and security, our obligations to ourselves as well as others, all require us to make this effort, to solve these mysteries, to solve them for the good of all men, and to become the world’s leading space-faring nation.

We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained, and new rights to be won, and they must be won and used for the progress of all people. For space science, like nuclear science and all technology, has no conscience of its own. Whether it will become a force for good or ill depends on man, and only if the United States occupies a position of pre-eminence can we help decide whether this new ocean will be a sea of peace or a new terrifying theater of war. I do not say the we should or will go unprotected against the hostile misuse of space any more than we go unprotected against the hostile use of land or sea, but I do say that space can be explored and mastered without feeding the fires of war, without repeating the mistakes that man has made in extending his writ around this globe of ours.

There is no strife, no prejudice, no national conflict in outer space as yet. Its hazards are hostile to us all. Its conquest deserves the best of all mankind, and its opportunity for peaceful cooperation many never come again. But why, some say, the moon? Why choose this as our goal? And they may well ask why climb the highest mountain? Why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic? Why does Rice play Texas?

We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too.

It is for these reasons that I regard the decision last year to shift our efforts in space from low to high gear as among the most important decisions that will be made during my incumbency in the office of the Presidency.

In the last 24 hours we have seen facilities now being created for the greatest and most complex exploration in man’s history. We have felt the ground shake and the air shattered by the testing of a Saturn C-1 booster rocket, many times as powerful as the Atlas which launched John Glenn, generating power equivalent to 10,000 automobiles with their accelerators on the floor. We have seen the site where the F-1 rocket engines, each one as powerful as all eight engines of the Saturn combined, will be clustered together to make the advanced Saturn missile, assembled in a new building to be built at Cape Canaveral as tall as a 48 story structure, as wide as a city block, and as long as two lengths of this field.

Within these last 19 months at least 45 satellites have circled the earth. Some 40 of them were “made in the United States of America” and they were far more sophisticated and supplied far more knowledge to the people of the world than those of the Soviet Union.

The Mariner spacecraft now on its way to Venus is the most intricate instrument in the history of space science. The accuracy of that shot is comparable to firing a missile from Cape Canaveral and dropping it in this stadium between the the 40-yard lines.

Transit satellites are helping our ships at sea to steer a safer course. Tiros satellites have given us unprecedented warnings of hurricanes and storms, and will do the same for forest fires and icebergs.

We have had our failures, but so have others, even if they do not admit them. And they may be less public.

To be sure, we are behind, and will be behind for some time in manned flight. But we do not intend to stay behind, and in this decade, we shall make up and move ahead.

The growth of our science and education will be enriched by new knowledge of our universe and environment, by new techniques of learning and mapping and observation, by new tools and computers for industry, medicine, the home as well as the school. Technical institutions, such as Rice, will reap the harvest of these gains.

And finally, the space effort itself, while still in its infancy, has already created a great number of new companies, and tens of thousands of new jobs. Space and related industries are generating new demands in investment and skilled personnel, and this city and this State, and this region, will share greatly in this growth. What was once the furthest outpost on the old frontier of the West will be the furthest outpost on the new frontier of science and space. Houston, your City of Houston, with its Manned Spacecraft Center, will become the heart of a large scientific and engineering community. During the next 5 years the National Aeronautics and Space Administration expects to double the number of scientists and engineers in this area, to increase its outlays for salaries and expenses to $60 million a year; to invest some $200 million in plant and laboratory facilities; and to direct or contract for new space efforts over $1 billion from this Center in this City.

To be sure, all this costs us all a good deal of money. This year¹s space budget is three times what it was in January 1961, and it is greater than the space budget of the previous eight years combined. That budget now stands at $5,400 million a year–a staggering sum, though somewhat less than we pay for cigarettes and cigars every year. Space expenditures will soon rise some more, from 40 cents per person per week to more than 50 cents a week for every man, woman and child in the United Stated, for we have given this program a high national priority–even though I realize that this is in some measure an act of faith and vision, for we do not now know what benefits await us.

But if I were to say, my fellow citizens, that we shall send to the moon, 240,000 miles away from the control station in Houston, a giant rocket more than 300 feet tall, the length of this football field, made of new metal alloys, some of which have not yet been invented, capable of standing heat and stresses several times more than have ever been experienced, fitted together with a precision better than the finest watch, carrying all the equipment needed for propulsion, guidance, control, communications, food and survival, on an untried mission, to an unknown celestial body, and then return it safely to earth, re-entering the atmosphere at speeds of over 25,000 miles per hour, causing heat about half that of the temperature of the sun–almost as hot as it is here today–and do all this, and do it right, and do it first before this decade is out–then we must be bold.

I’m the one who is doing all the work, so we just want you to stay cool for a minute. [laughter]

However, I think we’re going to do it, and I think that we must pay what needs to be paid. I don’t think we ought to waste any money, but I think we ought to do the job. And this will be done in the decade of the sixties. It may be done while some of you are still here at school at this college and university. It will be done during the term of office of some of the people who sit here on this platform. But it will be done. And it will be done before the end of this decade.

I am delighted that this university is playing a part in putting a man on the moon as part of a great national effort of the United States of America.
Many years ago the great British explorer George Mallory, who was to die on Mount Everest, was asked why did he want to climb it. He said, “Because it is there.”

Well, space is there, and we’re going to climb it, and the moon and the planets are there, and new hopes for knowledge and peace are there. And, therefore, as we set sail we ask God’s blessing on the most hazardous and dangerous and greatest adventure on which man has ever embarked.

Thank you.

Read more from our ‘Favourite Speeches’ summer series

Read next:

Comments (29 Comments)

  • If Fianna Fail are ever voted back into Government I’m leaving this country. We are in this mess because of them.

    Reply
  • What we can be thankful to FF for.

    IMF
    National Debt €200 billion
    €18 billion annual deficit
    450,000 live register
    70,000 solas courses
    NAMA
    Bust banks
    €63 billion to Banks
    €29 billion to Anglo
    €5.4 billion to INBS
    Pensions wiped out
    NPRF practically wiped out
    Laughing stock of the EU
    Decentralisation
    Highest PS pay in Europe
    Benchmarking
    Property bubbles well & truly burst
    40,000 in mortgage arrears
    250,000 negative equity
    100,000 utility arrears
    The need for water rates
    The need for property tax
    IMF
    Health service in tatters
    Massive payoffs for failed politicians
    No financial regulation
    Secret meetings between BIFFO and Seanie Fitz
    Secret meetings between Anglo Board and BIFFO
    300,000 empty houses

    evoting
    Thornton Hall
    Charlie Haughey
    Liam Lawlor
    Rambo
    Bertie Ahern
    Scandalous way that Tom Gilmatin was treated
    BT account
    Luas over-runs
    PPARs
    HSE
    Port Tunnel
    IMF
    IGB site
    DDDA
    DDA
    Terminal 2
    Sites all over the country bought at crazy prices
    €32m to Durkan Bros this week
    90,000 on housing lists
    Stamp duty loopholes not closed
    CFDs
    Special tax break for Ken Rohan………back dated
    Passports for Sale
    Boyne Site
    Promissory Notes
    Night of the bank guarantee
    Bertie Bowl
    National Aquatic Centre
    Govt jet used travel to the opening of an off licence
    $450 for hair do`s
    Limos from terminal 1 to terminal 2 stg £1500
    FAS extravagance
    FAS waste
    Roddy Molloy pay offs
    FAS premises in Tullamore
    Padraig Flynn
    Beverley Flynn
    Secret deals with independents

    All just from 13 years.

    The actions that leading historical figures would take against them, well we can all guess.

    Reply
  • I reckon meeholes real favourite is Brian Cowens resignation speech. I know its one of my favourites. Not because of the way Biffo drooled and stumbled his way through it, but because it happened. That was enough.

    Reply
  • Was halfway through JFK’s amazing speech before it hit me, “Oh my God! M.Martin chose this speech. The comments below this are gonna be head-melting.”
    And yiz didn’t disappoint.

    Great speech btw! It’s all v “West Wing” or something!

    Reply
    • mcbab 15/07/12 #

      Ah fagan I see half way down your list you acknowledge “the need for water charges” and “the need for property charges”. Does this mean you have seen the light and are now going to pay ? Hooray!

      Reply
    • So MaCrab. I take it I won’t be seeing you at the No Household Tax Dáil Protest this Wednesday so. Just in case you change your mind we’re meeting at Central Bank Plaza at 5pm and we’ll be heading up to the Dáil after a few speeches, to get us in the mood, at about 5.30. I’d love to see you there. ;)

      Reply
    • @ Paul

      “Oh my God! M.Martin chose this speech. The comments below this are gonna be head-melting.”

      Of course. The people will not forget what FF have done. We live with it daily. For shame.

      Reply
  • mcbab 15/07/12 #

    No Reada I won’t be at your demonstration. I happen to think that the guards have better things to be doing without having to keep you lot in order. Breaking through barricades and such like!

    Reply
  • Damocles 16/07/12 #

    Sorry to be so cynical but isn’t it more likely that this series should be entitled “Speech that identifying as my favourite puts me in the most favourable light”?

    No politician who favours the Nuremberg Address is going to admit to that (not to suggest that any politician chosen for this does pick that speech, but just for instance) but will go through a list of speeches, look at current politics and think “Hmm … this one seems quite apposite.”

    Just sayin’.

    Reply
  • Use each others heads as your unlikely to cause any damage that has ot been caused already.

    Reply
  • Seriously, does thejournal.ie not moderate some of the garbage that posters put up here.!!

    Reply
    • Yeah Donncha. I wasn’t that impressed by it either. But in fairness Enda had already taken the JFK speech to the Dáil and Martin McGuinness had taken MLK’s “I have a dream” one.

      If I were Mícheál Martin I’d have chosen Dev’s rebuttal to Churchill. I’ve never been a fan of Dev’s but it was class. I’ll post the end of it here for you and hope you enjoy it. Churchill had just more or less said that Ireland was lucky that Britain didn’t reinvade Ireland…

      “Mr. Churchill is proud of Britain’s stand alone, after France had fallen and before America entered the War.

      Could he not find in his heart the generosity to acknowledge that there is a small nation that stood alone not for one year or two, but for several hundred years against aggression; that endured spoliation’s, famines, massacres in endless succession; that was clubbed many times into insensibility, but that each time on returning consciousness took up the fight anew; a small nation that could never be got to accept defeat and has never surrendered her soul?

      Mr. Churchill is justly proud of his nation’s perseverance against heavy odds. But we in this island are still prouder of our people’s perseverance for freedom through all the centuries. We, of our time, have played our part in the perseverance, and we have pledged our selves to the dead generations who have preserved intact for us this glorious heritage, that we, too, will strive to be faithful to the end, and pass on this tradition unblemished.

      Many a time in the past there appeared little hope except that hope to which Mr. Churchill referred, that by standing fast a time would come when, to quote his own words: “…the tyrant would make some ghastly mistake which would alter the whole balance of the struggle.”

      I sincerely trust, however, that it is not thus our ultimate unity and freedom will be achieved, though as a younger man I confess I prayed even for that, and indeed at times saw not other.

      In latter years, I have had a vision of a nobler and better ending, better for both our people and for the future of mankind. For that I have now been long working. I regret that it is not to this nobler purpose that Mr. Churchill is lending his hand rather than, by the abuse of a people who have done him no wrong, trying to find in a crisis like the present excuse for continuing the injustice of the mutilation of our country.

      I sincerely hope that Mr. Churchill has not deliberately chosen the latter course but, if he has, however regretfully we may say it, we can only say, be it so.

      Meanwhile, even as a partitioned small nation, we shall go on and strive to play our part in the world continuing unswervingly to work for the cause of true freedom and for peace and understanding.”

      Reply
    • Well considering how meekly Ireland has given in to Germany and the Troika, Dev’s speech definitely no longer rings true. At least the Greek’s and Spanish are putting up a fight and you can be sure the English would not take what we are taking lying down.

      Reply
    • And Dev said all this as he handed control to the Vatican….

      Reply
  • I thought Martin might have picked Bertie’s oration at Haughey’s funeral:

    Of this memory, of this man, larger than life, there will be no end. Immersed in his many political battles, Charles Haughey would ruefully acknowledge to me that he enjoyed the proverbial nine lives. Charlie, ‘Boss’, the last of those lives has now been extinguished. Today, the most agile and instinctive of our political leaders is still.”

    Reply
  • My favourite speech was Padraic Flynns speech about Tom Gilmartin not being a well man and trying to keep 3 houses on his salary.
    Is Mr. Martin going to cooperate with the DPP to get the 50k back from Flynn? The 50k he diverted to his own account?

    Reply
    • Fagan's 16/07/12 #

      No is the simple answer. The FF gang will keep spinning the line that he referred it to the DPP, even though he has not legal right to do so, so that is a proven sham and lie.

      He or FF have not made an official Gardaí complaint in to the incident, which under law here, as he/FF gang are the aggrieved party ties the Guards hands in the investigation.

      So they’ll complain about it but will continue to impede the investigation at every turn. If Pee Flynn starts talking then there will be dozens of leading FF’ers from the last 30 years brought in for questioning. There would be more ex-FF TD’s in jail than in the Dáil.

      Reply
    • Fianna Fáil were the first party to ask the government to refer the Mahon tribunal report to the DPP (undisputable fact Fagan, despite your lies) and as such it IS being investigated by an Garda Síochána as the misappropriation of said funds in detailed in the Mahon report. He has stated that Fianna Fáil does not want anything to do with the IR£50k as it was dirty money and that, if the criminal investigation were to conclude that it was FF’s to decide where it was to go, it would be donated to charity. Hope that answered your question for you Sean.

      Fagan the more and more you’re found out as a compulsive liar on this site the more and more I wish you post. You’re crowd in Parnell Square must be quite desperate if they rely on this kind of clap-trap! Then again, the nuances of all things legal was never your forté.

      Reply
  • The sad thing is I could probably do a better anti-FF list than above. Duplicates, bogus entries, single items listed as one. Things that never happened listed as negatives (Bertie Bowl) – its bad that it didn’t happen is that what you’re saying? And CFDs are the fault of FF?! Do you even know what CFDs are?!! Sorry it’s just hard to draw much semblance of cohesion from most of that list. Can I take it it is now Sinn Fein policy to cut public sector pay? Since you’ve listed high PS pay as a negative on above. Must remember that one next time I’m on the doors.

    PS  Fagans I love the way your phraseology varies between posts and at different times of day. It’s almost as if it was a single account being manned by multiple people! Gosh. Are you still suspended from Twitter by the way?

    Reply
  • What a Country. What a man.

    Reply

Add New Comment