TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 7 °C Tuesday 18 June, 2013

NAMA chief: We’re not to blame for cheap hotel rooms

NAMA’s chairman Frank Daly dismisses criticisms that NAMA’s hotel ownership was forcing down the market prices.

Image: Julien Behal/PA Archive

THE CHAIRMAN OF the National Asset Management Agency has dismissed criticisms that the agency’s massive ownership of Irish hotels has resulted in an uncompetitive market and falling profits.

It emerged earlier this week that the price of Irish hotel rooms had dropped significantly in the last year, with accommodation in Dublin now cheaper than many European capital cities.

As a result, some had claimed that NAMA – which now controls 83 hotels, having taken over the facilities as collateral for underperforming loans – had used its resources to make the hotel sector overtly competitive, resulting in private hoteliers having to slash costs and massively reduce profits in order to stay in business.

Speaking at the AGM of the Licenced Vintners Association yesterday, Daly said that while he was aware there was excess capacity in the hotel market, NAMA had not been exerting its influence on the sector.

NAMA had acquired control of 83 hotels against which loans were secured, but hotels with debt due to NAMA accounted for less than 10 per cent of the total number of hotels in Ireland.

“NAMA owns the hotels loans, but has no ambition to become directly involved in the management of the hotel businesses concerned, longer than is necessary or indeed to hold these assets longer than necessary,” Daly said.

Moreover, the hotel sector was under the far greater influence of other non-national bodies, with two non-Irish institutions having a “significantly greater” exposure to the Irish hotel market – with those two institutions controlling around 300 hotels between them.

RTÉ this morning reported that Irish Hotels Federation president Paul Gallagher acknowledged NAMA was not to blame for falling prices, saying the market was simply oversupplied with 22,000 extra rooms being built between 2005 and 2008.

Current occupancy rates were around 50 per cent, but needed to be closer to 60 per cent in order for the market to become sustainable, Gallagher said.

Irish hotels now offer best value in Western Europe: survey >

Poll: Does Ireland really offer good value to tourists? >

Read next:

Comments (10 Comments)

  • I would also like to report massive decline in business for my privately owned bed and breakfast, I also suspect the Nama owned hotels to be partly responsible for this down turn. It is impossible for us to compete with these cheap hotels. The bed and breakfast industry offers a completely different product ,not an alternative to cheap hotel deals, but here in Dublin we are being over looked and left to go out of business in favour of putting heads on beds in zombie hotels.
    I also invested a great deal of time, energy and my own money to build my business.
    We are told visitors numbers are on the up, and Dublin is 3rd most popular destination in Europe, its hard to read these research figures, and watch your business crumble.

    Julie Mahon

    Reply
  • I would like to state that it’s not just private hoteliers that are being effected by these very cheap hotel deals but the whole Bed & Breakfast industry. It is nearly impossible to compete with the rates these hotels are offering and just to note that most of them offering the cheapest deals are Nama controlled hotels (especially in Dublin City) and forcing the privately owned hotels to compete. The bed and breakfast industry is being squeezed out as a result. I invested my own funds in my business, there is nobody going to take on my debt should I be forced out of business. I do believe Nama has to take some responsibility for the crippling decline in the privately owned bed and breakfast sector.

    Reply
  • I read all three articles again, and I am confused.

    Reply
    • Anything we can help you with?

      Reply
    • It is probably my own interpetation?
      Article on 21st
      “In fact, as little as €83 per night would secure you a four star hotel in Dublin, the survey showed.
      Dublin remains the third most popular destination for travellers from the UK.”
      Good news I thought.
      Poll on 21st
      “So have the years of Rip-Off Republic come to an end, making Ireland a good value destination once again for visitors like the Queen of England and Barack Obama? Or do these reports flatter Ireland, which still charges too much for other things like car hire, transport and visitor attractions?”
      Good news I thought
      Article on 23rd
      “We’re not to blame for cheap hotel rooms”
      “As a result, some had claimed that NAMA – which now controls 83 hotels, having taken over the facilities as collateral for underperforming loans – had used its resources to make the hotel sector overtly competitive, resulting in private hoteliers having to slash costs and massively reduce profits in order to stay in business.”
      The language is different, emphasising the negative.

      Thats all,
      Perhaps its simply providing balance, and I am still confused.

      Reply
    • Still confused Gavan.
      Who is blaming NAMA?
      Just read the charimans speach:
      “Hospitality sector
      There has been much comment on the extent of over-capacity in the hotel sector and
      on the role that NAMA could play in reducing such capacity.”
      According to your article
      “Irish Hotels Federation president Paul Gallagher acknowledged NAMA was not to blame for falling prices”
      Read RTÉ`s MI`s report and it`s similar, no-one is stated as blaming NAMA, and Paul Gallagher talks (how was it, you put it) “about the state of the hotel market at large”.

      Reply
    • Fair enough.

      Reply
  • I understand now that B&B owners are not happy.

    Reply

Add New Comment