TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 18 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Negative equity should not mean debt forgiveness – Rabbitte

The communications minister says “blanket debt forgiveness” is not an option, but that banks should write off loans where there’s a genuine inability to pay.

Image: Niall Carson/PA Wire/Press Association Images

MINISTER FOR COMMUNICATIONS Pat Rabbitte has said that the problem of negative equity should not influence whether householders are entitled to some kind of debt forgiveness.

Speaking on RTÉ Radio this morning, Rabbitte estimate that the majority of people who had taken out mortgages in recent years would now have loans greater than the value of their homes – but that this did not automatically constitute a right to have part of their loans written off.

“What government must seek to address is where the family home is at risk, because people can’t pay,” Rabbitte told Pat Kenny.

“In fact, I would say that most people who bought a house since 2004 are in negative equity. That doesn’t mean to say there should be debt forgiveness. People in negative equity can still pay their mortgage.”

The minister said banks were adequately capitalised to write down some mortgage debt, but that this should only be pursued when mortgages had been taken out on a family’s primary home and the family had shown a desire, but an inability, to pay.

He added that the banks had been recapitalised by the state because such a “sting in the tail” of domestic defaults had been anticipated by successive rounds of banking stress tests.

Rabbitte felt, however, that banks now suffered from a deficit of skills in how to manage the problem of struggling mortgage holders because they had not encountered such problems in previous years.

He separately commented that he anticipated the level of unemployment in Ireland would probably continue to rise, saying similar previous economic examples showed that the number of people out of work was likely to get worse.

More on the debt forgiveness debate:

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (18 Comments)

  • This couldn’t be the same Pat Rabbite who brought out a grievance charter whenever an opportunity arose to remind the previous monkey government of the hurt, injury, misery <insert adjective> it was causing the taxpayer through the debt-forgiveness vehicle called NAMA? Surely not?

    Reply
  • The money required to aid those in danger of loosing their homes (through no fault of their own) was factured into the banks bail out. Some will need help the majority will manage on their own. I’d prefer to see the money go to those in need rather then to bond holders etc.

    Seeing as the 2 ‘pillar’ banks have already said they will not meet the governments target of 3 billion in lending to business I’d not be to worried about the banks ability to aid in rebuilding the country they and some others destroyed.

    Reply
  • He’s right. Negative equity should not require any form of debt forgiveness. It’s immaterial unless you have decided to sell your home. 85% of people are currently employed and therefore can make mortgage repayments. Sure it’s tough but it was tough in the last recession when interest rates were staggering.

    Reply
  • More good news from the Minister for Wrong Numbers, the new Labour party, taking the social out of socialism.

    Reply
  • Typical of the labour party, founded by the workers party of Ireland in the Dublin general Strike of 1913 lockout, and look a hundreed years later. Not one of these Labour ministers have ever put a hand to a shovel, or worked on the building line or swept the streets. All graduate form universitys of Ireland and right into the Dail, and sat on there fat arses for 30 odd years, and telling the workers of Ireland whats good for them. Time to wake the f…up Ireland. The country has been raped by these wasters. Higgins an academic, that never got his hands dirty! Please give us a break from this circus of clowns. “Jim Larkin and James Connolly would be sick” to see what the labour party did for the working class in Ireland for the last 30 odd years. Now they want Higgins in the top Job? I bet none of these Labour Politician of the Labour party today had to go without food on the table.?Time to wake up Ireland !

    Reply
    • well said ed they their for soft job and simple chat they would not no what hard times are like the people of ireland that die for this country would turn in their graves with these boys in office.ireland need to get awake up call alright time for a goverment with morals and no bull shit or lies

      Reply
  • Climb back into your hole Rabbitte and f..k right off!.for years you were pissin about on tv and radio every chance you got..telling us how the government needed to do something for the people and now look at ye you bloody fool! Well the game is over Pat! The people are not listening to this shite anymore!

    Reply
    • Jeff 05/09/11 #

      The needs of the many out weight the needs of the few, what cuts would you have to bail out the middle class, former middle class & landlords ? health, social welfare, public sector jobs, or higher taxes!! ? or perhaps the banks should use all there capital to clean up this problem and forget about funding Irish jobs/industry for the next 20 years. Writing a blank cheque to write off all negative equity would bankrupt the country just because you have negative equity does not mean that you can’t pay your mortgage & in time inflation means you most likely get your money back unless you agree with great thinkers link Bertie SirCaste that would send us all back to poverty & dancing at the cross roads for fun.
      Some people are screwed and there is nothing we can do for them without dragging us all into the same black hole.

      Reply
    • Jeff: “would bankrupt the country”

      Newsflash for you : We are already bankrupt.

      Reply
    • Jeff 05/09/11 #

      Brian, we are in receivership, if we where bankrupt, we would all know it as the lights would go out.

      Reply
  • Look that’s just rabbitte being a prick and trying to reframe the argument away from the issue. The issue isn’t the notional value of the home at the point of sale. It’s that the banks are now reporting approaching ten percent of mortgage holders are over 90 days in arrears.

    Typical waffly Irish prick of a politician trying to take a down his nose patrician stand on "well, just because your house has gone down in value.." when he full f**king knows that the real issue is that a mortgage insolvency bomb is about to go off. I would like to give pat rabbitte a wedgie.

    Reply
  • Career politicians like rabbite and his ilk have no empathy with the common people of this country, they were born into political dynasties

    Reply
  • Well Vincent, maybe your the answer to whats really needed in this country, and to show with diginity !

    Amen to that !

    Reply
  • Loose, Lose, Alot, A Lot!!!

    Reply

Add New Comment