Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Experts say there is no risk of passive vaping. Shutterstock/Amani A
ecigs

Experts claim there is no evidence of a risk to the public from passive vaping

Passive smoking has long been known to have a negative impact on the public’s health.

EXPERTS HAVE SAID there is no risk posed to the health of people who stand in close proximity to other people vaping nearby. 

Vapers should not stand with smokers because it could entice them into smoking, but there is no danger to the public from passive vaping, according to Professor John Britton, consultant in respiratory medicine at University of Nottingham.

Whether or not to vape in close proximity to others is a “courtesy issue” but there is no evidence it poses health risks to others nearby, he said at a conference in the UK. 

“Vaping in an enclosed space… is a courtesy issue. There’s no evidence of harm to other people. Most of what comes out in the vapour is water.

“It’s a courtesy issue, and if you send the vapers out to smoke or to vape with the smokers you are putting them directly into contact with the drug they are trying to quit.”

“You wouldn’t send the methadone user out with the heroin addicts.” he said. 

Britton was speaking at a Science Media Centre briefing with Ann McNeill, Professor of Tobacco Addiction, National Addiction Centre at King’s College London and Alan Boobis, Emeritus Professor of Toxicology at Imperial College London.

He said guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) does not recommend smoking shelters because they can legitimise the activity and be expensive.

The panel did not say what, if any, spaces should be available for smokers and vapers, only that employers should be encouraging their workforce not to smoke.

Public Health England (PHE) has said that vaping is 95% less harmful than smoking.

It has come under fire from some academics who say the organisation is willfully ignoring mounting evidence that vaping is harmful.

In April Martin McKee, professor of European public health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said there are enough grounds for “serious concerns” around vaping.

He told the PA news agency: “We haven’t had e-cigarettes for long enough to know the true effects.”

“My position would be that e-cigarettes are not without harm, and long-term use will cause some damage, but the amount of that damage will be minimal relative to smoking,” Britton said. 

The panel also said it would be a “great shame” if people were deterred from vaping by the situation in the US, where regulators are examining cases of vapers with oil-like substances in their lungs. 

Several deaths have also been reported while overall, more than 450 cases of a lung disease linked to vaping are being investigated.

The panel said the issue was specific to the US, with around three-quarters of the cases involving cannabis products.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
65
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel