TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Howlin says new law on Oireachtas inquiries will require “careful balances”

The Minister said he was anxious to give authority back to the Oireachtas itself as opposed to the Government.

Government Buildings.
Government Buildings.
Image: Mark Stedman/Photocall Ireland

MINISTER FOR PUBIC Expenditure and Reform Brendan Howlin has said new legislation that would allow the Oireachtas to carry out inquiries will require careful balances.

Yesterday the Minister announced the the Government approval for the drafting of the new bill which he said would enhance the role of the Oireachtas in securing accountability.

The bill would provide for Oireachtas to undertake inquiries outside their normal day-to-day functions under five principal categories:

  • “Inquire Record and Report” style inquiries which would involve taking in evidence, recording it and reporting it without coming to conclusions.
  • “Forward-looking” inquiries which would be empowered to make findings of fact in the context of investigations relating to the legislative functions of the House(s);
  • Inquiries relating to the removal of certain office holders like the President or judges;
  • Inquiries in relation to the conduct of a Member of the House(s);
  • Inquiries and make findings of fact for the purpose of holding the current Government to account under Article 28.4 of the Constitution.

Speaking on Morning Ireland today Howlin said there will be “very careful balances” required when dealing with the conduct of a member of a House or with the removal of an individual from office.

“There are over 87 heads in the draft bill that we published and they enshrine very clearly protections against bias, if members have made statements in relation to any individual or any set of circumstances that would objectibly make them unsuitable to have an impartial inquiry, they would have to exclude themselves from it.”

Howlin said he was anxious to give authority back to the Oireachtas itself so that inquiries don’t “have a genesis of control in the executive of the Government but actually in the Houses”.

Commenting on last year’s rejected referendum to give powers to the Oireachtas to investigate and make findings against individuals, Howlin said the government has constructed what can be done “within that constrained area”.

“We put a proposal to them and they said ‘No, we don’t want to give you that extra power’, so this is the people’s best decision, and we, as the people’s servants, are obliged to say that’s exactly what we’ll do,” he added.

Read: Legislation may have to be put in place before banking inquiry>

Read next:

Comments (23 Comments)

  • I think this is a good idea, the referendum result only means they cannot make findings of fact but they can still hold inquirers. Look at the Jimmy Saville or the news paper hacking in the uk. People where brought in and grilled by MPS. I think that if somebody from a public body needs to be investigated where else better than infront of TDS with live TV cameras where the public can watch.

    Reply
    • Well Howlin said he wants ‘forward inquiries’ that can make “findings if fact”. That sounds like a violation of the SC judgement in the Abbeylara case to me. Expect constitutional challenge to this in SC.

      Reply
  • The people said no to this already, have you no respect for the citizens of this state.

    Reply
  • If I remember correctly pre the referendum on give additional powers to the Oireachtas we were told that if it was not passed it would not be possible to hold inquiries in the future?

    Seems that claim was not based on fact…..

    Reply
  • We the people said No to this referendum but yet the Government wants to go ahead with legislation? Is that un-constitutional?

    Reply
    • Proves that this Government never had and never will respect the people of Ireland we are just Muppets as far as they are concerned We need to show the shower in “power” what we are really made of.

      Reply
    • *Facepalm*

      The referendum was to give the Oireachtas committees the power to make findings of fact against individuals, which was rejected. The above legislation does not do that as, yes, it would be unconstitutional if it did. Folks, read the article in full before jumping to conclusions.

      Reply
    • How can anyone have respect for the constitution when crooks like Mick Wallace and PJ Flynn are still at liberty. They can have as many enquiries as they like, but ultimately Ireland will still be a KIP.

      Reply
  • I think this is a good idea, the referendum result only means they cannot make findings of fact but they can still hold inquirers. Look at the Jimmy Saville or the news paper hacking in the uk. People where brought in and grilled by MPS. I think that if somebody from a public body needs to be investigated where else better than infront of TDS with live TV cameras where the public can watch.

    Reply
  • Don 01/11/12 #

    Pierce, we have a very peculiar democracy here, where ‘No’ can mean ‘No …maybe ….ah, g’wan then’. This is especially true when ‘No’ does not suit the powers that be. But there’s no need to worry as “the government has constructed what can be done “within that constrained area”. I think Bill Clinton must be a Special Advisor to this lot.

    Reply
    • Don
      You said “no” to an amendment to the Constitution that would have changed the status quo . Why do you think or believe that this constrains a Government from carrying out its function under the current Constitutional imperatives. I think your ideas about Democracy a little bit whacky !

      Reply
  • This government only care about looking after their own interests they care nothing about the people of Ireland.

    Reply
  • WE ARE BROKE.
    These guys are shifting the chairs on the Titanic.
    WAKE UP. People are hungry and getting very angry.

    Reply
  • People on this site constantly crib and moan about TD and how they spend their time.

    Now we’ll have committees that will go through issues in real detail and we’re still complaining.

    Reply
  • For the love of god. The constutional amendment was to allow Oireachtas committees to make findings of fact which Howlin has said they can’t do here. And even if I’m wrong then the Courts will just rule against them again. People who post on this site really don’t have a clue what is going on. No wonder they’re so angry all the time.

    Reply

Add New Comment