TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Tuesday 18 June, 2013

Opposition parties disappointed in EU treaty

As the Cabinet meet today, both Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin have spoken out against the outcome of yesterday’s informal EU meeting.

Image: Photocall Ireland

THE EU FISCAL compact treaty agreed upon by eurozone leaders at an informal summit last night has been met with criticism from opposition parties in Ireland.

Designed to prevent another debt crisis and tighten budgetary disciplines within the area, the treaty is due to be signed by all 17 eurozone leaders by March, as well as a number of countries which do not use the euro.

Last night, Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin said the summit was a disappointment as no new initiative to overcome the current economic crisis was met.

“The decisions to speed up some single-market measures and to reassign unspent structural funds are welcome but tiny in the face of the scale of Europe’s rising unemployment, particularly among young people,” he said.

Responding to the agreed treaty, Martin said it is “too limited to solve the crisis” and called for more radical steps.

He also called upon Enda Kenny to publish the legal advice he acted upon when agreeing to sign the treaty.

The sentiment was echoed by Sinn Féin’s Padraig MacLochlainn, who said the treaty failed to offer any solutions to the eurozone crisis.

He added that a referendum on the treaty is a “democratic imperative” regardless of what advice is received from the Attorney General.

The party’s spokesperson on jobs Peadar Tóibín added that the 23 million unemployed people across Europe will be “bitterly disappointed” with yesterday’s statement on job creation.

“Vague aspirations don’t create jobs and what we see here is a critical opportunity missed as EU leaders try to divert attention away from failing austerity and bank bailout programmes,” he said.

What we have got is words and promises, no additional money.”

Both Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin have said they are seeking their own legal advice on the text of the treaty to see if they believe a referendum is needed to adopt the fiscal controls contained within it.

Martin also noted that it was “troubling” that this is the first time that a EU treaty is not being signed by all member states as the UK and the Czech Republic have declined to adopt the treaty.

The Cabinet is meeting today ahead of the text being sent to the Attorney General who will advise on whether a referendum is needed or not.

There will be no timeframe for which she will have to make her decision, Kenny advised last night.

The final wording of the treaty has not yet been released. However, van Rompuy confirmed it would include a “debt brake” – a legally-binding cap on the level of government debt – for all countries.

The fact that the treaty is enshrined in already-existing rules that will now be enforced more strictly means a referendum could be less likely.

More: EU leaders strike final agreement on new treaty>

More: Kenny: Government has “nothing to fear” from an EU referendum>

Read next:

Comments (14 Comments)

  • Micheál,
    Hush now ….

    Reply
  • ”There will be no timeframe for which she will have to make her decision, Kenny advised last night.” YET ”the treaty is due to be signed by all 17 eurozone leaders by March, ”

    Kenny ! The master of doublespeak ……….

    Besides that however will we see the wording of the Treaty or
    do we wait til after The AG has read and considered it ?

    Reply
    • In the case of European Treaties, it is signed by the leaders of the countries involved and then ratified in each member state according to that member’s specific constitutional requirement. In the case of previous treaties, this meant the Taoiseach signing it on our behalf before putting it to the people in a referendum. If it passes the referendum it is then ratified by the Government and becomes law. So he can sign away in March, it doesn’t mean a thing in practical terms. All depends on the AG’s reading to see if it goes before us or only before Dáil Éireann. I hope if she says no that all opposition TD’s band together and invoke Article 21 of Bunreacht na hÉireann. If that were to happen it would also make the case for the retention of the Seanad.

      Reply
    • Eoin O Nialláin .
      Thanks for taking the time to explain this to me. It is a lot clearer to me now.
      You are clever ! They would have to keep the Seanad when they ”invoke” article 21.

      Reply
  • The opposition opposes something the government agreed to???????
    Get the hell out of here!!

    Seriously Michael Martin…Shut the f*** up.
    Your party should be consigned to the rubbish dump of history.

    BTW I have no knowledge of what has been agreed but then again Im sure he doesn’t either

    Reply
  • Michael “the ducker” Martin is confident when following the lead of Sinn Fein. A sign of things to come maybe.

    Reply
  • Typical hurler on the ditch ff were in bed with Europe for years vote for Lisbon twice for jobs was that jobs to be lost . U better off shutting your mouth u had your chance and destroyed our economy and our citizens prospects

    Reply
  • i am afraid the attorney is a she, and her name is marie whelan who was recently elected by the government into law of the justice apartment last Dec in 2011, who happens to be an old friend of Alan Shatter and Enda kenny and Brendan Howlin, who do you think signed up the draft household Tax bill, and Septic tank charges, Allan Shatter and brendan Howlin and Enda Kenny and the attorney herself made it legal marie whelan and the internet copyright on facebook utube and google, this is not the end of the fiscal treaty there is more, Alan Shater wants to abolish the Kangaroo Court Refrendum which was defeated last year in oct 21st 2011, and abolish Neutrality and make it legal here in ireland, those are illegal, because they are on the nice treaty constitution, and the Fiscal treaty is totally illegal this is the second fiscal treaty, but no difference from the first in Dec last year, just that the budget will be severely cut big time and more household extra taxes, which is very dangerous with this economy crisis also alot of pain and burden in the next budget, the only difference would be that Angela Merkel, Nicolas Sarcozy will have a say in this budget, because this government havent a clue how to manage and run their own country or to stand up to these outsiders and tell them to get lost,
    Rita

    Reply
  • Martin Schulz MEP, President of the European Parliament and member of the Party of European Socialists (www.pes.org), “From the outset, the European Parliament has been categorical in its opposition to the revision of the Treaties, because it is simply not necessary and because we feared that a debate on the issue would open up a Pandora’s box of possibilities. However, our fellow citizens cannot understand why, in the midst of the crisis, we should be arguing about arcane matters such as institutions and Treaty articles. They are looking to us to provide answers to their everyday problems. If we fail to come up with those answers, confidence in political institutions, at both national and European level, will be undermined even further. It is time to focus on the real issues. It is time to talk about how we are going to lead Europe out of the crisis. It is time to take determined action.”

    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/the-president/en/press/press_release_speeches/speeches/sp-2012/sp-2012-january/speeches-2012-january-3.html

    Reply
    • Ah good auld Martin Schulz. The man who flipped out when we voted no to Lisbon and demanded that it be pushed through irregardless of the will of the people here. The man who demanded the same after Nice was rejected in France and Holland. He is a dangerous man.

      It is correct to state that this treaty does nothing to resolve the crisis. It may or may not stop the next one in years to come.

      Reply
  • Ciaro 31/01/12 #

    Fianna Fail are correct. Instead of having no vote we should have two!

    Reply
    • Thing is we all now that the grease bag Martin would have no qualms about backing this passionately if he was in Govt. and given his Parties track record we’d probably have a clause that developers or Irish billionaires would be exempt from tax in other countries.

      At least the Shinners have been consistent on this issue. Martin, like most FF’ers has no beliefs, no vision bar how he can get back to screwing the Irish people with his 3000 a night hotels.

      Reply
  • READ ALL ABOUT IT, READ ALL ABOUT IT….. Opposition parties in Irish parliament disagree with government , again BREAKING news , OPPOSITION parties disagree with government…

    Is this really news.

    Reply

Add New Comment