TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 5 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Pentagon expresses ‘deepest regret’ over killing of 24 Pakistani soldiers

Pakistan has rejected the findings of an investigation into last month’s incident on the Pakistan-Afghan border, saying the inquiry was “short on facts”.

Pakistanis in Islamabad light candles during a protest to condemn the soldiers' killing.
Pakistanis in Islamabad light candles during a protest to condemn the soldiers' killing.
Image: AP Photo/Muhammed Muheisen/PA Images

THE PENTAGON has expressed its “deep regret” over an attack that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers last month along the Afghan border, but says an investigation into the incident found that the American NATO troops had responded with appropriate force after coming under fire.

Air Force Brig Gen Stephen Clark, who led the investigation, said in a press briefing yesterday that there was no evidence that US troops had intentionally fired on Pakistani soldiers or had intended to deliberately provide inaccurate information about their location to Pakistani officials.

The report concluded that a series of miscommunications between the US and Pakistani troops led to the deaths.

Clark said that US troops who came under machine gun and mortar fire on 25/26 November were told there were no Pakistani soldiers in the area. He said that after US troops engaged in fire, their command centre began receiving reports from Pakistani officials saying their soldiers were being fired on by the US.

Pentagon officials spoke about the report’s conclusions with the head of Pakistan’s army, Gen Ashfaq Pervez Kayani.

‘Short on facts’

However, Pakistan has rejected the US military report on the incident, saying that its troops did nothing wrong and accusing the inquiry of being “short on facts”.

Pakistan is expected to provide a more detailed response after its officials, who refused to cooperate with the investigation, receive the report.

Pentagon Press Secretary George Little said the US military expresses “deepest regret” over the deaths.

“We further express sincere condolences to the Pakistani people, to the Pakistani government and most importantly to the families of the Pakistani soldiers who were killed or wounded,” he added.

Relations between the two countries have grown increasingly strained over the past year; the Pentagon’s report highlighted the importance of improving trust between the two, saying the US “cannot operate effectively on the border – or in other parts of our relationship – without addressing the fundamental trust still lacking between us.”

Read next:

Comments (16 Comments)

  • Halliburton confirms completion of centres to detain up to 2 million “terrorists”.
    https://drstevebest.wordpress.com/2011/11/30/halliburton-confirms-us-concentration-camps-ready-to-detain-up-to-2-million-terrorists/

    Reply
  • US foreign and military policy is making the world a more dangerous place. Pakistan is a nuclear power. It’s really not a good idea to be killing 24 of its soldiers.

    Reply
    • Oh dear. I got a thumbs down. Let’s turn it on its head then. Let’s say some foreign power killed 24 US Soldiers on US soil. How would the US react? They’d probably drop a nuke on the capital of the offending country.

      Reply
    • Let’s extend this further. Imagine if Mexican fighter aircraft enter US airspace without permission. The US military, surprise surprise, tries to shoot them down. The Mexican fighter aircraft fire back killing 24 US soldiers. The Mexican government then set up an inquiry at their leisure and conclude it was okay to fire at the US soldiers because they fired at them first.

      Reply
    • your forgetting if the Pakistani army fired on this aircraft and shot it down killing Americans it would be an act off terror. While the real terrorists are the American Government

      Reply
    • Chopper 23/12/11 #

      @Paul, just to take it a little bit further re: American foreign policy/interventionism, and if the tables were turned, how would Americans feel, have a watch of this “If China Attacks America (JUST IMAGINE)”:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMHBEAeNa-c

      It’s very well made, but there is definitely a WTF! moment at the end when you see who made it (or that might just be my ignorance of american politics!)

      Reply
    • Chopper: Ron Paul is an interesting character. He calls the US military presence abroad for what it is – an empire. In 2008, as far as I’m aware, there was no Democratic presidential candidate who came to the same conclusion, not even Mike Gravel.

      Reply
  • America are Al Quadas biggest recruiters. Really hope Ron Paul gets the nomination but the elite who control everything from political donations to the media networks wont let this happen

    Reply
  • Iran doesn’t have nuclear weapons.

    Reply
  • Of course they’re sorry bye bye to their bases for predator and reconisance drones.

    Reply
  • They came under fire. They shot back. End of story. Go America!

    Reply
  • @ Paul Carr I don’t think the Americans would drop a nuke on a foreign capital if there soldiers were killed on home soil. The Americans & Russians know that if Nuclear weapons are used its game over for everybody. It’s only unstable states like Pakistan, India, north Korea, Iran and israel that would use nuclear weapons in retaliation.

    Reply
    • George W Bush lied that Iraq had a chemical, biological and nuclear weapons program and he used this as a pretext for invasion of Iraq in 2003. Within a few months of the invasion we learned that in fact all these weapons programs were abandoned in 1991. How people’s memories fade fast! They fade all the faster, I suppose, given that the next US President, Barack Obama, praises him for is conduct of that war. George Bush and fellow neo cons should be on trial for war crimes. If it was good enough for the Nazis at Nurembourg in 1946, it’s good enough for them too.

      Iran doesn’t have nuclear weapons. Its Supreme Leader has issued a fatwa against their development, stockpile and use. Iran is developing a civilian nuclear power program as it is entitled to do as a sovereign state and an IAEA member and a signatory of the NPT. Since 1974, Iran has called for, at UN level, the creation of a nuclear weapons free zone for the Middle East. Very easy to implement but for the real bugbear of the region, Israel, which actually has nuclear weapons and delivery systems for them to target much of the Middle East and beyond.

      Iran is the bugbear of the US neo-cons who control both the Democratic and Republican parties. It’s the phantom menace that the US 1% foist on the US public to keep them in a state of fear and insecurity whilst the richest continue to rob from the poor and the middle class.

      Reply

Add New Comment