TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 4 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Poll: Germans support abandoning nuclear power, despite extra cost

The government is increasing a surcharge on electricity bills to fund the development of alternative energy.

A file photo of the Biblis nuclear power plant in Hesse, Germany. The government is increasing a surcharge on electricity bills to fund development of sustainable sources.
A file photo of the Biblis nuclear power plant in Hesse, Germany. The government is increasing a surcharge on electricity bills to fund development of sustainable sources.
Image: Kyodo/AP

A new poll finds that a large majority of Germans back the government’s decision to phase out nuclear power and switch to renewable energies within a decade, despite rising electricity bills.

The poll for German news magazine Focus published today found that 72 per cent continue to support the country’s energy switchover.

Only 24 per cent were opposed to the policy.

Germany’s grid operators announced earlier this month that a surcharge on households’ electricity prices financing the expansion of renewable energies will increase by 47 per cent starting in January.

A typical family of four will then have to pay about €250 per year on top of their bill.

Polling agency Forsa surveyed 1,000 people this week. Focus did not provide the poll’s margin of error.

Read next:

Comments (21 Comments)

  • the potential for renewable energy in Ireland us huge. i work in through marine industry and if you take achill island in mayo on its own as an example there is at least 10kmph of tide running between the island and the mainland everyday until infinitely. there are endless other sites like this. nuclear energy will be a thing of the past and if the Germans are shutting it down it must be for a very good reason. renewables is the wealth of the future

    Reply
    • padraig 22/10/12 #

      Nuclear energy just leaves too big a risk of accident or later cleanup. Coal does have fairly direct and negative effect on health, the insatiable need of the nuclear industry for subsidy, the future cleanup, and the risk ongoing, makes the German decision a good one. The worst effect of renewables is either business failure or visual blight – less of a problem than nuclear.

      Reply
    • theres no commerical tide energy plant in operation.
      at the moment its just like nuclear fission. an idea.

      Reply
    • Cathal, do you know of the law of twelveths? Your 12mph tide does not run at that rate all day does it?

      Reply
    • tom 27/11/12 #

      wishful thinking Cathal

      maybe one day we will harness the power of the waves and tides.

      Wind energy is the other one that has yet to be mastered… as fossil fuel power stations back them up burning as much resources that it makes no difference if the wind farm is there or not.

      Reply
  • The consumers will pay, but companies will continue to get subsidized energy. The companies use the lions share.

    Reply
  • geothermal can power the world with around 10000mw. there is over 26000 easily accessible, no waste, all natural. it’s the way forward

    Reply
  • padraig 22/10/12 #

    Nuclear energy just leaves too big a risk of accident or later cleanup. Coal does have fairly direct and negative effect on health, the insatiable need of the nuclear industry for subsidy, the future cleanup, and the risk ongoing, makes the German decision a good one

    Reply
  • Ah Brian sure isn’t there on in the middle of carlingford lough and also there’s a company called openhydro in dundalk producing tidal energy units (who are looking for staff at the moment) with no risk to environment and invisible to the eye as its on the sea bed.

    Reply
  • I think we should look at nuclear power production for Ireland, we already have it through the interconnector.

    Reply
    • Yeah, let’s build it right in the middle of your garden. Besides, we’d still need to have enough ccgt or coal fire plants running full time for when the nuclear plant had to be taken off line – maintenance, emergencies etc. so what would be the point? Other countries get away with it because they have so many nuclear plants, we’re do small we’d need just one.

      Besides, the interconnector is mainly aimed at bringing electricity from the esb’s station at carrington in the UK – when it opens in the next couple of years. All this talk of exporting excess to the uk isn’t a part of the esb’s plans. It’s only political waffling.

      Reply
    • You can if you like, might get more for under a compulsory purchase order. The UK and Irelands energy policies should be closer aligned and the interconnect is a good start. Is your point against having it that you would need more than one or are you against the idea totally?

      Reply
    • Seafra. Who said anything about building only one? Between the North and the South we will need about 6GW. One NP station is about 1GW. They only come off line every couple of years or so. Refuelling is now possible while the plant is running. France manages OK and has 80% of it’s electricity generated from NP. So can we. It is the ONLY solution in light of Climate Change.

      Reply
  • I do William. and i said 10kmph not 12 mph which is a different speed altogether. and when carlingford is at 1 twelfth achill is at 6 twelfths. just like when rathlin sound is at 1 twelfth little sapphire is at 6 twelfths. its a grid you see. you can add electricity and many different places.

    Reply
  • Good point William. Where will the Germans store the radioactive waste? Surely this is going to be a long term cost to every Germans bill.

    Reply
    • If ALL your energy requirements came from Nuclear Power the total high level waste you would create in your lifetime would be the size of a bar of soap. It can be put back in the ground WHERE IT CAME FROM!

      Reply

Add New Comment