TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Poll: Will the Personal Insolvency Bill help people struggling with debts?

Proposed legislation to reform Ireland’s bankruptcy regime were unveiled this week. Do you think they’ll help?

Image: Images_of_Money via Creative Commons

MINISTER FOR JUSTICE Alan Shatter published long-awaited new legislation on reforms to Ireland’s bankruptcy laws yesterday.

The Personal Insolvency Bill 2012 allows for some debts, such as mortgages, to be written down. It also proposes reducing the minimum discharge time of persons declared bankrupt from 12 years to three years.

However, the Bill has come under criticism for allowing lenders to have the final say in which debts are approved for the scheme. Lenders will also decide how much borrowers pay back over a five-year period under a Debt Settlement Arrangement.

Do you think the Personal Insolvency Bill will help Irish people who are struggling with their debts?


Poll Results:





Read next:

Comments (41 Comments)

  • very easy to say your debt is your own……..I’m sorry then if thats the case why are we bailing out developers, setting up Nama and pumping money into a disease pool known as Anglo Irish bank. See this argument by the new smug in society who didnt get huge mortgages and didn’t have the so called celtic tiger lifestyle is quiet disturbing, when we consider as a country we have no problem watching 1billion euros heading to bondholders, new stealth taxes and charges that pretty much pay for the bondholders and banks. But when it comes to the ordinary joe soap looking for a break that could in time be a benefit to the economy cos people will have money to spend well jesus we cant be having that no no no way cos like I didn’t get what they had and blah blah blah, grow up Ireland and wake up and see who the real leeches on our country are rather than attacking those who need help most!

    Reply
  • Debt slaves make the best slaves. Banks wouldn’t have it any other way.

    Reply
  • I think it most likely that any legislation drafted by our quivering quislings will benefit bankers rather than citizens. I’m more than open to being proved wrong but a cursory glance at the political/financial/european events of the past five years in particular should be enough to tease out the odds on this.

    Reply
  • It’s such a shame we all can’t become unsecured Irish bondholders, as we wouldn’t need to worry about insolvency, as we would be getting paid back every cent plus interest on our risky bets thanks to a toothless Irish Schoolteacher Government who wont negotiate on behalf of their people.

    What a coincidence, the Irish Government have let the unsecured Irish bondholders write their own rules and now they are letting the banks write their own rules.
    Why ?
    Because, in a lot of cases they are the same people.
    Surprising?

    http://politico.ie/crisisjam/8236-that-bondholder-list-cut-out-and-keep-version.html

    ”The Irish government”.
    ”Europuppets”

    Reply
  • Big improvement in what was there before. Give it a chance. At least some of the requests of the banks were ignored especially their wish that the ceiling be set at 1 million. If you cannot get agreement from the banks you can go bankrupt 3 years is a hell of a lot better then the current 12.

    Reply
  • Fagan's 30/06/12 #

    The banks should not have been give veto powers. That is just another example of the state deferring the national interest to suit the powerful.

    Reply
  • If you don’t like the bank’s version of the law, simply cancel your credit card or pay off your balance if you can. Credit card debt is the WORST kind of debt. The constant marketing promising you a “new and better life” along with predatory lending rates insure huge profit margins and enormous amounts of money sucked out of the local economy for use by multi-national gambling firms like Goldman and their ilk.
    Cancel your cards. Stop using them.
    For Gopod’s sake, if you find the household charge unacceptable, how on earth can you continue to pay 11% interest on your debt?

    Reply
  • Ireland the country were nobody takes responsibility for anything and blames everyone else. I wonder how many of these people would hand over any profits they made from the fake boom to the prudent tax payer?…yes you would be right not one of them they would go on buying nice cars and nice holidays….but when the gamble does not pay off and there is no profits then they start asking for more free money and get the prudent tax payer to pay for them. only in Ireland. Shocking.we all partied they say …no we fu*king did not all party.

    Reply
  • Nobody helped me out with my credit card debt, people need to learn some responsibility. Your debt is no one else’s fault but your own. If you couldn’t afford, why create this debt?

    Reply
    • Tell that to Enda re: we all partied and the bankers where the hosts!!

      Reply
    • Ask the banks the same question. Credit card debt is a bit different from somebody buying a house for 400k in 2003 when they had a stable well paying job that had no indication of going anywhere soon. Only to lose it in 2009 with no other job prospects that could cover the mortgage. Then see the value of the house almost cut in half. Yet they are stuck with a huge mortgage that is well out of whack with the real value. You can say be responsible and think of these scenarios before you get into a massive loan agreement, but not everybody is an economist. Some people just want a nice place to live. It is up to the banks to judge if a person is capable of paying this debt, and up to them to do the forecasting. It’s their job. Not Joe the electrician that wanted a decent place to live. But the way it was, the banks didn’t care if they lost their job and couldn’t pay. After all, they’d still get a nice chunk of the cash and then get to take the house and sell it on. Luckily we are taking steps to rectify it. We should have taken a leaf out of Iceland’s book though…

      Reply
    • A lot of people don’t seem to realise how bad this current economic state is, this crash is brutal, even when people worked a crash into the equation (as we did) they still got badly burnt in a lot of cases – and then the government hand’s over our future earnings to unsecured investors WTF??? There are plenty of people who’s fault this is, not just our own. Brutal taxes to bail out banks who then demand full payment of mortgages THEY approved weren’t factored into the equation by anyone, especially when you think you’re living in a capitalist society, only to later find out you’re not.

      Reply
  • Ye wont pay for peoples so called partying ways yet ye have no problem paying some investor in germany and france who took a gamble like the so called party people, but unlike them were paying the investor back who prob never heard of ireland or will ever contribute to the economy ever again…….but sure were backward ireland more worried about punishing those we see rather than demand to know who those we don’t ever see but seem to cost us the most.

    Reply
    • Tom, these people who bought our bonds were lending money to banks here or the government. They are not unreasonable to require it to be paid back. The proposed insolvency handling schemes are going to let some people off paying their full debts. This is reasonable in some circumstances. It would be stupid for lenders to forgive lots of debts and if they did so the people who do pay their debts and will pay them in the future would be disadvantaged. Why?, because interest rates would shoot up as the lenders try to recoup their losses.

      Reply
  • People never worked as hard as they did in the”Celtic tiger”years.they worked over time if they had investment properties they had to maintain them ie painting decorating etc.etc. for all to come to nothing.would ur notion of doing anything in Ireland to improve ur standard of living be knocked out of u or what? People who sat back and did sweet f—all during the “Celtic tiger” years ended up much better off. Well they don’t have to worry about debt as they never bothered.big lesson for future investing in Ireland .dont as they will pull the plug on u.

    Reply
  • No.

    Reply
    • Ah yes – ticking the ‘no’ box, and clicking submit was too much of a challenge for you?

      Reply
    • As it stands, no. I REALLY wanted to welcome the much awaited&needed personal Insolvency bill. However, the bill contains a veto for the banks, giving them final say.

      This will make the bill meaningless and pointless to SO many people that actually could have used it.

      Michael Noonan may say that they will make the banks accept some personal insolvencies, but didn’t he also say they would force banks to lend, since we pumped so much money into them? Sadly, I can see this “forcing banks” action ALSO falling on deaf ears!

      Hopefully, it will be amended…fingers crossed!

      Reply
    • 5 years (if not decades) too late, and will no doubt take numerous years and millions of Euro to teethe and implicate by an inept government .

      Basically written by the banks and signed by our government.

      More proof that our ”leaders” live in a parallel universe and just don’t care.

      This does nothing for people who we have lost and who we are still loosing each and every day.

      Reply
  • Its a welcome move. debt forgiveness will help get domestic spending going again. The usual doomsday seekers won’t see it that way. Not good for their party’s ambitions…

    Reply
  • The mob is out in force today, with no real understanding on what they are commenting about. That would involve reading the article or the proposed law, This law is very generous to debtors, as it happens. Debts can be written off for less than 20K, which is hardly in the interest of the banks – which we now own, and there is a 3 year period of bankruptcy then you can borrow again down from 112. There could be a debate on the moral hazard here, whines about quislings, bankers, and debt slaves are off topic, and missing the point spectacularly.

    Reply
    • @Eoin Norris.
      The proposed law?
      Proposed is all it is at the moment (and maybe for a long time, where this government is involved).

      This law is very generous to debtors?
      We will ask some people who are in debt their opinion about that one Eoin.

      Debts can be written off for less than 20K, which is hardly in the interest of the banks?
      I suppose the bankers had to throw something in to make it resemble ”Insolvency Legislation” (when they were writing it)

      there is a 3 year period of bankruptcy then you can borrow again?
      Again we will ask someone who uses this ”insolvency legislation” in 3 years time (or 3 years after it’s eventually implicated).

      debt slaves are off topic?
      Will you try telling that to the banks collections officers, who going around the country shaming, harassing, and intimidating unfortunate families out of their last few quid, and have been (very happily) aggressively doing so for the last 4-5 years in some cases, because their greedy underwriters recklessly dished out their,unsustainable, unstresstested, dog eat dog, commissions driven, over inflated, Ponzi style ”loans”.

      Corrupt bankers destroyed this country and now they are allowed to decide if people can go bankrupt??
      Strange ”legislation”?

      Reply
    • After 3 years you can borrow again….. And you called the mob dumb…..lol

      Reply
    • Are you a banker?

      Reply
  • Too little , too late and of no use to the people struggling to keep their family homes !

    Reply
  • Alan shatter has lied about the Insolvency bill, information of act has revealed that he was turned down on the insolvency bill, so did he write up one of his own, and get a few back leaders to sign up along with what he has been doing, himself and howlin and varadakar, and a few more crooked FG and LB TDS

    Reply
  • The bill is weak in a number of areas. The bankruptcy term will now be three years but what is not reported here is that the insolvency service or a creditor can ask for a five year income payments order to then be implemented. That could and probably will mean eights years further austerity for someone going bankrupt in the public.

    The is no provision for help for owing more than 3 million other than bankruptcy, unless all creditors allow a PIA.
    I look forward to further news on who can be an insolvency practitioner under the act and all the other aspects which are still so vague

    All the big solutions require agreement from the creditors. Only time will tell what they think.

    The PIA and DSA will not be cheap to put in place due to the amount of reporting and the obligations on the Personal Insolvency Trustee. You may well find that fees of many thousands are sought to put these plans to creditors who then reject them? The PIT will still want to be paid.

    The devil here will be in the fine detail and a lot of that is still missing. Nothing will happen anyway until at least Nov and then there will be months and months of sorting processes and procedures out. Believe me I have seen it all before in the UK.

    Reply
  • Great, the taxpayer gets to pay some clowns 20k credit card bill. I will agree to this scheme only if bankrupts are branded on their foreheads. At least then I will know who never to buy a drink or do a favour for again.

    Reply
    • I suppose I’m lucky then…. I know exactly who NOT to buy a drink for after those comments…..

      Reply
    • Why not take it out on the government instead?? It’s their fault after all. The tax payer shouldn’t be paying anyone’s insolvency bills.

      Reply
    • That’s a very simplistic and selfish way of looking at people who bought into a lifestyle when the going was good……your average Joe is no more an economist or crystal ball reader than a pig is an astronaut…..people are just that…PEOPLE…and people make mistakes…..there is no point in punishing large numbers of people by making the bankrupt some form of medival criminal…..it’s in all our interests to have a regime that allows for forgiveness and a chance to restart….goodness knows the clowns running the country and their buddies in the banking community seem to get endless breaks

      Reply
    • Ah give it rest with your poor me rubbish, you gambled and lost plenty of people still renting decided to rent and see it out as they knew it would all go belly up as economies always do, but what happens to the non greedy prudent people who want to buy now? Nothing they get shafted for being smart as they still can’t buy a house in an over inflated market that the government are trying to protect to save there own bad investments, the Irish are a dumb nation who only look after the greedy. It’s morally disgusting to the poor people out there renting and saving who get nothing….NOTHING from this government. You might as well just take out as much free money and loans as possible cause this dummy country will just write it off for free.

      Reply

Add New Comment