TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 4 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Poll: Is €100 a reasonable amount for property and water charges?

Household property and water charges are to be rolled together into one €100 lump. What’s your reaction?

Image: MissTakesYourPix via Flickr

THE GOVERNMENT IS expected to sign off tomorrow on a combined property and water charge of €100 per household, implementing charges required by the EU and IMF as part of our bailout deal.

The Irish Independent’s report this morning was the first to suggest that the two charges may be rolled together – and the combined fee of €100 would mean that the household charge could be far lower than first anticipated.

Irrespective of this, however, it’s another charge that the government will require households to pay in spite of the tough economic times – and in spite of the billions the State is saving through deals with the Eurozone and with Bank of Ireland.

So, today we’re asking: is a combined €100 charge for both a property tax and a water charge a fair amount to pay?


Poll Results:





More: Cabinet to approve combined €100 property and water charge >

Read next:

Comments (113 Comments)

  • Special introductory offer: Buy 1 get 1 free.
    Wait until next year.

    Reply
  • Like I was saying in a previous comment, how is it fair?
    A millionaire or wealthy person is paying the same for a mansion than the poorer person in society is paying!

    Also a e100 a year is just the start. What will it be in 5 years I wonder?

    Reply
    • We are just being conditioned to paying new charges without receiving new services.
      Then the price goes up.

      Reply
    • Water metering is expensive to impliment this is the best compromise really. Also justbecause someone has a mansion doesn’t mean everyroom occupied or that every room is ensuite. Many of the old stately houses in ireland are ran on a shoestring budget. May have opened themselves to the public for tours to make additional income.

      I would like to see this fee waived for pensioners, the disbaled, and single parents.

      Reply
    • @daniel why single parents ,i am married and currently out of work with mortgage 5 children in education,i do agree that there should be waivers but it should be to all or none on welfare not just the single parent

      Reply
    • daniel, from all the down votes youve recieved , i think you need to soften up.
      p.s.your also a prat of the highest order.

      Reply
  • Our government are very lucky to have such a compliant accepting population !!

    Reply
  • I don’t think I should pay water tax. I have a private well.

    Reply
    • Happy to pay it, it is a small price to pay really. Unlimited clean water at $100 a year? Not bad. Ask those paying water bills in the U.S. how cheap that it is.

      We all knew it was coming and if it helps us hold on to nearly free thrid level education and nearly free health care then I fully support it.

      We are in a recession, we do have to prioritise, free water is somethign we can’t afford any longer.

      Reply
    • @Daniel – Well nearly free third level education teaches us that with or without nearly free health care, we can’t continue to live without water, nearly free or otherwise.

      So out of the three, I’d rather (actually I did) pay for my third level education and keep the water free. You really need to sort out your priorities.

      Reply
    • @Daniel, you seem so happy you might pay mine as well while you’re at it.

      Reply
    • Oisín, I would ratgher pay €100 a for water than €9000 (or more) per year for education. Kids need to be given an equal chance at education when starting out in the world and not limited by their parents lack of income.

      Reply
    • @ AlanCummins

      Sadly that’s what you’ve come to expect isn’t it? We should all pay your way through life huh?

      Reply
    • @Daniel – So pay an extra €100/year for the price of education and keep water free. €100 is €100 regardless of why its paid.

      As for not limiting kids education, I think it should be graded fees based on means testing, which the wealthiest paying the full amount, and the poorest receiving free education via a grant or trust system. Doesn’t mean €100/year is beyond reach for either extreme however.

      Reply
  • And what about people who supply their own water????

    Reply
    • Exactly, but they are trying to side step that by calling it a household charge instead of calling it a property/water charge.
      People with wells are paying alot more than e100 already with the maintenance/electricity to run them already.

      Reply
    • If people who supply their own water already have to pay to subsidize public water supplies Fine Gael can kiss their rural vote goodbye.

      Reply
    • It is also a sewage disposal charge. Supply all the water you like yourself. Try and get rid of the waste.
      Hopefully people with septic tanks can now get it emptied for free after paying the household charge!

      Reply
    • Conor, don’t delude yourself. this is nothing more than a stealth tax which will not go away. I expect this will stay along with water rates and property tax. No Irish govt has ever withdrawn a tax after it was introduced. Economists can go on and say this is a low tax economy, but they neglect to mention that we have one of the highest instances of stealth taxation anywhere in Europe.

      Reply
    • No they won’t. There’s going to be an inspection of all septic tanks from next year on and the owner will have to pay for that.
      So can someone tell me if water is going to be metered or will this charge get rid of that suggestion?
      There are people in this country who own property but run their own well and septic tank.
      There are people in this country who live in council housing who do not own a property but get their water etc supplied.
      So who pays what???

      Reply
  • The money is needed because we have to give a gift of 500 million to the U.K. to build a road in Northern Ireland and we need to pay U.K. govt 440 million pounds in interest for the bail out loan they gave us last year.
    So, if we get 100 euro from every home, we only need to collect from approx 10 million homes to satisfy the 2 above commitments.
    Then we can focus on water….

    Reply
  • Can’t wait until I can turn on the tap and get Ballygowan sparkling.

    Reply
  • Someone in a small house on minimum wage will have to pay the same as someone it a 6 bed mansion. How can that be the right way to do it.

    Reply
  • I’ve already paid my property tax when I bought my house. In addition I pay a substantial proportion of my wages back to the government in taxes. It’s getting to the point where it would make more sense for me not to work.

    Reply
    • I don’t earn my income from any company in Ireland, and could live anywhere else in Europe. Even with its great people and natural beauty, this could be the straw that breaks the camels back and forces me to move. Unfortunately all the tax I pay and money I am putting into the economy every year will have to come with me.

      Reply
    • Just to clarify, I am not Irish. But I do love the country.

      Reply
    • Sneaky, please clarify… You are not from Ireland, you do not earn an income there, you do not pay income tax there & a €100 charge will make you leave the country? I’m not a fan of the charge, but I fail to see why it upsets you so much?

      Reply
    • I did not say I do not pay Income tax here. Because I am resident here, I still pay tax on my earnings from other countries. I did not live here in the “good” times. I pay VAT, and all the other taxes like the people here. Thing is people like me can up and leave, taking the money we spend in the economy with us. This reduces overall revenue for the country, increasing the burden on those that cannot leave.

      I just don’t the the economists in government have thought all these tax increases through properly. I am sure there would be other ways of raising the cash, i.e. reduce the spending on useless projects, etc. If they reduced income tax, VAT, etc, they would really stimulate the spending by people. Sometimes raising taxes is not the answer.

      Reply
    • Sounds better when you put it like that ;)

      Reply
    • Where Sneaky would you go? I’d love to know where I can live without paying some residential and water charge, personally I’ve lived in 5 other EU countries and paid such charges in all of them. So if you know of a country that charges a paltry €100 let me know so too can deprive the Irish govt. of my annual spend of hundreds!

      Reply
  • I think the €75k stamp duty I paid 5 years ago should cover this €100 charge for quite a while. Fucked if they’re getting another cent!

    Reply
  • Our water comes off the Reek from a privately-funded local Group Water Scheme. Neither municipal, county, nor national government has anything to do with how we get our water. I can’t see how they can charge us for it.

    Reply
  • The answers to the poll are deceptive too. Of course it’s less than expected but it doesn’t mean that makes it ok. People earning minimum wage and people earning millions a year should not be expected to pay the same amount of tax. It makes NO economic sense, none at all. If anything, people might use MORE water, sure if you’re paying the same as your wealthy neighbour, you might as well get your money’s worth.

    Reply
  • Property Taxes is a violation of private property. How can you legitimately say you own your own home when you’re paying to actually live there? Technically, you won’t own your own home; might as well pay rent to a landlord. Does anyone see the nonsense in all of this?

    Reply
  • €100….mmmmm sounds reasonable doesn’t it. Less than what some of us thought (isn’t that kind of them), and ah sure, aren’t we all in the same boat, let’s keep bailing out the boat together so we don’t all sink. OH BUT HANG ON A MINUTE…let’s think back to the motor tax. Wasn’t that just brought in ‘for a while’ just till we ‘come right’ … And it stayed all throughout the tiger and it’s STILL in place. Government could never afford to abolish it as they first intended to. 100€ standard charge this year just to get us all used to it…then watch it jump, and jump, and jump, just like the motor tax has. Ireland used to have water charges until the government decided that water was a basic human right like air that we breath. We could, arguably, survive without a house, or electricity or heating, BUT without a human being would die within days. What happened to our basic human right?

    Reply
  • By 2013 it will be 250-300 euro

    Reply
  • I cannot understand why, when you Own Your Property Outright, any Government has the Right to make you pay ANY Tax on it. It seems to me this concept needs to be Challenged, through the courts.

    Reply
  • I live in an apartment with 1 other person. I live in a smaller home and I would use a significantly lower amount of water than a family of 4 in a standard house, why should I be charged the same? I can’t afford it just as much as anybody else but if the government had a meter I would find it reasonable to pay for what I use. They can whistle for their €100

    Reply
    • If and when a water meter will be installed. You will pay a service fee (high) to have usage of the water meter.
      Then you will pay little in charges to use water.
      You will find that the cost component of water usage, which you control, will be very low and insignificant in relation to the overall charge.
      Normal practice.
      Water is a utility commodity as is electricity and gas.
      I can see the argument coming down the line where VAT is to be applied to water charges. This will be put to us in the guise of an EC ruling.
      ….watch this space..

      Reply
  • The Government need to get their priorities right. There’s no point whatsoever in nailing the people of Ireland again and again while at the same time, they are squandering millions on a motorway between Oilgate and Rosslare in Co. Wexford.

    Reply
  • Is there any word on how it will work for people in rented accomadation? I would accept having to pay for using water but if a tax is put on property shouldnt the landlord have to pay it? On my lease there is no clause saying I have to pay any new government charges on homes.

    Reply
  • G 25/07/11 #

    Doesnt bother me, I won’t be paying either. It’ll cost the state more to run me through the courts and possibly imprison me than would be worth the €100. I don’t have it and if I did I certainly would not give it to Anglo!

    Reply
  • I would agree that it’s not a stealth tax, as they are clearly specifying what the money is supposed to be going towards. I wouldn’t baulk at paying this as we really do seriously need to pay for the infrastructure to be upgraded and modernised, particularly in places like Dublin.

    However, the sad reality is that the money will not go towards improvements or pipe laying or dam building or reservoir construction – it’ll just be sucked into the bottomless pit of government coffers never to be accounted for again. Meaning, water will continue to leak into the ground under Dublin at a rate of something like 150 million litres per day. People in Co. Galway will probably continue to be repeatedly told not to consume their only drinking / cooking water supply due to bugs. We’ll also continue to see situations in places like Kilkenny where the tap water from mains supply is so poor that I would advise no one ever drink it unless they fancy a spell in hospital or bed suffering from stomach ailments caused by Helicobacter Pylori as happened both my father and my aunt a couple of years back. I once turned on the tap at my parents home to be met with a stench as greenish-brownish water with unidentified sediment and floaters poured from the tap. I’m not the only one saying it either… for years now some of that town’s most prominent doctors have repeatedly spoken about this in the papers and on the radio. Comically, this is usually followed up a short time later by someone from the local authorities saying it’s rubbish and that the drinking water is perfectly safe. Yeah, right, I know who I believe. Unfortunately the will to bring Ireland’s water quality in line with the EU norms is simply non-existent. So on the simple basis that absolutely sweet fanny adams is being done about it in any seriousness, I don’t think we should have to pay a cent.

    Oh.. and just as an aside – the reason they’ve lumped the property tax and the water charge together is most likely to make it easier to swallow at first… and they can separate and hike them later on. But also – I reckon it’s to get around the whole “But I have a private well!” claim. Fine, you have a private well – but you still have to pay the property tax. €100 please.

    Joke.

    Reply
  • They can call it what they like, house hold charge, stealth tax whatever, the common denominator is that its money out of the hands of the many going into the hands of the few.It must be rejected by the citizens

    Reply
  • So I am paying towards the IMF or the Council services????

    Council Services would be:
    Water – we don’t have access, had to provide my own
    Sewage – we don’t have access, had to provide my own
    Lighting – Ummm, we are 4 miles from the nearest
    Footpaths – we are 4 miles from the nearest
    Roads – I have filled the potholes twice every year outside my house as they won’t do them.
    Roads – Salting or gritting during very bad weather? No chance
    Broadband – Exchange not enabled.
    Fire Service – Nope, you have to pay for that if you call them
    4500 euro development fees to Council when I built my house – we paid that. 6 years on, ZERO development

    So my 100 euro will do what, Oh ya the IMF.

    They will sing for it.

    Reply
    • A good, articulate rant.
      I, for one, completely agree.

      Its either a water charge or it isn’t.
      And if it’s a water charge, I don’t want their pipes or water. I have my own. And it cost me the bones of 2 grand.
      If it’s not a water charge, I’ll pay it if it’s due.
      We also have no paths, no broadband, no surfaced road.. Our neighbour does ours; so he’s the one I’ll be paying.

      Reply
  • How can it be right that people with nothing at the end of the week pay the same as multi millionares? and the very wealthy in say dalkey ect.It will start at €100 and go up very quickly and then be privatized by the Irish Tory party. FG al…ways looking after the wealthy.They can only squeeze people so much If i hear” We all have to take the pain” from these politicans and buisness groups I’m gonna be sick..So much 4 a labour party, they dont know who they are..

    Reply
    • The Labour Party are right-wing lap dogs, if they had any working class tendencies, they would have never gone into coalition with FG. They had the numbers to align with other left-wing parties and formed a huge left opposition, probably resigning FF to the history books if they had. But they betrayed their voters.

      Reply
    • As someone who has read the economic polices of many of those on the far left I can’t say how happy I am they are not in power. It can get worse. The mantra is tax the rich, but unfortunately in the real world the rich pay most of our taxes already. The much vaunted Scandinavian model involves everyone being taxed at a high level but wait for the crying if that was tried here. Many want great services but for low taxes. My friends mother pays $60,000 a year in property taxes in New York, the house is in a nice area but she’s not particularly wealthy. She can pay that or sell up and move. It’s time we realised the average person in this country is not taxed heavily even with these new ones.

      Reply
    • As a percentage of income the poor pay more than the rich in taxes. Which includes vat and all the other stealth taxes. And when the rich pay most of the total tax take that only shows up how unequal society is. Thats the ‘real world”.

      Reply
  • we have to stand together and fight these taxes….it might start off at 100 but it wont stay at 100…..that is just to get us all sucked in and then they can charge what they like!!!!! They done it yrs ago introduced water rates @ £5 the first year and the following year it went up to £20 and 3rd yr went up to £75!!!! I say don’t start paying these taxes or we will be strangled with more bills!!!

    Reply
    • Yes Teresa we need to stand together. Let them take a couple of million of us to court. I hope people refuse to pay this. It is just a way of getting money to pay for the bailout of the corrupt banks.

      Reply
  • Just got my rates $1,453.73 of which $834.21 is purely ‘improved residential’ based upon the property value. Water rates are about $950 a year (infrastructure) then usage costs on top of that each quarter. Prices in Australian dollars, for Perth as a comparison. Doesn’t help those in Ireland who are strapped as it is.
    If the taxes go towards upkeep of infrastructure good, but as others have commented tax by stealth funds always go elsewhere.

    Reply
  • point 1) its another charge on top of the other levies / taxes we already pay to alleviate the public finance gap by giving the bond holders a “money back special” (gambling term)

    point 2) other countries have larger populations and different economies of scale. Comparison to them is null and void. 4.5 million people , how many have an income, how many can pay any additional charge , what will that mean to their bottom lines are the questions.

    point 3) once a government puts a levy , tax , surcharge into its revenue stream what are the chances that it will ever be removed ? Has anyone talked about that ?

    point 4) It looks almost certain that this new charge will come into effect. If that’s the case , the larger the house , the more water consumption ,the higher the charge should be.

    FYI intel corporation fabs drink water like no tomorrow. Are there any changes to the existing commercial water rates for these large organisations ? …..something tells me no

    Reply
  • The FG/Labour shills/plants haven’t been let loose on the poll yet, which leads me to believe that amount is not correct and could be a lot higher.

    Or maybe that’s the point, see how many people bite and vote for it being lower than expected.

    Either way, I’m not paying it

    Reply
    • Neither am I Trevor… fuck these robbing liars…they want to tax what has already been taxed (my home) and they want money for water that I pay for anyway on a group scheme and which may be fuck all use to anyone if polluted by hydraulic fracturing…this lot can go and whistle for their 100euro. Any sheep who are willing to pay this deserve to be ripped off for being so blindly lead on a merry dance by this shower of assholes.

      Reply
  • Again the rich get a break, when are the people of this country going to wake up. It is unfair, there should be no water or property charges for anyone except the rich. The rich won’t notice a charge of €100 per year but to me it might as well be a million.
    I can’t afford it. Our assholes in government should look at what happened in Bolivia a few years ago, there is only so much the people can take.

    Reply
  • More taxes = more admin = more civil servants = more cost to run the state.
    Fewer taxes = less admin = fewer civil servants = less cost to run the state

    Reply
  • Agree with Mark Browne, it seems to be forgotten that Ireland had Taxes on almost everything, thus our ‘expensive’ living.
    The #Tiger# was only for certain people, and now we are paying their bills!,
    but,dont worry, Lying Gael’ were going to change everything, they did… they are now getting the obscene wages instead of failure Fail
    Nothing changes in Ireland, see how quick the ‘LAW’ was brought in for the 100euro charge, no such quickness when a LAW is needed to charge the wanker bankers (has’nt that gone very quiet)
    Jack

    Reply
  • I thought it would be much higher.
    I’m not exactly a high rolling earner but after living for several years in London this is pittance in comparison to their rates & taxes.

    Reply
    • In London they get services for that money.

      Reply
    • @AlanCummins I also lived in London for years and in lots of other countries around the world and now back a couple of years. The services we get here are the same if not better than London. I paid about £80/€100 for council tax every month on top of water charges from Thames Water
      Irish people are so used to having free stuff for years they then moan when they have to pay for it. While I do think that water and property should be metered/taxed so that large users/owners pay their appropriate share, this is a first step to paying for resources based on scarcity and the externalities inherent in their use.
      In addition, Ireland’s implicit tax rate at 41% is 12th lowest in Europe amongst 27 countries. We actually pay very little personal tax here compared to most of our north european neighbours
      http://www.eapn.ie/eapn/policy/resources-on-taxation/tax-in-ireland-and-europe

      Reply
  • Will my 100euro go towards doing up a TDs office or buy them an iphone?

    Reply
  • I think it’s fair. People abuse water terribly I think it’s important we don’t take it for granted.

    Reply
    • Bob Go 25/07/11 #

      These taxes are not to assure additional services of any kind or improvement of services. The water tax is not for Water, neither is the property tax for property services, they are both to pay the IMF bank bailout taxes.
      If the people accept these they are fools.

      Reply
    • Your right in saying people should use water much more sensibly, but this charge isnt aimed at water conservation its a revenue generating exercise pure and simple. If the government cared about conservation they would implement a scheme to fix the pipes leaking thousands of gallons yearly. This will first be used to generate revenue then lead to eventual privatisation.

      Reply
    • I suppose it could go the other way. Given it’s a flat rate of €100 people might use more water than before out of spite. I’m lucky in that where I live we have very good drinking water, it’s unfair that someone who has to buy bottled all the time should have to pay the same as me but I’m an eternal optimist and I’d like to think the money will go towards fixing the problems with our water system.

      Reply
    • The charge will not go towards repairing the pipes etc

      Reply
  • ‘without water’ … Oops :/

    Reply
  • Just dont pay it.I payed stamp duty when i bought my house and they want to tax me again for having my own house and water my dog wouldnt even drink.They cant jail the whole country.If we dont stand up for this they will walk all over us.

    Reply
  • IMF gonna sell off your water

    Reply
  • How on earth is a household property and water charge a “stealth” tax? I’m not making a comment on the fairness of it, but calling it a stealth tax is ridiculous – it’s a very obvious and tanglible charge with a very clear purpose.

    Reply
  • G 25/07/11 #

    Anyone who thinks these taxes will go to pay for our water services are deluded. Snap out of the X Factor. These taxes are to pay for our banks. Whether we should or should not have to pay for water is a side issue, this money is not bing used for water. Ask yourself do you want to fund German bondholders and huge pensions and salaried to our TDs. If you agree with that then go right ahead and pay for your ‘water’.

    Reply
  • Okay… it’s not a stealth tax. Water doesn’t magically get purified and arrive at your sink. It costs money to get there and since no one paid for it there was no investment in the infrastructure. Now it’s going to cost a lot to fix when we have little money, hence the charges. Properties don’t sit magically away from the rest of the nation. they need services and infrastructure, be it roads, water, electricity or sewage. This costs money, money which we took in large one off amounts and then spent on the wages in the public sector. We should have had a property tax all along and no stamp duty but we were stupid. People screamed blue murder when anyone mentioned bin charges, or property charges or water charges. Now we see the consequences of not introducing those sustainable taxes a long time ago.

    Reply
    • The people of Ireland do not pay for water currently as this is paid for by current taxes. It is already built in. Money is handed over to the water authorities from the income tax pool. So in effect unless they reduce the current tax, I am now being double taxed. Water is only free if you do not pay tax(If you don’t … tell me how). i.e. “There is no such thing as a free lunch”.

      Reply
    • @Sneaky Jedi, We have always paid water charges where I live in Cavan, when I was a child I remember it cost £200 for the year. So you’re wrong.

      Reply
    • @Daniel Brady, Are you on a group scheme? This from the citizens information website: “Domestic water charges were abolished in 1997, but if you are a member of a group water scheme, you may still have to pay a certain amount for your domestic water”.

      So it would figure from when you were a child, but if you are paying now, only the group scheme makes sense. Or am I missing something?

      Reply
  • This is just a first step to introduce the concept and a political side step to call it household charge rather than property /water tax.

    Ultimately it should be more significant for big houses and households.

    In many countries in europe property tax varies from .5% to 2%

    This should have been brought in before the boom and would have helped dampen some of the specualtion both coalation of 93-97 and the FF/PD failed to do it.

    Reply
  • €100 is reasonable enough I suppose, the problem is it won’t be €100 for ever

    Reply
  • It’s not really a stealth tax if you know about it and are going to get an annual bill for it’s payment though is it?

    A stealth tax by definition would be one that is largely unnoticed as a tax, ie state lotteries, vat etc, no?

    Reply
    • By and large people refer to it as a stealth tax because they have already paid these taxes. Although this tax has been given the title property and water charges, It is just another form of revenue i.e. a tax by any name.

      Reply
  • This €100 will increase every year, its hardly worth the bother and hassle of working, so much is taken off in taxes. Irish people are way too placid, this mess was created by bankers and developers and it is everyone else who is picking up the tab while they live in their mansions in Massachusetts.

    Reply
  • My last bill for water charges was €800, I did the same to that bill as i did with the last. Shredder Job!
    Breakdown of the Bill, I think around €250 for the water meter to be placed outside my house, €550 for the water charges since last year. Reason Ive to pay this and the neighbours both sides of me dont is because i’ve a business sign on the road. The office out the back doesn’t even have water going into it! Load of Muck!

    Reply
  • This is what to expect , This is my update bill for water charges,

    http://nalcro.com/pages/water.php

    Reply
  • I have heard through local people who claim to be “in the know” that the water meters will not be provided by the state, they are unaffordable as the water networks need massive EXPENSIVE upgrades to support them. I have also heard that Water charges for homes could be in the €600 -800 range a year from 2014 , with or without meters. Also that residential property tax will be €1500 – 2000 a year at least. While this is unconfirmed rumor and not based on facts other than hearsay, I actually believe we could be looking at such prices considering our deficit. It makes sense too when you look at any country under an IMF bailout. It’s always hell for those countries in taxation terms. The Govt can’t tax it’s way out of the recession. But it thinks it can stealth tax it’s way out.

    Reply
  • Not paying for undrinkable water!! And just how much more of our fecking wages do they want…..,..

    Reply
  • It seems a bit rich that the government should want money from me seeing as I paid tax when I bought my house, I continue to struggle to pay my mortgage with no help from them, thank you very much, but they still feel entitled to tax me for doing this.
    As for asking me to pay for water, ok does this mean I’m actually going to get drinkable water for 52 weeks a year, 365 days a year, and a steady supply of it that won’t destroy my kettle, shower washing machine etc? If so, fair enough I’ll pay a few bob for it but as things stand I do not get this kind of supply and if they intend to charge me for it they better get their house in order first or, just like the various broadband providers out there who promise blistering fast download speeds but in reality deliver dial-up speeds, they’ll be in breach of contract as far as I’m concerned and I won’t be paying for a service I’m not getting.

    Reply
  • Well it’s better than I expected and less than other countries already.

    Some have stated that people are all charged the same rate irrespective of the size of house. It’s the number of people using the water, not the size of the house that should matter. I live alone in a 3 bedroom house, should I pay the same as the family of 6 a few doors down in a similar 3 bedroom house?

    As for the metering system to pay for what you use, good idea but there could be an issue there too. I presume these meters will be above ground so they can be read and hence the pipes going to them are more prone to freezing conditions. It may stop some people from leaving the taps running so they don’t freeze up, but say you do turn them off to save money. What happens when the pipes freeze and then burst? Who pays for the thousands of gallons that are wasted then?

    100e is not too bad but yes it’s still another tax, but it could be a lot worse. People on low incomes should get a waver or reduced rate with spreadable payments. Those on welfare I presume would already be exempt.

    Reply
  • Drink vodka and live in a tent.

    Reply
  • Bottom line. Workers will be paying for everybody. While I don’t mind those that are recently unemployed there is cohort out there that think they should have everything for nothing and forever.

    Reply
    • Yawn, the empathy here is just awesome. :-( it’s those scrounging dole fiends that are causing all the problems here eh… Ya that’s it, nothing to do with banks, social greed, corrupt politicians….

      Reply
  • Is this their way of avoiding the bother of installing water meters or is that still going ahead?

    Reply
  • Yes I will pay whatever I am asked to bail out my banks and my eurozone banks. I will vote what ever way the government tell me to vote. I will celebrate and “put on the green jersey” to pay the debts of other risk takers bets because its over a longer period.

    2+2=5

    I love Big Brother.

    Reply
  • The Management of the water supply & quality could be better, so IF this money was used & invested for the stated purpose it would be excellent. Also, as stated previously, it is not unusual to have to ‘pay’ for water supply & it’s management. It is this way across a lot of Europe.
    It is my belief that this money, under whatever title/excuse it is collected, will be diverted else where.
    But; 1-Can we expect a higher standard of tap water?
    2-As an occupier of a rented house can we ‘transfer’ our credit of payment to another residence?

    Reply
  • thank god i dont have a property! ;-) well in other countries water charges are NORMAL! even its hard even more charges but stil….i kinda agree!

    Reply

Add New Comment