TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Poll: Should Ireland’s new gambling laws allow for ‘super casinos’?

Justice Minister Alan Shatter has effectively ruled out developments like the proposed Twomileborris large-scale casino. Has he done the right thing? You tell us…

Image: Miss Turner via Flickr.com

JUSTICE MINISTER Alan Shatter has announced an overhaul of Ireland’s gambling legislation.

The law will create provisions for more medium-sized developments but so-called ‘super casinos’ – like that which had been proposed for Twomileborris in Co Tipperary – will not be permitted.

Shatter said yesterday that large casino developments would “attract other activities that are not desirable and pose a particular risk to vulnerable people”. In the comments section on TheJournal.ie’s report on the new legislation yesterday, some readers argued that the restriction on larger casinos would block a source of revenue and employment in the country.

What do you think? Should Ireland’s new gambling laws allow for ‘super casinos’?


Poll Results:






Read next:

Comments (44 Comments)

  • I bet Lowry has collected already!!!

    Reply
  • Don’t we already have one called NAMA? Surely the biggest gambling consortium of all, although in fairness to the minister, there are a lot of undesirable activites associated to it.

    Reply
  • Heard that if this casino was to be successful it would need a foot fall of 25000 punters per week. Wonder how much money each punter would need to leave behind on the table to pay the running costs etc? Was also left wondering were they would find 25000 per week to go through the door. Would be some amount of buses arriving in…

    Reply
  • “Yes, Unlimited” would be better described as allowing as many Casinos that is economically viable. If you’re going to allow them, I don’t want the government deciding where and how many there should be. Let them be built where the demand is. That’s how you maximise the jobs.

    Reply
    • Except where “the demand is” will be lower income areas where people try for fast wins and gamble away their income or welfare payments.

      We’re not talking about making Ireland another Monte Carlo here.

      As for creating jobs, casinos don’t flourish in a recession, and when the shine wears off and people realise the odds are stack against them, they’ll close and move on. Take a look at Las Vegas, its been hit worst of all.

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14747046

      Reply
    • Cillian 22/09/11 #

      Oisín, how terribly noble of you deciding how the least well off in society should spend their money!

      Reply
    • Cillian, far be it from me to decide how anyone chooses to spend their money, but I doubt if you went to the richest people in Ireland and asked them how they made their millions the answer would be “Oh we gamble in casinos”. People who have money tend to hold onto it, or invest it in “educated risks” where the odds favour them more than mere chance.

      Now I have no clue where you’re from, but I grew up in a welfare suburb of Dublin where most (not all) of the lower income families spend their income/welfare/benefits in the pub or in Paddy Power. I’ve also travelled extensively to places like Reno and Las Vegas for business, and lived in the US and saw first hand the income bracket which frequents casinos there. I can’t say it was a stretch of the imagination to deduce those same people I grew up with will be the casinos primary patrons.

      Now I took the liberty of looking at your Twitter profile (hope you don’t mind) but from what I can see (and obviously not knowing your financial/social background), I did may have more experience of lower income families than say your average Corporate Law Graduate doing their LL.B.

      But thanks for your sarcasm, it was much appreciated.

      Reply
    • Nice, Oisín!

      Reply
  • Another big pay off for some politicians and a big construction company. It would go bust after a few months. There is NO WAY it could support the footfalls it would need to operate and it would end up being taken over by Nama like half the rest of the company. We have too small a population to cater for these types of casino. Some people may argue that it would attract tourists but why would any one come to this cold and rainy country when they can go to Vegas. It’s not like Ireland would be any cheaper!

    Reply
  • The impact of super casinos on the native American reservations and the surrounds has not been entirely positive. Prostitution, drugs, money laundering, higher crime levels, hardly the backbone of social renewal.

    Reply
  • This development is a throw back to the white elephants of the celtic tiger. It would take business from the exisitng race courses and greyhound tracks locally in Thurles and take advanage of peoples addisction and desperation in hard times. The country is full of white elephant developments. No thought put into the feasibility of such projects. They are to politicians what tinfoil is to magpies, bright and shiny but completely worthless.

    Reply
  • Here we go with the ‘Nanny state’ again have we not got enough restrictive laws in this bloody country already? Just because some people can’t Handel their alcohol intake should we shut down every pub in the country? And put half our back benchers out of business? The same applies to gambling, should the rest of the country suffer for the sake of a few? If someone is addicted to something no amount of laws will stop that person doing just what they want. God I wish this country could think outside the box for once.

    Reply
  • Hum ha…. Finally went towards a No… Despite being an enthusiastic poker player and nag backer, I’m none too comfortable with the idea of gigantic fleeceing halls

    Reply
  • ridiculous! there is a million and 1 ways to gamble in ireland. a super casino would be a great benefit to the economy and would not change the way people gamble at all…. I’m putting a bet on now on my phone. :P

    Reply
  • It’s the casinos / slot palaces / poker machine joints / “sporting clubs” that can be easily accessed on a daily basis that do most harm to those who cannot afford to gamble at all. So if they are allowed, they should be miles away (like some of our empty dormitory towns), so that it’s a big deal to get to them once off.

    Reply
  • The bottom line is that the country wouldn’t be able to support such massive casino’s.

    Reply
    • Haven’t we enough vice here already? Between gambling, drink, drugs and prostitution, this island is on a course for destruction.

      Reply
    • You call it destruction, I call it a good time. It’s simple: if you don’t like gmabling, don’t bet. If you don’t prositution then don’t be a prostitute or a punter. Saty out of other people’s business.

      Reply
    • thats why its a tourist attraction. do’h

      Reply
    • Daniel, your argument is flawed. Would you also say that paedophilic rape is “other people’s business”? That’s sick!!

      Reply
    • @Irish Pride
      ‘Daniel, your argument is flawed. Would you also say that paedophilic rape is “other people’s business”? That’s sick!!’

      I most definitely do no agree with Daniel but that is kind of nonsensical.
      1) The victims (directly) are themselves
      2)They’re adults
      3)Most of society does it at some point for what is armless craic (again i realise it can escalate)

      If ya want to go down the comparison route try Its like letting someone drink but not take heroin. Not great but it might change on a few minds onto our side of the argument.

      Also mentioning paedophilia is like comparing someone to Hitler. Sounds like you don’t have a point. Which you do its just sounds bad. Good hunting.

      Reply
    • Cillian 22/09/11 #

      @Liam – Maybe, maybe not. But the point is, it is not for the Government to decide how many the economy can support. Would you say it ought to be up to the Government to decide how many shops, restaurants, cafés the economy can support?

      Let the market function, and let the consumer decide what they want to spend their money on. Not some idiot TD.

      Reply
  • Gambling is destructive to people and society. I’d actually welcome a harsher regime on bookies than we have at the moment.

    Reply
    • Don’t like it? The don’t gamble. Stop trying to control other people… We have the Catholic Church and their ideaology of “punishing sin” to thank for this legacy thinking.

      Reply
    • Actually Daniel I’m not a god-botherer but this is not related. It’s about societal decay.

      I’ve seen first-hand the desperation of daily gamblers, family men on the dole, pumping their money into a bottomless pit of “nearly winning”, and asking for their bus fare home, tears in their eyes, on the same day they got their double dole for Christmas.

      I’ve seen families reduced to fist-fights in an attempt to get a gambler away from a machine before the money for the food and clothes is spent. And all the gambling-hall owners do is call security to allow the gambling to continue.

      So all the red thumbs to this and my earlier comment, I hope it stays fine for you and your families, but we’ve already seen what hands-off government does to a country.

      If this post sounds like a rant, it’s because this sort of “We’re all adults, leave us alone” stuff is uninformed and simplistic, and it makes me sick.

      Reply
    • Oh David, I agree completely that gambling is bad.

      The reality is people can become addicted to anything. That can be drugs, gambling or even food (over eating), sex… you name it. It’s not a government’s role to control the person. It’s your right to destroy yourself, it’s your life. Just because you’re addicted to something doesn’t absolve you of personal responsibility. Some people win at at life, others fail. This is social darwinism.

      At the end of the day, if you’re out of control of yourself then it’s your responsibility to get yourself help but there’s no since taking all the sharp knives out of the drawer just because someone in the canteen likes to cut themselves.

      Reply
    • Social darwinism – Darwin would have given Spencer a wedgie for that one. “Some people win at life, others fail”? I hope it stays fine for you and yours.

      Reply
    • Daniel, have you a view on Eugenics while you’re at it?

      Reply
  • More nanny state nonsense, they say they don’t want people who have gambling problems to suffer and yet they want to tax online gambling! That won’t stop people placing bets.
    This would create jobs, fuel the local economy and boost tourism, simple as that.
    I play a bit of poker and don’t have a gambling problem, I’ve never even placed a bet on a horse, I mean you can gamble in any bookies in any town in Ireland, this won’t solve any problems, it’s a joke.
    They should keep the gambling laws as is and try to bring American poker sites to Ireland as the laws in the US are very strict.

    Reply
  • People like to gamble. People like whores. People like booze. If you don’t like these things then don’t use them. I am offended by the super casino in Tipperary but only because they decided to put it there. I don’t like the idea of blighting our country’s goreous landscapes. I think Ireland needs a red light district, and I think a heavily taxed super casino would fit well in Dublin. Let all the filth go to one area, keep the drunks, scumbags, off the decent streets. Use the tax income to clean up Dublin and other things. Where to put it? It’s hard to decide, Dublin is not a pretty city… We really need to get this city redesigned, get some good people in An Bord Pleanála.

    Reply
    • I have a suggestion, give them your address.

      Reply
    • The whole project stank to high heaven of brown handers and back envelopes. Hell, Lowry had a hand in it! Crooked as a rams horn! It was never going to be a runner. A project of that scale in the middle of nowhere? NO-one, apart from Lowry, to speak in defense of the casino to the media? No chance.
      That said, Ireland would be a prime location to build a super casino. The benefits financially could be enormous. If properly planned and managed, we could have Europes answer to Vegas, and that can’t be a bad thing. Might help us out of the hole we find ourselves in.

      Reply
    • Maybe self-contained “autonomous” areas for those not meeting a certain behavioural or educational standard would be a good idea. Get all those brickies back to work to build a huge wall around them. With spikes. And throw enough food over the wall to feed only half of them. That way only the healthiest would survive, saving money on the health service. It’s brilliant. It’ll save us all.

      Reply
  • Mr Doran your comments are just sick . Cant believe what you just said. Your the reason society and the world is the way it is today .
    You must be a very frustrated man !

    Reply
  • These comments are a great teaching aid for political philosophy.

    How far must the leviathans reach extend?

    I believe, in this case, that regardless of where the supercasino’s were to be built,
    in areas of high or low socio-economic status,
    the human species would be drawn in for the short-term gain,
    and stay for the dopamine hit and the brain-drain.

    It is for is in our collective interest that nobody suffers in this way.

    I voted no.

    Reply
  • Super Casinos….Jesus…as a nation, are we for real?

    The phrase ‘Bread and circuses’ comes to mind.

    Imagine directing funds (whether public or private) into developing red-light districts and super casino’s when we don’t even have some half decent fundamental healthcare facilities.

    What’s wrong with some of you people?

    Have any of you seen the state of our so-called National Children’s Hospital?

    Reply
  • the country is in a bad enough financial state without bringing super casinos in.

    Reply
  • Pie in the sky development considering the massive downturn in economic fortunes .Need to restrain gambling joints never more necessary obvious method to tax betting where vast revenues can be raised through Internet betting and other developments .The country has not the capacity for a Los Vegas style development.

    Reply

Add New Comment