TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Poll: Should Irish soldiers who fought in WWII be pardoned for deserting?

They “contributed to the freedom of Europe” but were met with “starvation orders” when they got home. Should those 5,000 soldiers who fought for the Allies against Hitler’s forces be pardoned for deserting the Irish army?

Image: Irish Defence Forces via Flickr

THOUSANDS OF IRISH soldiers could soon be issued with a pardon for deserting from the Defence Forces to fight for the Allies during World War II.

Earlier this week, Justice and Defence Minister Alan Shatter hinted that the 5,000 soldiers could be pardoned, stating it was time to revisit the issue as the men had “contributed to the future of freedom and democracy in Europe”.

On their return from fighting WWII, the men were denied pay and pensions, banned from working for the State and their names were essentially black-listed in what were known as “starvation orders”.

The advice of the Attorney General has been sought as the campaign for a pardon strengthens on the back of official calls from Stormont.

Writing in the Sunday Business Post last weekend, Tom McGurk said that the soldiers deserted the tricolour during a national emergency and, while the “shadow over these men” could now be lifted, it still should be recognised that they had done wrong and that the State needed to take action against their desertion at the time.

What do you think?

Should Irish soldiers who fought in WWII be pardoned for deserting?


Poll Results:





Read next:

Comments (115 Comments)

  • David 25/01/12 #

    I’m surprised by the responses of some on here. Regardless of the question, everyone is entitled to their opinion. To resort to name calling or rubbishing someone’s opinion just because you disagree with that opinion contradicts the principles of a free and tolerant Europe, and country. The irony is that those with strong views about tolerance are intolerant of those who disagree with them.

    Reply
  • It is one thing for these soldiers to be court martialled for deserting their posts in the 1940s. However the black listing of them for several years afterwards was pure spite. That is why they should be pardoned.

    Reply
  • Despite whatever ideological motives these men may have had, and despite the rightness of the anti-fascist cause they fought for, these men were guilty of desertion which is a serious dereliction of duty. By joining the army, you essentially agree to obey any lawful order you are given and it is not for you to decide yourself whether the course of action being ordered by the government is right or wrong or best for the country or indeed humanity as a whole.

    Had these men been court-martialed on their return and dishonourably discharged, I would have no problem with that. However, the manner in which they were denied a court martial, where at least they would have been able to mount a defence, and way they were blacklisted and abysmally treated, coupled with the fact that it was Nazi Germany that they went to fight, means that I believe the state owes them an apology and that after all these years the only appropriate apology would be a full pardon.

    Reply
  • It would be interesting to get comments from our senior citizens on this as they were different times with different values and pressures. Are the present generation the right people to be judging those who went off to fight in the ww ?

    Reply
  • Here is a thought. If 5,000 present day Irish army soldiers decided to up sticks and go off and fight in Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya because they were fighting evil dictators what would be the sentiment here? The 3,500 soldiers who didn’t desert and stayed behind would be all that we would have to carry out the functions of the defence forces. We might not be under military threat but I’m sure that the military law that exists now is the same as then. There is a mate of mine in the Leb at the moment and I’m sure that he doesn’t like what’s going on in Syria but I can’t see him saying fuck this for a game of soldiers I’m of to fight evil dictators. That is because he is a soldier that has taken an oath and follows orders.

    Reply
    • Brian, with respect, Hitler at the time was posing a very real pan-European threat while our great leader Dev kept the army sitting on it’s hands.

      Reply
    • Shea, we had 41,000 men in the army at the highest point during the Emergency, Hitler had 100,000 battle hardened troops in Belgium, a country less than half the size of Ireland. What would you suggest Dev should have done?

      Reply
    • Brian, far be it from me to attempt to rewrite history in relation to DEV’s neutrality stance but he might have made arrangements so that these 5,000 soldiers could play their part against the greatest monster of the 20th century without being branded as deserters. An honourable discharge and a boat ticket perhaps.?
      Of course, it’s a complex question. Standing with your former occupier against a common enemy may have been a political “hot potato” at the time but I can’t help feeling that DEV’s sly regard for Hitler (he did sign the book of condolences after Hitlers death!) may have had some influence on his neutrality stance.

      Reply
    • I’m not too sure what the rules for leaving the army are but I would imagine that during a national emergency they would change somewhat. You saw during the Queen and Obamas visit where all leave was cancelled for the security services whether they liked it or not. That’s just for cordial State visits so I would imagine with the threat of invasion things were a lot more serious. Supposing another 5000 decided to go and then another 5000 and so on. Pretty soon the platoon guarding Achill island would be the only army that we would have had!

      As for signing the book of condolences well I don’t know his motives but I can only assume that he was following diplomatic protocol. Although funny how Allied airmen who were interned “escaped” whereas German ones didn’t. Although I do take the point that they might have been very smart Germans!

      Reply
  • Forgive me if I am incorrect but the debate should not be framed in terms of desertion. These men, along with others, deserted the Irish army in a time of a national emergency, breaking their contract and their oath. However, they were not alone. Others deserted but did not fight. Upon the return of the deserters who fought with the British, these particular deserters were singled out for punitive measures while others were not. If desertion was simply the charge, the Irish state should have acted consistently across the board and, if it was applied, such punishment of all deserters would have been the right of the state. However, the singling out of particular deserters betrayed petty prejudice and the particular mode of punishment (leaving them and their families to effectively starve) was cruel and unusual in that it targeted the innocent families. The punishment has far outweighed the crime and enough time has passed that these men should be fully rehabilitated with an apology for the cruel and unusual punishment meted out by the anti-British state.

    Reply
    • We should also keep in mind that the Irish state was very young and the emotions of the conflict fought between 1919 and 1921 followed by a bitter civil war meant that it would have been difficult for a government to join a war on Britain’s side. I think this factor should not be forgotten zhen using terms like ‘anti-British’.

      Reply
    • The sad truth is that if we had joined the British, our forces would have been under their command. It would have been send Paddy out first once more. The greatest loss per capita of any country in WW1 was among Irish soldiers, the next was among Scottish.

      Look at the soldiers that come back from Iraq in bags, the Scots are always out of all proportion.

      Cannon Fodder, no thanks.

      Reply
  • Can someone who voted against a full pardon please explain why?

    Reply
    • Yes. I do believe that if people follow their conscience, it is a good thing. But when your are enrolled in a national army, you are not representing your conscience, but your country as your commanders and democratically elected government see fit. I don’t think it was wrong that people joined the British army to fight against Htiler, but whenthey were already members of an Army, they were betraying the stance of the army for their own personal choice.

      If they had been conscripted into the army, I would feel more inclined to pardon them, but they joined of their own free will. And when you commit yourself to fight for the national army, you cannot just change your mind when they don’t do what you want them too.

      Reply
    • I am not saying their stance against Hitler was wrong, and in truth, I think the British government ought to commend them for their services, but deserting an army (it might sound harsh to say that, but they left without leave which constitues deserting), for whatever cause has to be treated as desertion. I don’t think they should have been descriminated against when they came back, but their actions were comprimising the stance of our own army.

      Reply
    • I’ll try. When you sign up to join an order you undertake an allegiance to your country and too obey superior orders. These guys didn’t. In the British army the penalty for desertion is high as with most Armies. you can’t play ‘Lanigan’s ball’ with which country and army you pledge allegiance to.

      Reply
    • Because we should all leave the past behind, and they are probably gone to their reward anyway. It wont stop warlords or greedy nations finding excuses to use wars or threats and sanctions and bailouts to keep the elites in power. Eg politicians earning more than doctors and much more (x ? times) the national wage. It doesen’t matter which tyranny we live under. Ask Russians or Americans or Muslims or Christians they all fought for freedom and betterment of mankind supposedly. BTW is it the Germans (converted nazis) ruling or leading Europe into austerity rather than sharing the wealth of the elite.

      Reply
  • Anyone who thinks they should receive a full pardon knows little about military law. These were men in an army. They weren’t boy scouts. They knew what they were doing and if they chose to desert and abandon their country they should be prepared to live with the consequences.

    More importantly, I think giving a full pardon now is indicative of how we as a nation feel about ourselves. We seem to care more about how we are seen by others! (Ask Enda!) I understand that this feeling of low self esteem is the result of being oppressed but really think it’s time we stood up and got off our knees.

    While saying that, at this stage I think we should just forget it as I think we can safely assume they won’t do it again but deserters in any other nation’s army would have been dealt with more harshly. Get real!

    Reply
  • @Gav. Yes it works both ways. If you undertake to defend Ireland in her army and them desert to join any other army then of course you should be entitled to leniency under the law.

    Reply
  • No. You can’t run an army if you tolerate disobedience. The army is the very last place that can afford disobedience. Disobedience kills, particularly in high-pressure environments that a soldier may find himself in.
    Ireland remained neutral during WWII. These men who abdicated to join the British Army jeopardized our neutrality.
    Would we be as tolerant of Irish soldiers who left to fight for the Germans? We should be tolerant of neither, and pardon neither, because we trained them to be Irish soldiers, to defend Ireland, even if that ultimately meant that they may not actually fight a war.

    Reply
  • This is a no brainer for me. There must be a full pardon. The members of our defences have always stood by our country when needed most. They fought against one of the greatest acts of evil ever known to be mankind and we should be proud of that. I am.

    Reply
  • I’m astounded it took this long. How soon after WWII did we know about the holocaust? That’s exactly the maximum amount of time it should have taken to issue pardons. And medals.

    Reply
  • “On their return from fighting WWII, the men were denied pay and pensions, banned from working for the State and their names were essentially black-listed in what were known as “starvation orders”.”

    To ban whose who were fighting against German nazi in WWII? I’m shocked. Really. Terribly shocked. Honest.

    Reply
    • The narrow-mindedness of the time I guess, where if you had any association with anyone or anything British, you were considered a pariah. I wonder if so many had deserted had fought for Nazi Germany would they have been lauded as heroes on their return?

      Reply
    • If you don’t turn up to work, you don’t get paid and you can’t expect the same employer that you left swinging in the wind to take up back with open arms.

      Professionalism is a bitch, most of these people knew what they were doing and accepted the consequences.

      Reply
    • They were barred for a limited time, approx 7yrs. They swore an oath to defend the State, they deserted to England and swore an oath to defend that state at home and abroad, If Britain had decided to invade Ireland, they had plans, these people would have been part of the invasion force. In time of war deserters are usually shot. They should consider themselves lucky they were not jailed.

      Reply
    • I think it’s hard for many people now to feel the anxiety felt during “the Emergency” by Irish officials about a British invasion to make use of strategically valuable Irish ports as well as preempting possible Nazi collaboration. So, to have a group of Irish soldiers desert their positions in the IDF to join the armed forces of that potential adversary, who on top of that was still occupying a large portion of Irish territory, was a flagrant violation responsibility to their country.

      Finding them guilty of desertion and banning them for seven years from state employment was a reasonable conclusion.

      The inability of so many Irish people to understand this shows how lacking people are in a coherent Irish perspective on the world. They are caught up in the point of view of the countries for whom the heroic war against the Nazis is the towering mythology of the age. Yes, the war against Nazi Germany was the main feature of modern history but that shouldn’t mean that the Irish can’t have a perspective that sometimes runs counter to the dominant narrative even as we move along with it.

      Reply
  • Having read the comments down this far, I have to get my tuppence worth in here. There is a lot of talk of nation, oaths, duty etc. Our nation at the time was a benign dictatorship, under the rule of a Spanish American megalomaniac, the Roman Catholic Church had too much of a say in the day to day running of the country. Dev hated the British and anyone who sided with them. A lot of these “deserters” saw Dev standing back and doing nothing to help in the fight against Nazism. Their only way of becoming an effective part in the fight was to join one of the armies of the Allies. The closest being the British army. Yes, deserting the Irish Army was wrong and against the law but our nation at the time was a banana republic and guarding turf stacks was not going to defeat the Nazis. History shows us that Dev was always a vindictive man, even from before the Rising, so when he got the chance to show us just how powerful he was, he took it.
    The government should not only pardon these men and women, they should apologise on behalf of the state.

    Reply
  • In my eyes they are heroes of Ireland. They along with the British army fought to defeat Hitler and his Nazis. They were made to feel like traitors by their fellow Irish men and woman. They feared to show their medals incase what punishment would be bestowed on them. We should be proud of our Irishmen who fought in the World Wars and other international conflicts. To this day Irish service men and women are working alongside the UN to bring and maintain peace, for example Lebanon.

    I hope the Government will give full pardons to those who were ‘blacklisted’ and apologise to their families.

    Reply
  • Dave the reason we speak English is because another evil country invaded murdered starved enslaved and pillaged our country so at least we’d be use to it.

    Reply
  • We should stop calling these men deserters. They would ,in the main be men of working class who would have considered it a necessity to provide for their families. I am old enough to remember some of these men. All the people who knew them, in my memory , considered them very brave men and as Irish as anybody.

    Reply
  • A full pardon would be inappropriate. These men did desert in a period of great danger to the state they served. If they had done it, to any other army in Europe, irregardless of the time, they would have been tried, jailed and death sentences would be common.

    When you sign up and agree to play by the rules, the only way any org. esp. an army can be run, then you break them in the most profound way possible, it is some cheek to turn around and ask for a blind eye to be turned. They avoided jail time, what more do they want. ???

    Reply
  • Running away from a safe position into a hostile position is not deserting, dont know why it is been termed that.

    Reply
    • I don’t think Ireland could have been deemed as ‘safe’. It was bombed, and there was a constant fear it could be invaded at any time. Deserting your country for your beliefs is all very well, but when you have sworn to put your country before all else, then I think it was wrong. When you give your unconditional loyalty to your national army, there are no terms and conditions. It is unconditional.

      Reply
    • Deserting is walking away from the mission and the task, the army that you signed up for. It usually carries the death penalty during crises or war and jail at others. These men were not sentenced to death or jailed upon return.

      The state could not view them as reliable workers, you not bother turning up to work one day, come back five years later and hand in a CV and see if you’ll be taken back.

      Reply
  • Of course they should be pardoned, as well as hailed for standing up for the greater good. Rather than staying neutral, they decided to fight against one of the most infamous and evil dictators in history. They would be hailed in any other nation as heroes, not shunned as deserters. The fact that they volunteered to do this adds to their bravery and commitment to do the right thing.

    Reply
  • As a group of heroes that we, as a nation, can be wholeheartedly proud, they definitely should be pardoned but I think that Tom McGurk quote raises an important point. In another context they could have been imprisoned or hanged for desertion. Punishment of these men at the time was not random and vindictive, they did actually break the law. But again I am totally in favour of a pardon which is long overdue to a courageous Irish group who fought the tyranny of the nazis.

    Reply
  • Should Ireland seek a pardon from the world for not doing enough to stop that tyrant from eliminating so many people and cultures? Not playing a full part in protecting the Allied cause was a major reason for Ireland stagnating after WWII even Germany benefitted from the Marshall plan. When the Americans declared war, Ireland should have rowed in with the rest of the free world as a nation who stood clearly on the side of freedom.

    Reply
    • We had some centuries of fighting other peoples wars. From the American War of Independence, American Civil War, the Mexico-American wars, the Napoleon Wars, to the trenches of WW1(250,000 Irish soldiers killed).

      Also, remember that less than twenty years previously, we had just fought a large scale conflict of our own with the largest ever empire known to man and had a civil war after, to boot.

      We simply didnt have the population or resources to once again, fight wars for others.

      Reply
    • Actually Ireland received quite a lot of money from the Marshall plan even though we were neutral. I don’t think this was the reason for stagnation in this country after the war.

      Its easy to say that we should have joined the war effort against the Nazis today, but you’ve got to see it from the perspective of that time. This was just 20 years after Ireland had gained a bitterly fought freedom from the UK, the Treaty ports had only been returned a year before and partition and the “Economic War” in the mid 30s had created a very anti-British sentiment in the country. I have no doubt that at the time not joining was probably quite a popular opinion to have.

      Reply
    • The question of whether or not we should have been involved is not something you can consider reasonably with the benefit of hindsight. but I think it is quite well dealt with here – http://neverfeltbetter.wordpress.com/2012/01/24/suicidal-obstinacy/

      Reply
  • Elrat 25/01/12 #

    Didn’t Dev & his FF send a letter offering condolences to the Germans on the death of Hitler ! Dipshit!

    Reply
    • visited herr hempel.in.person!

      Reply
    • “De Valera argued that to refuse condolences “would have been an act of unpardonable discourtesy to the German nation and to Dr Hempel. During the whole of the war, Dr Hempel’s conduct was irreproachable. … I certainly was not going to add to his humiliation in the hour of defeat.” ”

      Did De Val know that Dr.Hampel’s co-wokers were burning people in camps ovens?

      Reply
  • Pardon, definitely. Setting sail from Dev’s artificial Gaelic paradise, fighting against the Nazis making a real difference, how could what they did be viewed as truly immoral?
    Some would argue that they dumped their Ireland uniform and became subjects of the crown and thus deserved their fate.
    It’s worth noting that Ireland at that time was a revolutionary nation with limited and narrow revolutionary ideas towards how it’s citizens should behave.

    Plus, If they had stayed they would just have been armed guards for the transfer of money from credit unions anyway.

    Reply
    • Winston 25/01/12 #

      We might have had Dev as President but in 1941 we were by no means a revolutionary nation! In fact, compared to the Europeans we were one of the most stable and secure western states!

      Reply
    • Ireland was a revolutionary nation. It was independent, it was anti-colonial and it was anti-British, whether or not it was justified. Ireland’s independence wasn’t a gallant decade long struggle, it was out of the blue.
      Revolutionary as in a social engineering of the Irish man and woman to an ideal, which was very common in 30s and 40s Europe.
      Call Ireland a democracy as in it maintained many of the practices that were there previously but the two largest political entities were two sides of the one philosophical coin.
      We were stable because we had no one to bother us, not by some virtuous inherently Irish quality.

      Reply
    • Actually, Ireland was in fact run by the Catholic church at the time, in collusion with Fianna Fail …

      Reply
    • Well said, Galway Buzz…Ireland might have shrugged off colonialism from the British, but it only meant the Catholic Church could gain an even greater foothold in the running of our young state. Alot of men that joined the British forces were doing it out of economic reasons, just the same way that thousands of Irish left for English, Scottish and Welsh cities to find employment that our state couldn’t provide.

      Reply
  • While I commend anyone who fought against Nazi Germany – I feel it was wholly inappropriate to desert the Irish army during the war. Ireland’s defence was poor enough and we needed to maintain the little defence that we had. They made their bed – which is fine, but don’t expect a state pension for it.

    Reply
  • No pardon. And for those eager to get red thumbing think and respond to this. What happened to British Soldiers that deserted their army ? Hint : jail.

    Reply
  • Yes, most definitely they should be pardoned.

    Although I have a question. Why has it taken so long? Many of those men fought the good fight against an evil, evil person. The fact that they joined the British army is irrelevant. They (the Allies) defeated Hitler. For that they should have been honoured. Imagine what the world would be like today, if Hitler was allowed to continue doing what he did.

    It’s sad that many of those men will never know that they have been pardoned, but at least it has been done Better late than never I suppose, and maybe their families will take some peace from it.

    Reply
    • I can’t dare to think of what the world would be like today if Hitler had won. But, even with Ireland being ‘Neutral’, I think you could hardly describe it as being pro-Hitler. If the Germans had invaded Ireland, I daresay the Irish army would not have keeled over and be trodden on. They would have fought. And when people left the army they swore to fight for, they compromised our position as a free and sovereign nation.

      Reply
  • Back in the 1940s. deserters be it from Japanese, German, American, Russian, or British armies the penalty for desertion was to be shot. These days its life imprisionment. Its a very serious offence and these men.should not be pardoned. If operation green (hitlers plan for Ireland, where Ireland would be invaded to be closer to Britian) or even the British invaded to use the ports. These men signed up to be protect IRELAND and they failed in their duty. I’m am not sure of the numbers but will those who deserted to join Hitlers army also be pardoned ? We are neutral so i expect that is the case.

    Reply
  • Nice to see that as of 10.27am on the 25th of January there are only 3 morons voting for NO PARDON. With 40 people living in the real world.

    Reply
    • Do you actually know what an army is? It is a structured organization with a chain of command whereby if you are a soldier and an officer gives you an order you follow it. You are told where to go, what to do when you get there and that’s it. You don’t just decide for yourself what you would like to do. If that was the case we would have battalions of soldiers taking in tours of Europe in their nice APC’s and nissan 4×4′s! 1st Southern Brigade decide en masse that Bashar al-Assad is a bollocks so they toddle off to Syria to fight the good fight in the cause of freedom. Would you welcome them back with open arms when they arrive back?

      To call people who voted against a pardon morons is an insult to the professional soldiers that served in the past and serve today. The men who stayed behind were soldiers, the men who left were deserters. I acknowledge their bravery and sacrifice as anyone who is willing to go into battle must show courage, however it does not get away from the fact that if you are in the army you follow orders.

      Reply
    • Actually I didn’t know what an army was before. I checked Wikipedia and found out about an hour ago. Phew…… Thanks for the explanation though.

      It is history. It is in the past. With everything that has gone down on our tiny little island we just need to forgive and move on. There are far too many people still clinging onto the past and probably giving themselves ulcers as a result. I would suggest focusing your energy on something relevant.

      Reply
    • My apologies Brenden I forgot to include the Wikipedia link in my post. :-)

      I am a bit puzzled as to why you think military discipline is irrelevant or why deserting ones post,army and country in a time of National Emergency also bears no serious thought. I’m sure the Chief of Staff and the rest of the personnel in the Curragh are thinking the same thing. MP’s in barracks all over the country must be asking themselves what do we do the next time a soldier goes AWOL? Do we go after and arrest him or ” forgive and move on”?

      Reply
    • I told ya dude, ya need to stop clinging onto the past or a trip to the doctors with an ulcer is what will happen to ya. You then wont be able to have a few pints and a nice 3 in 1 from Charlies afterwards because of your tummy problems.

      That is significantly more relevant. Stop clinging onto the past and let go. You will feel the better for it.

      Reply
    • I think if we had more soldiers following their conscience rather than blindly following orders like inhuman robots we might actually have a decent planet to live on.

      Reply
    • After 12 years in the yank army and another 5 in the french army. I can tell you that these men are not deserters. In military terminology, desertion is the abandonment of a “duty” or post without permission and is done with the intention of not returning (No Time restrictions although after 30 days AWOL, SOP is to Place the soldier in desertion status). “Intention of Not Returning” being the portion of the sentance to pay attention to. You can call them AWL/AWOL, but not deserters. Upon return to his former command the soldier needs to prove that there was no intention of deseretion (to leave with the intention of not returning). Proof is accepted by command in the fact that the soldier left all possessions and family members behind. What is the level of education of a WWII soldier and could we expect him to know that his situation is as such?

      Reply
    • Actually Brian, using Nazi imagery (your FB profile pic) to make a political point about contemporary Germany, bailouts etc. is far more insulting.

      Reply
  • Of course they should be pardoned, these brave souls went to out to fight an unimaginable evil and in doing so were shunned by certain people in Government, namely De Velera They should be honoured for their actions…

    Reply
  • so to all the people who think they shouldn’t be granted are pardon you are all selfish, and without these kind of people would now be living under a nazi regime, they didnt fight to protect England, it was just their only opportunity to fight to protect Europe. some of u people are unbelievable

    Reply
    • David, if you actually look at the demographics of those who deserted it was mainly married men who had families who, spurned on by economic, not ideological reasons, left to fight for the British, as their soldiers enjoyed higher wages.

      At that point in time the security of Ireland was by no means secure. Ireland was a very important strategic location and both the Allies and the Germans made contingency plans for it’s occupation. 5,700 soldiers, the equivalent of half the number of the current Defence Forces, abandoned their post and in doing so, made their fellow citizens more vulnerable.

      Every year I attend a WW1 & WW2 memorial service to commemorate those Irish soldiers who fought for the freedom of Europe. But the case of these individuals is not so black and white. Their contribution needs to be acknowledged but it’s not productive to castigate those who disagree with a full pardon.

      Those times were very difficult and it’s hard to imagine what our perspectives would have been like had we personally lived through them.

      Reply
    • oh no dont get me wrong, i dont disagree with anything you have said, but to still hold the pardon i disagree with. yes they were very different times, and maybe had i lived back then i would have agreed, but i disagree that anyone continues to hold that view. times have dramatically changed

      Reply
  • Shame what our government did to these brave people sickens me….

    Reply
  • Most of the so called deserters were married mane with children and DeValera’s Starvation Orders had appalling consequences on totally innocent families.
    Ireland was not at war but was clearly at risk from Germany and it could be rationally argued that fighting with the British was merely disobeying orders rather than desertion and defending Ireland at the same time.
    They should be pardoned without delay.

    Reply
  • We are under German rule here. Grant the full pardons.

    Reply
  • Of course they should be pardoned. If they hadn’t done what they did we’d all be owned by the Germans now.

    Oh. Wait.

    Reply
  • I have to agree with DublinNaas on this one. I served 10 years in the army (yes the Irish army, my dad is from Cabra where’s yours from?) and I would question the motives.
    Did they go because they believed Hitler was evil? Probably not, it was far more likely the reason given above.

    And desert they did and we were under threat of invasion. What would these 5000 men have been able to do if the Allies had carried out the plan to invade Ireland. There was a plan, it was considered and it was ruled out. It was ruled out because Ireland was a lot less neutral than everyone believed but the plan did exist and the reality was that the Americans and British were in a far better position to invade Ireland than the Germans.

    Elrat, Dev did send a letter of condolence, however it was the correct diplomatic protocol and Dev was a great man for protocol. I am no fan of Dev by the way.

    Reply
  • After visiting Auschwitz just a few hours ago, all I can say is Thank God the Nazis were stopped! If there was an official way to get your release from here then join the Allies, im sure they would have done that.but obviously they had no choice but to desert.

    Reply
  • I really have to wonder why people refer to them as “Irish Soldiers” they were not Irish soldiers just a bunch of mercaneries wandering looking for the biggest pay check, they signed up to play the age old game of Imperialism for mother Britannia at the sake of their brothers and sisters at home. We live in the Irish Republic, I like to believe that we are above other nations Imperial pasts and land grabbing ways, I like to believe we believe in the advancement of humanity and the abolishment of war, and I like to beleive we would never lend a hand to further the old colonial powers thirst for land and spoils which is either Germany or Britain as they are as bad as each other. “Campaign for a pardon strengthens on the back of official calls from Stormont”, it is pathetic to this day to imagine that there are many within our land still jumping to outside influences. They had the neck to come home and they already got the greatest gift Ireland could give them and can ever give them, and that was letting them off so easily, in any other country they would have been put against a wall and plugged with bullets.

    Reply
    • In Hitlers Europe your grandparents would be pillowfill

      Reply
    • Gary, there was nothing Imperialist about WW2.

      Reply
    • Sorry – Gary, I should have said there was nothing Imperialist about Englands part in WW2. As Hitler had “annexed” Austria, Poland, Belgium, The Netherlands and France, with eyes on England and Ireland and other sovereign European countries, You could say that WW2 was a war against Imperialism.

      Reply
    • Gary get yer gun…

      Reply
    • So all that British and Dutch fighting in India, Burma, Singapore, that was all a humanitarian mission? Please, Shea, it was all about Imperialism. Both the acquisiton of territory on the part of the Axis, or the defence of empire on the part of the Allies.

      WW2 was not Ireland’s fight, Multi. We were not wrong to stay out of it. We weren’t attacked and there was no benefit for us in getting involved. To look back and say ‘How could we not stand up to EVIL HITLER’ misses the point that our materiel contribution would have been less than nothing (40,000 troops at max strength to defend the country and contribute to an allied cause?), and also no one really believed how EVIL Hitler was until the concentration camps were liberated. And that was about a fortnight before he put a gun in his mouth and rendered the whole point moot.

      Gary, they were Irish soldiers. The fact that they had the ‘neck’ to come back to what was at the time a third world country, when they could have stayed in the lands of their new employers after victory, shows how they thought of themselves. If they were mercenaries, there were still plenty of little wars at the time burning merrily away that could use some hired help and they would have stayed away. These men didn’t. They followed the convictions of their conscience and came home when the job was done. They are to be admired for that.

      All that said, these men deserted the Irish Army during a national emergency. you cannot get around that fact. They left their comrades in the lurch. Had it come to an invasion of this country, I doubt we’d be applauding them.

      Reply
  • It has been established that there were those who deserted for less valiant reasons than those who fought in WWII, and though it’s not right to desert an army, why would any of us in our 21st century comfortable armchairs begrudge pardon to those involved in what is, quite frankly,a relatively harmless event that happened nearly 70 years ago? It is begrudging, there is nothing to be achieved and no lesson to be learned by not awarding these pardons, especially considering how much it will mean to their families;

    Reply
  • There are two things crossing over here, and they need to be treated separately;
    1- these men were enlisted soldiers in the Irish Army, and they deserted.
    They should be court-marshalled and punished according to the military code, including imprisonment, dishonourable discharge, and denial of wage/pension.

    2-these men went to fight against the tyranny of nazism and many died and many were injured. Some did it for adventure, some to defend freedom, and many did it for the money (including 2 of my uncles)

    They should be admired, but definitely NOT pardoned

    Reply
  • disgraceful ignorant attitude Gary. I knew one of these men..a newly commissioned officer at outbreak of war..was cinvinced our leaders would do the right thing after Dunkirk. When it didnt happen he deserted and joined the British Army..along with over 40000 other non.deserters..hecserved in north africa..sicily and italy..a hero. with your holier than thou attitude Gary you would have been an appeaser back then like thosr who stood by while Hitler annexed czechoslovakia and austria. As for Mr McGurk..having listened to him.on rte news his grasp of history is pretty thin..he referred to the soviet union as being neutral at start of ww2..tell that to the people of eastern.poland lithuania estonia and latvia and also finland. the ribbentrop/molotov non.aggression.pact divided poland between the two evil.empires.

    Reply
  • about time these heros are regonised even if they did leave the defence forces here

    Reply
  • Let’s not forget that while most of your grandparents were sitting and eating potatoes after mass, the U.K. was the only thing keeping them from having to study the German language.

    Reply
    • If it was not for the USA Britain would have lost the war. It was Britain and the USA cooperating that is why we don’t speak German or have a Führer

      Reply
    • Padraig..check your history..if it wasnt for Churchill Britain wouldv sued for peace. Churchills main opposer in cabinet was thecappeaser Lord Halifax. It was Britain standing alone..thru battle of britain and the blitz which stopped the wehrmacht from invading britain..the reports back to US from.London on radio during the blitz helped change public opinion in US..Roosevelt had to fight to get lend lease passed.

      Reply
    • How could they have jailed 5000 men, which would have been the outcome of a trial. They would still have been denied public jobs as they would be felons at that stage and would not have gotten security clearances.

      Reply
    • Britain lost about 240k soldiers. At the Battle of Leningrad, the Russians lost over 1 million soldiers and 1 million civilians.

      The Germans 6th Army of 600k men was destroyed and captured, another 200k Romanians and other German forces were killed as well.

      5.5mn German soldiers died in the war about 9 million Russian Soldiers.

      It really is a disservice to the 9 million dead Russian Soldiers that died beating Germany and to claim that it was the efforts of 240k men that actually did it.

      If Hitler had not invaded Russia, he would have conquered Britain in a very short time and with little difficulty. He lost more men on the Eastern Front than Britain had in its army in total and it still took another 3 years to be Germany.

      Reply
    • Actually, I think I’ll thank that ruthless bugger Stalin if it’s all the same. If he wasn’t so Hell-bent on keeping the city with his name out of German hands, and Hitler wasn’t so bloody-minded about getting it, the English would be eating Saurkraut and Shnitzel on a daily basis right now.

      Reply
    • Ahem, without British tenacity early in the war, the Russians would have been overwhelmed with Operation Barbarossa and the Americans would have had no base to invade. Russia absorbed the mass of the German armies in a protracted land war allowing the Americans (who had been supplying both Britain and Russia with valuable war materiel prior to entering the war.) Without American, British and Chinese efforts in the East Asian and Pacific theatres, the Japanese might have been able to exert serious pressure on the Russians and American troops and armanents hastened the demise of the Third Reich immensely. All of the contributions should be realised but the contributions of Britain, Russia, the United States and China cannot be taken in isolation. No one nation “won” the war.

      Reply
  • No pardon.No way.They fought for queen and country.There was Irish army then too.Turncoats should hang their heads in shame to this day.

    Reply
  • Ireland was neutral? Ye, it definitively was. Even more than that, Ireland granted asylum to WWII war criminals after 1945.

    Reply
  • these men are now in their late 80′s early 90′s there are nothing like 5000 of them left let them live out their days with this monkey off their back.

    Reply
  • If we had been at war then they would have deserved their treatment but we weren’t, even though we were subject to nazi bombing. Our country took a cowardly stance and these men refused to follow it. As far as I am aware, the oath taken for the army includes a moral clause of sorts and I would consider their actions to fall under that clause.

    Reply
  • Desertion yes, but condemned without trail; no, to say nothing of the personal penalising of them through reducing their possibility of employment and the destruction of their family life through poverty and the back-pocketing of their British Family Allowance into Irish Government coffers. You need to know the full story.

    Reply
    • Yes, I agree their mistreatment afterwards was a bit harsh, but they broke their oath of loyalty to the state. No one forced them to take the oath. They took it of their own free will, and they broke it of their own free will. I don’t think breaking an oath to serve your army can ever be justified, if you freely entered the oath and all its obligations with complete understanding of the duty you were taking on.

      Reply
  • That’s fair enough Patrick. The term was a little harsh considering all that had been gone through. I still feel that the punishment of these soldiers was carried out in an unjust fashion even if I may have allowed my typing to get away from me.

    Reply
  • Just because their government during WW2 made a deal with the Hitler Empire not to keep their freedom and to be ruled by Germans after they defeat Britain. 10,000 Irish soldiers where willing to give their life to keep their freedom like their freedom fighter before them. Being a former US Marine I understand them and a pardon is the least they should receive. My family lost two family members in WW2 one first generation Irish and one first generation Polish fighting to free Europe. Free your them, fight for them, all gave some, some gave all

    Reply
  • Different nationality, different view….
    For my opinion Ireland have 5000 heros more! There is no doubt about it. The soldiers dicided to leave the irish army to fight again occupation, imperialism and inhumanity. Each person is reponsable to his own conscience, not to an oath. For example: Many german soldiers thought the oath on the Fuehrer is more important then humanity. Isn´t it the same with the britsh soldiers who shoot at the bloody sunday?
    Any human have the right to deserting from a army, sometimes is this the better way.
    I thanks a lot this 5000 irish people, in the name off my perents, off my childrens and in the name off all my friends. I think the most off the german and austrian people thinks like me.
    To give pardon isn´t enough! Give them all a medal!
    —sorry for my bad english—

    Reply
  • They did desert so a pardon would be a strange decision I feel unless the state are now saying Deserting in 21st century Ireland is okay and the law back then was wrong. Which would be a little mad,

    The families should receive an apology for the poor treatment of these men in the post war era. But in comparative terms given they joined an army which they were at war with just 30 years before they probably got off lightly to what the punishment would have been in a lot of other countries.

    Reply
  • Like padriag I totally agree with you there….and I think the word “Deserted” is very harsh and is also a very big “dramatisation” and it makes it sound that they committed a brutal war crime which the didn’t all they did was fight to protect our freedom against Hitler because the Irish army did not want to participate in the war which is completely understandable but they shouldn’t blame the people who did not want to stand around and watch the world fall apart!

    Reply
  • This wasn’t just a backyard fight,these men chose to fight a war that if lost meant world conquest. Going on what we know today and all politics aside I think they are true hero’s and should get a full pardon and respect they deserve.

    Reply
  • I find it ironic that this matter, whatever its merits, has led to a worm-like politician herald that these soldiers actions had “contributed to the future of freedom and democracy in Europe”, when it is now clear that Germany has gained control of that once free Europe and, as usual, has not a single care, wish nor a moment of respect for democracy. 100 years later, nothing has changed.

    Reply

Add New Comment