TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 14 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

Poll: Should the UN take greater action on Syria?

Some countries fear a Libyan-style interaction, while others are outraged at the lack of even a resolution from the UN on the violence in Syria. How far should the UN go?

Syrian army defectors stand guard on a rooftop to secure an anti-Syrian regime protest in the Deir Baghlaba area in Homs province in January.
Syrian army defectors stand guard on a rooftop to secure an anti-Syrian regime protest in the Deir Baghlaba area in Homs province in January.
Image: AP/Press Association Images

THE UNITED NATIONS General Assembly is to vote today on a resolution to condemn President Bashar Assad’s violent crackdown on anti-government protests in Syria.

If passed, the resolution – although not binding – will be the UN’s strongest statement against Assad’s regime. It calls for an immediate end to human-rights violations and attacks on civilians, as well as condemning the president’s actions since dissent started to emerge last March.

Assad continues to deny that government troops are slaughtering thousands of civilians, claiming that the violence has been caused by terrorist groups.

The UN human rights chief believes that crimes against humanity are being committed every day in Syria. More than 5,400 people have been killed since March 2011 and tens of thousands more are displaced from their homes. A further 18,000 are being held in detention as political prisoners and thousands are reported missing.

Today’s vote comes in the wake of the Security Council’s failure to agree on collective actions aimed at stopping the violence. Russia and China’s veto of that resolution has been blamed for emboldening the Syrian government to launch an assault to crush dissent with overwhelming force.

Russia – a trade and arms ally of Damascus – remains opposed to any resolution that amounts to a mandate for regime change or interferes with Syria’s sovereignty.

Both China and Russia are also against anything that could replicate the intervention seen in Libya last year.

What do you think about it? Should the UN take greater action on Syria?


Poll Results:






  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (29 Comments)

  • Sadly the west wont go in there.Not much oil there,or lucrative post war contracts.All about money again.

    Reply
  • What can the UN do? They’re a joke of an organisation to be honest.

    Reply
  • It would Be fantastic if the U.N. could break with tradition and actually do the job they were created to do. They have failed countless countries with Rwanda, Cambodia and Bosnia at the top of the list and continue to allow mass killings, genocide and human rights violations continue without batting an eye.

    Maybe they’ll vote to take action (*awaits veto or some other block*) but then they’ll waste 8 months arguing about the definition of ‘action’ and then another year appointing troop % per country and by then it’ll be too late.

    You’d have more hope of the U.N. intervening in a dispute over a garden fence than any real conflict.

    Reply
  • Something needs to be done as the videos floating around the net of Children with Bullet wounds to the head and bodies been blown apart is sick. And not to mention the countless videos of people being tortured and beaten because they will not be loyal to Assad!

    Reply
    • Who are the idiots who vote these posts down? I mean do you agree with kids being killed? What if they were your kids being massacred.

      Reply
    • I was actually just wondering the same, possibly someone did it by mistake, I’d like to think.

      Reply
    • You have the Syrian army ,army defectors ,Sunni religious insurgents and US/NATO backed armed insurgents who do you suggest we support? The arab league monitors report paints a picture of armed gangs targeting civilians (did they shoot the children) government forces shooting civilians (did they shoot the children )Their report was hushed up because Saudi Arabia and the US dont want anything but regime change like Libya ,Iraq and Egypt and there places you’d really want to live now aren’t they ?

      Reply
    • @Jeff. Well said. Really could not be bothered to point out the broader issues … Again. Some people just sit there watching Sky News et al. and thumbing the Journal and think that is all there is to global politics. It’s these people who vote into power the very people who cause the problems in the first place! This World could be such a wonderful and safe place, if only we tried.

      Reply
    • @Stephen the world is full of people who dont seem to get that things are not black n white ,if you want to know what the US plans for Syria look at the bloody history of Lebanon .Bahrain Yemen and Nigeria (Muslims killing Christians ) are all butchering protesters but the silence in the media is deafening because their US backed governments .People will mark this comment down simply because it makes them uneasy that maybe half truth and agendas dictate the news .Sad

      Reply
    • There have been equal attrocities on an even larger scale in the Ivory Coast and other African countries its just they didnt have any valuable rosources there so no one gave a crap. If Syria’s main export was broccoli you wouldn’nt be hearing of this. I want an intervention cause I think America’s ( and lately Europe’s) exterior motives come beneath the slaughter of innocents. But the world isn’t balck and white.

      Reply
    • It’s obvious Shane that you don’t give a damn about kids being blown to bits, because if you did, the first thing you would do is try to figure out WHY this is happening and WHO is doing it. Being a mindless reactionary will not solve the problem. Some clues: French, British and American special forces have been on the ground in Syria for some time now working as agents provocateurs; the Muslim Brotherhood is a British Intelligence operation; the reaction you are having is part of a plan, which is going according to plan, to Regime Change in the usual fashion to further secure the theft of resources and for larger (namely Iran) geopolitical goals. You’re sentiments are merely helping to ensure that the game continues and more kids die.

      Reply
    • Get off ur high horse stephen, knowing ALL the facts does not make you a more caring person. The problem is people are being murdered now while we all suit back and watch and argue amongst ourselves about what should be done. These people need or help now. It is obvious that it is not straight forward, it doesn’t take a super brain to figure that one out.

      Reply
    • Conspiracy theorists, that’s the down-thumbers.

      Reply
  • Peace inforcement for both sides. Figure out what the hell is going on there. Don’t walk blindly in support one side as in Libya, Libyans are murdering each other on a daily basis now according to the journals other story today. Make sure it is actually syrians uprising first. And for what reason?

    Reply
  • Saddam Hussien managed to dominate his people for nearly 30 years, the result of him been ousted opened the can of worms we see today. The west liked Saddam because of this and tried their best to court him becuase Iraq is the second biggest oil reserve after Saudi Arabia, but he didnt play ball so they sent in the tanks. US makes it quite clear they will use all their power to protect their strategic interests. They are itching to go into Syria so they can install another puppet to surround Iran. Where as they should just keep their nose out of other peoples business but they wont.

    Reply
  • Why not bomb the crap out if the place, support the instalment of a westernised regime and forget about it in a few months… Seemed to work for the libyans? Oh no sorry, Libya is even worse off now!!!

    I can’t give a constructive answer to the poll because I find it hard believing most of what i read or see in the (western) news!

    Reply
  • People need to look.at Libya and Syria objectively and take the blinkers off either pro or anti western blinkers that is. Our own countrys history after independance was one of a bitter civil.war between former allies and a period of instability following thst civil.war..FF deputies brought firearms into the Dail in.1927..Gardai were targeted throughout the 20′s and the minister for justice was murdered leaving church. we had two extremist groups targetingveach other blueshirts & ira. during the actual civil war there were atrocities on.both sides. this is almost always the case when a country is born.through violence..scores to becsettled with former rulers and in.the case of libya and syria their longterm.rulers were vile tyrants. this regrettable scenario is nothing to do.with.NATO its human nature to seek revenge and revenge is a fact of life in middle east and north africa

    Reply
  • A few drones could take out the tanks and heavy artillery and level the playing field considerably. You have forgotten to mention that wounded civilian men taken to hospitals are being murdered inside the hospitals by the Assadites! God is not great.

    Reply
  • yes if they were remove the israeli and yanky terrorists trying to destabilise the country like they did in Libya!! look how that turned out!!

    Reply
  • level the playing field so you would like to see Muslim extremist’s in charge just like Libya and Iraq ,They put 5 bullets into a senior cleric this morning because he supported dialogue with the government still think there lovely ,they want to ban any other religion ie convert or leave there new Syrian Islamic state ( or die) ,not sure whether they will arrest and torture any blacks like they are doing in the new Libyan utopia but NATO did transport them after they rapped up leveling the playing field against Gaddafi so probably

    Reply
  • I say send in a few UN peacekeeper forces. The Irish defence Forces does great work across the worlds troublespots peacekeeping. So why can’t they send a few Blue berets to help?

    Reply
    • blue berets have to be accepted by both sides…assad backed as he is by the great human rights nations of china and russia wont accept them. it would have to be peace enforcing misdion which nerds unsc approval.again the heroic russians and chinese will veto it

      Reply
  • What can they do? The Libya rebels have already said they do not want any interference in their fight. If they are going to do it they want to do it themselves. The UN should respect their wishes. They should probably do more to stop the slaughter of those caught in the middle though.

    Reply

Add New Comment