TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

Poll: Should there still be a moratorium on election broadcasts?

While broadcasters will be barred from election coverage from Wednesday lunchtime, island voters will already have voted.

Broadcasters will be barred from referendum coverage from Wednesday afternoon.
Broadcasters will be barred from referendum coverage from Wednesday afternoon.
Image: xJason.Rogersx via Flickr

UP TO 2,000 Irish citizens will be voting before the rest of us this week, as voters on the islands off Donegal, Galway and Mayo cast their ballots in the referendum on the Fiscal Compact.

The referendum campaigns will continue this week, but will largely wind down by Wednesday afternoon – when the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland imposes its moratorium on political coverage.

The rules, which have been imposed ahead of every public vote for decades, are intended to lessen the impact of any last-minute statements from campaigners on one side, which could leave no time for the opposing side to counter the claims.

With the modern world making it possible to receive news through a variety of other media, however, many believe such rules are redundant – as those who want political discussion will still be able to get it.

So – given the change in media usage, and the fact that some voters will already have voted, should there still be a moratorium on broadcasts about elections or referendums?


Poll Results:






It’s polling day (if you live on one of five islands in Donegal)

Read next:

Comments (12 Comments)

  • I voted last week. Among others in defence forces/Garda. For me personally I still felt Ill informed about it,when addresses by party leaders is too late for me.

    Reply
  • They should make it so that People in the Islands can either vote the same time as everyone one or that no broadcast should take place after the polls open. All one has to do is look at what happened with Sean Gallagher last year. Many people on the Islands would have voted before his collapse.

    Reply
    • Sean Gallaghers fall in popularity had more to do with a self imposed moratorium by the Irish media on reporting the facts. Gallagher had been referred to in The Washington Post and New York Times as “a bagman for the most corrupt government in Irish history”. Neither of these stories were reported by the general Irish media, whilst certain major Irish publications contained significant supportive editorial content. Indeed it was left ultimately to an ordinary citizen (Glenna Lynch) to point out his flaws. As long as the Irish media can be depended upon to imbelish the truth with sponsored editorial this moratorium actually has the opposite effect to which it’s supposedly designed to prevent.

      Reply
  • That moratorium came in before the internet had evolved. It only applies to TV broadcasts, and yet the reality is such that most people gleam their news from sources like “Journal.ie” etc. In other words, its an outdated prohibition and serves absolutely no purpose.

    Reply
  • I think it would be more important to put a ban on opinion polls once an election or referendum is called. They are often more about setting the agenda rather than measuring levels of support for parties or referendum subjects.

    Reply
  • It should never have been brought in in the first place. It’s bullshit.

    Reply
  • I am bombarded with information about this Fiscal/Stability/Austerity (or whatever you want to call it) Treaty and am heartily sick of it. Irish media over-discuss ever political situation to death – keeping them in jobs and keeping wanna-be politicians in the public eye and of course there has to be discord or politicians and media would lose out.

    Reply
  • Whatever about the moratorium on broadcasters, I’d like to see a ban on all of those polls that are done before a vote is held. They are a massive influence on the result I reckon.

    Put the arguments out there and let people make up their own minds. Then let the vote be held and then let the result be known. That should be, in my opinion, be the one and only poll. Same for local and general elections.

    My tuppence worth.

    Reply
  • Would cost a fortune and solve nothing

    Reply
  • It is important to have that “calm before the storm” so-to-speak. The moratorium allows for people to make up their own minds before voting and not to be swayed by either camp.

    Reply

Add New Comment