TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 3 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Priory Hall residents question developer’s ability to afford legal team

The Supreme Court has dismissed Dublin City Council’s appeal to overturn the stay on Tom McFeely’s jail sentence and €1m fine.

Priory Hall in January 2012
Priory Hall in January 2012
Image: Priory Hall Residents Committee Facebook Page

RESIDENTS AT PRIORY Hall have questioned how the developer of the defective apartment complex could afford to pay an Irish legal team to appear in the Supreme Court today after filing for bankruptcy in the UK.

The Supreme Court today dismissed an application by Dublin City Council to have Tom McFeely imprisoned and fined for failing to carry out necessary remedial works at the Donaghmede properties.

The council tried to argue that the courts should not have put a stay on his three month jail term or €1 million fine.

The Priory Hall residents committee immediately asked the question of how McFeely was funding the court appearance after his UK assignee confirmed in writing that funds would not be released for any further or retrospective legal fees.

Speaking to TheJournal.ie following the hearing, committee spokesperson Graham Usher said that five months after being evacuated from their homes, the residents are still the “only ones being punished”.

The residents have all been warned that they may have to consider bankruptcy and insolvency in the near future.

“[24 April] is d-day for us essentially,” explained Usher. “We’ve been getting a lot of financial advice of the past few months and essentially what they’re telling us is that if you’re not paying your mortgage interest and capital will continue to accrue, you may need to consider bankruptcy and insolvency.”

He said they would only consider this under the new legislation that is coming in.

Currently, Dublin City Council is paying for the temporary housing costs for the majority of the 256 residents. However, this may cease after the council goes to the Supreme Court on 24 April.

The council, which says it can no longer afford to pay for rented accommodation for the homeowners, wants the Supreme Court to overturn a previous judgement that made it liable for such payments.

Usher and other residents have been told by lawyers to “expect the worst” from that hearing and they will then have to start paying for their own alternative accommodation.

Five months ago we were working away, paying our mortgages and now thanks to Tom McFeely and the incompotency of DCC and government all these people are facing bankruptcy, including myself.

“Because of nothing that I’ve done I am now facing bankruptcy. That’s tough to take,” he added.

Residents at the ill-fated apartment block were evacuated on 17 October over fire safety concerns discovered by the council. Remedial work was due to be carried out by McFeely but he was ordered off the site after failing to do so.

With a repairs bill of €7.3 million which the council, developer and residents all say they cannot afford to pay, it is unclear when (if ever) the residents will be able to move back in. Meanwhile, the properties remains uninhabited and risk becoming completely dilapidated.

Usher said that the committee has learned some “incredible things” over the past few weeks.

“The Department of the Environment found fire safety and building control issues that are still there today. DCC who despite clear signs that there were problems, chose not to carry out any inspection. We hold them responsible for what happened,” explained Usher, who has demanded – but failed to obtain – a meeting with the Taoiseach or Environment Minister Phil Hogan.

“Hogan is clueless of the reality of what is happening here,” he added. “The government seem to want to wash their hands of this.”

Going back to the day they were evacuated, Usher remembers how her learned the news by listening to the radio.

On 14 October, the council went to the High Court and asked the judge to make an order so they could evacuate 256 people. That’s an incredible action from a housing authority without prior notice.

The residents are now writing to the Irish Bank Federation to see if they can get a meeting to agree a “joined-up” approach to freezing their mortgages, which are all worth at least €250,000.

Usher also wanted to underline the fact that there is still no work being carried out at the site and no plans for any work to start.

“It isn’t going to be done,” he says. “The builder is ‘bankrupt’ and DCC won’t take responsibility.”

-Additional reporting by Hugh O’Connell

More: Displaced Priory Hall residents unable to secure meeting with Taoiseach>

More from TheJournal.ie’s coverage of Priory Hall>

Read next:

Comments (45 Comments)

  • In the US…. The DCC would have been taken to court in a class action suit for the inept behavior, incompetence and possibly malpractice. Why is it so difficult in this country to hold anyone with money or a politician for illegal behavior or incompetence? For the regular man, the law doesn’t forgive transgressions against law because of ignorance.

    Reply
    • Well said Marlon, I believe in ANY other country this would not happen. It stinks of corruption, they’re all up to their necks in it and are afraid that the truth will be exposed. Brown envelopes springs to mind. They’re all protecting each other. It’s disgusting. But the truth will eventually come out. But in the meantime the innocent party suffers. Happy St. Patrick’s day :(

      Reply
    • It would appear that having money in this country is a ticket to do whatever you feel like and not have to ever worry about facing the consequences. The mortgages should be transferred to other properties, there’s enough empty NAMA ones out there for the residents to choose from. They deserve the right to pay a mortgage on a place that is safe and inhabitable, that’s what they signed up for in the first place. If it was any other country in the world, this would have been sorted out by now and that scumbag McFeely would be locked up.

      Reply
  • Never is there justice for the poor! Keep up the fight

    Reply
  • Why is the City Manager still walking around and not put in jail? He is responsible for buying over 25 apartments in Priory Hall from the developer while his company was under investigation by Dublin I Council for failing to comply with building regulations on uuanother site. He handed over 5 million to the developer and didn’t even inspect the properties. I bet he viewed and inspected his own home at least 3 times before he handed over the money. Yet he handed over the taxpayers money without a second thought for the people who would have to live there. Brown envelopes to planners and city managers – corrupt.

    Reply
  • Doesn’t he not live in a big massive house on the south side too?

    Reply
  • As taxpayers we bailed out the bank, I’m a taxpayer and if I was told in the morning my tax is being used to give priory hall residents a new life and a new home Id be so happy these poor poor people! The stress and upheaval must be immense! Tom mc will get away Scott free! Best of luck to u all x

    Reply
    • @Ciara,

      Hopefully he and all the others that are involved in this distruction of lives will pay for it dearly. If not in this life in the next. The sad thing is, there are people like them that are actually born with no conscious, so they’ll never accept responsibility. They’ll always blame the other person.

      Reply
  • Residents have an excellent point, leaving aside the irony of an IRA/SF developer using the Queen’s courts to avoid his responsibilities here in the Irish Republic, how can he afford to pay massive legal fees if he has filed for bankruptcy?

    Reply
  • Ardo Ci 17/03/12 #

    If I won the Euromillions I would sue the bloody lot of them including the banks for their failed surveys on behalf of the poor unfortunates on the receiving end. This could be any of us in this Godforsaken excuse for a country. That said, the worst part for me is the ridiculous legal system, which is morally bankrupt itself as it is impossible to find justice unless you have the money to do so. As me Usher pointed out, where did the money come from to pay the high fees of representation in the Supreme Court if McNOfeely has declared himself bankrupt? Gas, too, that a man can wreak disastrous havoc on hundreds of people’s lives and a City Council and walk abroad with impunity and another but decent man gets 6 years in prison for importing garlic!
    It’s time the State and the whole judicial system got their ‘Priory’ right.
    Good luck to the Residents on 24th.

    Reply
  • with all the red tape in this country how was this development allowed to proceed?? the person or persons responsible for the all clear here should be held accountable and then the department they work for should foot the bill, then leave them off to chase the developer via the courts and let these innocent victims get on with living in the complex they had paid for in the beginning

    Reply
  • Have to say, the whole thing is a disgrace. Abandoned by the Courts, Co.Council, and the Goverment.
    No accountability anywhere. Feel so sorry for the Residents.
    Just get the feeling that one Person in particular has a smirk on his face.
    As the song goes…CAN’T TOUCH THIS……..or me.

    Reply
  • Another Sinn Fein man making the news . Hopefully he can make use
    Of the money taken from the northern
    Bank to fix up priory hall . How in hell are these provos allowed to get away with this !

    Reply
  • 16/03/12 #

    The Committee should search in Google for ‘Windle Hanna Srinivasan Devrajan’ and then instruct their solicitor to their advantage.

    The Common Informer

    Reply
    • Excuse my ignorance but wot has this got to do with priory hall?

      Reply
    • @ Niamh,

      Obviously, from the clue in his message …….. it must be a case that was brought to another (country) court that is similar to what is happening these poor families.

      Best of luck Priory residents. I hope 24th April is a good day for you all. It was my mum’s birthday RIP. Keep strong and positive. Remember that there are many people listening and watching what’s happening to you, you are not alone. We are here supporting you.

      Reply
    • Thank you for your support Sheila. I’m not looking forward to the 24th of April as I’m sure you’re not, for very different reasons, RIP to your mam, our problems are so small compared to losing somebody!

      Reply
    • 16/03/12 #

      Niamh

      If the residents had mortgaged their property to TSB Dublin, TSB Bank or Permanent TSB and also had a savings or investment a/c with them opened before 20 February 1993 with them or Cork Savings Bank, Cork and Limerick Savings Bank or Limerick Savings Bank, they would have a claim for fraud. The bank will likely write off their mortgage to settle the claim of fraud.

      Cheers

      The Common Informer

      Reply
    • @ Stephenie,

      You are all going through hell at the moment. It’s devastating. It’s not a small thing. It’s your homes. These horrible individuals are covering each others backs and it is disgusting. I always believe in ‘what comes around, goes around’. I’ll be watching your progress, if things get worse for you all, we’ll know about it and we’ll be there.

      Take care.

      Reply
    • Hmmm all seems a little vague and difficult to apply for the priory hall residents. If only it did.Ursula/sinead did you get dail questions on march 8th re building/fire safety regs? Will forward on in case you didn’t, makes interesting reading.

      Reply
  • They bought a bad apartment from a bad builder. It was a disgrace, but why is the taxpayer liable?

    If they bought a bad car from a bad garage, would we buy them a new one?

    Reply
    • I think you’re confused here, nobody is asking the tax payer, myself and my extended family and residents included, to buy us a new apartment. We did not ask for this, we bought in utmost good faith and expected to live in at the very least a safe home.
      If I bought a car from a garage and it developed problems, it would probably have a warranty and it would be replaced or fixed.
      I don’t think there is a comparison. Albeit I wish it was that simple.

      Reply
  • Dylan,

    Obviously, the 3 thumbs down are sympathtisers!

    Reply
  • Priory hall residents question developer’s ability.

    Reply
  • Glenn — What all-clears are you referring to?

    Reply
  • People don’t seem to be interested in the fact that the local authorities do not sign off on buildings. They have no legal powers to do so and therefore there is no possible reason for brown envelopes.. The city of Belfast has more building inspectors that the whole of the republic. Blame FF for setting up such a system. It suited their builder pals.

    Reply

Add New Comment