TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 16 °C Thursday 2 October, 2014

Comment #1498375 by Duke of Limerick

Duke of Limerick Aug 18 10:14 PM #

Simon,
jfk killed by a lone gunman? Sorry but that’s been proven to be utter bullshit. We’ve all seen the kill shot which was hit him in the forehead. Oswald was behind him in the library.

The 9/11 hijackers were found miraculously walking around Saudi Arabia months after 9/11.

Diana’s driver was not drunk.

Sometimes you just gotta open your mind.

Reply
| Share | Report this comment

Read the article where this comment appeared:

Police assessing claim Diana was murdered by army figure

Police assessing claim Diana was murdered by army figure

Scotland Yard has said it is checking the credibility of recently received information about her death in Paris in 1997.

Comment thread:

  • As a republican I have to say that she was a caring and kind person who stood up to the royal family.

    The baby in her womb signed her death warrant.

    Reply
    | Share | Report this comment
    • Ben Black Aug 18 3:35 PM #

      Now for those of you who don’t recognise it, that’s (the comment above) what the truth looks like.

      Reply
      | Share | Report this comment
    • What baby? Of course the French pathologist covered that up to.
      Even if she was carrying Diana and any subsequent children following her divorce was NOT a threat to the royals, they were out of the line of succession.
      A Moslem as threat to the throne, no Muslim would accept the throne as he/she would have to change religion. The monarch is also the head of the Church of England. Ergo only a member of the Church of England can be the Monarch and no I’m not CofE I’m R C

      Reply
      | Share | Report this comment
    • Fiona Mc Carthy Aug 18 4:34 PM #

      I have to disagree with you. Being pregnant with a baby of a muslim was indeed a threat to the throne. the future King of England, i.e. William, could not have a half brother or sister that had muslim heritage.

      I do believe Diana was gotten rid of as she herself was a threat to the throne. Just look to the past and any person who threatened the crown was executed. Think of Lady Jane Grey, beheaded by Bloody Mary because she was a threat evne though she was only 15. Think George 1, beheaded by his government, Mary Quenn of Scots, and thats just a few. Obviously the royals cant just behead people anymore as it is no longer acceptable, but to have a threat removed by a fatal car accident — sure who would know!!!

      Reply
      | Share | Report this comment
    • Duke of Limerick Aug 18 5:29 PM #

      aics,

      The guy who embalmed her abdomen and only her abdomen covered it up.

      Reply
      | Share | Report this comment
    • Simon Jester Aug 18 7:21 PM #

      Ok slight bit of reality into these conspircy nut theories.
      For someone to order this kind of hit,it would be a very high up senior civil servant and belive it or not contray to Hollywood celluiod fantasies that many mistake as fact.The worlds secret services dont go around bumping each other off at the drop of a grey ferdroa. Its not how the game is played,they do consider it a game and potting one of your opponents agents leave them open to get you in their cross hairs.It is only done in very extreme cases and is usually called by the US “termination with extreme prejudice”. “wet affair” by the Russians and “extreme ending of contract” by the British.
      In the CIA it is the director of the CIA and the US president who can only sign these orders.

      In the UK it is the prime minister,who at the time was Tony Blair,who was a great personal friend of DI,so abit unlikely that he was going to sign orders like this no matter what. Now ,of course the answer is it was some old school boy civil servant loyal to the Queen type group outside the chain of govt and command who orderd this.In that case,they must have bumped each other off as there is no concrete proof of ever such existing and to keep this secret they must be all dead as if there ever was a slight leak on the matter they would be all up for treason,which does carry the death penalty in the UK.Obviously they wont swing in pentonville anymore,but the fear of the real British hitmen getting them would be genuine.
      Sometimes the simple facts are the hardest to accept.JFK was shot by a lone gunman,911 planes were not drones,Diana died because of a boozed up French driver and toast will fall butterd side down.

      Reply
      | Share | Report this comment
    • Ben Black Aug 18 7:45 PM #

      And that was, Prof. Simon Jester, Oxford University Lecturer in Global Secret Service Operational Systems, former Secret Service asset for number of different agencies and a close personal friend of James Bond.

      Reply
      | Share | Report this comment
    • Ben Gunn Aug 18 10:08 PM #

      George I beheaded,? which country was he king of?

      Reply
      | Share | Report this comment
    • Duke of Limerick Aug 18 10:14 PM #

      Simon,
      jfk killed by a lone gunman? Sorry but that’s been proven to be utter bullshit. We’ve all seen the kill shot which was hit him in the forehead. Oswald was behind him in the library.

      The 9/11 hijackers were found miraculously walking around Saudi Arabia months after 9/11.

      Diana’s driver was not drunk.

      Sometimes you just gotta open your mind.

      Reply
      | Share | Report this comment
    • Simon Jester Aug 19 1:29 AM #

      And that was Ben Black conspiricy nut extreme,living still with his parents in his bedroom who belives each and everything he sees on the Net,and proably is still a virgin and has zits .

      Reply
      | Share | Report this comment
    • Simon Jester Aug 19 1:45 AM #

      sorry Duke,you have to open your mind to the facts.Oswolds shots have been recreated with the same rifle by numerous experts one British fellow the name of Micheal Yardley,he just happens to be one of Britans foremost firearms experts Google Micheal Yardley and JFK shot reconstruction
      .His conclusion is that it is inconclusive and that it is most certainly no grassy knoll gunman.Now you can go int o “Forward and to the right mode” for the rest of the night,but I’ll take evidence rather than fantasy.
      Also,seeing that you dont know much about ballistics either as much as autopsies I wont bother trying to explain bullet impact and body movement when you get a “pink mist” shot.

      Again your 9/11 nonsense is again ubeliveable like the supposed moon landing fakes in the simple fact to keep such a conspircy quiet,it would involve literally hundreds of Govt employees,secret service personel,military personel,govt officals,Pentagon staff and even Donald Rumsfeld!!
      Answer me this then …HOW do you ensure all those people will and do keep their mouths shut???
      HOW do you ensure that everyone from the mastermind,[proably the evil Darth GW Bush],down to the lowliest clerk hasnt stashed away someplace the crucial documentation of their part in this conspircy??
      Do tell…we would all love to know how this total wall of silence will be maintained.

      Sometimes you just have to face reality.

      Reply
      | Share | Report this comment
    • Ben Black Aug 19 12:58 PM #

      I guess I deserved that.

      Reply
      | Share | Report this comment

Add New Comment