Advertisement
This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
OK
Dublin: 14 °C Thursday 24 May, 2018

Comment #1784766 by Joe Valentine

Joe Valentine Nov 8th 2013, 9:21 AM #

I honestly don’t know which one of them is worse.

Reply
| Share | Report this comment

Read the article where this comment appeared:

Israel "utterly rejects" Iran deal aimed at ending nuclear tensions

Israel "utterly rejects" Iran deal aimed at ending nuclear tensions

Talks involving the US, China and Russia aimed at easing tensions over Iran’s controversial nuclear programme have been taking place in Geneva.

REPLIES

    Favourite Kevin Higgins
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 9:32 AM

    Israel

    90
    Favourite margaret
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 9:51 AM

    Why. Has Israel used it’s nuclear weapons? No. It shows tremedous restraint in the face of extreme provocation by it’s extremely fanatical, religious maniacial, teenage girl hanging, woman stoning, neighbours. Iran would see it as a religious obligation to wipe Israel off the face of the earth it it had the tools.
    Israel knows it’s enemies.

    34
    Favourite Peter_Artnold
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 9:58 AM

    They are all too similar.

    17
    Favourite werejammin
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 10:19 AM

    “Iran would see it as a religious obligation to wipe Israel off the face of the earth it it had the tools.”

    Iran has not started a war with another country in hundreds of years, including the 20-30 year period between the creation of the state of Israel and Israel obtaining nuclear weapons, so the notion that Iran would nuke Israel, guaranteeing its own destruction ni the process, is laughable.

    58
    Favourite ThomasFrancisMeagher
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 11:41 AM

    A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY.

    In 1948, the land could have been split between Jews and Arabs as was suggested by the League of Nations Partition Plan. The Jews said yes, the Arabs said no and went to war. They lost. They went to war again in 1967. They lost again and with it, Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. They went to war again in 1973 and lost again and with it, the Sinai and Gaza.
    Israel has handed back the Sinai, in exchange for peace with Egypt and has moved out of Gaza. There has been no peace with Gaza – just continuous missiles and terror attacks.
    The clock cannot be turned back, but the Palestinian Arabs could have infinitely better lives than they have now, but not if they continue to hit at Israel.
    Things cannot be the same as they were in ’48, ’67 or even ’73 – the world has moved on. The Palestinian Arabs can either accept that and decide to change their lives, or they can continue the ‘struggle’. Only they can decide.

    19
    Favourite werejammin
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 12:03 PM

    A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY.

    The above user is incapable of making a valid point of their own and repeatedly copy+pastes stock zionist propaganda paragraphs. They have posted that particular propaganda crap above multiple times on this very site.

    31
    Favourite ThomasFrancisMeagher
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 12:21 PM

    Facts are Facts. I don’t go changing them to suits my lies unlike yourself.

    12
    Favourite Stephen McMahon
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 12:23 PM

    A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY.
    in 1798 the United Irishmen went to war against the English. We lost. In 1848 the Young irelanders rebelled against the English. We lost. In 1867 the Fenians rose. We lost. In 1916 the IRB/ICA/IV rebelled. We lost. (there are plenty more examples I know)

    By your rational we should have just accepted that and decide to change their lives, or they can continue the ‘struggle’. Only they can decide.

    We didnt give up, we were called terrorists, we were vilified in the press controlled by the powerful.

    We regained the majority of our lands and after another admittedly long 80 years we now have relative peace and harmony in the bit then occupiers kept.

    But you are right, we should have stopped being silly and just accepted it.

    30
    Favourite werejammin
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 12:32 PM

    @TFM: “Facts are Facts.”

    LOL! You don’t deal in facts TFM/Murray etc. You copy and paste cunningly worded zionist propaganda filth, nothing more. For instance..

    “The Jews said yes, the Arabs said no and went to war. They lost. They went to war again in 1967. ”

    Slyly worded to avoid the fact that israel started the 67 war by attacking Egypt.

    Like I said, carefully constructed, slyly worded zionist propaganda filth, nothing more.

    FACT

    26
    Favourite Cian Doherty
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 1:29 PM

    Werejammin showing himself to be quite the bigot.

    12
    Favourite werejammin
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 1:43 PM

    Explain….

    7
    Favourite Bobby Moore
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 1:57 PM
    1
    Favourite rotund jocularity
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 2:00 PM

    Please feel free to refute the facts with your own. I know your specialist subject is character assassination but you should try harder werejammin

    8
    Favourite Jason Bourne
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 2:42 PM

    No one said anything about wiping anything/anyone off any map. Get your facts straight.

    4
    Favourite rotund jocularity
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 3:35 PM

    Really werejammin? Egypt were at home knitting and baking scones and israel thought to itself ‘ you know what lads lets take out the egyptian airforce for the laugh’. Was it an entirely unprovoked attack against a peaceful neighbour? Werejammin you really should at least try to explain your guff honestly as opposed to giving out about peoples character and burping half arsed half truths and spin. Youre an awful yolk

    7
    Favourite Stephen Murray
    Hide Comment
    Report as Defamatory
    Report this Comment
    Nov 8th 2013, 10:26 PM

    werejammin, your responses might as well be a copy + paste job from a pro-Pally comment from Youtube: “Iran has not started a war with another country in hundreds of years, including the 20-30 year period between the creation of the state of Israel and Israel obtaining nuclear weapons, so the notion that Iran would nuke Israel, guaranteeing its own destruction ni the process, is laughable.”

    So why does Iran sponsor Islamist aggression against Israel (via Hezbollah and Hamas) if it’s so cute and cuddly as a nation?

    5

Leave a commentcancel

 

Trending Tags