Welcome to our Public Beta Site - What does this mean?
Dublin: 12 °C Thursday 24 May, 2012

Rape support group condemns judge’s comments in alleged assault case

The courthouse in Cork city, where Judge Seán Ó Donnabháin this week criticised an alleged assault victim for the delay in reporting a case in spite of her profession.
The courthouse in Cork city, where Judge Seán Ó Donnabháin this week criticised an alleged assault victim for the delay in reporting a case in spite of her profession.
Image: ctoverdrive via Flickr

THE RAPE CRISIS Network has condemned the comments of a Cork judge who this week criticised an alleged assault victim for failing to report the incident despite being involved in a profession that encourages quick reporting.

Judge Seán Ó Donnabháin was presiding at Cork Circuit Criminal Court in the case of Fr Dan Duane, a retired priest who was accused of kissing and groping a teenage girl when she visited him to discuss a family problem.

Directing a jury to find Fr Duane not guilty, the judge remarked at how the woman making the claim worked in a profession which encouraged victims to report such incidents quickly – while she herself had waited almost 30 years to report it.

The woman had said that she had only revealed the incident to a friend a few months later, and had not spoken about it for years afterward.

Those remarks were criticised by the Rape Crisis Network’s legal director Caroline Counihan, who told the Irish Examiner her association was gravely concerned about the possibility that a person’s profession could be seen “as grounds for questioning her actions”.

“Every survivor of sexual violence has a unique set of circumstances and choices when considering reporting the crimes,” Counihan told Claire O’Sullivan. “The Supreme Court in 2006 recognised that it was ‘no longer necessary to establish reasons for the delay’.

“Would some of the approximately 170 staff and volunteers who work in the rape crisis sector in Ireland – as but one example – feel less able to pursue a case in our courts, or report in the first place, should they be subjected to sexual violence or report past abuse?”

The comments coincide with a political storm in the UK where the current justice secretary and former chancellor Kenneth Clarke is under pressure to quit over remarks he made on the subject of rape.

Discussing the sentences for rape offences, Clarke suggested that “date rape” – usually involving the use of a drug to assist in the sexual attack of the victim – was a lesser crime that other “serious rape” crimes.

Clarke told BBC Radio 5 Live that people convicted of “serious rape” crimes would not be released as quickly as those found guilty of “date rapes” – prompting fury among opposition leaders.

Clarke has clarified his remark, saying that “all rape is serious”, and has resisted calls to step down.

Man found guilty of attacking and raping a woman in a public toilet >

Poll: Are some rape cases more serious than others? >

Read Next:

Comments (3 Comments)

  • Report this comment

    Unbelievable. I wonder will he be punished? Probably not.

    Reply
  • Collie Woods 19/05/11 #
    Report this comment

    The judge needs only to look at the history if his own profession to realise why the alleged incident was not reported. Judges can forgive themselves for the past and go on like it never happened.

    Reply
  • Rory Connor 31/05/11 #
    Report this comment

    Judge Sean Ó Donabháin, directed the jury to find Fr Duane not guilty. He said the delay by the woman in making her complaint was inexplicable, given that she was trained and worked in a profession which encouraged victims to make complaints, and which emphasised that complaints would be treated seriously when they were made.

    Judge Ó Donabháin said he had a worry about the delay in making the complaint, given that Fr Duane had established to his satisfaction that he shared the house where the assault was alleged to have occurred with a housekeeper and a curate. He said if the complaint had been made earlier these people could have been asked to make statements about it.

    The charge alleged that the assault occurred on dates between 1 September 1980, up to and including 1 April 1982, and Judge Ó Donnabháin said he could not understand why that period of time could not have been narrowed down. (The woman said she was getting extra lesssons at the time which must have meant an examination year.)

    She claimed that she told a friend about the “assault” but the friend knows nothing about it.

    This farce should never have come to court in the first place.

    Reply

Add New Comment