TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Column: Care system had been well funded – so why didn’t it work?

The Report on Deaths of Children in Care revealed horrific failures, writes Fianna Fáil’s spokesperson on Children Charlie McConalogue, but will everything be fine once we pass the Children’s Rights referendum?

Charlie McConalogue

I HAVE ONLY been a TD since last February, but already I’ve learned many lessons about national political life in our country. One is the striking demand that we all have for simple explanations and a villain for even the most complex issues. Another is how quickly the political and media agenda moves on if it is looking at anything other than the fortunes of individual politicians or their parties.

I’ve been thinking a lot about these particular lessons over the past few days as I have read and reflected on the Report of Deaths of Children in Care.

The Report is a harrowing and tragic catalogue of personal tragedy. I would challenge anyone to read it and not be emotionally affected by the stories of some of the most vulnerable and neglected children in our country. The Report is also an indictment of how our country responded to these children’s needs.

As my party’s frontbench spokesperson for Children, I was called on to speak to media to respond to the publication of the Report. Media also spoke to experts in the field, some of us appeared on the evening news, the next day’s newspaper carried the story and then the cameras moved on.

In this case, apart from the shock and sorrow genuinely felt across the board, the drive to simplify the issue meant that two central themes emerged – it was shocking that these 196 individuals could have died in care during the ‘Celtic Tiger’ and that we must now pass the Children’s Rights referendum later this year.

It is easy to simply agree with two statements of basic fact. I agree with both and will be campaigning hard to pass the referendum. In the limited bits of media I was involved in, I did my best to convey that sense of shock and determination to help stop it happening again.

“Is it enough for politicians to give a few lines in response to a report and then move on to the next issue?”

But is it enough for politicians to give a few lines in response to a report and then move on to the next issue? I don’t think so. I certainly don’t think that we as a country should get away with concluding that it was terrible that these things could happen when we had lots of money, that we’ll pass the referendum and everything will be grand.

I don’t think it’s good enough for lots of reasons, but mainly because not seeking to properly understand how it happened in the first place and probing whether a constitutional amendment is going to be the magic wand that fixes it, is a further dishonour to the children we read about in the Report.

It is of course shocking and sickening that children were failed when the country had money, but much of the commentary around this has had an unspoken subtext – that had the money been spent in this area there wouldn’t be a problem. Unfortunately, when you pick at the policy detail, this doesn’t stack up. Hundreds and hundreds of millions were spent, hundreds of extra social workers were recruited, new organisations and institutions were established and funded to tackle youth disadvantage and improve the quality of care for disadvantaged children. It didn’t work for these 196 people.

“Would we not be better employed in a conversation about why interventions didn’t work?”

Rather than slip into comfortable condemnation, would we as a country not be better employed in a much more uncomfortable conversation about ‘why’ these interventions didn’t work?

Similarly, are we satisfied that just by passing the Constitutional amendment we’re really going to see the end of vulnerable young people lying in the streets of Dublin and other towns and cities across the country? From January to May this year, 13 additional young people in State care or known to the HSE have died – are we going to have any discussion about how this is able to happen when we now know the scale of the problem?

I don’t pretend to have the answers to these questions, but I’m pretty confident that unless we start asking them, we are going to be in the same situation in another ten years. I, or someone who replaces me, will be asked to appear on the plinth at Leinster House to respond to another report and vow that this should never be allowed to happen again.

Before the cameras move on to the next story.

Charlie McConalogue is Fianna Fáil TD for Donegal North East and the party’s spokesperson on Children.

Read next:

Comments (13 Comments)

  • I think the trouble is the right hand does not tell the left whats going on, poor communication is a problem a lot of the time, plus there is a attitude in this Country that nobody is allowed complain when a problem appears, it gets swept under the carpet, and God help anyone who complains they get called whistle blowers and sacked..

    Reply
    • speaking up about a problem isn’t being a whistle blower unless the problems breaks rules or is illegal. in any of my jobs i’ve always pointed out problems, it’s not always possible to do without threading on toes but a little tack goes a long way, but it each case I’ve always had a recommendation for the problem. In the public sector people need to see they are part of a team and not just fulfilling a specific role, lose that attitude and we’ll see change for the best.

      Reply
  • I think we need to totally rethink the way we are doing things and how the system works. And I agree with Charlie McConalogue that is up to us to ensure this issue stays at the top of the agenda so we don’t ever have to read about another horrific report again. It is not good enough to be outraged once a year.

    Reply
  • Until we replace the layer upon layer of middle and senior management in the HSE with some old fashioned leadership, these type of issues will just go on and get worse and worse.
    HSE, like so much of our civil service is a breeding ground for “management” devoid of any sense of leadership where report after report gathers dust on shelves in needlessly rented office space in a host of towns throughout the country.
    And we expect incompetent parish pump politicians to grasp the nettle. It’s all a bit too cosy and this government which promised so much and is delivering so little is just more of the same. Is there a leader out there?

    Reply
  • “The Report is also an indictment of how our country responded to these children’s needs.”

    No Deputy McConalogue, it’s an indictment of how your party, Fianna Fáil, failed to respond to children with care needs in Ireland when they were in government.

    There might have been extra money thrown at the HSE for care work, and extra social workers recruited. But the money was being put in to an already chronically underfunded system that was broken from the outset. Extra social workers were recruited and case loads increased. It isn’t unusual for children to go in to foster care and not be given a care plan, or for them not to see their social worker for over a year. Any money that was invested in addressing this problem went towards addressing issues for when children were already *in* care, rather than addressing issues such as embedded structural disadvantage and intergenerational poverty that may actually have an effect on keeping children out of care in the first place.

    Reply
  • Charlie raises a great point here in that we, as a society, tend to be more concerned on trying to vent anger at an individual or organization, rather than focusing on the problem at hand and finding a viable, sustainable solution. The more attention this gets, the more the question is asked, the more likely that it is we see credible action taken on this and that maybe some other young life will not go to waste in such a manner again. Good article all round!

    Reply
  • It’s a complete lie that the care system is well-funded and I’m not surprised to see this crap coming from Fianna Fail who underfunded it for years, even during the boom.

    Ask any social worker what their options are if they want to take a child into care and most of the time they avoid it at all cost because there is simply nowhere to send the kids and even living with negligent, junkie parents is better than being dumped into a homeless shelter for adult addicts. Residential care facilities are always oversubscribed with long waiting lists and social workers have ridiculous case loads that make it impossible to do their job properly. Operating in permanent crisis mode means they can often only react after disasters have happened, rather than being able to prevent them.

    The overwhelming reason for this is that successive governments have underfunded the system and expected it to operate on a shoestring because they don’t really care about marginalised children from deprived backgrounds. Management issues are also important, but mainly that there is too much of it as with everywhere else in the HSE, and not enough frontline staff. Another issue is that a lot of child protection staff are young and experienced and turnover is sky high because it’s so notoriously awful to work in that most people get out of it as fast as they can to go into pretty much any area of social work.

    Reply
  • Charlie McConalogue makes some useful points. He also make some whoppers too. I think its fair to ask, without seeking to undermine his personal interests, what specific qualifications or experience has seem him appointed as spokeperson for children. If only elected since Feb, hes still getting a handle on how the Dail works, so clearly it is not his expertise on that. So maybe he has some expertise or experience specifically in the field of child care and protection

    On maybe political organisations in the Dail dont really do things that way do they. Maybe being spokeperson on Children is seem a blooding for the career politician, not really that important. To be clear this is personal attack, just looking at the real politik machination of electoral representation that has tended not to ever serve the weakest is societies that well.

    In terms of the whopper arguments, he suggest that there is no use in looking at the organisations that have exercised power over people, and that somehow by not doing this we can look at the root causes of the problem. He belongs an organisation, Fianna Fáil that since the inception of the state has played a role in reinforcing the practice of neglect and abuse of children by state and church over generations. Whilst the Roman Catholic church has rightly been scrutinized for its role in the appalling violence against children and women and its continual cover up, no such examination of other large institutions or organisation that exercise power and authority and thus facilitated such cover up.

    No honest historical appraisal can ignore the role of political parties and indeed the police force of the day for a wider culture of state violence against the poor and most vulnerable.

    Reply
    • Stop excusing and start doing….nnYour looking at everything other than the people who matter… These children.nnAs a social care worker I’ll tell you why these children have been let down. These children are removed from adversity and inconsistency from the people who are meant to love them most in the world. They have had their trust broken and they put this barrier around themselves to protect themselves from being hurt again. The children come into care, and social care workers and other professionals work hands on to establish a relationship and break down the barriers but it takes time. Staff are not consistent, too many agency workers and not enough permanent, staff move on, children lose all that trust again. Employ permanent staff in these residential units, and employ youth workers to get out into the disadvantaged and at risk areas or wherever there is concerns and get them to work WITH the families before there is abuse, neglect which will minimise the risk of children going into care into an environment where there is also no consistency. n

      Reply
  • It seems to me that those with the statutory responsibility for child care are replicating the old RC child-farming system, at least as far as gross scandals are concerned.

    The HSE has no excuse – they are the so-called child-care professionals, the church was just an ignorant organisation chancing their arm with at least one eye on the financial gains. Thankfully their day is done, and their secret millions salted away in high finance bonds and shares hade turned to the biblical rust and dust.
    As in most such scandals, the hordes of management are usually the chief offenders – apologies, promises, apologies and more promises. It’s a game of bluff by unscrupulous self-seekers.

    And it will go on as long as there are weak and voiceless persons to bear the pain!

    Reply
  • Mary harney, bertie aherne, have a lot to answer for!

    Reply
  • its about time we created a bill of childrens rights, also a floor in which no child should go below, we need to invest in safe houses for children rather than these hostels, and ensure a compassionate experience for them. social workers are good people, and should be able to go with their judgement without feeling like taking children from dangerous situations would be possibly putting them in an even more dangerous one

    Reply

Add New Comment