TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 15 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Column: Council reform will discourage women – and help the old boys

The changes to councils will reinforce the dominance of the three major parties, says Fine Gael councillor Mick Glynn.

Mick Glynn

TIME HAS FINALLY been called on the local government system and the ‘reform’ agenda has been announced without any real drama. The plans to reduce the number of local authorities by two thirds, remove 500 elected councillors and save up €400million have gone down well with the general public, who are baying for any type of meaningful spending cuts.

So will there be any real losers, or is this too good to be true?

This reform agenda will also see the existing powers enabling councillors to challenge planning decisions removed. City, town and borough councils have been around in some cases for over 600 years, set up through medieval and royal charters. By and large, elected councillors have represented their areas well, with the prime motivation of making the locality more liveable. The much discussed abuse of planning powers will now leave the planning process without any internal checks and balance system and will now be left up to An Bord Pleanála and An Taisce alone.

Real damage

No other sector has attained the same levels of savings as the local government sector. A running total of more than €830 million has been achieved by the reduction of costs and wages since 2008. The number employed in the sector has been reduced by 18.5 per cent – yet there is a belief that more can be done.

No matter how you frame these welcome ‘reforms’, there is one aspect that has not been taken into account: the real damage will be done to local democracy.

In a time when apathy towards politicians and public representatives is at an all-time high and voter turnout in local elections is low, we need to make the local electoral process more inclusive and accessible. Smaller numbers of elected members in smaller councils, or new Municipal Districts suits the bigger parties. Seventy-five per cent of the vote in the 2009 local elections went towards the three biggest parties in the state. Our proportional representation system, coupled with controlled numbers to be elected, will mean that a first time out local candidate does not stand a chance with the numbers. Well-established candidates affiliated to bigger parties will be able to protect their seats.

These reforms also do nothing to help the shortage of women and younger people getting involved in the electoral process. In new electoral reforms a 30 per cent female gender quota will be linked to state funding for political parties. But it stands to reason that they will find it hard to attract new women to run for office when the chances of gaining a seat are non-existent.

Diluted numbers

In the 2009 local election, 20 per cent of the seats on town and borough councils were taken by independent candidates, against only 12 per cent of the seats at county council level. The figures get even worse at national level, with only seven per cent of the seats taken. The local electorate finds it easier to vote for an independent candidate that might have plenty of character or maybe working on a single issue that appeals to many. The number of independent seats suffers as the electorate size increases, because the localised agenda becomes diluted with the numbers and the electorate likes to follow a party path when the stakes of representation are higher.

We have heard so many times in the electoral reform debate that we need national politicians looking after national issues – and equally we need local politicians looking after local issues.

Local democracy has always thrived on real differences of opinion around the chamber and helps the fringes of the public get their voice heard. A reduction in the numbers of seats decreases diversity of the representatives, and fuels the ivory tower attitude which has developed. Locally there are are tough times ahead economically with the property tax and water charges coming down the line. We need to bring forward ideas that will help communities with a wide range of views feel part of the process. In the future, consideration for an elected voluntary grassroots or community council that would feed into the new Municipal Districts might have to fill this vacuum.

Mick Glynn is a Fine Gael councillor and Mayor of Bray Town Council. He is also a member of Wicklow County Council.

Read next:

Comments (18 Comments)

  • Most councillors were only worried about who gets to be lord mayor, their picture in the local rag and fact finding missions ( golfing or shopping holidays ) abroad, all expenses paid. Well delighted they’re gone. Good luck and close the door on your way out. Byeeee

    Reply
  • Stopped reading when I saw the Female Quota – You should be elected on merit and merit alone and not because they have to have 30% women.

    I would think that young people are not getting involved because they see that most parties are corrupt to the core.

    Reply
  • For once I find myself in agreement with an FG politician. Having seen some of the ridiculous decisions of the local executive over the past few years the only group able to keep it in any check was the councillors. The thoughts of the unelected, overpaid county manager having even more power is scary.

    Reply
  • Any section of society that votes anti government will have to be got rid, over the last year we have seen local councils vote against decisions made in the dail bar , in order to prevent newspapers reporting councils voting against government plans and voting for common sense something the government does not have guts to do , the government are following a path dictated by the lords and masters from germany.

    Reply
  • Next week on The Journal: Turkey speaks out against Christmas

    Reply
  • Whatever about the new reforms, it is a fact that many Councillors in the not too distant past were utterly corrupt when it came to planning. They certainly did not act in the public interest or provide the right kind of checks and balances within the planning process. Although they were in the minority, it nevertheless demonstrated serious flaws in the system. It had to be changed. I also think that there are too many councillors. The idea of a voluntary community type council deserves consideration.

    Reply
  • Between Kenny’s meandering cheerleading and Hogan’s switcheroos and policy blanks there’s alternatives to choose…unless you want to keep the two right wing parties in dominance. Only difference between the two is the b s rhetoric that comes from their lips and who they give the money they steal from (all of) us to (Bondholders).

    Adams for Taoiseach 2012.

    Reply
  • Begrudgy. and how many Lords Mayor are there in this country?

    Reply
  • With regards to the restrictions on planning though, I can’t see a down side to taking power away from councillors. Decisions that will effect the populace for more than a hundred years shouldn’t be left up to people with no idea of how town planning works..in the 90′s planners and city managers were crying out for more thoughtful zoning and strategic development, but councillors could run ahead with their plans and now we’re left with a countryside littered with one-off houses and towns plagued by endless reams of housing estates..

    Reply
  • Local politics equals clientism, political no-hopers and gladitorial carry on/NIMBYism from TD hopefuls. We don’t need four or five levels of representation – if a street light needs fixing the system should fix it if the money’s available. Land should be rezoned if it makes logical sense to do so – not because of backhanders and lobbying in respect of these fools.

    And where exactly is the author going with the quota issue? If you have to have 30% female candidates on the ballot then it hardly makes a difference if you’re electing to a legislature of 50, 100 or 1000 representatives – I should imagine the outcome in percentage terms will be the same regardless.

    Reply
  • What I want to know is – is that the photo of the Column in the headline..?

    Reply

Add New Comment