TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Column: Ireland will never care for its people until we admit our own guilt

Revelations over child deaths are just the latest in a long line – and nothing will change unless we move beyond scapegoats, writes Aaron McKenna.

Aaron McKenna

THE BRITISH COMEDIAN Eddie Izzard has a great way of delivering thought-provoking history lessons through his humour. One lesson nestled in a show of his is about how the world community only reacts to tyrants when they try and harm foreigners. Pol Pot, he argues, was left largely alone because, well, he took to murdering folks at home.

One of the sources of real tension between world nations is their shared history. People from one country tend to feel animosity towards another because of some past war, injustice or slight. The euro crisis is happening some 70 years after the end of the Second World War and the first go-to thought among austerity protesters and headline writers in countries like Greece is swastikas and reparations.

We even fall back on these things in everyday conversation. The Dutch do a lot of business with the Germans and generally get along well with them, but one thing I always hear from Dutch business people when they’re complaining about Germans is how they stole all their bicycles during the war.

The tension between nations is even worse when the perpetrating nation pretends that nothing happened. Witness Japan’s relationship with its Asian neighbours. The Chinese, for example, are pretty annoyed that Japan refuses to acknowledge many of the most egregious human rights abuses that went on during the Sino-Japanese War and later World War Two. We know ourselves in Ireland that long-overdue apologies from Britain about past injustices carry real weight and meaning.

When bad stuff happens at home, perpetrated by one group of our citizens against another, we tend to try and sweep it under the carpet. It is an inconvenient truth when considering topics like clerical sex abuse, Magdalene laundries or symphysiotomies that there was no foreign invader to blame. It is hard to swallow that we – be that you and I, or our parents and our grandparents – lived in a society that accepted, or at the very least ignored, what went on.

‘Ireland has had some shocking failures of humanity’

Be it at a clerical, a judicial, political or individual level, it is clear that Ireland has had some pretty shocking failures of (to be frank) basic common decency and humanity. The blame for this is to be shared as a nation. Rather than passed off either onto select individuals or – more often – opaque and unnamed groups of people such as the judges who sent children to industrial schools, or the civil servants who should have policed them.

Anyone who ever heard about people being sent to these awful places – or of barbaric practices like symphysiotomies, or whispers of the sexual abuse of children by priests – and did nothing about it shares a small portion of the blame. As a society and a nation Ireland didn’t bother to help those in distress, and a backwards view of what our Christian values are led us to accept cruelty where we should have shown compassion.

We have had a process of awakening that began in the 1990s around many of these issues. It is certain that institutions like the Church have been dragged off their high pedestal and through the mud for their role in running politely-named concentration camps, and protecting child molesters. In truth however, we have not yet stepped up and addressed the issues. Many survivors of various forms of state sanctioned abuse still haven’t received recompense. We haven’t even touched on the collective responsibility of government and society in a serious way.

‘We are doomed to repeat ourselves’

The trouble with not addressing the culpability of society and government is that we are doomed to repeat ourselves. The repeat may carry a different flavour to past abuses and neglect, but the outcome is the same: People in need of care and compassion left to rot, their lives irretrievably broken.

Just this past week we’ve had a report into the deaths of children in state care during the height of the bonanza, 2000 to 2010. 112 died of non-natural causes. All concerned in the world of politics and child protection got out their standard press releases, changed around some of the words and the dates and spoke about a shameful day for Ireland.

These children did not die at the hands of intentionally cruel individuals, like paedophile priests. But in many cases they died unnecessarily for lack of proper care and attention. During this time of bumper budgets, nobody cared enough or took ownership of the problems in our social protection systems to fix the obvious problems and save lives.

I believe that if we, as a nation, faced up to the horrors of the past – and present – decided to take collective responsibility, no matter how small as individuals, and felt a bit more guilty about what has gone on in our country, the problems would get a bit more attention.

As it is we pass the blame off onto some other group – like the HSE – and mutter about how cruel or idiotic they are. We don’t stop and consider that if there was a national passion for exorcising the transgressions of the past in about the same manner we expect, say, the British to do so for their misdeeds then we would likely have a much better organised social care system today.

‘Children will continue to come to harm’

Our social services continue to be a mess, and children will continue to come to harm for something as stupid as a bad paperwork system. We continue to send children to prisons that turn them from redeemable people into lifelong criminals. We have a mental health care system (and a social stigma) that would not be worthy of a country where mentally disturbed people are treated by the local witch doctor for possession.

Will we really be surprised in two, or five or ten years time to discover that right now, in 2012, there is a manic depressive shackled to the floor in one of our institutions? Or that a grandmother is having seven shades kicked out of her in a retirement home by a frustrated nurse? Why should we be surprised? After all, in the past decade we’ve let over a hundred kids die in the care of our state. Get those press releases ready.

Ireland needs to sort out its issues in providing basic human decency to our citizens who find themselves in state controlled or regulated care.

To do this we need to begin by acknowledging that we are really, really, really bad at it – even today. We need to have a truth and reconciliation process – not to bash the church alone but as an opportunity to get to the bottom of why we sanctioned, why we ignore, and why we must continue to be shocked by revelations of abuses of one form or another.

Ireland needs to provide better care to those who need it. The results of recent scandals prove that we haven’t cracked it. To get motivated, we need a push.

That push should be a national sense of guilt at the fact that even during the boom, when we had it relatively better than ever before, we didn’t care enough – collectively – to protect people despite all the lessons of the past.

Aaron McKenna is a businessman and a columnist for TheJournal.ie. You can find out more about him at aaronmckenna.com or follow him on Twitter @aaronmckenna.

Read: More columns from Aaron McKenna on TheJournal.ie>

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (32 Comments)

  • Another great piece from Aaron McKenna. I remember when I was a child incarcerated into one of those dreadful places wondering why no one came to our rescue. And arguing with the nuns (God help my naivety) that their behaviour contravened the teachings of Christ which always led to yet another beating as they told me “they would break my spirit” if it was the last thing they did!
    One thing I took with me from that hellish place was that people in power or with power were not necessarily trustworthy or good people – we learned this first hand ;in other words regardless of where people are on the social spectrum, it’s doesn’t automatically confer trust or respect which must be earned by behaviour. Unfortunately most folk are still blinded by, and revere, wealth, power, and social status!

    Reply
  • I remember an rte radio presenter talking about discovering that his son who was disabled and in residential care during the week was found during a weekend visit home to have bruises and welts on his body – his answer was not to tell anyone for fear the child would suffer more – and he worked in the media !!!! Eventually the male carer assaulted the wrong patient and parents stepped in and he was fired – but the mind boggles that someone could send their own child back into this situation ? He said he was ashamed and didn’t want to upset his wife – so kept it quiet ! That’s the culture that needs to go – the brush it under the carpet and don’t tell anyone culture n

    Reply
  • Best article in a long time. Well done . Now time for us all to take responsibility and do something positive as a nation.

    Reply
    • Exactly what i was thinking. Great article. This report is a chance to really see the gap between ‘what I would have done if I was there and ‘ what I am doing now that I am here’. It’s scary & a little paralysing & the best solution to paralysis is action. If every person who feels strongly about our childrens care took on one concrete action that empowers children & their carers, then we would change our history today.  
      The challenge is to DO something instead of saying others should. (eg. Set up a standing order to a children’s charity, even €5 a month will make a difference … Or find out about volunteering as a local sports coach, for childline, Rainbows, etc. … Or … ). It’d be great if people here shared news about other such opportunities so we could learn about how we all could empower & support children & their carers today. 

      Reply
    • Nonsense Paddy. This article is born of the unique Irish set of prejudices that are encapsulated in the term “Irish anti-Irishness”. The author has not one single mention of the deficiencies in the academic training of social workers. No mention of the source of the incompetence of HSE managers or the role played by highly qualified fellows of various royal societies. (He does try to remove the blame from where it lies and place it elsewhere to feed his prejudices.) Any eejit can write an article like this and the manifest lack erudition feeds blind prejudice and children therefore will continue to suffer. Upon silly prejudices poor analysis lays, its products are buffoonish and thus it empowers the various incompetents to continue to cover up their incompetence.

      Reply
    • Fagan's 23/06/12 #

      A better analysis on this than you will find in any paper.

      A credit to citizen journalism.

      Tks Aaron.

      Reply
  • Does anyone think that maybe the crux of our problem is that our morality lies at the level of avoiding punishment and following rules? Do we need to develop a stronger sense of our own values and morals, and therefore what we will and will not stand for? If we can have celebreties like Brendan Gleeson on the late late show in tears about the health system in the middle of an unprecedented boom, and the same government subsequently voted back in with full knowledge of its corruption, there us something wrong with our collective sense of society. It goes back to the ‘I’m alright Jack’ mentality. No one who thinks this way will ever stand up for what is right.

    Reply
  • Excellent article

    Reply
  • Well said and I hope, so much, that we all start caring. Joe

    Reply
  • The author wishes to blame “society as a whole” – in other words each of us collectively – for crimes rather than the individuals responsible. I must say this is highly objectionable, and if we consider it rationally, absurd. If we “all collectively” are responsible for heinous acts, such as for example the abuse of a child, by this logic the victim of abuse who is too frightened to speak out is responsible for his/her own abuse. Murray Rothbard wrote about this:

    “The individualist view of “society” has been summed up in the phrase: “Society” is everyone but yourself. Put thus bluntly, this analysis can be used to consider those cases where “society” is treated, not only as a superhero with superrights, but as a supervillain on whose shoulders massive blame is placed. Consider the typical view that not the individual criminal, but “society,” is responsible for his crime. Take, for example, the case where Smith robs or murders Jones. The “old-fashioned” view is that Smith is responsible for his act. The modern liberal counters that “society” is responsible. This sounds both sophisticated and humanitarian, until we apply the individualist perspective. Then we see that what liberals are really saying is that everyone but Smith, including of course the victim Jones, is responsible for the crime. Put this baldly, almost everyone would recognize the absurdity of this position. But conjuring up the fictive entity “society” obfuscates this process. As the sociologist Arnold W. Green puts it: “It would follow, then, that if society is responsible for crime, and criminals are not responsible for crime, only those members of society who do not commit crime can [p. 39] be held responsible for crime. Nonsense this obvious can be circumvented only by conjuring up society as devil, as evil being apart from people and what they do.””

    Reply
    • You make an excellent counter argument, but you swing a bit too far in opposition to the author’s points. An individual’s behaviour is in part a product of his environment, which includes society. I believe the Irish have in many cases a healthy stance on this. E.g. We blame the church as perpetrators of abuse, but we are ashamed of ignoring it. We blame the banks and politicians for our economic woes, but we admit that we made bad financial mistakes ourselves. The frustration mostly comes from a perceived unequal distribution of punishment and that nothing is fundamentally changing for the better.

      Reply
    • Fagan's 23/06/12 #

      The attitude that drove this scandal, is replicated again and again in Irish society.

      Given what has gone on in Ireland, for the last 50 years, it is quiet right to question what is wrong with people here and their attitudes. It is not anti-Irish to say that, it is a reflection of a beat down people over centuries of brutality, and then a pyschotic church breaking our spirit further.

      Reply
    • In the final analysis it is absurd to say that “society” (which includes victims of crimes and abuses) are a party to their own abuse and injury. It is the individual perpetrators of the crimes who are responsible. Saying that “we” are collectively to blame is a perversion of common sense and rationality. The perpetrators of crimes bear full responsibility for their actions and should be treated accordingly by the law. Or are we all be tried for committing “pseudo”-crimes? How can any right-thinking person come to the conclusion that victims of crimes are partly-responsible for the abuse they suffer at the hands of their attacker? I know Aaron hasn’t stated this, but it is the bizarre conclusion that follows from his premises.

      Reply
    • Fagan's 23/06/12 #

      For me, the point Aaron is making is questioning what is wrong with society here, that things like this happen again and again.

      A deference to power, excess deference to authority, not complaining, not protesting. Just lying down and taking it. Perps bare full responsibility but the damning societal aspect is why do we tolerate it to be repeated, why do we tolerate a minimal approach in resolving this. That is a much more damning mark on our our national head, that being accused of carrying out these crimes.

      Aaron’s questions are poised at countless events and stories from the society of this state over the last few decades.

      Reply
  • Excellent and honest writing, thank you.

    Reply
  • Very well written indeed….
    This article should appear on the front Sunday front page of every news paper….

    Reply
  • We are all in this together…

    Reply
  • Great article. So true.

    Reply
  • What utter nonsense. What’s wrong with blaming the people who committed a crime for the crime?

    Ireland has long suffered from a surfeit of guilt. It was was guilt and shame that stopped so many (but not all) people from speaking out for years about abuse within the church and now you want us all to feel “a bit more guilty”?

    In any case, I’m not accepting one ounce of blame for things I didn’t do – and especially not for things that happened before I was born. I’ve never abused anyone nor turned a blind eye to abuse. What have I got to feel ashamed for? Being Irish? F*ck off!

    You cite the British as some kind of model for exorcising the transgressions of the past. When did you last hear about Haut de la Garenne on the news? Didn’t the British just last week refuse to investigate the Ballymurphy massacre? What’s going on with those files relating to the Dublin and Monaghan bombings? Didn’t Panorama produce a documentary about elder abuse in England just a couple of months ago? Where’s the national shame over that?

    I see no problem with blaming the guilty. Turning the blame on “society” dilutes their guilt. It’s pride this country needs, not shame. Pride demands high standards. Shame thinks we deserve a kicking

    Reply
  • The Dutch had a famine in 1944, real hunger. This because the Germans grabbed all the food.So not just bicycles.Unless we make people responsible for their crimes we will continue to have them repeated. the Four Courts is filled with little crooks. The big ones dodge and hide their assets.I find the “we are all to blame” attitude of the article particularly annoying.I was not responsible for any of these scandals.But I want to make sure they don’t happen again.

    Reply
  • Blaming society is a cop out. It assumes more information is known by ordinary people than is the case, in fact we assume that people are treated well in care homes because we – most of us – are not abusive, and trust the State to do its job. This stuff is actually hidden, and when find out we are appalled. we can’t do anything til we find out, and even then there may be little we can do, but powerlessness is not responsibility. The journalist who is too scared to report to the HSE, is also a victim of the State. It’s different in degree but not in kind to someone in an authoritarian State who knows his relatives were abused by State agencies but can’t act, do we blame we as a society in that case or the State and it’s abusers? nnLet’s blame the responsible parties. If there is abuse in the HSE system all managers responsible up the chain get fired without pensions. If you think this severe because they couldn’t all know then you are arguing that society should know, but managers can’t be expected to. nnI would argue that blaming us is part of the problem, blame them. n

    Reply
  • This is a classic case of Irish Eejitry. It is a manifestation of a confirmation bias and this requires that any evidence that contradicts one’s opinions is ignored. To be classed as ‘intelligent’ one would need to demonstrate an ability to examine and test the null hypothesis. In other words, one has to demonstrate an ability to seek out information that might contradict one’s opinion in order to arrive at a balanced view.

    I have no problem with Aaron admitting guilt for his own stupidity but I do have a problem with clowns that try to blame their failings on others.

    What has come across in this report group’s findings is that a college degree/master’s degree in sociology and politics does not suitably qualify people as social workers. Most social workers will agree with this statement because academic qualifications concentrate on theoretical aspects of childcare and are no substitute for practical experience. The British reached the same conclusion after similar defects were discovered in their child protection services. The difference between here and there is that the British are not anti-British and thus their findings have more validity than those of the Irish ‘journalists’ educated by Barstool bores.

    Now had the author attempted to examine similar experiences in other jurisdictions and present an argument based on analysis and examination of their responses, readers would have no option but to be impressed, no matter what conclusions had been reached. However, that would require brain work and research.

    “The First Law of Journalism: to confirm existing prejudice, rather than contradict it” – Alexander Cockburn

    Reply
  • who is this we?

    Reply
  • I got some red flags which makes no sense so lets do this scientifically. nn A child is abused in care. Who does the responsibility lie with. nn1) chap on 16a who works in a pubn2) the abuser paid for by the State( via taxes on the pub worker)n3) other employees who know but don’t report, though not abusers themselves. n4) the manager who either knows or doesn’t run a tight ship well enough to known5) his boss who doesn’t run procedures to find out about abuses in the system. n6) his boss who doesn’t run procedures to find out about abuses in the system.n….nN) the minister for health. nnVery few people would blame 1) but that is Aaron’s argument. Everybody would blame 2). Lots would blame the minister but missing out the intermediate steps makes no sense. nnThe guy on the bus represents society, if people are confused on that score. n

    Reply
  • Excellent intelligent article. We now have government ministers threatening social workers with criminal charges! For once society need to see the real problem….we have not invested in our children for years. Proper Investment in preventative child protection services will make a change not the token measure of 200 new social workers! Work out the Maths. Each county can receive up to 2000 new cases each year!! Now we have young social workers leaving the service in droves afraid to be branded criminals and rubbish at their jobs.

    Reply
  • Why has my comment been removed please?

    Reply
  • RDX862 23/06/12 #

    Weren’t the majority of the kids that died not even in HSE care?

    Reply
  • Miles the arrogance of your message leaves me speechless and somewhat frightened by your overt viciousness against a quality article. Please spend your time giving positive criticism.

    Reply
    • Paddy. There is no arrogance in exposing prejudice. Neither is there any viciousness but as prejudices are highly resistant to rational influence they are prone to formulating imaginary daemons for the preservation of prejudices and in justification for nonsensical defences. “Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment”-Albert Einstein

      Reply
  • WOW. This is going to take a while to digest, and probably several readings, its one of those “why didn’t someone say this before now moments”. I can’t disagree with anything Aron says here and agree with everything, I think we should have been doing more some years ago, when we as a country had the money. And there’s the problem. As he indicated if we look and find that the problem is a lack of investment in these areas, he suggested a grandmother may today be having “seven shades kicked out of her in a retirement home by a frustrated nurse”, ok so maybe the solution is to provide a few more nurses in that retirement home but due to a lack of funding that just isn’t going to happen.
    My point is that yes we need to take a step back, acknowledge where we failed, see how it can be corrected then do it. But that will likely take a very major investment in funding, its going to cost, at a time when we can least afford it. We have no choice but pay these bills and respect the folks we, as a nation ignored for so long and maybe get it into the national pshcye that this is the right way to go.

    Reply
  • Test

    Reply

Add New Comment