TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Column: Proposed local government reforms will lead to job losses and closures

Entrepreneurs, job-seekers, rural enterprises, tourism initiatives and community-based projects all rely on local development companies – which could be forced to close under new reforms, writes John Walsh.

John Walsh Irish Local Development Network

I MET SIMON Stenson for the first time today. He lost his job in construction in recent years. Faced with unemployment, he didn’t rest on his laurels; with his wife, Siobhán, he founded Cherry Blossom Bakery to produce artisan breads and confectionery, using only natural ingredients. The bakery now employs nine people – all former construction workers – and supplies over 100 stores in five counties in the West of Ireland. Plans are underway for it to go nationwide very soon.

Simon is just one of thousands of entrepreneurs who have received practical support from a local development company to help make their business a success. When he was starting out, in late 2010, he approached South West Mayo Development Company for assistance. He told me today that, without the funding, mentoring and training he received from them, he couldn’t have gotten Cherry Blossom Bakery off the ground.

There are 50 local development companies in Ireland, covering every corner of the country. They can be known by different names – such as Local Area Partnerships, LEADER Partnerships or Integrated Development Companies – but they share a number of key features: they focus on promoting local economic development, addressing inequality and social exclusion; and have an emphasis on a ‘bottom-up’ approach – working with communities to develop local solutions to local issues.  All local development companies are independent and not-for-profit.

Community-led development under ‘serious threat’

The model of community-led development pioneered by local development companies over the past 20 years is now under serious threat. In October, the Department of Environment, Community and Local Government published a report proposing a number of reforms for the local government sector. One of its suggestions is to remove the core funding currently received by local development companies (through programmes like LEADER and the Local and Community Development Programme) and to route it instead through new local authority-led bodies, which would be known as Socio-Economic Committees.

Without core funding, local development companies could not survive.  Some 2,000 people are currently employed in these companies; their jobs would be at risk because many local development companies would be forced to close.

Furthermore, entrepreneurs like Simon Stenson would suffer – as would job-seekers, rural enterprises, tourism initiatives and community-based projects.  In 2011 alone, local development companies supported 5,223 people into self-employment and assisted 1,644 enterprises. A further 9,000 people were supported into employment, and over 28,000 were supported into education or training. These results are made possible because of the community-led approach adopted by local development companies.

If the establishment of the Socio-Economic Committees goes ahead, decision-making and funding will be removed from community-led bodies with a proven track record of success, and placed in the hands of local authorities. This makes no sense: Ireland’s current system of local development is viewed as a model of best practice at European level. The European Court of Auditors, for example, has strongly criticised the excessive involvement of local authorities in the implementation of LEADER in other countries, so it is unlikely the changes being proposed by the Government would be welcomed within the EU.

Work underpinned by volunteerism

Furthermore, local development companies offer good value for money. A huge amount of their work is underpinned by volunteerism. They are all managed by voluntary boards; they operate on tight budgets; and they have proven their capacity to focus on service-delivery rather than ratcheting up high administrative costs.

I met Simon Stenson this morning because we were both in Dublin to highlight our concerns about the proposed local government reforms. TheIrish Local Development Network – the representative body for the country’s 50 local development companies – had organised a day-long political briefing. Representatives of every local development company were present to meet their local TDs and Senators and explain to them why they are seriously concerned about the proposals for reform.

We organised today’s event to show how the local government reforms – if they go ahead – will destroy community-led local development.  Minister Phil Hogan has agreed to discuss our concerns with us over the coming weeks, which is a move we welcome. In the meantime, our members will maintain ongoing contact with their local political representatives in relation to this issue.

John Walsh is Acting Chairperson of the Irish Local Development Network (ILDN), the national representative body for Ireland’s 50 local development companies.  He is also Chairperson of the Voluntary Board of Ballyhoura Development, a local development company covering the areas of South and East Limerick and North East Cork.

About the author:

John Walsh  / Irish Local Development Network

Read next:

Comments (15 Comments)

  • Partnerships have huge expertise in and experience of working with a ‘bottom up’ community development approach in their local communities. They are fundamentally democratic insofar as community members are directly involved at all levels of their decision-making processes. Partnership companies empower local people and communities to have a real say on issues that affect them and to identify their own needs and issues, and then bring together all sectors of the community to meet those needs. In practice this could mean setting up vital new projects and services, or working for change at local, regional or national levels.

    They provide a range of local employment, enterprise, education and community development services and supports for some of our most marginalised and disadvantaged people and communities in a cost effective way.

    It is vital that these local community-led companies keep their independence and their own funding, because without this many will close and a huge resource will be lost to our local communities.

    Reply
    • There is no ‘bottom up’ community anymore. Nobody trusts nobody and people don’t trust the system because it is ultra-conservative and less connected to local issues. A more liberal approach would socially rejuvenate our socioeconomic development. The problem is people don’t vote for liberal politicians – they instead vote for the repressive type who are not connected to local issues.

      Reply
    • I hear you Mark, but the Partnership companies are truly independent separate companies, usually set up as charities, and certainly in Bray anyway they have a high level of involvement and oversight by the local community on all of their decision-making bodies, including the ones that say what work and projects should be done and how the Partnership spends its money!

      For example, a networking group such as the Disability Cluster Group is run by the Partnership and has members sent from all the main disability groups and service-providers in the local area (including input from service-users / people with disabilities). Their job is to represent the real issues for people with disabilities and take action, with the Partnership supporting their actions. This networking group elects two of their members to represent the group on the Partnership Board, and on rep on each of the working groups that decide on the programme of activities each year and oversee the progress of the work. There are eight of these community representative on the Board alone.

      In terms of the bottom up approach, when service gaps are identified in these groups, the Partnership will then do outreach (eg knocking on doors in estates) to find out what the relevant people affected (eg long-term unemployed) by the particular issue say their need are (eg if it is a new training project, what are their training and support needs).

      Or another example in Bray would be getting a large group of older people together (including providing transport) at a friendly event to find out what they say their needs are – from this the Partnership ending up supporting the set-up and funding of a new project HomeLINK that now has 900 older people who are living alone using the service (a daily phone call to find out how the person is doing, what needs they have, contacting other services on their behalf if necessary, social events, small repairs and gardening etc). The service was given an award and is one of the most treasured in the local area. They do not replicate any statutory service available, and they help older people to stay in their own homes longer. Without the Partnership listening to people, the need would not have been identified and the service would not exist.

      There are many more examples. The key thing is to keep the independence of these companies and the involvement of so many local people, groups and communities in the work.

      Reply
  • If the local county councils could not organise a bin collection system and at least break even with a captive market how do we suppose they can be ANY use to aspiring entrepreneurs?
    The mind boggles as to how this is going to work and I despair for those who think it will……

    Reply
  • This article proves my hunch that these,are,cuts dressed up as reforms

    Reply
  • The only why to get this economy working again is to leave the people wit some spending money at the end of the month . But we are been milked like some prized cash cow .

    Reply
  • Bit of a 3 card trick going on!

    Reply
  • You can open as many business as you like . But thy need customers and customers need money to spend . Even my 3 year old knows this .AUSTERITY MY ASS

    Reply
  • Pity Cherry Blossom Bakery is a completely flash based site. Best of luck to them all the same.

    On the issue of the reforms/cuts – from our current position local business supports are not sufficient to provide the level of expertise, suitable courses and funding that local start ups need in the number society and local communities want and need to kick start local economies and employment.

    The proposed reforms are still somewhat hollow on the practicalities, expecting local authorities in their current form to be capable of providing the correct leadership and interest is a big gamble. The current set-up from my personal experience has great people involved but limits what they can achieve and has the habit of being a dumping ground for TD and Councillors referring crack pot cases seeking start up monies for unrealistic or out-dated business concepts.

    Reply
    • I don’t know where you have that experience, but in my area the Bray Area Partnership’s enterprise company does an amazing job working with unemployed people who want to set up their own business – giving them one-to-one support and mentoring, signing them onto the Back to Work Enterprise Allowance, and most importantly of all, providing comprehensive training programmes where people get to test out their business idea to make sure it is viable. This is supplemented with individual tailored training, ongoing mentoring after set-up, support to access funding, and an Early Stage Entrepreneurs Network for clients who have set up business to meet, network and get training in vital areas such as Marketing on a Shoestring… http://www.brayareapartnership.ie/our-services/enterprise/

      Reply
  • This goverment cant create jobs or the enviroment for them they jus creating more stupid policies

    Reply
  • Just a way to privatize all the states services to the friends if FG/LAB/FF. people pay taxes and get nothing in return like a mini USA.

    Reply
    • Water charges & property tax are likely to be abolished in the next election if Independents/SF are given a chance by the Irish people. We should be cutting our spending and give the middle class breathing space to help our economy grow.

      Reply
  • Next blunder has arrived!

    Reply
  • Replace the staff in these highly expensive, inefficient quangos with the entrepreneurs themselves and we are starting to get on the right track….Step 1. Cut out the rot, especially inefficient rot…

    Reply

Add New Comment