TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 16 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

Column: The majority of care givers are women, but it shouldn’t be prescribed upon us

Traditional gender roles serve as prescriptive claims about how girls and women should act. There are greater choices for both men and women now, so we need to reconcile our competing demands, writes Margaret O’Keefe.

ESSENTIALISM HAS BEEN described as an essence which categorises race, gender and personality. Professor Siobhán Mullally notes that a commitment to the ideal of ‘separate spheres’, based on the complementarity of male and female roles alongside the presumption of natural sexual differences between women and men is given legal recognition in the language of Article 41.2.1.

Traditional gender roles also serve as prescriptive claims about how girls and women should act. Thus, it may be claimed that all females are naturally better at care work. This type of claim may be followed by the claim that females should be the primary caretakers. Some men and women, however, prefer to work full-time in the home. Their choices need to be fully respected by us all.

Caring and domestic work

Despite the very welcome involvement of men in the care role, women continue to do the bulk of caring and domestic work. Data from the 2011 Census reveals that 61 per cent of carers are women.  They provide 66 per cent of all care hours, while 86 per cent of childcare is carried out by women.

Care obligations, however, may limit the individual’s active participation in Irish society at the social, cultural and economic level.  Successful entrepreneur Sarah Níc Lochlain has argued that if we want more women to become entrepreneurs and help rebuild the economy, then a national childcare scheme is needed.

Care provision is not a gender-specific issue. The need for ‘Cradle to Grave’ care provision is an issue for all human beings: male and female. Professor Kathleen Lynch said:

No human being, no matter how rich or powerful, can survive from birth without care and attention; many would die at different points in their lives, if seriously ill or in an accident, without care.

Significantly, in February 2013 the Constitutional Convention voted overwhelmingly to radically alter the “Women in Home” Clause in the Irish Constitution, rendering it more gender inclusive in its language and orientation. 97 per cent also supported more Government action to increase participation of women in public and political life.

Increasing entrepreneurship

If these recommendations are adopted and implemented they would foster a more positive environment for women and men who are carers to operate without constraint, realising their full potential as active citizens. The provision of complete care provision is necessary for a sustainable society and economy. Furthermore, increasing entrepreneurship is currently a critical policy concern. To achieve optimal outcomes, a comprehensive care system needs to be integral to ‘entrepreneurial ecosystems’ as business and government seek to embed enterprise and entrepreneurship across Irish society.

Women need to be present and active on issues that affect them and their families.  These issues include child, elder care and reproductive health. Above all, women need to be present when economic-related decisions, such as banking, finance, are made because these decisions can have a profound impact on their lives.

Power-sharing and decision-making

The Beijing Conference (1995) recommended that the international community and civil society, including non-governmental organisations and the private sector, act to reduce inequality between men and women in power-sharing and decision-making. Last year, along with other groups, the 5050 Group campaigned successfully for the introduction of legislation to increase the number of women on the ballot paper at general elections in the Republic of Ireland.

Last year, the President of Ireland, Michael D. Higgins, signed that legislation – the Electoral (Amendment) (Political Funding) Act – into law.  The Act ensures that women comprise 30 per cent of party candidates in the next general election. The figure will increase to 40 per cent seven years thereafter.

More women elected to the Oireachtas, while not a solution for our socio-economic ills, is likely to promote gender-sensitised care and family policies. Policy and practice models drawn from the Northern European context could be particularly useful. These models may facilitate greater choice for both men and women as they seek to reconcile the competing demands of work and family life.

Margaret O’Keefe is a lecturer in Community Development at Cork Institute of Technology. Both Margaret O’Keefe and Collette Finn are members of the 5050 Group – an organisation that are looking to achieve gender parity in Irish politics by the year 2020.

Column: Childcare is the main obstacle for women getting into business>

Constitutional Convention votes to alter ‘women in home’ clause>

About the author:

Margaret O'Keefe and Colette Finn

Read next:

Comments (21 Comments)

  • We need to move away from the whole gender issue. Caring happens on many levels, the person who steps up to mark does so regardless of gender. I had a very caring Father, I have 5 brothers, one in particular is very caring towards our 85 year old mother. Many men make great carers, many women make great carers. Some men don’t know the meaning of the word, some women don’t either.

    Reply
  • More women in politics will have a positive effect, but what i also want is a cap on the proportion of teachers being elected. We cannot get proportional representation when so many have such a narrow skill set. 25% or so of elected TDs are teachers of one sort or another!

    Reply
    • Jo Carr 08/03/13 #

      I’m sorry, Tim, but I don’t see how ‘teaching’ is a narrow skill set. As you said yourself, there are various types of teachers representing us. That means they know about a lot of different things. And, yes, I am a teacher.

      Reply
    • Denito 08/03/13 #

      While feminist activists are happy to highlight the gender imbalances in areas such as employment, income and participation rates in politics, you seldom hear them highlight areas such as unemployment, early school leaving, third level qualifications, emigration, suicide or life expectancy. Also, when fathers who have felt hard done by in dealings with the courts and Gardaí in relation to child custody and access matters complain of bias in the system, they are often lauged off with the line that there is no objective evidence of such bias (as all such cases are held in camera with no reporting).

      This suggests to me that, rather than genuine gender equality, such activists are merely interested solely in the advancement of women at the expense of men.

      Reply
    • Eleen 08/03/13 #

      Denito, are you implying that all feminist activists are this way? Or just some? Because feminism is a broad and complex movement.

      You will find that issues such as father’s rights, domestic violence perpetrated by women, and other gender-related problems were first highlighted by those in the feminist/women’s movement. That we speak at all about issues of gender and oppression is thanks to those movements. And there are in fact a lot of feminists who speak out about how our sexist culture impacts negatively on men, as well as how some strands of feminism or feminist thought are terrible.

      It was through feminism and feminists that I learned about the problems and injustices that boys and men face today.

      Reply
  • Why can’t a man be primary care giver, Terry? That’s a ridiculous comment!

    Reply
  • Nydon 07/03/13 #

    There are definitely still some legacy issues in Western society , such as statements in the Irish Constitution which need to be fixed – asap.
    However women are not now forced into roles as they used to be and many (Most?) women chose to do what they do with their life. To claim that these women have been hijacked from an entrepreneurial nirvana is so condescending. We are in danger of becoming gender communists pushing an agenda based on a “one size fits all homogeneous society” I.e the size that suits the activist.

    Reply
    • Eleen 08/03/13 #

      It’s true though that women are assumed to take on the role of caregiver, and are pressured into it. Because we’re still not completely out of the woods when it comes to notions of gender, it feels a lot more natural to let the daughter of a family take care of a sick parent as opposed to a son, for example. In a marriage, men are still more likely to be the breadwinners simply because that’s how it’s always been done, and also because we have no paternity leave in this country.

      Nothing wrong with women being caregivers per se, but it would be nice to not feel guilty every time you put yourself or your career first (something women feel a lot and struggle with). Personally I think care giving is one of the most important things a person can do, and it should be celebrated and financially rewarded so that caregivers don’t have to become financially dependent on other people, and don’t have to work a full-time job on top of everything else.

      Reply
  • What a mean-spirited and negative article. It’s implications are in parts distasteful and sometimes border on the absurd.

    The general theme is a skewed portrayal of society. Alot of women delight in caring for their children. This article devalues the choices they have made in their lives and implies there is something wrong with it. To bring entrepreneurship into it is particularly low as it implies women giving care are incapable of ingenuity and their lives are of no benefit to anyone other then there families.

    Care giving is a choice, both men and women do it. Do not attempt to devalue or ridicule it.

    Reply
    • Care giving limits one’s independence though as the person needs to freeze or give up up their career which may backfire badly later in life. It’s only reasonable to consider these long term costs as not to base such decisions on domestic stereotypes.

      Reply
    • I agree it is certainly an equally, if not more so, time consuming occupation as a full time job without the financial reward or possibility of advancement. And I agree with your point about the long term.

      But people make the decision to go down this road in full awareness of the sacrifices. Such a decision should not be open to scorn, stereotype or ridicule

      Reply
  • It took two of you to write this article? Women are so inefficient

    Reply
  • A hodge podge of bald assertions and non sequiturs.

    Reply
  • Good article. Of course it steps on toes; ignore the irritated comments of those who have benefited from this outsourcing of caring work to my gender for years and years.

    Reply
    • Meanwhile you’ve outsourced all the hunting, fishing, mining, building, engineering, farming, poetry, dying in wars, firefighting, inventing, science and art. You’re welcome

      Reply
    • I think the point is the voluntary and often more than full-time nature of the work that women do that props up the economy, Chuck. Not just in child-rearing, but with so much more work that needs to be done in our society. The roles you describe tend to be paid, so I am not sure about why you would want extra thanks… And women who consider themselves equal and hard-working farmers with their husbands down the years, but have to put up with the insulting “farmer and his wife” soubriquet, might take issue with your assertion.

      Reply
  • Don’t say the majority of caregivers are women or this anti female govt will try to cut or tax it.

    Reply
  • 86% of childcare is by women? Until men start having children i dont think that is going to change much

    Reply

Add New Comment