TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Column: Troubles over Mick Wallace follow a long line of left-wing splits

The Irish left has a history of schism, writes Adrian Grant – but if it wants to reap electoral rewards it must learn to co-operate.

Adrian Grant

IRELAND HAS NEVER really had a strong left-wing political party or grouping in the way that the UK or our continental European neighbours have.

The Irish Socialist Republican Party (ISRP) was founded by James Connolly in 1896 but it is often joked that the party had more syllables in its title than members in its ranks. In 1912, the Irish Trade Union Congress decided to establish a political party that would represent the interests of the working class in the now-expected Home Rule parliament. However, a series of major events from the Dublin lockout (1913) to the War of Independence (1919-21) prevented the new party from being genuinely active on the political front.

By the time the Labour Party contested its first general election in 1922, much of its radical edge had been lost and it became an ineffective opposition in the new Free State parliament. After Fianna Fáil decided to take its seats in Leinster House in 1927, Labour had its work cut out to compete electorally with De Valera’s populist machine.

Today, the Labour Party is a partner in one of the most austere governments in the history of the state and the Irish left-wingers in the Dáil could be said to include a wide variety of groupings including Sinn Féin, the Socialist Party, People Before Profit Alliance and a number of Independents. Many of the TDs outside of Sinn Féin (those that some would claim are the real left) had been grouped under an umbrella organisation known as the United Left Alliance (ULA). This fairly small left-wing grouping now seems to be tripping its way towards fracture in a way that has become so predictable in Irish politics over the last ninety years.

Infighting and schism

Outside of the Labour Party (which has had its fair share of splits over the years) the left in Ireland has been plagued by infighting and schism. Throughout the late 1920s and early 1930s, the IRA (which at the time was not politically represented by Sinn Féin) and Irish communists constituted a loose socialist republican movement that opposed the right-wing policies of Cumann na nGaedheal and later provided a far-left critique of the Fianna Fáil government.

However, the various groups involved could never solidify into one coherent left-wing bloc. The IRA leadership became jittery about open left-wing political activity after a ‘red scare’ in the early 1930s. This precipitated a split in 1934 with leading republicans like Peadar O’Donnell and Frank Ryan going on to establish the Republican Congress. This new socialist republican umbrella group included a wide variety of republicans, communists, trade unionists, individual Labour party members, James Connolly’s son and daughter, unemployed workers’ groups and even a group calling themselves the ‘Shankill Road James Connolly Workers’ Republican Club’.

From March to September 1934, the Republican Congress threw itself head-first into grassroots campaigns. Many of its members were arrested for opposing evictions and its public meetings in Cathal Brugha Street attracted huge crowds from the tenements in the area. The government was quite worried about the threat posed by the new group. Garda surveillance was cranked up to find a way to crack down on the group’s newspaper so that it could be either severely censored or suppressed.

Devastating

In September, almost to script, the Republican Congress split over its future direction – whether it would become a new political party, or oppose the government as a united front grouping from the ground up. The split was devastating and destroyed any vestige of left-wing unity in 1930s Ireland. Many of those involved in the Republican Congress went on to fight against fascism in the Spanish Civil War and those lucky enough to return home found that there was no outlet for their political beliefs anymore.

This is just one example of the many splits the Irish left has endured during the twentieth century. They are too numerous to analyse here, but the lessons remain. The ULA is now going through a period of upheaval that could threaten its future. The fact that it had to compromise and form a technical group in the Dáil with deputies outside of its membership has come back to haunt it.

The fallout from technical group member Mick Wallace’s tax affairs has seen Clare Daly resign from the Socialist Party and become an Independent TD under the ULA banner. Seamus Healy’s Workers’ and Unemployed Action Group has withdrawn from the ULA over the issue, leaving the latter’s future very uncertain. More recently, the chairman of the technical group, Finian McGrath, has resigned his position due to Wallace’s insistence on remaining as a member. It appears that little can be done to stop Independent TDs, regardless of political controversy or ideological conviction, from joining or remaining in the technical group.

Unprecedented gains

The ULA’s members must now proceed with extreme caution and ensure that these events do not destroy an alliance that has given the Irish left a much louder voice than would otherwise have been the case. There is, in the context of progressively more crippling austerity, a huge opportunity for the left to make unprecedented gains at the local elections of 2014. If the ULA is still around in eighteen months time, it can become the lynchpin that regional groups can gravitate towards. Or perhaps a more open alliance is needed; one that all manner of dissenting opinion can congregate around, without being tarred with the ‘crazy old lefties’ label by the media.

Excepting Sinn Féin and Labour for the moment, the left cannot grow into a proper opposition if constituent groups in the ULA are going to fall out over the tax affairs of an eccentric businessman. If the ULA is to have any real influence after the next general election it is going to have to play the game of co-operating with parties like Sinn Féin and the many anti-austerity groups that have been formed.

However, if Mick Wallace’s troubles with the taxman can have this kind of effect on the ULA, the chances of any kind of alliances being struck with people who are not socialist to the bone will be slim. It seems that today, even without the might of the church and state to contend with, a broad left-wing alliance is as difficult to form as it was in the 1930s. Irish politics continues to congregate around the parish pump, while the socialists fight each other in the corner, snipe about populists and can never seem to get off the ground.

Dr Adrian Grant is a historian and the editor of the online history magazine Scoláire Staire. His book Irish Socialist Republicanism, 1909-36 is available here. It will be launched at the Peadar O’Donnell weekend in Dungloe on 20th October and at the Irish Labour History Museum, Beggars Bush, Dublin on November 5.

Read next:

Comments (44 Comments)

  • Mick Wallace could not by any stretch of the imagination be regarded as left wing.

    Reply
    • More like Left the house without looking in the mirror

      Reply
    • cormac 21/10/12 #

      I don’t think poor auld mick knows the difference between his left and his right.

      Reply
    • I thought he was typical Left Wing?
      A failed capitalist conveniently recasting themselves as vehemently anticapitalist. It saves them face to reposition themselves as ‘deliberately never wanting to be successful in the first place and now fighting for the little guy.’

      Imagine if Shane Ross, rather than just being a former stock broker, actually had skills as an investor and risk taker, rather than just being a salesman – and had gone on to make millions. Would he be in The Dail today? Given his past admiration for Fingleton, I expect he has a capitalist streak.

      It is hard to find a genuine left winger. Many are just angry with the system as they were rejected by it.

      Reply
    • mattoid 21/10/12 #

      He’s certainly not known as Pinkie Wallace for his politics ;-)

      Reply
    • Mick Wallace has done some really stupid things and he made a lot of money in the boom but his politics are left wing. He is good on social, economic and cultural issues. He is not a great example to people and not a perfect person but I don’t think you can doubt his politics if you might doubt his own personal dedication to them in his own dealings. His voting record in the Dáil is better than many who would not be questioned on their left credentials.

      Reply
    • Thought to myself at last a fully interesting article on the Journal. Then the author goes and mentions left wing,current Labour party and Mick Wallace in the same breath. Boom! credibility walks out of the door.

      Reply
    • Sure Oisin.. A capitalist who screws his employees on their pension entitlements and deliberately avoids tax: yeah, a real lefty!

      Reply
  • Great article, however the comment on the Workers and Unemployed Action Group, they left really because of the ULA support of Abortion, and opportunism over Wallace, for political cred. I’m involved on the left, and have been really annoyed that Clare Daily resigned and supported Mick Wallace. But even though there are some problems the ULA is new and is made up of committed hard working and honest people. Who are constantly targets and undermined by the right wing media for trying to campaign for a fairer deal for least well off and the vulnerable.
    The technical group although not ideal is something that has to happen because it gives us a voice.
    On the bright side the left is strong and vibrant, and growing, constantly attracting new members. The Labour Party is imploding as will Fiana Gael as they push austerity and inequality and people get more and more tired of the lies and hardship. I’m optimistic that left will get through its current impasse and become stronger

    Reply
  • It was almost impossible to have a “left wing” in Irish politics up until recently. It is simple to see why. Just ask a few simple questions. Who controls the education system in this country ie the schools. Who hates the left wing and its “liberal policies” ?
    The left has always been ridiculed as misfits,terrorists or godless communists by labour FF, FG or the Vatican. The Greens were sucked in by ff and destroyed. Labour joined a coalition government with a right wing christian democratic party and once again will pay the price for it at the next elections.
    There is room for a left wing in irish politics but they should never enter a coalition just to take part in government because recent history has taught us that they will be destroyed by the senior coalition partner.

    Reply
  • ah sure remember when Gilmore , rabbite and co split from the ira to form the official ira…people need to examine the past of some of the former hard line lefties that have moved to the right.

    Reply
  • The problem with Irish politics is corruption. Transparency is the solution. Left and right are meaningless as long as corruption really rules. It makes no difference if you’re governed by corrupt right wingers or corrupt left wingers.
    The only solution is to hold all elected officials’ feet to the fire and get some meaningful transparency in place. That should be priority #1. Get it done, or you’ll be having your pockets picked by corrupt officials until the end of time.
    For god’s sake, you say you love your country and you love your kids. Don’t hand them what you’ve been dealt.

    Reply
  • The Labour party can no longer be regarded as left wing, and I’d say they will see the results of that in the next election.
    The policies of the ‘centre-right’ (i.e. FF / FG, parties whose biggest difference is the spelling of their names – and now Labour) have shown themselves to be deeply unpopular, driving a move to the left.
    The biggest focal point for left-inclined voters now is Sinn Fein, but they’re a bit of a Marmite party because of their history. ULA is too fractious (as the article says) to make a real difference.
    Interesting times ahead. Where will support for the left land, and will it be focussed enough to make a difference…

    Reply
    • Of course their policies are unpopular; they have no option but to take away things that used to be paid for by the state.
      Like them or loath them, for once I see certain politicians earning their salary in having to do very unpopular things rather than just appease the public and ride the crest of an economic wave.
      No doubt the Irish economy will recover, as cycles always do, and being about 5 years away, that should see Fianna Fail just about ready to get elected again and jump aboard that wave, with a passionate electorate right behind their plans to slash taxes, increase social welfare, open hospitals in every county and cancellation of the property charge. Plus Ca Change.

      Reply
  • And meantime we have hungry kids amidst booming agri-exports(famine economics) and escalating homelessness despite a housing glut and elevating emigration.

    Nothing structurally wrong?
    You’re locked in your market ideology as solidly as any loony left is in theirs, and to further austerity you will impose on the already pinned to the wall, to secure the bad gambling debts of the obscenely financially obese white-collar criminals that engineered this extraction of wealth.

    Reply
  • I think we should go back to defining our problems in democratic terms; as in government of the people, by the people, for the people on an inclusive basis, as opposed to govt by a golden circle, for a clique neuveau-ascendancy, by an elite, or loose affilliation of financial elites, on exclusive pyramidic precepts.

    That would require the resuscititation of such antique ideas as equality and fraternity(again, inclusively)to accompany the over-elevated exclusive Liberty of a dictating minority through the megaphone of corporatised media, which has mutated into corporate lobby licence to puppeteer our so-called representatives.
    The jaded and liturgical language of simplistic left/right is anti-democratic cadre-country for shorthand dialogues of ideologues who forget how the average voter reacts to such jargon, and provide a hungry media with crude cudgels for obscuring the issues their masters do not want discused rationally. Such as the limits to private property and the recognition of the precedence of the public good over private interests. But our mediacrats will resist such debate with vitriol and venom. As they do currently.
    Thats my fivepence worth.

    Reply
    • @ damian, there’s a hell of a lot of words from you above, but is there are practical proposals to improve our political system in there? Please try to write clear sentences and use smaller words and phrases, because I’ve no real idea of what you’re talking about, just a fuzzy impression. But maybe it’s just me, and I’m not smart enough for you.

      Reply
    • Which words are too big for you, Nikolas?
      Inclusive, democratic, elites, coporate media, equality??Just as well I resisted egalitarian, eh?
      Or mediacrats maybe?Thats the likes of our mega-money men controlling all debate through their propaganda organs of the right. And of course the elisions(sorry about that, it means self-censorship of the unpallatable)due to advertisers sensitivities. Need I explain advertiser and sensitivities?
      I can translate if you are having problems with the dictionary facilities. And point out the grammatical errors. I can only spot one misspelling.

      And looking back over the comments, my input doen’t seem such a ‘hell of a lot of words’. Perhaps its the ideas you find indigestable. Try reading more slowly, and thinking.
      Sorry, but THAT, I cannot do for you.

      Reply
    • Trying bring clearer, is all. He point is to communicate, not to show everyone hoe much smarter you are. Say what you said above in three sentences, using no words with more than one syllable. Clarity is what made George Orwell a good writer. Hat’s he challenge.

      Reply
    • Go back to Eric Blair, then.

      And re-read your own last comment. Or are you just trolling to distract from the content of what I wrote?

      Reply
    • I think Nikolas is saying, for any sort of future, Ireland needs to be generating true economic growth.
      The only way to do that is the long term pursuit of money from overseas for things we do as a country that we’ll get paid for.
      Otherwise, we simply cannot afford to support ourselves and the country grinds to a halt, literally.

      If we have no money coming in to Ireland Inc, then it cannot be redistributed to help those underprivileged who cannot generate income for themselves.

      The only way to change the system is to excel within it, and leading it in a better direction.
      Dismantling it results in a catastrophic net loss for everyone on every level. That sometimes seems like the Leftie goal. Which is ludicrous.
      Ireland is currently in intensive care, on a life support machine. Articulate voices, intelligent brains, and people with imagination need to get to work and innovate in order to generate Ireland’s future independence.
      Philosophising about hippy ideals is a waste of time.

      Reply
    • @arbitrasure
      yeah yeah yeah..business as usual, back to the failed economics of the tiger…and any suggestion there are systemic problems is ‘hippy’ fantasy.

      Abuse trumps thinking, yet again.
      Another Oirish solution to an Oirish problem..except its the same solution caused the problem.

      Have another Duff beer.

      Reply
    • “business as usual” – NOT what I said
      “back to the failed economics of the tiger” – NOT what I said
      “any suggestion there are systemic problems is ‘hippy’ fantasy.” – NOT what I said
      “Abuse trumps thinking” – NOT what I said.

      I do agree with you though; your over-embellished word salad is worth about fivepence.

      “The jaded and liturgical language of simplistic left/right is anti-democratic cadre-country for shorthand dialogues of ideologues who forget how the average voter reacts to such jargon, and provide a hungry media with crude cudgels for obscuring the issues their masters do not want discused rationally”

      I should get that printed on a t-shirt. It’s hilarious.

      Reply
    • You never said a word.

      But you WROTE what I translated. More conomic growth, which is actually financially interpreted to suit the banking cartels and speculators.
      I’ve seen plenty of ‘economic growth’ in the past ten years. Where did it go?Into the pockets of the already wealthy.

      Not did ‘what you said’ resemble anything Nikolas wrote in his tendentious troll.
      Print the T-shirt. Amuse your buddies. Somehow I doubt you will.

      Reply
    • @ Damien, If you’re not going to discuss, why make a comment? Discussion is a two-way street. As for Orwell, have a read of this if you have a few minutes. Almost 70 years old but very relevant to what you’re doing here.
      https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/orwell46.htm

      Reply
    • So you are arguing against economic growth? At least that clarifies things.

      You should apply to a university for a grant to explore your theories.

      Reply
    • Thats not new to me, Nikolas. I posted it here recently myself. I’m quite happy to ‘discuss’. But when my point is dismissed with abuse, I will consider ulterior motivation.

      Which of THOSE words is too big?Ulterior?Motivation?My original statement remains relevant despite the decoy tactics.
      Media and language are central to any debate, as are definitions of terms. I’ve done my homework. Buy that dictionary.

      Reply
    • Damo, as an example of something I would see as what Ireland should be doing, would you be in favour of the recent Web Summit thing?

      Is it an affront to your anti-economic principles or do you see it as a good thing?

      Try not to respond with too many big words, I’ll get blocked from dictionary.com as an attempted DoS attack soon if I have to keep doing searches.

      Reply
    • @ Damien – I’ll leave you to it so. I’m obviously your intellectual inferior. I hope you don’t get lonely all the way up there.

      Reply
    • @arbitrasure
      I don’t need indoctrination by the offspring of the Manchester school of economics to understand what caused the 19th century famines, or the Chicago school to understand why the repeal of Glass Steagall brought back ’29/Depression conditions across the globe.

      Economic growth is a moveable feast, another ideological shibboleth of the Right(the ‘left’ have no monopoly on jaded jargon). There are more than one ways to econometrically measure such liquid phenomena. Lawyers, damned lawyers, and statisticians. I could give you a reading list, from Weimar inflation to The Big Short.

      Reply
    • With your fine reading pedigree, you must have acquired all this knowledge in order to devise a clear set of ideas of your own for what the best alternative path and framework should be for society.

      Care to illustrate briefly The Better Way and how we get there?

      And I mean a practical plan that a layman like me can grasp – and can relate to how the reality I see around me could better evolve in the coming years.

      Reply
    • ‘anti-economic’???

      How can I be anti-economic?I have a tight budget to manage, I need economic skills might baffle a few of your academic lecturers.
      I am totally pro the Web summit, and anything that promotes science and technology development, to say nothing of networking and communications. Its religious adherence to liturgical dogma of either left or right ideologues I find dangerous. I have taken an interests in the history of the various fascisms and their gestations. Propagandist, unexamined ideology is central. And our failed economic received wisdom is fat with such dogma.

      But I am not stupid enough to think that (science and technolgy growth)to be sufficient to solve economic anomalies that are open to abuse by the powerful against the general population.

      Reply
    • As Stephen Colbert would say Damien, apology accepted, I’m glad you are big enough to review your initial position and now agree with me that economic growth is indeed necessary.

      Seriously though, I do agree with you that a polarised left-right cartooning of politics has done great damage in other countries (like the US) where it is used as a swift censor of any alternative views.

      If you haven’t already read him, try Sun Tzu. You may find inspiration in there on how best the minnow that is Ireland might succeed best in the coming years.

      Reply
    • @Nikolas. I’ve plenty of company. Nor do I prefer the company of verbal gymnasts. Some complexities need the economics of precise language. I’m just about smart enough to know how little I know.
      @Arb
      My first comment was an attempt at just that. Try reading it again. Maybe it actually has content. The inclusivity is central.
      But our problems are global, and while national management is necessary, global change is vital. There are enormous corporate interests who prefer the staus quo(it fattens them). Its hard to be optimistic given the hominid aversion to the learning process other than as a self-serving mechanism.
      We need to re-examine the roots of our economic model and its inherent value assumptions. They are founded on war, imperial piracy of resources, and carefully nourished lies. Nikolas mentioned Orwell, a fine expositor of the dilemma.

      Reply
    • To expand your metaphorical minnow…

      ..there will not even be an oceanic biosphere if we don’t evolve above our narrow national identities and complete the human experiment nature has initiated.

      There is planet sized whale lodged on the beach of squeezing infinte growth from finite material combined to a false economy of upward distribution to a parasitic colony of financial gluttons armed to their nuclear teeth and straining for the final carve-up. They are on a 19th century Great Game plan, with technologies that caan close the biosphere, and we already into the sixth great extiction of species, anthropoid(thats us)driven.
      Crisis is a small word. It can go either way. The rat race is killing the human race..and most of it doesn’t know, because the corpo-rats run the media. And the hominids would rather not be disturbed by noticing. Thats how all fascisms thrive.

      Reply
    • “There are enormous corporate interests who prefer the staus quo(it fattens them)”

      Likewise, when change happens, as it inevitably does, there are, rapidly, new enormous corporate interests ready to replace the old ones. Disrupting the status quo merely allows new giants take control. And those new giants can be far more deeply invasive to the true liberty of mankind, and the homogenisation of thought.

      Apple, Google, Facebook – are they more or less dangerous to liberty and privacy than General Electric, IBM and Unilever?

      Wanting to change the status quo demand a well constructed plan for how you defeat ultimately making things worse than better.

      Reply
    • ‘..a well constructed plan..’ I do not have. As they say in Kerry when asked for directions…I would not recommend you start from here..’.

      But there are millions, and always have been, trying to remain human and further a human civilisation to replace the sophisticated savagery that currently masquerades in its cloak.
      In the end, maybe thats the only victory possible, maintaining your own humanity in the face of the gluttonous savagery and waste.
      I don’t do optimism. I prefer the real, as I perceive it. Try Ambrose Bierce’s Dictionary. Look up his definition of ‘land’.

      Reply
  • I got the numbers From TASC

    Reply
  • Adrian Grant’s new book, Irish Socialist Republicanism, 1909-36 is being launched in the Irish Labour History Museum, Beggars Bush, Haddington Road, Dublin – on Monday 5th Nov, at 6.30pm. See http://www.fourcourtspress.ie for additional details.

    Reply

Add New Comment