has anyone seen a ‘no’ poster yet?

So who’s money is funding the yes vote, and paying for posters, literature, etc etc etc .

The Judges in Irish courts are often politically motivated. Some are even married to Fianna Fail / Fine Gael Councillors.

Our money is but our legal system and government system are all corrupt!

Their are millions of vote yes posters all over the place and I haven’t seen one sign for the no side.

Now in government we are supposed to have an opposition, where is it?

Ill be voting no anyway and no matter what garbage the government try to fill us with I still simply do not trust them and definitely would not give them more rights over children.

http://www.change.org/petitions/supporting-the-irish-nation-step-down-from-government

I’m confused. Who funds the Irish referendum commission, is that not public money? Fine gale are running the government but would are they not be entitled to advocate a yes vote? As any other party could advocate a no vote. Unfortunately no other party have the balls to do so. I don’t think this article explains what the real issue is! I’m voting no.

If its children’s rights, why does the government have to become involved . This is a dangerous referendum with a lot of hidden agendas. Children have enough rights along with common law to protect them , lets uphold them first before any other changes

I don’t trust the government therefore I’m voting No? Idiots. Consider the issues and decide.

All you have to do is watch any of the program’s on tv on this debate to see that every so often they feel the need to go to a school that has children’s drawings on the wall of vote “yes” for happy child and “No” for a crying child and they zoom into these messages. Vote No!

I dont care who is funding it, This man is right it is a one sided campaign funded by the people, Sure we are all funding Mr.Quinn so why not a worthy cause!

Well said Terry. People are not aware what a yes bite entails. Europe are again bullyin our puppet politicians and they’re all running into line like sheep that they are. Shame

Have a read and don’t trust politicians. They got us here to where we are VOTE NO.

http://www.aps.ie/page8.php

Who’s finding this challenge? Opus Dei? I can smell there grubby fingers all over this.

I wonder who’s paying for this chaps court case?

cannot see my comments on fb.

The Referendum Commission uses state funding to provide a netural balanced view to the public via a dedicated website and an information booklet. I agree with this.
http://www.referendum2012.ie/

The Government is using state funding to provide a netural balanced view to the public via a deedicated website and an information booklet. I disagree with this.
http://www.childrensreferendum.ie/childrens-referendum-information-booklet

If this is fairplay I’m Pele!

When this plonker fails in the Supreme Court the folks in there need to be cognisant of the economic misery out here and ensure that the entirety of this mad challenge from a cost perspective is not put at my door from a Public Interest perspective!

The article might be better worded but the case wasn’t about government using public money. It was about the state using public money to promote a specific vote – in this case, a Yes vote. The High Court ruled that they didn’t push a Yes vote and that the material was neutral. The judge also found it pointless to block further publishing of the material considering the vast majority of them have already been delivered.

Fine Gael and one other organisation are using their own party money to fund the Yes campaign. They are not using public money to fund the campaign. Its also worth noting that the opposition are clearly not that bothered about the campaign and are just letting the government to do all the work. Not a single poster advising a Yes, not even from Fianna Fail. Very disappointing that those we elect are not even bothered to represent us unless they can score political points.

The Referendum Commission uses state funding to provide a netural balanced view to the public – and not to push either a Yes or No vote. The High Court found that it did not do either and paved the way for him to go to the Supreme Court to fight his case. To suggest that Europe are pushing this on us is completely daft and false. To suggest that a High Court judge is politically motivated is also false.

Is he on free legal aid?.

Higher than normal count of idiots on this thread