TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 7 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Shortall says reforms were “blocked” by Reilly

The former minister of state said her resignation was coming for some time.

Image: James Horan/Photocall Ireland

FORMER MINISTER OF STATE Róisín Shortall has said Minister for Health James Reilly “blocked” many of the health reform initiatives she worked on.

Speaking this morning on RTE’s Marian Finucane show, Shortall said a major contributing factor to her resignation was the difficulties she experienced with reforms she tried to bring about that Reilly did not agree with.

Shortall said “a number of initiatives” were blocked by the Minister for Health and she felt her effort was “completely wasted”.

“Why would you stay in work, if your boss doesn’t support you?” she said.

Hospital staff

Shortall said one particular incident where her reforms were blocked was in relation to increased staffing in hospitals for which the department had a €20 million allocation.

The former minister of state said black spots were identified and it was discovered that there were “huge variations in staff across country” particularly in areas of social deprivation.

On the eve of her announcement of proposals for staffing, Shortall said the minster’s advisor called her to tell her the reform would not go ahead for a number of reasons.

Vote of no confidence

Shortall revealed that she had considered resigning in July but tried to hold on as “there was a view that maybe James Reilly wouldn’t be around in the longer term”.

Speaking about her decision in the vote of no confidence in the Minister for Health she said:

I had to make a call on this. I had serious differences with James Reilly and his ability to manage the health service. I believe he was going in a totally different direction.

The former minister of state said her inclination was to vote no but said that would have been a “one day wonder” and instead she used the opportunity and her speech to highlight some of her concerns.

Labour party

When asked if she felt let down by Labour, Shortall said she hadn’t been supported and that was why she resigned from the party.

“There’s a certain closing of ranks and certain attempts to smear you,” she added.

Shortall also said she felt as though Tánaiste Eamon Gilmore had ultimately backed James Reilly over her when she brought her concerns to him.

“If the Labour party isn’t about the allocation of resource based on need than what is it about?” she said.

When asked if she thought the addition to a list of two primary care centres in Reilly’s constituency was “stroke politics”, Shortall agreed that it was.

Read: Shortall won’t get ministerial pension – so she receives €33,100 severance>
In full: Róisín Shortall’s resignation statement>

Read next:

Comments (66 Comments)

  • So much for ‘Labour’s Way’! Indeed so much for the Programme for Government as well. For the Health Service it’s ‘Reilly’s Way or the Highway’. Ms Shortall has chosen the Highway and Labour has chosen the ‘Reilly Way’

    These are the ‘New Politics’ Enda told us about!!! Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

    Reply
    • Reilly is a pushy, bombastic, non cuddly kinda guy……just whats needed to tackle the behemoth that is the HSE! Shortall bottled it and threw a hissy fit….and yes….she has been carrying that chip since she lost out on a senior job. She should go away and join the looney Mingers and be done with it!

      Reply
    • Clearly she couldn’t get it into her head that she was a Junior Minister, not co-minister.
      Her ego, and bitterness at operating at a junior level with the responsibilities that requires, destroyed her.
      Any organisation requires roles and hierarchy in order to operate and deliver.

      It is ridiculous how much waffle and chatter there is on this issue. I wish she would just go away quietly now that she has put her own pride before the good of the country.

      Reilly better start illuminating his achievements to the electorate. The rabble are more concerned with destabilising the government than allowing any program to succeed. The Irish do love to fight amongst themselves rather than get organised. No wonder our history is so peppered with invaders; so easily conquering the island of fueding chieftans and drunken peasants.

      Reply
    • Spot on Sean !

      Reply
  • It’s kinda hard to take this in. She votes confidence in Reilly, resigns a short time later because (presumably) of Reilly’s stroke politics. Now she tells us her resignation was more to do with the lack of Labour support. This means Labour in government are for even more privatisation of health care in Ireland with all that that entails, and we know Reilly want’s to hand the health service over to private insurance companies.

    Roisin asks a pointed question: “If the Labour party isn’t about the allocation of resource based on need then what is it about?”

    Over to you Eamon.

    Reply
  • fair play to her. the only one in the labour party with a back bone

    Reply
  • No matter what side of the Reilly / shorthall fence you’re on her being free to speak about the whole thing is probably the best chance we have to find out what they’re at up in the big smoke…

    Reply
  • Looks like she discovered at an early stage alright that Reilly’s agenda and that what was agreed as a programme for Government,jointly between the Coalition Parties, were just not the same.

    Reilly clearly has an agenda , from what Roisin stated, to introduce a pay or lie down ,suffer and die, medical system, which will be redesigned by him & his FG colleagues, to leave the poorer in our society to be neglected.

    In fairness to him , does he not represent the view of any far right wing political party in this philosophy?

    What must sicken her most , I’m sure , is that her Labour colleagues supported his policy over hers – shame on you Labour!

    Reply
    • I think you’re hitting on the issue exactly here. All this talk of Shorthall speaking up earlier/confidence vote etc is pretty moot IMO. The bottom line is that there is (was?) a programme for government and a clash between ministers’ party values. The whole sour grapes argument also appears moot – whether Shorthall has been bitter about a Junior ministry doesn’t appear to be the point – she has only spoken in pure political terms, not personal feelings.

      I think between now and the result of the next election, this particular farce may actually be something that people look back on as a pivotal point for this coalition.
      That is of course unless they manage to slap the voting public hard enough in the face with some other cut/tax situation that might actually wake people up to just how harsh things are going to get.

      Reply
  • I dont follow either party,but i believe she was shafted…Big Time…

    Reply
  • They don’t want reform, they want privitisation so they can give it to their criminal vested interests. It a neoliberal agenda and its the same in all effected nations across Europe. Just look at the situation in England where some of the Tories biggest donors were given billions of NHS contracts in the breakup of their health service. Its a massive con job carried out by white collar criminals.

    Reply
  • Bruce 29/09/12 #

    I listened to the interview and it is clear she was shafted by Gilmore.

    Not surprising since power is more important than principle for Gilmore.

    Anyway Roisin you have the upper hand. Prove it by refusing your ministerial pension.

    Reply
  • The wrong Minister resigned.

    Reply
  • My respect for her is there and it is clear she was abandoned. I know what it is like to work in a place and try to point glaring inequalities only to have no support. I too left because I was not supported. If I turned a blind eye and just did lip service like everyone else I could have stayed but Principals are such that you either live by them or you don’t. Either way your conscience will decide. I respect her very much for what she did and I hope that other Labour Td’s follow suit. It is the only way they will salvage any support in future to go now because staying in government with Fianna Gael is doing them damage on a daily basis.

    Reply
  • @David, she was not a minister for education or social affairs. Her brief was health.

    Reply
  • Nice to see all the Fine Gael and Labour Shills posting comments.

    This government are worse than Fianna Fail!

    Reply
    • The only person who could would have the neck to make such a suggestion would be a Fianna Fáil supporter – and they have some necks. Fianna Fáil have to rely on the collective memory loss of the entire electorate.

      Reply
    • No, they are the very same!

      Reply
    • Ryan'O 29/09/12 #

      Wrong Patrick, I agree with true Ireland and I’m an Ex FG voter. Eat them apples come next election!

      Reply
    • @Ryan – that statement gets made a lot on comments on thejournal. I’d love to hear what posters of such comments would like the make-up of the next government to be and would you expect anything to be different?

      I expect the next election will actually be tight – the only way things would actually change in this country is if people actually started to shout it out what they want and demand it. But that won’t happen so those who shifted their traditional FF vote last time around will probably give them a chance again this election. Martin has IMO done something of a decent job in opposition and has rarely opened the door to being accused in the Dail of being told “sure your party put us here”.

      I’m sure this will get red thumbs but I suspect that’ll be more because people don’t like the idea of FF returning rather than that they expect this won’t happen.

      Reply
  • Fair play to her! She has done the professional thing by resigning from her post. She would be foolish to support a failed business man trying to line his pockets from the crumbling health care system. His ways of saving money so far has been to keep the recruitment ban. This means agency workers have to be employed to keep services rolling over ( mostly young graduates). This costs the HSE significantly more as 15% of their salary goes to a recruitment agency i.e. private investors. This niche market has been expanded by the inability of the HSE to recruit new staff. Please stop this practice Mr Reilly!

    Reply
  • I think the way Roisin shorthall has been treated by labour has really shown them up for the charlatans they really are.

    Reply
  • Idiots have you never heard of principles she was elected as a labour candidate and unlike the rest of them bar nultey broughan she stuck to labour principles. She had no choice without selling out

    Reply
  • Anyone here, ever hear of a bad boss or a boss serving their own interests. For Example, Sean Quinn, Wallace,Lowry, Haughey,Ahern and I could go on? I would like to see all the parties wiped out in an Election and new people or parties brought in. But Shortall was shafted, by the power hungry labour. If they backed her, they wouldnt have qualified for their pensions!

    Reply
  • It’s either get my big fat juicy pension and milk it for as much as I can way or the have morals and principles way. an easy choice for Gilmore and his Labour ministers methinks!

    Reply
  • wait till budget comes in, then we will see the government fall like a house of cards, wont last past mid 2013

    Reply
  • Was she looking to increase frontline staff or pencil pushers??? Because it’s her party protecting the pencil pushers in the Croke Park Agreement.

    Reply
  • That picture is scary …….

    Reply
  • Should have resigned earlier so. There was never any doubt that Reilly would be given the firm support by the government parties, regardless, and she would have known that. She was so disheartened by the whole thing she then decided to keep going anyway and voted with confidence. If her speech was supposed to make a difference, than she didn’t give it much time to settle.

    James Reilly is a Senior Government Minister in one of the worst positions you could possibly be given and was never going to be booted out because a Senior Ministerial resignation would rock the government. Fianna Fail seem to know it all and have solutions, despite being the ones in the power and having people in the post for centuries who failed just as much as Reilly appears to be doing now. Reilly makes some valid points re: Croke Park being a major problem in terms of fixing the health service. I like the proposal for primary health care units also. But is he doing enough?

    Could he do more, quicker? What was wrong with increasing staff as per Shortall proposal? I doubt we will ever know, but I suspect there are two sides to the story. Its been less than two years and I don’t think its fair to suggest the health service be turned around even slightly within such a tight timeframe. Movement is being made. Leave him at it, see how it goes. Maybe this pressure will move things on.

    Reply
    • We are also forgetting that there seemed to be sour grapes since day one. If I recall correctly, everyone expected Shortall to be given a much bigger position and she didn’t get it. Not a great way to enter government – already disillusioned with her party colleagues and now not having as much control throughout her brief tenure in Health.

      Reply
    • I must say if the funds were diverted at the last minute then maybe Rielly caved in, so far he is as bad as myself and I have no political experience. Remember he held Harney to ransom for years in this dept so he was then and now part of the foot dragging. Its time for Enda to re-shuffle or Eamon to shuffle off to ask the country to approve this back sliding policy of this inept government. Reform is not much use if its out of date by the time its implemented, remember F.F.&GP

      Reply
  • Why is the severance pay available if you volentarily resign I hope she refuses to take it, then we can believe she has really got “principles” as distinct from “princible”.

    Reply
  • Regardless of how one believes her resignation to reflect on Shortall herself, the Labour Party’s treatment of her carries far more weight than what is, essentially, a departmental spat. The ostracization by Gilmore and his subordinates of one of their own in the name of preserving their position in government has been immensely damaging to the coalition as a whole, and belies a seriously skewed sense of priority on the part of the party leadership.
    http://perspectivesbyjack.blogspot.ie/

    Reply
  • Its odd is it not that the great Labour Hero of the morning Roisin Shortall didn’t resign over cuts to Welfare or Education or Carers or SNAs or OAPs or any other cuts and savage austerity measures but when James Reilly tells her that he’s the Minister and as his junior she should do whats she’s told she’s out the door and all over the media.<<<< I'm just going to look up how you spell Hypocrisy ..

    Reply
  • She didn’t like the boss so she left the job. Her call.

    Reply
  • Shorthall get over yourself, you just an attention seeker who was never happy just getting a junior post. Hope we don’t see you in politics again.

    Reply
  • Shorthall was annoyed from day one that she was not made a minister. She resented playing second fiddle to anybody. Time will show her what a gig mistake she has made. She is very bitter.

    Reply
    • She hasn’t said anything to suggest that – but it has been pretty obvious that she was abandoned by her own party.

      Reply
    • Patrick, that is a diversion.the real isss are two.one, the sudden pulling of ring fenced money by Reilly and secondly his privatisation agenda, which stands to benefit members of his party.

      Reply
    • Looks like you’ve fallen hook, line and sinker for the Labour leadership spin. They’ll put anything out there to blacken Shorthall if it helps cement their position. There is no evidence whatsoever that this had anything to do with her decision or that she resented being junior minister.. The meeting with Kenny and Gilmore backs up her account that it was down to the boarish Reilly’s attitude and vision for a private system that would not benefit ordinary people.

      Reply
  • What would happen if my boss failed to implement my recommendations? Would I get sympathy from my work colleagues if I resigned because the boss did not accede to my demands.

    Reply
    • She was attempting to implement the Programme for Government, not just some random thought that ran through her head. Reilly has and is obstructing the implementation of that programme.

      Reply
  • The real question here is… does her resignation mean that we will be able to continue to buy moderately priced booze not?

    Reply
  • Betty
    This is politics, the art of the possible.
    Labour are the junior party in a coalition so their “principles” are always going to come second best when push comes to shove.
    The big payoff will come as a comfort though.

    Reply
  • We should be encouraging that sort of victim treatment of a health system that doesn’t work..

    Reply

Add New Comment