TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 3 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Romney says risk in Middle East has increased under Obama

In a wide-ranging foreign policy speech, Mitt Romney argued the case for supporting countries who would arm Syria’s rebels.

Mitt Romney gives a foreign policy speech at Virginia Military Institute earlier today.
Mitt Romney gives a foreign policy speech at Virginia Military Institute earlier today.
Image: Evan Vucci/AP

THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE for US president, Mitt Romney, has said the risk of conflict in the Middle East “is higher now” than it was when President Barack Obama took office – proposing that the US take a more assertive role in Syria.

In a wide-ranging speech on foreign policy, Romney claimed Obama’s withdrawal of troops from Iraq has jeopardised US interests in the Middle East and wider world.

Declaring that “it’s time to change course in the Middle East” and accusing Obama of “passivity,” the Republican presidential nominee called for the US to work with other countries to arm the Syrian rebels to help them defeat President Bashar Assad’s “tanks, helicopters and fighter jets”.

Romney aides said he is not calling for the US to directly arm the rebels, but said he would support helping other countries provide the opposition with enough weaponry to force Assad from power.

Romney said American gains in Iraq — won during the war started by President George W. Bush — have eroded. “America’s ability to influence events for the better in Iraq has been undermined by the abrupt withdrawal of our entire troop presence,” he said.

In a speech at the Virginia Military Institute, Romney looked to paint the Democratic incumbent as a weak leader who has limited America’s influence on global affairs.

Obama’s campaign dismissed the Republican challenger’s address as a rehashed attempt to rewrite what they said is his record of past blunders and said he hardly differentiated himself from the president.

US should wield power ‘wisely, with solemnity’

While Romney took a hawkish tone during the GOP primaries this year, today’s address highlighted the work of “patriots of both parties” and looked to cast the Republican nominee as a statesman and part of a long and bipartisan tradition of American leadership in the world.

He said the U.S. should use its power “wisely, with solemnity and without false pride, but also firmly and actively.”

In the speech, Romney emphasised Iran’s ties to the Syrian government and insisted that the US, through allies, should “support the many Syrians who would deliver that defeat to Iran rather than sitting on the sidelines.”

This would allow the US to “develop influence with those forces in Syria that will one day lead a country that sits at the heart of the Middle East”, he said.

Romney also called for tougher sanctions on Iran than those that exist, though he did not say how he would strengthen them. He said he would condition aid to Egypt on continued support for its peace treaty with neighbouring Israel. Current law already includes such a condition.

The Republican nominee also emphasised his commitment to a two-state solution for peace between the Israelis and Palestinians, a process he dismissed during a secretly videotaped fundraiser in May. He also criticised the administration for its handling of the attacks in Benghazi, Libya.

“As the administration has finally conceded, these attacks were the deliberate work of terrorists who use violence to impose their dark ideology on others,” Romney said.

Read: Observers give Romney the victory in first US presidential debate

More: Obama mocks his own debate fiasco

Read next:

Comments (40 Comments)

  • How are the polls looking? Is it time to start building a fallout shelter in the garden?

    Reply
  • mike 08/10/12 #

    The risk of conflict in the middle east is usually caused by the US sticking its nose in other countries affers years before.

    Reply
    • @Mike,

      Romney is an idiot! There will always be conflict between certain rich countries in the world especially when each one thinks that their religion is true and they try and push it down vulnerable people’s necks.

      I say down with religion! Cause of most wars started in the world. Why can’t people pray to their own god inside their own front doors.

      Reply
  • eoghan 08/10/12 #

    I hope this Romney guy doesn’t get elected he is the same as bush he will be bush the third

    Reply
  • A scare-mongering republican. Shocker.

    Reply
  • Good to hear him praise the US allies in the middle east, those bastions of democracy, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Qatar. Lets hope if this moron gets elected that it coincides with the first shuttles to colonize Mars cause my seat is reserved.

    Reply
  • There’s not really much Romney can say about foreign policy and I don’t think he can make a dent on Obama in that respect. If the operation rescuing Captain Richard Phillips or the killing of Bin Laden had gone wrong Obama’s credentials would’ve been ruined but since they didn’t, he’s largely untouchable on foreign policy. Romney will have to comfortably defeat Obama in the townhall debate to lessen his likely defeat in the final, foreign policy debate.

    I should add though that with all the mentions of warmongering and George W Bush, I refuse to believe that Irish people are so naive as to think that Obama is squeaky clean in that respect. According to an article in the LA Times today (http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-drone-legal-20121009,0,3639057.story) the US has launched 284 drone missile strikes in Pakistan (46 under Bush) and 49 in Yemen (1 under Bush). Considering the collateral damage such strikes cause it’s interesting that people seemingly hate Guantanamo Bay for the detention of suspects but see nothing wrong with them being killed from the sky – usually alongside crowds of innocent people – instead.

    Now obviously I don’t think an elected Romney would curtail such strikes but this Republican = bad, Democrat = good narrative is overly simplistic.

    Reply
  • Read a really interesting article in the New Scientist. In summary, research on past election patterns & other data give Obama has a 75% chance of winning versus Romney 25% – despite how close the polls are.

    This is reflected in bookies odds. For example, Paddy Power gives…

    - OBAMA 2/7 odds (payback of €127 on a €100 bet.)
    - ROMNEY 5/2 (payback of €350 on a €100)

    Reply
  • Romney must be having a joke…
    Bush showed by invading Iraq how powerless they can be. He invested huge amount of capital and manpower and showed that the US will not stomach another invasion so readilly. Especially when that invasion was based on numerious lies.

    Then look at Obama. He killed Osama, simple as, he didn’t care about which country you are in, he rightly or wrongly made the statement that no where is safe if you screw with us.
    Then look at Libya, he took a stand and helped throw out a cruel dictator without investing any ground troops. He helped change a country to democracy without any outlay…

    Obama has not got involved in Syria just yet because he had no mandate through UN. Russia and China are taking sides with Iran and Obama is being careful not to get involved in a strung out war. But now Syria has attacked Turkey. If Obama wasn’t in an election he might have dipped his toe in…

    The US could take a low level bombing with no fly zone and bombing major troop and artillery movements… The rebels could solve the rest…

    Interesting but Obama hold the cards and Romney is a joke…

    Reply
  • Will they ever learn?

    Reply
  • More the cause of George Bush Jr

    Reply
  • Why can’t we be as passionate about the state of Ireland’s political system as we are about America’s?

    Reply
  • Might stick a bet on Romney winning.

    Reply
  • B Lowe 08/10/12 #

    He should have listened to his countries founding father, George Washington and keep his nose out of the middle east. The US is an imperialist country and the complete definition of a hypocrite. I mean the US is now arming, supporting and financing Al Qaeda terrorists in Syria just as it did in Libya.
    Current US system makes me sick to the core. If I was a citizen of that country I would be ashamed.

    Reply
  • The world is a safer place without gun-slinging American Republicans. I trust the vast majority of Americans don’t want another war to break out with the U.S in the middle of it. That being said word has it that the U.S. have made more money from invading other countries than Apple have selling iPhones!!

    Reply
  • republicans have a really bad record when it comes to arming rebels/dictators.
    or maybe there in it for the sales figures

    Reply
  • The only thing Bush gained in Iraq is American dead bodies . If Mitt wants to defend Syria let him put on a uniform and get a gun and go out there himself instead of sending young men and women to do his dirty work and pay the ultimate price .

    Reply
  • Mitt Romney has some neck talking about foreign policy. Also, has he missed the Arab Spring? More countries turning to democracy, I just think Mr Romney isn’t happy with the Islamists being elected in free and fair elections. God help the world if this man gets elected.

    Reply
  • Risk in the ME will never decrease so of course it’s worse now than 4 years ago.

    Reply
  • America has a death wish, not just starting with Bush’s reaction to 9/11 in Iraqi war and the Taliban, but before than. Those who curse Israel by placing Her on the table of negotiations for a people sworn to terrorize and murder every Jew in Israel, have made their county vulnerable to the Arab themselves.
    America boasts in her power over the world, yet America owes billions! America’s deficit had weakened her so that another attack much bigger than 9/11 is imminent.

    Reply
    • No one cares Israel isn’t even your country.

      Reply
    • You are right that no one here cares about Israel and that you would say it’s not my country anyway…. Do you think that I have come here in a delusion that the members here would even give “a damn” about Israel? Of course not, duh! I have come here knowing full well the implications of my posts, and that everyone has a good laugh every time they read. I am so glad for your honesty about your anti-Semitic and anti-Israel position! Israel is the most peaceful place in the world to be, and it is their Arab neighboring countries that have made the Middle East the most violent place on the planet! But there sits little Israel thriving and powerful. :) Why? Because Israel is the L-RD’s and their rightful owners care so beautifully for Her. Oh yeah Israel has one place that is such a stench. This place has violence, bloodshed, their leaders starve their people, disease, and filth are what identifies this place, and it is called Gaza. One day we Jews will make that place beautiful as it is meant to be and there is nothing any foreigner can do to change that. Nothing!

      Reply
    • I’m not anti Semitic. I just disagree with oppression. It has nothing to do with race or religion we’re all human. Something the Israelian gov’t doesn’t seem to comprehend unfortunately. And how could I be racist to you anyway. You’re a European peasant/emmigrant. Come home

      Reply
    • Yes, Vinnie, of course you would say that about my Israel. Israel welcomes the foreigner and alien when they comply Israeli law, but as we all know “Pakestinian” are lawless and rebellious human beings who would promote terrorism. They want a another Nation(State) in a Nation that is for Israel. It would be interesting to see what Ireland would do if the foreigners come in and say they want half of Ireland by making a new Nation and then seek terrorize and murder the citizens of Ireland so they can have their own Nation. All war would break loose because that would never be allowed, but of course, you hypocrite, would say Israel has to live with different standards then any free Nation, because you say so!? Duh. You are too comfortable! You are anti-Semitic, for what you want for Israel shows your hate and disrespect for the right of the Jews to have what has always been theirs.

      Reply
  • No surprise there with Mohammed Obummer, I mean Obama! Yet, the nature of presidential elections is bashing one another. Any president who calls for Israel to give land to terrorists are all bad in my book! Every US president, and yes even Romney will all do the same! I vote for no one! They are all bad!

    Reply

Add New Comment